Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 274: 160-165, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35653905

RESUMO

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) combines the advantages of vaginal surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Feasibility of vNOTES for other indications such as hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy and myomectomy has been established. In this article, we describe a standardised step by step process to perform adnexal surgery by vNOTES.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Miomectomia Uterina , Anexos Uterinos/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Histerectomia Vaginal , Vagina/cirurgia
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 263: 216-222, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237485

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The first ever report of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynaecological was reported in 2012. There has been an exponential uptake of the number of surgeons performing such procedures worldwide with no official guidance to ensure the safe implementation of this technique into gynaecological practice due its recency. The objective of this study is to report an international consensus-based statement to help guide a basis for adopting vNOTES into clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: The consensus-based statement was developed amongst 39 international experts using the Delphi methodology over three successive rounds. Consensus was pre-defined as an agreement of 80% or more by the experts. Consensus sought over eight key concepts pertaining to vNOTES including patient selection, perioperative management, surgical technique, instruments, anatomy, training, registries and trials and definition of the surgical technique. Recommendations from an expert anaesthetist and urogynaecologist were also sought to give a broader perspective with respect to the implementation of vNOTES. RESULTS: Fifty nine international surgeons were invited to participate and 39 (66%) agreed to participate based on being involved in a minimum of 20 vNOTES procedures. They were from 13 countries across 5 continents (Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Asia). Participation was 100% on all three rounds. Overall, consensus was reached in 50 of the 56 questions (89%) with the remaining 6 questions where consensus was not reached pertaining to the domain of patient selection. CONCLUSION: An international expert based vNOTES statement is presented here to help guide adoption of vNOTES based on the experience of early adopters. Consensus was achieved on most components of this consensus statement. Given the recency of this technique, until high-level evidence becomes available, this statement provides an appropriate guidance to the safe implementation of vNOTES into gynaecological practice.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Ásia , Austrália , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 256: 221-224, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248377

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynaecological indications. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3) in a non-university teaching hospital. One thousand consecutive patients (2013-2018) who were eligible for vNOTES approach to benign gynaecological surgery were included. RESULTS: Patient data and perioperative outcomes were included for analysis after the vNOTES surgical approach was standardized and made the default route of surgery. Of the 1000 vNOTES cases performed during this study period, hysterectomy (73%) was the most common followed by adnexal surgery (18%) and salpingectomy (4%). The mean age of the patient cohort was 46 yrs of age (22-83) and mean BMI, 26 kg/m2(16.5-52). There was a conversion rate of 0.4% (4 cases), 3 to conventional laparoscopy and 1 to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 42 minutes (14-250 minutes). The total complication rate was 3.9% (39) of which 1% (10) was intraoperative complications and 2.9% (29) were post-operative complications. When the hysterectomy cohort was sub analyzed, the total complication rate was 5.2% in this group (intraoperative 1.4% and post-operative 3.8%) with only a 0.4% complication rate in the non-hysterectomy sub-group. Of the complications in the hysterectomy group there were 9 cystotomies (1.2%). The mean specimen weight for all hysterectomies was 172 g (20-3361 g) with an average operating time of 46 minutes (20-250). CONCLUSION: The perioperative outcomes of this large vNOTES case series for benign gynaecological indications is comparable to other vNOTES procedures reported in the literature apart from the risk of cystotomy which is a hysterectomy specific risk. The outcomes are that of a single high-volume surgeon incorporating cases within his respective learning curve of the surgical technique and as such should be interpreted accordingly. Since 2015 the International NOTES Society has initiated a prospective complication database where all vNOTES surgeons are invited to register their cases.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Vagina/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA