Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Surg ; 141(1): 16-22, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16415406

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there might be different effects on breathing control and respiratory mechanics after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: A general hospital in Greece. PATIENTS: Of 53 patients assessed for eligibility, 18 and 10 were randomly allocated to the laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy groups, respectively. These 28 patients had normal spirometry measurements and American Society of Anesthesiologists' class I physical status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurements of breathing control and mechanics variables. Tidal volume, inspiratory time, breathing frequency, mean inspiratory flow, duty cycle, central respiratory drive, and mean inspiratory impedance were recorded before surgery on the second and eighth postoperative days. Airway resistance was recorded before surgery and on the eighth postoperative day, with all measurements being performed under no influence of analgesia. RESULTS: Two days after surgery, inspiratory time, breathing frequency, and central respiratory drive were significantly changed compared with preoperative values for both methods, whereas mean inspiratory impedance was significantly increased (P<.001) for the laparoscopic procedure. Eight days after surgery, changes were seen only for the laparoscopic group: duty cycle and airway resistance were significantly reduced (P = .01) and increased (P = .04), respectively, compared with preoperative data. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be associated with small but sustained alterations in the control of breathing and mechanics, which might have an unfavorable clinical impact on patients with compromised lung function.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistectomia , Respiração , Mecânica Respiratória , Adulto , Idoso , Resistência das Vias Respiratórias , Anestesia Geral , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espirometria
2.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 50(53): 1193-200, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14571697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined 28 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute or chronic cholecystitis and/or cholelithiasis in order to evaluate the effect of surgical technique on respiratory functional parameters. METHODOLOGY: We compared lung volume, flow parameters and blood gas indices in two groups of patients, eighteen of which underwent laparoscopic and ten of which open cholecystectomy, specifically on the 2nd and 8th postoperative day lung function indices were compared to preoperative values. The same anesthetic protocol was administered for all patients. No underlying illness other than the cholecystitis and/or cholelithiasis was present. RESULTS: From the results of lung volume parameters, ERV (%pred) data indicate a better expiratory ability for the Open Cholecystectomy [preop.: 93.10 (38.80), 8th day: 116.90 (63.69) compared to the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group (preop.: 105.39 (31.51), 8th day: 98.72 (35.80). For IC (%pred.) parameter, in the Open Cholecystectomy group a marked but not statistically significant decrease remained into the 8th day (preop.: 86.70 (16.40). 8th day: 68.40 (16.98)] whereas for the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group, IC %pred value reflected a better respiratory performance [preop.: 92.83 (17.87), 8th day: 82.50 (18.82)]. For RV and RV/TLC parameter measurements a marked increase in the %pred value was observed for the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group on the 8th postoperative day as compared to preoperative data [RV: 122.94 (42.80), 109.22 (33.23) respectively, RV/TLC: 122.68 (31.10), 109.14 (21.56) respectively]. From the analysis of the flow parameters, a distinct difference was evident for PEF between the preoperative and 8th postoperative day data with the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy group showing statistically significant better flow rates [preop.: 93.72 (15.91), 8th day: 84.33 (20.67)] as compared to the Open Cholecystectomy group [preop.: 82.30 (22.98), 8th day: 59.10 (15.23)]. CONCLUSIONS: Having compared the 8th postoperative day with preoperative data for the two surgical methods, open cholecystectomy presented a better expiratory performance as compared to the laparoscopic method. However, laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in an overall better postoperative respiratory function.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistectomia , Laparoscopia , Ventilação Pulmonar , Capacidade Pulmonar Total , Adulto , Idoso , Colecistite/cirurgia , Colelitíase/cirurgia , Capacidade Residual Funcional , Humanos , Capacidade Inspiratória , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Testes de Função Respiratória , Capacidade Vital
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA