Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 685067, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26682222

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) readmissions are considered an indicator of healthcare quality that is particularly relevant in older adults. The primary objective of this study was to identify key factors for predicting patients returning to the ED within 30 days of being discharged. METHODS: We analysed patients who attended our ED in June 2014, stratified into four groups based on the Kaiser pyramid. We collected data on more than 100 variables per case including demographic and clinical characteristics and drug treatments. We identified the variables with the highest discriminating power to predict ED readmission and constructed classifiers using machine learning methods to provide predictions. RESULTS: Classifier performance distinguishing between patients who were and were not readmitted (within 30 days), in terms of average accuracy (AC). The variables with the greatest discriminating power were age, comorbidity, reasons for consultation, social factors, and drug treatments. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to predict readmissions in stratified groups with high accuracy and to identify the most important factors influencing the event. Therefore, it will be possible to develop interventions to improve the quality of care provided to ED patients.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 11(12): 1208-13, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875400

RESUMO

AIMS: The 'Hospital at home' (HaH) model avoids hospital admission by transferring healthcare and treatment to the patient's home. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of treating elderly patients with decompensated heart failure (HF) using HaH care vs. inpatient hospital care (IHC) in a cardiology unit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty patients aged over 65 years who presented at the emergency department with decompensated HF were randomly assigned to IHC or HaH. All patients were studied for 1 year. Seventy-one patients completed the study, of these 34 were admitted to cardiology and 37 received HaH care. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics, including comorbidity, functional status, and health-related quality of life. Clinical outcomes were similar after initial admission and also after the 12 months of follow-up. Death or re-admission due to HF or another cardiovascular event occurred in 19 patients in IHC and 20 in HaH (P = 0.88). Changes in functional status and health-related quality of life over the follow-up period were not significantly different. The average cost of the initial admission was 4502 +/- 2153 euro in IHC and 2541 +/- 1334 euro in HaH (P < 0.001). During 12 months of follow-up, the average expenditure was 4619 +/- 7679 euro and 3425 +/- 4948 euro (P = 0.83) respectively. CONCLUSION: Hospital at home care allows an important reduction in the costs during the index episode compared with hospital care, whilst maintaining similar outcomes with respect to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and quality of life at 1 year follow-up.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente , Espanha
3.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 55(10): 1098-100, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12383398

RESUMO

No published information is available about myocardial infarction management in Spanish emergency departments. The EVICURE is a prospective, multicenter, observational study involving 35 hospitals that for a 3-week period collected all the cases of patients requiring care in which the final diagnosis of the cause of symptoms was ischemic heart disease. The study included 2,216 patients, of which 600 (27.1%) with acute myocardial infarction formed the study population. Fifteen patients died in the emergency department (2.5%) and 80 (13.3%) diagnosed as myocardial infarction were admitted to the ward instead of the coronary care unit. The median time before patients were admitted to the coronary care unit was 32 minutes versus a median time of 111 minutes for all patients. Before leaving the emergency room, 461 patients (76.5%) received aspirin and 93 (15.5%) underwent fibrinolysis. We concluded that there is room for improvement in light of current standards of care.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Idoso , Angina Instável/diagnóstico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Admissão do Paciente , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha , Terapia Trombolítica , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA