Repurposing a Small Community Hospital Surgical Residency Program in an Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 put a stop to the operative experience of surgical residents, leaving reassignment of the team, to the frontlines. Each program has adapted uniquely; we discuss how our surgical education changed in our hospital. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of changes in general surgery cases, bedside procedures, and utilization of residents before and during the pandemic. Procedures were retrieved from electronic medical records. Operating room (OR) cases 1 month before and 5 weeks after the executive order were collected. Triple lumen catheter (TLC), temporary hemodialysis catheter (HDC), and pneumothorax catheter (PC) insertions by surgical residents were recorded for 5 weeks. RESULTS: Before the pandemic, an average of 27.9 cases were done in the OR, with an average of 10.1 general surgery cases. From March 23 to April 30, 2020, the average number of cases decreased to 5.1, and general surgery cases decreased to 2.2. Elective, urgent, and emergent cases represented 83%, 14.6%, and 2.4% prior to the order and 66.7%, 15.1%, and 18.2%, respectively, after the order. Bedside procedures over 5 weeks totaled to 153, 93 TLCs, 39 HDCs, and 21 PCs. CONCLUSION: Repurposing the surgical department for the concerns of the pandemic has involved all surgical staff. We worked with other departments to allocate our team to areas of need and re-evaluated daily. The strengths of our team to deliver care and perform many bedside procedures allowed us to meet the demands posed by this disease while remaining as a cohesive unit.

Correlation between preoperative endoscopic and intraoperative findings in localizing colorectal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy findings compared with findings at time of surgery have a discrepancy rate of 3-21%. The objective of our study was to investigate this discrepancy and provide potential resolutions. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified 400 patients who underwent colonoscopy followed by colon resection at our community hospitals in 1999-2006. Discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were noted. Each discrepancy was classified as major if the surgical procedure had to be altered, the lesion was missed, an unnecessary segment was removed, or the incision was extended. A discrepancy was classified as minor if there was no alteration in planned surgery. RESULTS: Of the 400 cases, 160 (40%) were located in the right colon, 13 (3%) were in the transverse colon, 185 (46%) were in the left colon, and 42 (11%) were in the rectum. A total of 48 (12%) discrepancies between colonoscopy and intraoperative findings were identified: 26 (54%) were major and 22 (46%) were minor. Thirteen (27%) were in the proximal colon (3 major and 10 minor discrepancies), 3 (6.3%) were in the transverse colon (all major), 22 (46%) were in the distal colon (17 major and 5 minor), and 10 (21%) were in the rectum (3 major, 7 minor). Major discrepancies were significantly higher in the left colon (17 of the 185 left-sided lesions; 9.1%) than in the right colon (3/160; 1.9%; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, colonoscopy has an error rate of 12% when used to localize tumors; more than half of these patients require significant unanticipated changes in their surgery. The discrepancies are significantly higher in left side of colon.

Effects of a twenty-four hour call period on resident performance during simulated endoscopic sinus surgery in an accreditation council for graduate medical education-compliant training program.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Since the early 1990s, extended resident work hours have undergone increasing scrutiny. Although previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding cognitive decline secondary to fatigue, few studies have specifically examined the effects of fatigue on surgical performance. No previous studies have examined resident performance under current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work-hour guidelines that limit residents to an average number of work hours of 80 hours per week. The study sought to determine whether an endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) measured performance changes before and after a 24-hour on-call period in residents following mandated work-hour limitations. STUDY DESIGN: Case control, crossover trial at a Level I trauma center. METHODS: Eight general surgical residents were trained on the novice mode of the ES3. These residents were then tested twice both before and after on-call duties. Performance and hazard scores were compared using a paired t test. RESULTS: No statistically significant change in the number of errors, time to task completion, or overall performance was identified in the study between the precall and postcall groups. There was a trend toward improved speed at the expense of accuracy in the postcall group. Postcall score between the two trials improved, on average, by 3.3 (P = .045). CONCLUSION: In the study of residents following current ACGME work-hour mandates, there was no diminution in performance before and after a 24-hour on-call period. There was a trend toward improved speed at the expense of accuracy. Furthermore, repetition on the ES3 in the postcall period can result in improved ES3 proficiency.