Dose-finding study of weekly 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil associated with alternating oxaliplatin or irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine maximum tolerated dose, safety and efficacy of weekly 24 h infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined alternately with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced colorectal carcinoma patients in first- or second-line chemotherapy received increasing doses of 5-FU (weekly 24 h continuous intravenous infusion without leucovorin) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, irinotecan days 1 and 15; and oxaliplatin days 8 and 22, every 35 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients received 175 cycles. The median age was 64 years (range 47-78). Eighteen per cent of patients had the primary tumor in the rectum, with a median of one disease site (range one to three), and liver involvement in 88% and lung in 38%. Six (18%) patients had chemotherapy for prior advanced disease. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (41% of patients), but the regimen was well tolerated clinically, with febrile neutropenia in two patients and grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days in one; grade 3-4 diarrhea, nausea and vomiting in 6% of patients; grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy in 9% of patients. Seventeen patients had a partial response (50%; 95% confidence interval 33%-67%), 13 had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Five patients underwent metastatic surgical resection after tumor shrinkage. Median response duration was 14 months (range 4.7-29.2+) and median time to progression was 11.3 months (range 1.1+-30.7+). CONCLUSIONS: This combination three-drug regimen is feasible and well tolerated without toxicity overlap. Preliminary antitumor activity compares well with standard double combinations, with an unusually long median time to progression. The recommended dose is 5-FU 3000 mg/m(2), weekly for 4 weeks, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) days 8 and 22. Further assessment of antitumor activity and safety is warranted.

[Oxaliplatin: a first DACH-platinum in oncology]. / In process citation.

Around 3,000 cisplatin analogues have been synthetised over the past 30 years but only half a dozen are presently in clinical development, while only two (cisplatin and carboplatin) have been available prior to the recent European registration of oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is a new platinum salt belonging to the DACH (diaminocyclohexane) platinum family, and is the only such cisplatin analogue that has entered clinical development and achieved approval for marketing. During its development, oxaliplatin has aroused lively interest due, firstly, to its in vitro and in vivo antitumoral activity, especially in cisplatin-resistant models and cell lines expressing resistance genes, and, secondly, to its good clinical tolerance, the absence of renal or auditory toxicity being combined with a low hematotoxicity. Combined with other antitumoral agent cytotoxic agents (5FU, raltitrexed, irinotecan or cisplatin), oxaliplatin produces an additive and often synergistic cytotoxic effect. The oxaliplatin-5FU +/- FA combination is now well established in metastatic colorectal cancer. Regarding its particular cytotoxic characteristics and its activity in mismatch repair deficient cells (which are resistant to cisplatin and carboplatin), oxaliplatin is shows potential in a large variety of solid tumor types, notably in association with other cytotoxic agents, thus opening the path to a wider range of indications.

Multicenter phase II-III study of oxaliplatin plus cyclophosphamide vs. cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in chemonaive advanced ovarian cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A phase II-III randomised study to compare safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide (OXAC) combination, vs. the reference combination of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (CPC), in untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 182 patients were enrolled, of whom 177 were treated: 86 with OXAC (130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin two-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion, 1,000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide two-hour i.v. infusion), and 91 with CPC (100 mg/m2 cisplatin one-hour i.v. infusion. 1,000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide two-hour i.v. infusion). Treatment cycles were repeated every three weeks (maximum of six cycles). RESULTS: The main toxicities, which were significantly less severe in the OXAC arm, were myelosuppression and vomiting, including (OXAC vs CPC, % patients): grade 3-4 leukopenia (37% vs. 56%), and anaemia (7% vs. 32%), with blood transfusions in 8% vs. 21%. In the OXAC arm, 64% of surgically assessable patients and 33% of clinically assessable patients achieved an objective response. In the CPC arm, 67% patients achieved a surgical response and 42% achieved an objective clinical response. In the OXAC and CPC arms, median progression free-survival was 13.0 and 13.3 months, and overall survival was 36.0 and 25.1 months respectively, without statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The activity and time-related parameters of the OXAC and CPC combinations in advanced ovarian cancer patients, are comparable. Combined with the better safety profile of the oxaliplatin-containing regimen, this confirms the interest of oxaliplatin combined with active new agents in this indication.

Pilot study of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, and cisplatin combination in patients with advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer.

To determine the feasibility of the paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), 15 patients with AOC (8 chemonaive, and 7 second-line, disease-free interval > or = 12 months) received paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 at day 1, with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 at day 2, every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Pretreated patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/d, days 6-13). Seventy cycles were administered; median 5 (range: 2-6 cycles) in chemonaive, and 4 (range: 2-6) in pretreated patients. There were grades III to IV neutropenia in 77%, febrile neutropenia in 24%, and grades III to IV thrombocytopenia in 4% of the cycles. Besides neutropenia, cumulative neurosensory toxicity was also limiting although reversible, with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grades II to III observed in 13 patients. Three of the pretreated patients had complete responses (43%), three had partial responses, and one had disease stabilization. Six of the 8 chemonaive patients had complete responses (75%), 1 had disease stabilization, and 1 had disease progression. The median follow-up is 17 months (range: 9-20 months) in chemonaive and 41 months (range: 13-58 months) in pretreated patients, and time to progression has been consistently more than 12 months, with 6 patients (5 chemonaive) still progression free (range: 15+ to 22+ months). This active combination shows acceptable hematologic toxicity, and reversible cumulative neurosensory toxicity. Further clinical exploration of the present combination appears warranted.

[Therapeutic intensification and autotransplantation of hematopoietic stem cells in metastatic breast cancers]. / Intensification thérapeutique et autogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques dans les cancers du sein métastatiques.

The first studies on intensive chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer conducted in the 80s were disappointing. Despite good response rates, the duration of remission was short and long-term survivals exceptional. Nevertheless, these phase I and II trials helped to develop a better understanding of the potential indications of this new therapeutic approach and apprehend its technical aspects. Over the last 5 years, considerable progress has been made in grafting techniques and hematopoietic support greatly improving the safety of the method. Notwithstanding the financial considerations involved, it must be noted that the efficacy autologous stem cell support, in terms of recurrence-free overall survival, has not yet been demonstrated although the (controversial) results of two randomized controlled trials have recently been published. In France, the PEGASE programs for the study of autologous stem cell support in breast cancer have been developed in an attempt to elucidate the question.

[High-dose therapy and hematopoietic cell autotransplantation in the treatment of adult gynecologic tumors]. / Intensification thérapeutique et autotransplantation de cellules souches hématopoïétiques dans le traitement des tumeurs gynécologiques de l'adulte.

Autologous bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of gynecologic tumors in adults remains an uncommon therapeutic approach. The feasibility of such high-dose therapies is clearly proved, especially with the advent of hematopoietic growth factors and the rescue by the peripheral stem cells to reduce the duration of the chemotherapy-induced myeloid aplasia. The question is to exactly define the place of high-dose therapy in the land of solid tumors. In the treatment of poor prognosis breast cancer, high-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation or with peripheral stem cells support is able to convert some patients with partial response into complete responders. However, the consequences on overall survival and disease-free survival are not convincing. For metastatic breast cancer and for poor-prognosis tumors (inflammatory breast cancer, axillary metastatic nodes > or = 8), the interest of high-dose therapy has to be determined by randomized studies. These studies are ongoing in USA and in France. For the treatment of poor-prognosis ovarian cancer, the situation is more difficult to appraise. Randomized studies have to be done to precisely define the interest of high-dose therapy in terms of response and disease-free survival for the treatment of ovarian carcinomas.