The Level of Expressed Need--a measure of help-seeking behaviour for chronic pain in the community.

Chronic pain is a common and disabling condition, with a high impact on health and the health services in the community. The extent of help-seeking behaviour and factors that influence this are complex, but poorly understood. A simple, valid measure of help-seeking behaviour would be useful for community-based research, with a view to developing and evaluating interventions. The aims of the study were to test a hierarchical scale designed to measure help-seeking behaviour in chronic pain in postal surveys of the community, and to explore factors associated with responses. As part of a community survey of chronic pain, we developed the Level of Expressed Need (LEN) scale, based on questions about the use of treatment and professional advice for chronic pain. We compared this scale with two measures of chronic pain severity--the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), and the Glasgow Pain Questionnaire (GPQ)--and analyzed associations with the SF36 general health questionnaire and demographic variables. Of 3605 respondents (corrected response rate 82%), 1817 reported chronic pain. Of these, 17% were at the mildest and 28% at the severest LEN. There were strong correlations with both the CPG (r=0.48) and the GPQ (r=0.55). There were, however, many important disparities in responses to these measures. Several other factors were independently associated with a high LEN in chronic pain: female gender, lower educational level, and physical, mental, pain and general health dimensions of the SF36 questionnaire. The LEN is a useful tool for measuring the help-seeking response to chronic pain in the general population. The findings confirm that this response is influenced by clinical and demographic factors in addition to the severity of the pain. Further development work will strengthen the instrument to explore these.

Intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium.

OBJECTIVES: (a) to describe current practice in the monitoring and treatment of moderate and severe head injuries in Europe; (b) to report on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring, occurrence of measured and reported intracranial hypertension, and complications related to this monitoring; (c) to investigate the relationship between the severity of injury, the frequency of monitoring and management, and outcome. METHODS: A three-page questionnaire comprising 60 items of information has been compiled by 67 centres in 12 European countries. Information was collected prospectively regarding all severe and moderate head injuries in adults (> 16 years) admitted to neurosurgery within 24 h of injury. A total of 1005 adult head injury cases were enrolled in the study from 1 February 1995 to 30 April 1995. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was administered at 6 months. RESULTS: Early surgery was performed in 346 cases (35%); arterial pressure was monitored invasively in 631 (68%), ICP in 346 (37%), and jugular bulb saturation in 173 (18%). Artificial ventilation was provided to 736 patients (78%). Intracranial hypertension was noted in 55% of patients in whom ICP was recorded, while it was suspected in only 12% of cases without ICP measurement. There were great differences in the use of ventilation and CPP monitoring among the centres. Mortality at 6 months was 31%. There was an association between an increased frequency of monitoring and intervention and an increased severity of injury; correspondingly, patients who more frequently underwent monitoring and ventilation had a less favourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In Europe there are great differences between centres in the frequency of CPP monitoring and ventilatory support applied to head-injured patients. ICP measurement disclosed a high rate of intracranial hypertension, which was not suspected in patients evaluated on a clinical basis alone. ICP monitoring was associated with a low rate of complications. Cases with severe neurological impairment, and with the worse outcome, were treated and monitored more intensively.

Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of disability in young people and adults admitted to hospital with a head injury and to estimate the annual incidence in the community. DESIGN: Prospective, hospital based cohort study, with one year follow up of sample stratified by coma score. SETTING: Five acute hospitals in Glasgow. SUBJECTS: 2962 patients (aged 14 years or more) with head injury; 549 (71%) of the 769 patients selected for follow up participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glasgow outcome scale and problem orientated questionnaire. RESULTS: Survival with moderate or severe disability was common after mild head injury (47%, 95% confidence interval 42% to 52%) and similar to that after moderate (45%, 35% to 56%) or severe injury (48%, 36% to 60%). By extrapolation from the population identified (90% of whom had mild injuries), it was estimated that annually in Glasgow (population 909 498) 1400 young people and adults are still disabled one year after head injury. CONCLUSION: The incidence of disability in young people and adults admitted with a head injury is higher than expected. This reflects the high rate of sequelae previously unrecognised in the large number of patients admitted to hospital with an apparently mild head injury.

The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is recognised as an important problem in the community but our understanding of the epidemiology of chronic pain remains limited. We undertook a study designed to quantify and describe the prevalence and distribution of chronic pain in the community. METHODS: A random sample of 5036 patients, aged 25 and over, was drawn from 29 general practices in the Grampian region of the UK and surveyed by a postal self-completion questionnaire. The questionnaire included case-screening questions, a question on the cause of the pain, the chronic pain grade questionnaire, the level of expressed needs questionnaire, and sociodemographic questions. FINDINGS: 3605 questionnaires were returned completed. 1817 (50.4%) of patients self reported chronic pain, equivalent to 46.5% of the general population. 576 reported back pain and 570 reported arthritis; these were the most common complaints and accounted for a third of all complaints. Backward stepwise logistic-regression modelling identified age, sex, housing tenure, and employment status as significant predictors of the presence of chronic pain in the community. 703 (48.7%) individuals with chronic pain had the least severe grade of pain, and 228 (15.8%) the most severe grade. Of those who reported chronic pain, 312 (17.2%) reported no expressed need, and 509 (28.0%) reported the highest expressed need. INTERPRETATION: Chronic pain is a major problem in the community and certain groups within the population are more likely to have chronic pain. A detailed understanding of the epidemiology of chronic pain is essential for efficient management of chronic pain in primary care.

Multivariate outlier detection applied to multiply imputed laboratory data.

In clinical laboratory safety data, multivariate outlier detection methods may highlight a patient whose laboratory measurements do not follow the same pattern of relationships as the majority of patients, although their individual measurements are not found to be outlying when considered one at a time. Missing data problems are often dealt with by imputing a single value as an estimate of the missing value. The completed data set may then be analysed using traditional methods. A disadvantage of using single imputation is the underestimation of variability, with a corresponding distortion of power in hypothesis testing. Multiple imputation methods attempt to overcome this problem, and in this paper a study is described which considers the application of multivariate outlier detection methods to multiply imputed clinical laboratory safety data sets. Three different proportions of missing data are generated in laboratory data sets of dimensions 4, 7, 12 and 30, and a comparison of eight multiple imputation methods is carried out. Two outlier detection techniques, Mahalanobis distance and generalized principal component analysis, are applied to the multiply imputed data sets, and their performances are discussed. Measures are introduced for assessing the accuracy of the missing data results, depending on which method of analysis is used.

Relationship between the chronic pain grade and measures of physical, social and psychological well-being.

Chronic pain is an important cause of suffering, disability and loss of productivity within the community. Chronic pain can also be viewed as a multidimensional phenomenon, and may be associated with increased suffering of a social and psychological nature, as well as physical suffering. In this paper, the severity of the chronic pain gradings (CPG) is defined in terms of physical, social and psychological well-being, as measured by the SF36 and Glasgow Pain Questionnaire. Although previous work has shown the chronic pain grade to be a valid measure of chronic pain severity, little is known of the relationship between this and other health measures. A random sample of 5036 individuals, representative of the general population, stratified for age and sex, was drawn. A further sample of 4175 patients was drawn from a list of patients enrolled for repeat prescriptions for analgesic medication. A questionnaire survey was carried out, and response rates of 82 and 87% were achieved, respectively. The comparisons described confirm the widespread impact of chronic pain on all aspects of health, supporting the multidimensional view. These findings are important in addressing the management of chronic pain patients, and in particular, the social and psychological well-being of a patient needs to be addressed in parallel with the physical well-being in order to successfully reduce the suffering associated with chronic pain.

Minor morbidity after day-case surgery.

The number of patients and procedures considered suitable for day-case anaesthesia and surgery continues to grow and it is hoped that 50-60% of all operations in the UK will eventually be performed on a day-patient basis. However, minor but troublesome post-operative side effects remain common. We have examined the incidence of the most common causes of minor morbidity, namely headache, nausea/vomiting and pain occurring after a wide variety of day-case surgical and diagnostic procedures. Patient satisfaction with treatment and the impact of day case surgery on the workload of the general practitioner was also assessed. The anaesthetic records of the patients involved were reviewed in an attempt to determine if there was any association between the anaesthetic technique and an adverse outcome. A simple postal questionnaire completed on the morning after surgery was returned by 553 patients (response rate over 87%). More than 50% of respondents complained of some morbidity, with 40% complaining of pain, 19% of headache and 9% of nausea and vomiting. One third self-medicated to modify their symptoms, and in most cases (81%) this was effective. However, 6% of patients called their GP for advice and 2% received a home visit. No patient required readmission. A total of 92 patients (17%) would have preferred treatment as an in-patient. Analysis of the anaesthetic drugs and techniques suggested that the commonly used anti-emetics droperidol and metoclopramide had little effect on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intubation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of minor morbidity although this may be related to surgical factors.

The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research.

The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire has been proposed as an interview-administered, multi-dimensional measure of chronic pain severity in selected populations with chronic pain in the United States of America. It has not previously been tested in the United Kingdom, in self-completion form or in an unselected general population. We undertook a postal survey to assess its reliability, validity and acceptability in these circumstances, using a general practice population in Scotland, with a practice population of 11202 patients. A random sample of 400 patients aged over 18 was drawn, stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular prescriptions for pain-relieving medication. The dimensions and sub-scales of the Chronic Pain Grade were compared with the SF-36 general health questionnaire and questions relating to duration of any pain and attempts to seek treatment for this. The methodological approach proposed by Streiner and Norman (1989) was used to assess validity and reliability. A response rate of 76% was achieved. Cronbach's alpha was > 0.9 and item-total correlations were all high, indicating good internal consistency and reliability. Validity was confirmed by psychometric testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Good correlations with comparable dimensions of the SF-36 general health questionnaire confirmed convergent validity. Construct validity was confirmed by testing scores against duration of pain and treatment sought for pain. We concluded that the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire is a useful, reliable and valid measure of severity of chronic pain. It translates well into UK English and is acceptable in general population postal research.