The feasibility and usability of mixed reality teaching in a hospital setting based on self-reported perceptions of medical students.

BACKGROUND: Clinical teaching during encounters with real patients lies at the heart of medical education. Mixed reality (MR) using a Microsoft HoloLens 2 (HL2) offers the potential to address several challenges: including enabling remote learning; decreasing infection control risks; facilitating greater access to medical specialties; and enhancing learning by vertical integration of basic principles to clinical application. We aimed to assess the feasibility and usability of MR using the HL2 for teaching in a busy, tertiary referral university hospital. METHODS: This prospective observational study examined the use of the HL2 to facilitate a live two-way broadcast of a clinician-patient encounter, to remotely situated third and fourth year medical students. System Usability Scale (SUS) Scores were elicited from participating medical students, clinician, and technician. Feedback was also elicited from participating patients. A modified Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning Materials: Learner Perceptions Questionnaire (mETELM) was completed by medical students and patients. RESULTS: This was a mixed methods prospective, observational study, undertaken in the Day of Surgery Assessment Unit. Forty-seven medical students participated. The mean SUS score for medical students was 71.4 (SD 15.4), clinician (SUS = 75) and technician (SUS = 70) indicating good usability. The mETELM Questionnaire using a 7-point Likert Scale demonstrated MR was perceived to be more beneficial than a PowerPoint presentation (Median = 7, Range 6-7). Opinion amongst the student cohort was divided as to whether the MR tutorial was as beneficial for learning as a live patient encounter would have been (Median = 5, Range 3-6). Students were positive about the prospect of incorporating of MR in future tutorials (Median = 7, Range 5-7). The patients' mETELM results indicate the HL2 did not affect communication with the clinician (Median = 7, Range 7-7). The MR tutorial was preferred to a format based on small group teaching at the bedside (Median = 6, Range 4-7). CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings indicate that MR teaching using the HL2 demonstrates good usability characteristics for providing education to medical students at least in a clinical setting and under conditions similar to those of our study. Also, it is feasible to deliver to remotely located students, although certain practical constraints apply including Wi-Fi and audio quality.

How Does SCORTEN Score?

The Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis-specific severity of illness score (SCORTEN) was developed to predict mortality in patients with Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). Several studies have attempted to assess the accuracy of SCORTEN with mixed results. The objective of this study is to compare the predicted and actual mortality for patients with SJS/TEN admitted to a single high-volume burn center.This retrospective study included adult and pediatric patients admitted to our burn center with biopsy-confirmed SJS/TEN between February 2008 and February 2016. SCORTEN scores were calculated for each patient on days 1 and 3 of admission. The primary endpoint was predicted vs actual in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included the association of SCORTEN, as well as individual components of SCORTEN, with hospital length of stay, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and in-hospital complications.Of 128 patients included, the mean age was 44.5 years, 40.6% (n = 52) were males, and 50.0% (n = 64) were Caucasians. The median TBSA was 12.25% on day 1 and 25% on day 3. The median SCORTEN at admission was 2 (interquartile range: 1-3.5). There were a total of 20 deaths (17.2%). SCORTEN exhibited good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.91) and performed directionally as expected, but a low but nonsignificant standardized mortality ratio (75.3%, P = .164) and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test of borderline significance (P = .088) make the model's fit unclear.The accuracy of the SCORTEN model in predicting mortality for SJS/TEN patients treated in a burn center remains unclear. This study may encourage future multicenter studies to further clarify its predictive ability and may also enhance future investigation into the use of a reformulated or reweighted SCORTEN.