Access to Liver Transplantation in Different ABO-Blood Groups and "Exceptions Points" in a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Allocation System: A Brazilian Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: In the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system, patients with "MELD exceptions" points may have unfair privilege in the competition for liver grafts. Furthermore, organ distribution following identical ABO blood types may also result in unjust organ allocation. The aim of this study was to investigate access to liver transplantation in a tertiary Brazilian center, regarding "MELD exceptions" situations and among ABO-blood groups. METHODS: A total of 465 adult patients on the liver waitlist from August 2015 to August 2016 were followed up until August 2017. Patients were divided into groups according to ABO-blood type and presence of "exceptions points." RESULTS: No differences in outcomes were observed among ABO-blood groups. However, patients from B and AB blood types spent less time on the list than patients from A and O groups (median, 46, 176, 415, and 401 days, respectively; P = .03). "Exceptions points" were granted for 141 patients (30.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma being the most common reason (52.4%). Patients with "exceptions points" showed higher transplantation rate, lower mortality on the list, and lower delta-MELD than non-exceptions patients (56.7% vs 19.1% [P < .01]; 18.4% vs 38.5% [P < .01], and 2.0 ± 2.6 vs 6.9 ± 7.0 [P < .01], respectively). Patients with refractory ascites had a higher mortality rate than those with other "exceptions" or without (48%). CONCLUSIONS: The MELD system provides equal access to liver transplantation among ABO-blood types, despite shorter time on the waitlist for AB and B groups. The current MELD exception system provides advantages for candidates with "exception points," resulting in superior outcomes compared with those without exceptions.

Transient Elastography in Acute Cellular Rejection Following Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Transient elastography (TE) is a noninvasive technique that measures liver stiffness. When an inflammatory process is present, this is shown by elevated levels of stiffness. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a consequence of an inflammatory response directed at endothelial and bile epithelial cells, and it is diagnosed through liver biopsy. This is a systematic review of the viability of TE in ACR following liver transplantation. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline PubMed databases were searched and updated to November 2016. The MESH terms used were "Liver Transplantation," "Graft Rejection," "Elasticity Imaging Techniques" (PubMed), and "Elastography" (Cochrane and Embase). RESULTS: Seventy studies were retrieved and selected using the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison or control, outcome) criteria. Three prospective studies were selected to meta-analysis and evaluation. A total of 33 patients with ACR were assessed with TE. One study showed a cutoff point of >7.9 kPa to define graft damage and <5.3 kPa to exclude graft damage (receiver operating characteristic 0.93; P < .001). Another study showed elevated levels of liver stiffness in ACR patients. However, in this study, no cutoff point for ACR was suggested. The final prospective study included 27 patients with ACR at liver biopsy. Cutoff points were defined as TE > 8.5 kPa, moderate to severe ACR, with a specificity of 100% and receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.924. The measurement of TE < 4.2 kPa excludes the possibility of any ACR (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TE may be an important tool for the severity of ACR in patients following liver transplantation. Further studies should be performed to better define the cutoff points and applicability of the exam.

Better Selection Criteria With Prognostic Factors for Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has evolved significantly in recent years, with each advancement part of the effort toward increasing patient and graft survival as well as quality of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and selection criteria for liver transplantation. METHODS: Our study was a statistical analysis, logistic regression, and survival evaluation of a total of 80 liver transplants that were performed between June 1, 2016 and September 24, 2016. Recipient factors evaluated included age, retransplantation, hemodialysis, cardiac risk, portal vein thrombosis, hospitalization, fulminant hepatitis, previous surgery, renal failure, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Donor factors included age, cardiac arrest, acidosis, days in the intensive care unit, steatosis, and vasoactive drug use. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients transplanted, 65 deceased donor liver transplants (DDLTs) and 15 living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) were performed. LDLT overall 1-year patient survival was 77.5% and graft survival 75%, and DDLT overall patient survival was 89.23% and graft survival was 86.15%. On evaluated score criteria analyzed we observed a significant score on recipient (P = .01) and not significant on donor (P =.45). Isolated factors evaluated included recipient age (relative risk [RR] 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89 to 11.09; P = .074), retransplant (RR 4.22, 95% CI 1.36 to 13.1; P = .013), and hemodialysis (RR 4.23, 95% CI 1.45 to 12.31, P = .008). On donor evaluation, we observed moderate and severe steatosis (RR 3.8, 95% CI 0.86 to 16.62; P = .06). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we demonstrate a relevant model of criteria selection of liver transplant patients that is able to make a better match between the donor and recipient allocation for a better graft and patient survival.

Ten years' evaluation of potential pancreas donors in São Paulo, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation is a treatment for advanced type 1 diabetes and offers significant improvement in quality of life. Recent advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression regimes lead to good outcomes. However, despite significant higher rates of multiorgan donors in Brazil, pancreas transplantation seems to have remained stable. This study aimed to investigate the acceptance rate of potential pancreas donors in the past 10 years in São Paulo State. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated potential pancreas donors characteristics and its acceptance rate in São Paulo State in the past 10 years. We divided this period into 2 eras: 1st era from January 2003 to January 2008; and 2nd era from January 2008 to January 2013. Data were obtained from São Paulo's government official website. RESULTS: During the whole period, 5,005 deceased donors of all ages were available for pancreas transplantation. According to eras, we had 1,588 donors in the 1st and 3,417 in the 2nd era. In the 2nd era, donors >49 years old were significantly more common (P < .001). Blood test abnormalities, donor comorbidities, and high dosage of vasopressors also were significantly higher in the 2nd era. Rate of graft acceptance had a significant decrease in the 2nd era, from 46.4% to 25% (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater organ availability, pancreas transplantations performed in São Paulo State remained stable. Rate of graft acceptance is dramatically lower in more recent years.