Management of zygomatic fractures using different surgical approaches.

Management of zygomatic complex fractures using closed reduction, two point open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), closed reduction with three point ORIF and two point ORIF is of interest to dentist. 150 patients with zygomatic bone fractures between the ages of 14-60 years were included in the study. At final assessment, the percentage of stable condition was greater in closed reduction + two point ORIF and closed reduction + three point ORIF when compared to two point ORIF alone and three point ORIF alone and closed reduction alone. It was observed that stable condition was lowest in closed reduction alone. It was also observed that stable condition was lower in closed reduction + two point ORIF as compared to closed reduction + three point ORIF. It was also further noticed that stable condition was lower in two point ORIF alone as compared to three point ORIF alone. The treatment approach involving closed reduction and three point ORIF had better outcomes for management of zygomatic complex fractures.

Management of temporo-mandibular joint ankylosis using different surgical approaches.

Comparison of gap arthroplasty (GAP), interpositional arthroplasty (IAP) and distraction osteogenesis (DO) simultaneous with interpositional arthroplasty (DO+IAP) in management of TMJ ankylosis is of interest to dentists. The study comprised 36 individuals with TMJ ankylosis, 16 of whom were female and 20 of whom were male. Both prior to and following surgery, the maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO) and facial pattern were noted. The postoperative MIO was 33.23 ± 1.23mm, 35.24 ± 1.11mm and 38.24 ± 1.34mm in GAP, IAP and DO+IAP respectively. Data is statistically significant with high MIO observed in DO+ IAP technique and low MIO in GAP technique (p < 0.005). In addition to lengthening the mandible, concurrently processed interpositional arthroplasty alongside DO for TMJ ankylosis corrects gross asymmetry of the face, occlusal mal-alignment, midline change, and creates room for previously un-erupted teeth to emerge.

Assessment of Anatomical Variations of Mandibular Canal Depicted in Panoramic Radiography.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal play a vital role while performing surgical procedures affecting an area with mandibular canal course in the mandible. The neurovascular bundle may be severed during surgical procedures carried out mandible. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The present retrospective study was aimed to assess and evaluate the mandibular canal and its variations on the panoramic radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 88 randomly selected panoramic radiographs with complete mandible and associated bone. On a panoramic radiograph, the following parameters were assessed including bifid mandibular canal and location of bifurcation, the diameter of the mandibular canal as recorded in the first molar region, trabeculation in submandibular gland fossa, anterior loop measurement, direction and diameter of the bifid mandibular canal were all evaluated. Statistical analysis was done. RESULTS: In 51 hemimandibles, the mandibular canal was found to be corticalized, whereas in 21.59% (n = 19), the mandibular canal was visible. In the remaining 20.45% (n = 18) of the study participants, the mandibular canal was not visualized. In the submandibular gland fossa region, diminished trabeculation was seen in 55.68% of the evaluated radiographs, whereas trabeculation was not seen at all in the remaining 23.86% of the subjects. A significant correlation was seen in decreased trabeculation of submandibular gland fossa and absence of the mandibular canal (P value < 0.001). The bifid mandibular canal was seen in 19.31% of the study participants (n = 17) with a mean width of 3.12 ± 1.1 mm. Extension of the anterior loop of the mental nerve was seen as up to 2 mm in majority participants in 67.04% individuals (n = 59). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that panoramic radiographs are a reliable tool for assessment of the mandibular canal and associated anatomical variations associated with it.

A Comparative Study Evaluating Implant Success and Bone Loss in Diabetes and Nondiabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is seen to be associated with increased rate of failure of implants. The implant failure can be categorized as ailing, failing, and failed implants. The review of literature did not form any consensus on the effect of diabetes on the implant success rates. The reason we found was many confounding factors and nonconsideration of glycemic status of diabetic patients. Hence, in our study, we eliminated the confounding factors and took glycemic index in consideration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six participants were included in this study, out of which 26 were nondiabetic and 20 diabetic. Diabetics were further divided into two groups based on the HBA1C values, as controlled and uncontrolled diabetics. RESULTS: We found that the uncontrolled diabetics had highest rate of implant failure as compared to other two groups. Furthermore, the controlled diabetics and nondiabetics had similar implant successes and failure rates. CONCLUSION: This suggests that controlled diabetics are comparable to nondiabetics in terms of implant success rates.

Articaine as an alternative in lidocaine allergy: Case report of a seventy year old male patient.

INTRODUCTION: Allergy to lidocaine is extremely rare but if it occurs, one should switch to an alternative drug and discontinue the use of lidocaine so that adverse consequences do not occur. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 70 year old male patient who had come to our department to undergo extraction of his decayed teeth under local anesthesia. DISCUSSION: He had history of allergy to lidocaine. Type IV hypersensitivity to lidocaine was confirmed by positive skin prick testing to the drug. Skin prick testing was also performed for articaine that was available with us, and the test was found to be negative without any wheal or flare reaction even after 72 h. Thus it was confirmed that he was non-allergic to articaine and successfully underwent exodontia by using the same. CONCLUSION: Articaine can be a suitable alternative in patients with true lignocaine allergy and vice-versa. No cross-reactivity has been reported between lidocaine and articaine so far. However, the number of cases reported in the past are limited, hence more cases are required in the future to prove its authenticity.