Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Genomics ; 6: 147, 2005 Oct 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16253144

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Global mRNA amplification has become a widely used approach to obtain gene expression profiles from limited material. An important concern is the reliable reflection of the starting material in the results obtained. This is especially important with extremely low quantities of input RNA where stochastic effects due to template dilution may be present. This aspect remains under-documented in the literature, as quantitative measures of data reliability are most often lacking. To address this issue, we examined the sensitivity levels of each transcript in 3 different cell sample sizes. ANOVA analysis was used to estimate the overall effects of reduced input RNA in our experimental design. In order to estimate the validity of decreasing sample sizes, we examined the sensitivity levels of each transcript by applying a novel model-based method, TransCount. RESULTS: From expression data, TransCount provided estimates of absolute transcript concentrations in each examined sample. The results from TransCount were used to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between transcript concentrations for different sample sizes. The correlations were clearly transcript copy number dependent. A critical level was observed where stochastic fluctuations became significant. The analysis allowed us to pinpoint the gene specific number of transcript templates that defined the limit of reliability with respect to number of cells from that particular source. In the sample amplifying from 1000 cells, transcripts expressed with at least 121 transcripts/cell were statistically reliable and for 250 cells, the limit was 1806 transcripts/cell. Above these thresholds, correlation between our data sets was at acceptable values for reliable interpretation. CONCLUSION: These results imply that the reliability of any amplification experiment must be validated empirically to justify that any gene exists in sufficient quantity in the input material. This finding has important implications for any experiment where only extremely small samples such as single cell analyses or laser captured microdissected cells are available.


Assuntos
Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Técnicas Genéticas , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Análise de Variância , Sequência Conservada , Primers do DNA/química , DNA Complementar/metabolismo , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Biblioteca Gênica , Células HeLa , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , RNA/metabolismo , RNA Neoplásico/metabolismo , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
2.
BMC Genomics ; 4(1): 11, 2003 Mar 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12659661

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A limiting factor of cDNA microarray technology is the need for a substantial amount of RNA per labeling reaction. Thus, 20-200 micro-grams total RNA or 0.5-2 micro-grams poly (A) RNA is typically required for monitoring gene expression. In addition, gene expression profiles from large, heterogeneous cell populations provide complex patterns from which biological data for the target cells may be difficult to extract. In this study, we chose to investigate a widely used mRNA amplification protocol that allows gene expression studies to be performed on samples with limited starting material. We present a quantitative study of the variation and noise present in our data set obtained from experiments with either amplified or non-amplified material. RESULTS: Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple hypothesis testing, we estimated the impact of amplification on the preservation of gene expression ratios. Both methods showed that the gene expression ratios were not completely preserved between amplified and non-amplified material. We also compared the expression ratios between the two cell lines for the amplified material with expression ratios between the two cell lines for the non-amplified material for each gene. With the aid of multiple t-testing with a false discovery rate of 5%, we found that 10% of the genes investigated showed significantly different expression ratios. CONCLUSION: Although the ratios were not fully preserved, amplification may prove to be extremely useful with respect to characterizing low expressing genes.


Assuntos
DNA Complementar/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/métodos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos/estatística & dados numéricos , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Análise de Variância , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , RNA Neoplásico/genética , Células Tumorais Cultivadas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA