RESUMO
The Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology developed this evidence-based practice guideline for management of chronic constipation. A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 29 statements, which were generated by electronic voting iteration as well as face to face meeting and review of the supporting literature primarily from India. These statements include 9 on epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic criteria; 8 on pathophysiology; and the remaining 12 on investigations and treatment. When the proportion of those who voted either to accept completely or with minor reservation was 80% or higher, the statement was regarded as accepted. The members of the consensus team believe that this would be useful for teaching, clinical practice, and research on chronic constipation in India and in other countries with similar spectrum of the disorders.
Assuntos
Consenso , Constipação Intestinal , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Doença Crônica , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constipação Intestinal/epidemiologia , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeAssuntos
Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/microbiologia , Histoplasmose/diagnóstico , Pancreatopatias/microbiologia , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico , Endossonografia , Feminino , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Histoplasmose/complicações , Histoplasmose/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Imunocompetência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatopatias/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Though antroduodenal manometry (ADM) is an important research tool, experience on its clinical utility is scanty. METHODS: All ADM performed as a clinical service, using an 8-channel water perfusion system were retrospectively analyzed. Impact on clinical management was classified as: (1) new diagnosis made, (2) change in management (new drug, decision regarding surgical treatment), (3) further special investigation done, (4) referral to another specialty. RESULTS: ADM was successful in 32/33 (97%) patients (age 30 years [range 8-71]); 6 patients were < 12 years old. Clinical impression before ADM was: chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) in 16 (50%), suspected gastroparesis in 11 (34.3%), dyspepsia in 5 (15.6%). Consequent to ADM in patients with CIPO, a new diagnosis was made in two (intestinal neuronal dysplasia and celiac disease), new drugs were started in five, surgery was performed in three and specific referral was sought in three. ADM confirmed gastroparesis in 9 of 11 patients. A new diagnosis was made in three patients, new drugs were started in three, and three were referred. In five dyspeptic patients, ADM was normal and no therapy was suggested. Overall, eleven patients with CIPO and four with gastroparesis benefited after ADM. CONCLUSION: ADM was found useful in CIPO and gastroparesis, helped in decision making regarding surgery; however in nonspecific indications its utility was limited.