The Role of Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Lower Female Genital Tract Pathology: PD-L1, MMR, HER2, p16, p53, and Beyond.

Biomarkers play a crucial role in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis of premalignant and malignant lesions and are increasingly used in neoplasia of the lower female genital tract (LFGT) including the cervix, vagina, and vulva. This review will discuss key biomarkers routinely used in LFGT pathology, including programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), mismatch repair (MMR), and tumor mutational burden (TMB) testing, which are FDA-approved companion diagnostics for anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. Recent developments in HER2 testing as a marker for anti-HER2 therapies, and prognostic biomarkers such as p53 in HPV-independent vulvar intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas, are also reviewed.

Cervical cytology in endometrial cancer patients with Lynch syndrome: opportunities for early detection and limitations.

INTRODUCTION: Timely detection of endometrial carcinoma in Lynch syndrome patients ensures prompt treatment and appropriate cancer screening for the patient and impacted family members. While cervical cytology is utilized primarily in cervical cancer screening, endometrial glandular abnormalities can be identified as part of routine cervical cancer screening or during work-up for abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated cervical cytology samples from Lynch syndrome patients with endometrial carcinoma to determine how often atypical/malignant glandular cells were identified on prior/concurrent cytology. RESULTS: We identified 14 Lynch syndrome patients with cervical cytology available within a year of endometrial carcinoma diagnosis. The average patient age was 55 years (36-73). Cervical cytology preceded diagnostic biopsy in 57% and was concurrent in 43%. A glandular abnormality was identified on original diagnosis in 43% and ranged from atypical glandular cells (AGC), not otherwise specified to adenocarcinoma consistent with endometrial primary. In 4 cases, abnormal cervical cytology triggered the subsequent biopsy. Evaluation of 8 cases with accessible cytology slides revealed 2 previously unrecognized glandular abnormalities, leading to an abnormal rate of 63% among cases reviewed retrospectively and a final glandular abnormality detection rate of 57% based on either original or review diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, abnormal glandular cells were commonly identified in endometrial cancer patients with Lynch syndrome and led to endometrial cancer work-up and diagnosis in a subset. These results suggest that cervical cytology may have utility in endometrial cancer screening in this population and indicate that awareness of the patient's familial cancer risk is important for maximizing sensitivity of this test. They also caution against primary human papillomavirus screening in the Lynch syndrome population, as this may result in missed opportunities for early endometrial carcinoma detection among these high-risk individuals.

Molecular Classification Outperforms Histologic Classification in Prognostication of High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas With Undifferentiated and Sarcomatous Components.

Since the establishment of 4 molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma (EC), there has been significant interest in understanding molecular classification in the context of histologic features and diagnoses. ECs with undifferentiated, spindle, and/or sarcomatous components represent a diagnostically challenging subset of tumors with overlapping clinical and histologic features. We examined the clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of these tumors identified in our institutions' pathology databases using immunohistochemistry and targeted sequencing. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. One hundred sixty-two ECs were included: carcinosarcomas (UCS; n=96), dedifferentiated/undifferentiated EC (DDEC/UDEC; n=49), and grade 3 endometrioid EC with spindled growth (GR3spEEC) (n=17). All molecular subgroups were represented in all histologic subtypes and included 12 (7%) POLE -mutated ( POLE mut), 43 (27%) mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), 77 (48%) p53-abnormal (p53abn), and 30 (19%) no specific molecular profile (NSMP) tumors. However, the molecular classification (irrespective of histologic diagnosis) was a significant predictor for both DSS ( P =0.008) and P≤0.0001). POLE mut EC showed an excellent prognosis with no recurrences or deaths from the disease. MMRd tumors also showed better outcomes relative to NSMP and p53abn tumors. In conclusion, molecular classification provides better prognostic information than histologic diagnosis for high-grade EC with undifferentiated and sarcomatous components. Our study strongly supports routine molecular classification of these tumors, with emphasis on molecular group, rather than histologic subtyping, in providing prognostication.

Yolk Sac Differentiation in Endometrial Carcinoma: Incidence and Clinicopathologic Features of Somatically Derived Yolk Sac Tumors Versus Carcinomas With Nonspecific Immunoexpression of Yolk Sac Markers.

Endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors are characterized by yolk sac morphology with AFP, SALL-4, and/or Glypican-3 immunoexpression. Yolk sac marker expression, however, is not limited to tumors with overt yolk sac histology. Three hundred consecutive endometrial malignancies were assessed for immunomarkers of yolk sac differentiation. Of these, 9% expressed ≥1 yolk sac marker, including 29% of high-grade tumors. Only 3 (1%) met morphologic criteria for yolk sac differentiation; these were originally diagnosed as serous, high-grade NOS, and dedifferentiated carcinoma. Two were MMR-intact and comprised exclusively of yolk sac elements, while the dedifferentiated case was MMR deficient and had a background low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; this case also showed BRG1 loss. All 3 were INI1 intact. Nonspecific yolk sac marker expression was seen in 14 carcinosarcomas, 4 endometrioid, 2 serous, 1 clear cell, 1 dedifferentiated, 1 mixed serous/clear cell, and 1 mesonephric-like carcinoma. INI1 was intact in all cases; one showed BRG1 loss. Twenty were MMR-intact, and 4 were MMR deficient. All MMR-deficient cases with yolk sac marker expression, both with and without true yolk sac morphology, had no evidence of residual disease on follow-up, whereas 82% of MMR-intact cases developed recurrent/metastatic disease. In summary, endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors were rare but under-recognized. While AFP immunostaining was specific for this diagnosis, Glypican-3 and SALL-4 expression was seen in a variety of other high-grade carcinomas. INI1 loss was not associated with yolk sac morphology or immunomarker expression in the endometrium, and BRG1 loss was rare. All patients with MMR-deficient carcinomas with yolk sac immunoexpression +/- morphology were disease-free on follow-up, whereas the majority of MMR-intact cancers showed aggressive disease.

The association of histopathologic features after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with clinical outcome: Sub-analyses from the randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase III IMagyn050/GOG3015/ENGOT-ov39 study.

OBJECTIVE: Histopathologic characteristics after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may correlate with outcome. This study evaluates histopathologic features after immunotherapy and NACT/bevacizumab, and associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: Evaluable tissue from IMagyn050/GOG3015/ENGOT-ov39 patients from prespecified anatomic sites from interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) after NACT/bevacizumab plus atezolizumab/placebo underwent central histopathologic scoring and analyzed with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The predefined population had 243 evaluable NACT patients, with 48.1% tumors being PD-L1-positive. No statistically significant differences in PFS (16.9 months vs. 19.2 months, p = 0.21) or OS (41.5 months vs. 45.1 months, p = 0.67) between treatment arms were seen. Substantial residual tumor (RT) (3+) was identified in 26% atezolizumab vs. 24% placebo arms (p = 0.94). Most showed no (1+) necrosis (82% vs. 96%, respectively, p = 0.69), moderate (2+) to severe (3+) fibrosis (71% vs. 75%, respectively, p = 0.82), and extensive (2+) inflammation (53% vs. 47% respectively, p = 0.48). No significant histopathologic differences were identified by tissue site or by arm. Multivariate analyses showed increased risk for progression with moderate and substantial RT (13.6 mon vs. 21.1 mon, hazard ratio 2.0, p < 0.01; 13.6 mon vs. 21.1 mon, HR 1.9, p < 0.01, respectively); but decreased risk for death with extensive inflammation (46.9 mon vs. 36.3 mon, HR 0.65, p = 0.02). Inflammation also correlated with greater likelihood of response to NACT/bevacizumab plus immunotherapy (odds ratio 2.9, p < 0.01). Modeling showed inflammation as a consistent but modest predictor for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed histologic assessment of ICS specimens appear to identify characteristics, such as inflammation and residual tumor, that may provide insight to certain clinical outcomes. Future work potentially leveraging emerging tools may provide further insight into outcomes.

Interobserver Agreement on the Interpretation of Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) Among Gynecologic Pathologists.

The anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved for the treatment of cervical carcinoma with a programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) of ≥1. We assessed interobserver agreement in cervical carcinoma PD-L1 CPS to identify whether it may affect patient selection for immunotherapeutic candidacy. Twenty-nine cervical carcinomas were stained for PD-L1 (Dako 22C3), and slides were interpreted by 5 subspecialty-trained gynecologic pathologists with experience reading PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. Expression was scored using CPS and read out as positive (≥1) or negative (<1); in positive cases, a final score was assigned (1 to 100). There was consensus agreement across all 5 pathologists for 90% (26/29) (Fleiss Kappa value for interobserver agreement: 0.799). The 3 cases with disagreement were composed of 2 squamous cell carcinomas and 1 small cell carcinoma. Of the 26 with unanimous agreement, 88% (23/26) were positive and 12% (3/26) were negative. All (16/16) pure squamous cell carcinomas with full consensus were interpreted as positive, whereas tumors with glandular components were commonly consensus negative (33%, 3/9); this difference was significant ( P =0.037). Disagreements were attributable to low CPS versus negative reads (2 cases) and difficulty discerning glandular involvement from pushing invasion (1 case). In summary, experienced gynecologic pathologists showed substantial interobserver agreement in the interpretation of PD-L1 CPS at the Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment threshold, with the majority of tumors being classified as positive. Pure squamous histology was strongly associated with a consensus-positive read, whereas a subset of tumors with glandular differentiation was negative by all readers. Disagreements occurred in tumors with low versus negative CPS values and in the setting of limited invasion.

Somatic Sequencing and Microsatellite Instability Results From Mismatch Repair-deficient Endometrial Carcinoma Patients Without Lynch Syndrome ("Lynch-like" tumors): Implications for Heritable Cancer Screening, Molecular Prognostication, and Immunotherapeutic Vulnerability.

Immunostaining of endometrial carcinomas for mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss is standard-of-care for Lynch syndrome screening, but also identifies MMR-deficient tumors without germline pathogenic variants. While the majority show MLH1 hypermethylation ( MLH1hm ), somatic MMR pathogenic variants are increasingly recognized drivers of immunohistochemistry-germline discordance. Because MMR abnormalities with both germline and somatic origins have prognostic significance and impart susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors, it is important to understand how frequently tumors with MMR immunohistochemical loss and normal germline testing ("Lynch-like" tumors) have underlying somatic MMR pathogenic variants. Somatic tumor sequencing±microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was performed on 18 endometrial cancers with MMR immunohistochemical loss but negative MMR germline results and negative MLH1hm where relevant. Tumor sequencing and MSI testing were successful in 94%. Where successful, 80% were MSI-high and 94% had a molecular correlate for the initial immunohistochemical interpretation. The single case without an identified somatic pathogenic variant was MSI-low and initially showed loss of MSH6 by immunohistochemistry but with extremely limited internal control staining. On review, MSH6 immunohistochemistry was reclassified as equivocal, and repeat staining revealed improved control expression with intact MSH6. Following reclassification of this case, 100% tumors with MMR deficiency by immunohistochemistry had at least 1 confirmed somatic MMR pathogenic variant, and 86% were MSI-high. These results demonstrate that when correctly interpreted immunohistochemistry is a strong surrogate for somatic MMR pathogenic variants and support its use as the frontline MMR biomarker in endometrial cancer for heritable screening, molecular prognostic classification, and immunotherapeutic biomarker testing purposes.

PD-L1 and MHC Class I Expression in High-grade Ovarian Cancers, Including Platinum-resistant Recurrences Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Immune-modulating therapies targeting the programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunosuppressive system have been used successfully in many solid tumor types. There is evidence that biomarkers such as PD-L1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I help identify candidates for anti-programmed cell death-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition, though the evidence is limited in ovarian malignancies. PD-L1 and MHC Class I immunostaining was performed on pretreatment whole tissue sections in 30 cases of high-grade ovarian carcinoma. The PD-L1 combined positive score was calculated (a score of ≥1 is considered positive). MHC class I status was categorized as an intact or subclonal loss. In patients who received immunotherapy, drug response was assessed using RECIST criteria. PD-L1 was positive in 26 of 30 cases (87%; combined positive score: 1 to 100). Seven of 30 patients showed subclonal loss of MHC class I (23%), and this occurred in both PD-L1 negative (3/4; 75%) and PD-L1 positive (4/26; 15%) cases. Only 1 of 17 patients who received immunotherapy in the setting of a platinum-resistant recurrence responded to the addition of immunotherapy, and all 17 died of disease. In the setting of recurrent disease, patients did not respond to immunotherapy regardless of PD-L1/MHC class I status, suggesting that these immunostains may not be effective predictive biomarkers in this setting. Subclonal loss of expression of MHC class I occurs in ovarian carcinoma, including in PD-L1 positive cases, suggesting that the 2 pathways of immune evasion may not be mutually exclusive and that it may be important to interrogate MHC class I status in PD-L1 positive tumors to identify additional immune evasion mechanisms in these tumors.

Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Endorsement of College of American Pathologists Guideline.

PURPOSE: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has developed a guideline on testing for mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) for patients considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS: The CAP guideline was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS: The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the CAP guideline, published on August 3, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer. RECOMMENDATIONS: Within the guideline, MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI polymerase chain reaction, and MSI next-generation sequencing are all recommended testing options for colorectal cancer, MMR-IHC and MSI-polymerase chain reaction for gastroesophageal and small bowel cancer, and only MMR-IHC for endometrial cancer. No recommendation in favor of any testing method over another could be made for any other cancer. Tumor mutational burden was not recommended as a surrogate for DNA MMR deficiency. If MMR deficiency consistent with Lynch syndrome is detected, it should be communicated to the treating physician.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

PRAME Expression in Endometrioid and Serous Endometrial Carcinoma: A Potential Immunotherapeutic Target and Possible Diagnostic Pitfall.

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a cancer testes antigen initially employed as a diagnostic marker for melanoma. Although negative in most normal tissues, its expression has been reported in benign endometrial glands. Additionally, PRAME expression has been identified in a growing list of solid and hematologic malignancies and is of interest as a predictive biomarker, as cancer vaccination strategies and adoptive T-cell transfer targeting this molecule are under clinical investigation; additionally, PRAME may identify candidates for retinoid therapy. However, expression of PRAME has not been well-studied in endometrial cancers. We herein evaluate PRAME expression in endometrial carcinomas to better characterize its limitations as a diagnostic melanoma marker as well as its potential as a predictive biomarker in endometrial carcinomas. PRAME expression was evaluated in 256 endometrioid (n=235) and serous (n=21) endometrial carcinomas via tissue microarray. In all, 89% (227/256) demonstrated some degree of nuclear PRAME expression, including 88% (207/235) of endometrioid carcinomas and 95% (20/21) of serous carcinomas. Diffuse (>50%) expression was observed in 70% (179/256) of all cases, including 69% (163/235) of endometrioid carcinomas and 76% (16/21) of serous carcinomas. There was no association between degree of expression and grade, mismatch repair protein status, or stage. The widespread expression of PRAME in endometrial carcinomas suggests this marker should not be interpreted as specific for melanoma in this context. However PRAME may have utility as a predictive biomarker in endometrial cancer, and expansion of testing of PRAME-based therapies to endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinomas may lead to new therapeutic options for these endometrial cancer subtypes.

Endometrial Hyperplasia.

The objectives of this Clinical Expert Series on endometrial hyperplasia are to review the etiology and risk factors, histologic classification and subtypes, malignant progression risks, prevention options, and to outline both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. Abnormal uterine and postmenopausal bleeding remain the hallmark of endometrial pathology, and up to 10-20% of postmenopausal bleeding will be either hyperplasia or cancer; thus, immediate evaluation of any abnormal bleeding with either tissue procurement for pathology or imaging should be undertaken. Although anyone with a uterus may develop atypical hyperplasia, also known as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), genetic predispositions (eg, Lynch syndrome), obesity, chronic anovulation, and polycystic ovarian syndrome all markedly increase these risks, whereas use of oral contraceptive pills or progesterone-containing intrauterine devices will decrease the risk. An EIN diagnosis carries a high risk of concomitant endometrial cancer or eventual progression to cancer in the absence of treatment. The definitive and curative treatment for EIN remains hysterectomy; however, the obesity epidemic, the potential desire for fertility-sparing treatments, the recognition of varying rates of malignant transformation, medical comorbidities, and an aging population all may factor into decisions to employ nonsurgical treatment modalities.

Dataset for the Reporting of Carcinoma of the Cervix: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Cervical carcinoma remains one of the most common cancers affecting women worldwide, despite effective screening programs being implemented in many countries for several decades. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) dataset for cervical carcinoma was first developed in 2017 with the aim of developing evidence-based standardized, consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for resection specimens. This 4th edition update to the ICCR dataset on cervical cancer was undertaken to incorporate major changes based upon the updated International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (FIGO) staging for carcinoma of the cervix published in 2018 and the 5th Edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors published in 2020 and other significant developments in pathologic aspects of cervical cancer. This updated dataset was developed by a panel of expert gynecological pathologists and an expert gynecological oncologist, with a period of open consultation. The revised dataset includes "core" and "noncore" elements to be reported; these are accompanied by detailed explanatory notes and references providing the rationale for the updates. Standardized reporting using datasets such as this helps facilitate consistency and accuracy, data collection across different sites and comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters for quality and research purposes.

Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer.

CONTEXT.­: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors that have DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability; however, the FDA provided no guidance on which specific clinical assays should be used to determine mismatch repair status. OBJECTIVE.­: To develop an evidence-based guideline to identify the optimal clinical laboratory test to identify defects in DNA mismatch repair in patients with solid tumor malignancies who are being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Using the National Academy of Medicine-endorsed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the recommendations were derived from available evidence, strength of that evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability derived from both polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, and tumor mutation burden derived from large panel next-generation sequencing were within scope. RESULTS.­: Six recommendations and 3 good practice statements were developed. More evidence and evidence of higher quality were identified for colorectal cancer and other cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than for cancers arising outside the GI tract. CONCLUSIONS.­: An optimal assay depends on cancer type. For most cancer types outside of the GI tract and the endometrium, there was insufficient published evidence to recommend a specific clinical assay. Absent published evidence, immunohistochemistry is an acceptable approach readily available in most clinical laboratories.

HER2 Overexpression and Amplification in Uterine Carcinosarcomas With Serous Morphology.

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is an aggressive malignancy with few treatment options. A recent clinical trial has shown an increase in progression-free survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive serous endometrial carcinomas treated with anti-HER2-targeted therapies. Few studies have evaluated HER2 expression/amplification in UCS. Similar to serous endometrial carcinoma, the majority of UCS have TP53 mutations and a serous epithelial component, suggesting that UCS may show similar rates of HER2 positivity and therapeutic response. Therefore, we evaluated HER2 expression/amplification in a cohort of UCS over a 5-year period. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization were performed on tissue microarray and whole tissue sections and scored according to the most recent clinical trial recommendations. Three of 48 UCS (6%) had strong (3+) HER2 IHC expression, and 3 cases (6%) were equivocal (2+). Seven cases (15%) had HER2 amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization, including all 3 with overexpression and 2 that were equivocal by IHC. Mismatch repair (MMR) protein, p53, and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status was obtained from prior whole section analyses. All HER2-positive cases had a serous morphology and aberrant p53 expression. Only minimal PD-L1 expression was seen in the HER2-positive cases, and none had MMR loss. A subset of UCS with serous morphology have overexpression and/or amplification of HER2, which may predict response to HER2-targeted therapies. HER2-positive UCS may be less susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibition as they uncommonly show MMR deficiency and/or strong PD-L1 expression. Thus, HER2-targeted therapies could be of clinical utility in a subset of UCS without other adjuvant treatment options.

