Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrason Imaging ; 33(3): 153-64, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21842580

RESUMO

Our group has proposed the concept of subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) utilizing microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent signals for the noninvasive estimation of hydrostatic blood pressures. An experimental system for in vitro SHAPE was constructed based on two single-element transducers assembled confocally at a 60 degree angle to each other. Changes in the first, second and subharmonic amplitudes of five different ultrasound contrast agents were measured in vitro at static hydrostatic pressures from 0-186 mmHg, acoustic pressures from 0.35-0.60 MPa peak-to-peak and frequencies of 2.5-6.6 MHz. The most sensitive agent and optimal parameters for SHAPE were determined using linear regression analysis and implemented on a Logiq 9 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). This implementation of SHAPE was then tested under dynamic-flow conditions and compared to pressure-catheter measurements. Over the pressure range studied, the first and second harmonic amplitudes reduced approximately 2 dB for all contrast agents. Over the same pressure range, the subharmonic amplitudes decreased by 9-14 dB and excellent linear regressions were achieved with the hydrostatic pressure variations (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). Optimal sensitivity was achieved at a transmit frequency of 2.5 MHz and acoustic pressure of 0.35 MPa using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway). A Logiq 9 scanner was modified to implement SHAPE on a convex transducer with a frequency range from 1.5-4.5 MHz and acoustic pressures from 0-3.34 MPa. Results matched the pressure catheter (r2 = 0.87). In conclusion, subharmonic contrast signals are a good indicator of hydrostatic pressure. Out of the five ultrasound contrast agents tested, Sonazoid was the most sensitive for subharmonic pressure estimation. Real-time SHAPE has been implemented on a commercial scanner and offers the possibility of allowing pressures in the heart and elsewhere to be obtained noninvasively.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Meios de Contraste/farmacocinética , Microbolhas , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Acústica , Desenho de Equipamento , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Pressão Hidrostática , Técnicas In Vitro , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Modelos Lineares , Imagens de Fantasmas , Transdutores , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
J Ultrasound Med ; 29(8): 1177-85, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20660451

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of static and dynamic cumulative maximum intensity (CMI) subharmonic imaging (SHI) in breast ultrasound studies. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced SHI was performed in 14 women using a modified LOGIQ 9 scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) transmitting/receiving at 4.4/2.2 MHz. Following mammography, baseline scans of gray scale ultrasound and power Doppler imaging (PDI) were performed. Contrast-enhanced PDI and gray scale SHI were performed after contrast agent administration. Static CMI-SHI is a composite image summarizing blood flow over multiple frames using the maximum intensity projection technique. The dynamic CMI-SHI mode depicts the gradual inflow pattern of the contrast agent in blood vessels. Both CMI-SHI modes were set up using a new automated sum-absolute-difference-based block-matching algorithm to reduce noise and blurring and compensate for motion artifacts. Evaluation of the imaging modes for detecting breast cancer was done by an experienced radiologist, blinded to histopathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were computed and compared for all ultrasound imaging modes and mammography. Results Of the 16 lesions, 4 were malignant. The area under the ROC curve (A(z)) for the diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.64 for gray scale and PDI, 0.67 for contrast-enhanced PDI, 0.76 for mammography, 0.78 for SHI, and 0.75 for static CMI-SHI. For the dynamic CMI-SHI mode, the A(z) increased to 0.90, and this was significantly better than mammography (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The new dynamic CMI-SHI mode produced the highest A(z) for the diagnosis of breast cancer compared to conventional techniques and thus appears to improve diagnosis of breast cancer relative to conventional techniques, albeit based on a limited patient population.


Assuntos
Albuminas , Algoritmos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluorocarbonos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Ultrassonografia Mamária/métodos , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA