The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry Template Modifications on the Administration of High-Risk Medications in Older Adults in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are more susceptible to adverse events when administered certain medications at doses appropriate for younger adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of default geriatric dosing on computerized physician order entry (CPOE) templates on the subsequent administration of recommended starting doses of opioids, benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to older adults in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a before-after comparison of the frequency of the recommended starting doses of high-risk medications to adults aged 65 years and older. Computerized records were queried for the administration of the above medication classes in two academic EDs over two similar 4-month periods in 2015 and 2016. Between study periods, the doses of high-risk medications on ED CPOE templates were adjusted for older adults based on established pharmacy guidelines and expert consensus. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the rate of recommended dose administration of all medications of interest (27.3 vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Not surprisingly, the medications that were maximally impacted were also those most frequently prescribed, with a significant increase in the recommended dosing of opioids (29.0 vs. 35.2%, p < 0.001) accounting for the majority of the change. Although there were no differences in BZDs as a group, there were significant differences in selected BZDs such as midazolam and diazepam. Changes in the recommended dosing of NSAIDs could not be determined due to low numbers of administered doses in both phases of the study. CONCLUSION: Simple changes in the CPOE template resulted in increased administration of the recommended starting doses of high-risk medications to older adults in the ED.

A New Generation of Comfort Care Order Sets: Aligning Protocols with Current Principles.

BACKGROUND: There are few published comfort care order sets for end-of-life symptom management, contributing to variability in treatment of common symptoms. At our academic medical centers, we have observed that rapid titration of opioid infusions using our original comfort care order set's titration algorithm causes increased discomfort from opioid toxicity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the process and outcomes of a multiyear revision of a standardized comfort care order set for clinicians to treat end-of-life symptoms in hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Our revision process included interdisciplinary group meetings, literature review and expert consultation, beta testing protocols with end users, and soliciting feedback from key committees at our institutions. We focused on opioid dosing and embedding treatment algorithms and guidelines within the order set for clinicians. SETTING: The study was conducted at two large academic medical centers. RESULTS: We developed and implemented a comfort care order set with opioid dosing that reflects current pharmacologic principles and expert recommendations. Educational tools and reference materials are embedded within the order set in the electronic medical record. There are prompts for improved collaboration between ordering clinicians, nurses, and palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a new comfort care order set at our institutions that can serve as a resource for others. Further evaluation of this order set is needed.