Mesonephric-like Endometrial Carcinoma: Results From Immunohistochemical Screening of 300 Endometrial Carcinomas and Carcinosarcomas for This Often Overlooked and Potentially Aggressive Entity.

Mesonephric-like endometrial carcinoma is a rare but frequently misclassified and aggressive malignancy. KRAS mutations, limited estrogen receptor (ER) expression, and TTF-1, GATA3, and luminal CD10 expression are described in these tumors, but an immunohistochemistry-based screening approach has not been studied. We assessed 300 endometrial carcinomas/carcinosarcomas to ascertain the specificity of TTF-1/GATA3/luminal CD10 expression with or without ER staining for this diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing and morphologic review were performed on screen-positive cases. In all, 3% (9/300) were TTF-1+; 2 coexpressed GATA3. No cases expressed luminal CD10 or GATA3 in isolation. Two TTF-1+/ER- cases, one of which was also GATA3+, were reclassified as mesonephric-like based on morphology and molecular results (KRAS mutations without mismatch repair deficiency, TP53 mutations, or PTEN mutations): these represented 0.7% of all cases (2/300). The reclassified cases were originally diagnosed as grade 1 and 2 endometrioid carcinoma, and the latter had pulmonary metastases and pelvic recurrences. Six TTF-1+ cases retained their original serous (3) and endometrioid (3) diagnoses; 1 was reclassified as dedifferentiated. All had negative or low ER. KRAS mutations were identified in 4 TTF-1+ non-mesonephric-like cases, including 1 serous and 1 grade 3 endometrioid with p53 abnormalities, 1 mismatch repair-deficient endometrioid with a complex molecular profile, and 1 endometrioid with mucinous differentiation. These findings suggest that TTF-1 and ER are good first-line screens for mesonephric-like carcinoma, but caution that a TTF-1+/ER- immunoprofile is not specific, even in the setting of KRAS mutations. A final diagnosis of mesonephric-like carcinoma requires integration of morphologic and immunohistochemical features, with molecular support when relevant.

The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor LAG-3 and Its Ligand GAL-3 in Vulvar Squamous Neoplasia.

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (vSCC), although rare, carries significant morbidity and a high rate of recurrence. Treatment options beyond surgical excision remain limited. Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and its binding partner galectin-3 (GAL-3) are an immuno-inhibitory checkpoint pair that represent potential immunotherapy targets for the treatment of vSCC. This study examined the expression of LAG-3 and GAL-3 alongside programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in invasive SCC and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) by immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. A total of 35 cases were selected for evaluation: 13 VIN3 [human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated VIN/usual-type VIN], 2 differentiated VIN (dVIN), 16 HPV-associated vSCC, and 4 dVIN-associated vSCC. LAG-3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were identified in 91% (32/35) of cases of vulvar squamous neoplasia. Tumor cells were positive for GAL-3 in 71% of the vulvar neoplasia cases. HPV-associated vSCC was more likely to demonstrate GAL-3 tumoral positivity when compared with dVIN-associated vSCC (24/29 vs. 1/6, P=0.004). We observed co-expression of all 3 immunomarkers in 40% (14/35) of cases evaluated. In light of these findings, use of immunomodulatory drugs that target the LAG-3/GAL-3 pathway may be potentially beneficial in vSCC and efficacy may be increased when combined with anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 therapy.

Targeting immune checkpoints in gynecologic cancer: updates & perspectives for pathologists.

Checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers, and most often targets the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Pathologists should be familiar with the biomarkers required to determine candidacy for these treatments based on existing FDA approvals, including mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability testing, tumor mutation burden testing, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. This review summarizes the rationale behind these treatments and their associated biomarkers and delivers guidance on how to utilize and readout these tests. It also introduces additional biomarkers which may provide information regarding immunotherapeutic vulnerability in the future such as neoantigen load; POLE mutation status; and immunohistochemical expression of immunosuppressive checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, and VISTA; immune-activating checkpoints such as CD27, CD40, CD134, and CD137; enzymes such as IDO-1 and adenosine-related compounds; and MHC class I.

