Assessing different brain oxygenation components in elderly patients under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients undergoing pathophysiological changes necessitate clinical tools for cerebral monitoring. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to explore how cerebral monitoring using Δo2Hbi, ΔHHbi, and ΔcHbi manifests in elderly patients under either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, randomization. SETTING: A single tertiary hospital (Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea). PATIENTS: Enrolled 100 patients scheduled for urologic surgery under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were (a) age 70-80 years, (b) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. INTERVENTION: Patients were double-blind randomized to receive propofol-based or sevoflurane anesthesia. Cerebral oximetry-related parameters were measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in a setting devoid of surgery-related factors. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome focused on the Δo2Hbi pattern in the left and right sides within the propofol and sevoflurane groups. MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 100 patients, 50 patients in each group. In the propofol group, the left Δo2Hbi decreased from 1.4 (3.7) at 5 min to -0.1 (1.8) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo2Hbi decreased from 2.9 (4.2) at 5 min to -0.06 (2.3) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). In the sevoflurane group, the left Δo2Hbi decreased from 1.1 (3.4) at 5 min to -1.4 (4.4) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo2Hbi decreased from 2.0 (3.2) at 5 min to -1.2 (3.9) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups. ΔHHbi did not exhibit significant changes after an initial decrease at 5 min and showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In cerebral oximetry, Δo2Hbi and ΔHHbi could emerge as a valuable approach for discerning changes in the underlying baseline status of the brain in elderly patients during anesthesia.

A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study.

Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVisionTM system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze correlations between the NRS and the current perception threshold (CPT), pain equivalent current (PEC), and quantified pain degree (QPD). Methods: Medical records of 398 subjects who visited the pain clinic in a university hospital from March 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the pain degree, NRS, CPT, PEC, and QPD were measured. Subjects were categorized into two groups: the Pain group (n = 355) and the No-pain group (n = 43). Results: The NRS showed a negative correlation with CPT (R = -0.10, p = 0.054) and a positive correlation with QPD (R = 0.13, p = 0.008). Among various diseases, only spinal disease patients showed a negative correlation between CPT and NRS (R = -0.22, p = 0.003). Additionally, there were significant differences in CPT and QPD between the Pain and No-pain groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: CPT and QPD measured using the PainVisionTM system could be used to estimate pain intensity and the presence of pain. These parameters would be considered useful for predicting pain itself and its intensity.

Predictive Ability of Perfusion Index for Determining the Success of Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The perfusion index (PI) is an objective method used to determine a successful nerve block. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic ability of the PI for a successful adductor canal nerve block (ACB) and suggest the optimal PI cut-off value for predicting a block. METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study and enrolled a total of 39 patients. The patients were dichotomized into successful and inappropriate ACB groups according to the results of the sensation tests. The PI value, Pleth variability index (PVi) value, and heart rate were recorded one minute before the block, at the time of the block, and one to 30 min after the block at one-minute intervals. Delta (dPI), which was defined as the difference in PI value from the baseline (the value one minute before the block), was the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to determine the dPI prognostic accuracy and optimal cut-off value. RESULTS: Successful ACB was achieved in 33 patients, while ACB was inappropriate in six patients. The dPI showed significant differences between the two groups under the time interval measured (p = 0.001). The dPI at 5 and 20 min showed good prognostic ability for a successful block, with optimal cut-off values of 0.33 (AUROC: 0.725, 95% CI 0.499-0.951) and 0.64 (AUROC: 0.813, 95% CI 0.599-1.000), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dPI is an effective predictor of successful ACB. The suggested dPI cut-off values at 5 and 20 min were below 0.33 and 0.64, respectively.