Development and validation of a Smartphone Impact Scale among healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES: Smartphone overuse is prevalent among healthcare professionals. There is no standard scale that can measure the impact of smartphone usage on healthcare professionals. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool, the Smartphone Impact Scale (SIS), that can effectively measure the use of smartphone among healthcare professionals. METHODS: We developed a generic instrument to study the impact of smartphone usage among healthcare professionals. A total of 1436 healthcare professionals from various regions of KSA participated in this study through an online questionnaire-based survey. The psychometric properties of the SIS were developed using content validity index (CVI), factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analysis. RESULTS: A 23-item scale was selected for reliability and validity analysis. The average CVI was found to be 0.824. The internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha value was 0.91, and test-retest reliability was 0.85. The Cronbach's alpha values for Factors 1 and 2 were 0.875 and 0.803, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis indices were as follows: root mean square of approximation = 0.0710, comparative fit index = 0.861, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.845, and the coefficient of determination = 0.969. The correlation between two factors was 0.66. After factor analysis, we developed a final questionnaire with 23 items. CONCLUSIONS: Our SIS showed a three-factor structure and appropriate psychometric characteristics. Due to its adequate reliability and validity, SIS can be conveniently used to evaluate the impact of smartphone usage on healthcare professionals.

What Factors Influence Union and Refracture of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia? A Multicenter Long-term Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors influencing union of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT), refractures, and integrity of the tibia at maturity. METHODS: Data of 119 children operated for Crawford-type IV CPT and followed-up till skeletal maturity were analyzed. Logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses were used to test associations between several variables and the outcome. RESULTS: Primary union occurred in 86% of children. At maturity, 69% remained soundly united. The odds ratio for failure of primary union was 3.89 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-14.40; P=0.042) when bone morphogenetic protein was used, and children who had a combination of the Ilizarov technique and intramedullary nailing were at risk for unsound union at maturity (odds ratio, 6.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-30.83; P=0.026). No other association reached statistical significance. On recursive partitioning, use of the Ilizarov technique, transfixing the ankle and subtalar joints, use of cortical graft and not operating on the fibula were associated with a better outcome; use of bone morphogenetic protein and combining intramedullary nailing with the Ilizarov technique were associated with poor results. CONCLUSIONS: A larger sample is needed to confirm which factors truly influence the outcome of CPT. This may be feasible if data are collected prospectively through a multicenter registry.