Indications for lateral lymph node dissection in patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A case report and review of the literature.

The optimal surgical indications for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are controversial. Generally, treatment guidelines for rectal NETs >2 cm or with potential lymph node (LN) metastasis recommend formal oncologic low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME). However, rectal NETs have the potential to metastasize to the lateral lymph nodes (LLNs). To the best of our knowledge, there are no detailed reports in English on LLN metastasis from rectal NETs. A 47-year-old man diagnosed with a rectal NET underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The pathological diagnosis was NET G1. The tumor was 10 mm in diameter, and the tumor depth reached the submucosal layer. A period of 3 years after ESD, the patient was diagnosed with LN metastasis in the mesorectum and LLN metastasis on the left side from the NET. Robotic TME and bilateral LN dissection were performed. The pathological findings indicated that two of the 18 LNs in the mesorectum were metastatic, and all the LLNs on the left side were negative. In contrast, 1 of the 6 LLNs on the right side was metastatic. Early-stage rectal NETs can metastasize to the LLNs, and it is very difficult to detect LLN metastasis based on size alone. TME alone may be insufficient to treat rectal NETs, and additional LLN dissection may be an important treatment strategy. However, it is increasingly difficult to determine the surgical indications for optimally timed LLN dissection.

Robotic surgical procedure for diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the rectum: A case report.

Diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the rectum (DCHR) is a relatively rare benign vascular disease. DCHR is marked by recurrent bleeding and anemia, and it is difficult to diagnose correctly. Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old man diagnosed with DCHR by colonoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography. The patient underwent a robot-assisted anterior abdominal excision and subsequently recovered well from the surgery. Ileostomy closure was performed 3 months after surgery. Eight months after surgery, he had no evidence of rectal bleeding, and his defecation function was good, with no fecal incontinence. Regardless of the characteristics of DCHR and the susceptible age of DCHR, it is important to diagnose DCHR correctly as soon as possible and to treat it without a permanent colostomy. Robot-assisted resection may be a good option for the treatment of DCHR.