MLH1/PMS2-deficient Endometrial Carcinomas in a Universally Screened Population: MLH1 Hypermethylation and Germline Mutation Status.

MLH1/PMS2 loss due to epigenetic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter is the most common cause of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial carcinoma, and typically provides reassurance against an associated germline mutation. To further characterize the genetic features of MLH1/PMS2-deficient endometrial cancers, the departmental database was searched for cases with dual MLH1/PMS2 loss and retained MSH2/6 expression which underwent MLH1 hypermethylation testing. Genetic testing results were obtained when available. One hundred seventeen endometrial cancers met inclusion criteria: 100 (85%) were MLH1-hypermethylated, 3 (3%) were low-level/borderline, 7 (6%) were nonmethylated, and 7 (6%) were insufficient for testing. Sixteen cases (12 MLH1-hypermethylated, 3 nonmethylated, and 1 insufficient for testing) underwent germline testing, 6 of which (37.5%) demonstrated germline variants of unknown significance (VUS) (MSH6, PMS2, POLD1, BRIP1, RAD51D, CHEK2) but no known deleterious mutations. Notably, however, the patients harboring the MSH6 and PMS2 germline VUS had clinical features concerning for Lynch syndrome. One nonmethylated, germline-normal case underwent somatic tumor testing, and demonstrated a somatic MLH1 mutation. In summary, MLH1-hypermethylation accounts for the vast majority of MLH1/PMS2-deficient cancers in a universally screened population, although MLH1 somatic and germline mutations can occur. Occasionally, patients with MLH1-hypermethlated tumors also bear germline VUS in other mismatch repair genes as well as genes implicated in other hereditary cancer syndromes, but their clinical relevance is unclear. Family and personal cancer histories must always be evaluated to determine the need for germline testing in women with loss of MLH1/PMS2, even in the setting of hypermethylation.

Effects on Smoking Behavior of Switching Menthol Smokers to Non-menthol Cigarettes.

INTRODUCTION: Bans of menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes have been implemented in some localities and have been proposed more broadly. One proposed benefit of such a ban is to increase cessation rates among current menthol smokers. There is currently relatively limited data regarding how smoking behavior changes if menthol smokers switch to non-menthol cigarettes. AIMS AND METHODS: African American menthol smokers interested in quitting smoking were randomized to either continue smoking menthol (n = 60) or switch to non-menthol cigarettes (n = 62) for 1 month prior to a cessation attempt. Cessation results were reported previously; this analysis reports the results from the pre-cessation visits at which amount smoked, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) concentration, urinary cotinine concentrations, and subjective measures were assessed. RESULTS: Over the 4-week study period, those switching to non-menthol (vs. continuing to smoke menthol) cigarettes smoked fewer cigarettes per day (mean ratio: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.98; p = .02), reported lower withdrawal symptom severity (mean difference -1.29; 95% CI: -2.6 to -0.01; p = .05) and higher perceived effectiveness of their skills for quitting smoking (mean difference 0.56; 95% CI: 0.02-1.10; p = .05). No significant differences were found between groups in exhaled CO, urinary cotinine concentrations, or most other subjective effects including support for a ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that were menthol cigarettes no longer available, those that switch to non-menthol cigarettes would not change their smoking behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefit.Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02342327. IMPLICATIONS: A ban on menthol characterizing flavor in cigarettes has been proposed as a potential means by which to increase smoking cessation rates among current menthol cigarette smokers. This study evaluated how African American menthol cigarette smokers adjusted their smoking behavior after switching to non-menthol cigarettes. Although the overall differences between groups were modest, they were in a direction consistent with decreased smoking suggesting that current smokers would not adjust their behavior in a way that is likely to be more hazardous, with some indicators suggesting that there may be some benefits.