RESUMO
GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy with consecutive esophagogastroduodenoscopy (CCEGD) can be more convenient than performing each procedure individually. There has been no randomized controlled trial comparing carbon dioxide (CO2) versus air insufflations during CCEGD in sedated patients. CO2 insufflation instead of air during CCEGD may reduce abdominal pain and be more comfortable. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during CCEGD in moderately sedated outpatients. STUDY: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. A total of 96 outpatients were randomly assigned to the groups of CO2 or air insufflation. Postprocedure pain was assessed using a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale, and the proportion of pain-free patients was compared between the groups. Waist circumferences and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were measured. RESULTS: Among 96 patients, cecal intubation failed in 2 patients, who were excluded from the analysis. Forty-eight patients in the CO2 and 46 patients in the air group completed the study. There was significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the proportion of pain-free patients 30 minutes after the procedures [air group, 35/46 (76.1%) vs. CO2 group, 44/48 (91.6%)] (P=0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion at 6 and 24 hours after the procedures. The mean increase in waist circumference was greater with air than with CO2 (1.54 vs. 0.18 cm, P<0.001). The ETCO2 measured immediately after the procedures was slightly higher in the CO2 group than in the air group (38.6 vs. 37.2 mm Hg, P=0.02), but the values were within the normal range. No significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 insufflation during CCEGD reduced postprocedural pain and distension compared with air. It was comfortable and safe to use in moderately sedated outpatients.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono/administração & dosagem , Dióxido de Carbono/efeitos adversos , Colonoscopia/métodos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Insuflação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Circunferência da Cintura , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We report a case of pediatric acute megakaryocytic leukemia (AMKL) showing 48,XX,+21,+21 as a sole acquired cytogenetic abnormality without the mutation of GATA1 gene. A physical examination showed a phenotypically normal female. Bone marrow findings showed diffuse infiltration of leukemic blasts having scanty cytoplasm with budding blebs and prominent nucleoli, which were negative for myeloperoxide (MPO) stain, Sudan black B stain and periodic acid-Schiff stain. Immunophenotyping of leukemic cells revealed positive expression of CD34, CD13, CD33, CD117, CD41, CD61, CD7 and negative expression of TdT, anti-MPO, CD64, CD56, CD2, CD3, CD5, CD10, CD19, CD20 and CD22. A fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed four distinct AML1 signals in 284 of 300 interphase nuclei. The entire six exons of the GATA1 gene (7757bp) were directly sequenced. We could not find any mutations, including known polymorphisms, which are known to be involved in transient myeloproliferative disorder and acute megakaryocytic leukemia of Down syndrome. After achieving complete remission, the tetrasomy 21 disappeared.