Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 25(2): 327-355, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30810892

RESUMO

A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Consenso , Engenharia/ética , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Editoração/ética , Ciência/ética , Má Conduta Científica , Acesso à Informação , Cultura , Educação Profissionalizante , Ética em Pesquisa , Humanos , Revisão por Pares , Políticas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pesquisa
2.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 57(1): 163-180, 2017 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748637

RESUMO

Scientific integrity is at the forefront of the scientific research enterprise. This paper provides an overview of key existing efforts on scientific integrity by federal agencies, foundations, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, and academia from 1989 to April 2016. It serves as a resource for the scientific community on scientific integrity work and helps to identify areas in which more action is needed. Overall, there is tremendous activity in this area and there are clear linkages among the efforts of the five sectors. All the same, scientific integrity needs to remain visible in the scientific community and evolve along with new research paradigms. High priority in instilling these values falls upon all stakeholders.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Guias como Assunto , Má Conduta Científica , Animais , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Fundações , Prioridades em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , National Academy of Sciences, U.S. , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos , Revisão por Pares/tendências , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sociedades Científicas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , United States Office of Research Integrity , Universidades
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA