RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vaccination or the type of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 affects ovarian function in an assisted reproduction treatment. DESIGN: A retrospective and observational study. SETTING: University-affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. PATIENT(S): Five hundred one patients who had received the complete vaccination schedule. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment before and after vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Parameters for both reproductive outcomes and IVF results in patients vaccinated RESULT(S): We included 510 patients, distributed as follows: 13.5% (n = 69) received a viral vector vaccine, either the adenovirus serotype 26 vector vaccine (Ad26.CoV2.S; Janssen; n = 31) or the chimpanzee adenovirus vector vaccine (ChAdOx; AstraZeneca; n = 38). The remaining 86.5% (n = 441) received an messenger RNA vaccine from either Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 336) or Moderna (n = 105). Sample size for the unexposed women was n = 1190. No differences were found in any of the evaluated parameters for both reproductive outcomes and IVF results in patients vaccinated with any adenovirus or messenger RNA vaccine. When we compared the results after vaccination with different types of vaccines between the exposed and unexposed groups, and similar results were obtained in the days of stimulation or the doses of administered follicle stimulating hormone. Finally, the numbers of oocytes were as follows: Johnson & Johnson (9.2 ± 2.6), AstraZeneca (7.7 ± 1.2), Moderna (11.3 ± 1.8), Pfizer (12.6 ± 1.0), and the unvaccinated group (10.2 ± 1.5), P=0.057. CONCLUSION(S): These early results suggest no measurable detrimental effect on reproductive outcomes, regardless of the type of vaccine received.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Fertilização in vitro , Ovário , Feminino , Humanos , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Reprodução , Estudos Retrospectivos , RNA Mensageiro , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19RESUMO
A 31-year-old man presented to the hospital after suffering a sudden cardiac arrest. Despite optimal therapy, the patient passed away. His medical history included febrile rash at age 2. At autopsy, there was aneurysmal dilation and severe coronary artery stenosis by atherosclerotic plaques and myocardial fibrosis. These findings were presumed to be due to complications of Kawasaki disease, given the remote history of severe febrile rash as a toddler and the presence of chronic coronary artery injury, recanalization, and thrombosis with ischemic heart disease leading to sudden cardiac collapse and death.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT A 31-year-old man presented to the hospital after suffering a sudden cardiac arrest. Despite optimal therapy, the patient passed away. His medical history included febrile rash at age 2. At autopsy, there was aneurysmal dilation and severe coronary artery stenosis by atherosclerotic plaques and myocardial fibrosis. These findings were presumed to be due to complications of Kawasaki disease, given the remote history of severe febrile rash as a toddler and the presence of chronic coronary artery injury, recanalization, and thrombosis with ischemic heart disease leading to sudden cardiac collapse and death.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, both the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association recommend preoperative preparation with Lugol's Solution (LS) for patients undergoing thyroidectomy for Graves' Disease (GD), but their recommendations are based on low-quality evidence. The LIGRADIS trial aims to provide evidence either to support or refute the systematic use of LS in euthyroid patients undergoing thyroidectomy for GD. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be performed. Patients ≥18 years of age, diagnosed with GD, treated with antithyroid drugs, euthyroid and proposed for total thyroidectomy will be eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria will be prior thyroid or parathyroid surgery, hyperparathyroidism that requires associated parathyroidectomy, thyroid cancer that requires adding a lymph node dissection, iodine allergy, consumption of lithium or amiodarone, medically unfit patients (ASA-IV), breastfeeding women, preoperative vocal cord palsy and planned endoscopic, video-assisted or remote access surgery.Between January 2020 and January 2022, 270 patients will be randomized for either receiving or not preoperative preparation with LS. Researchers will be blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome will be the rate of postoperative complications: hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hematoma, surgical site infection or death. Secondary outcomes will be intraoperative events (Thyroidectomy Difficulty Scale score, blood loss, recurrent laryngeal nerve neuromonitoring signal loss), operative time, postoperative length of stay, hospital readmissions, permanent complications and adverse events associated to LS. CONCLUSIONS: There is no conclusive evidence supporting the benefits of preoperative treatment with LS in this setting. This trial aims to provide new insights into future Clinical Practice Guidelines recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03980132.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intralesional injection of Candida antigen appears to be an effective alternative for the treatment of warts. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of this treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of all children who received intralesional injection of Candida antigen at our center from January 2008 to July 2013. RESULTS: From a total of 220 patients, 156 (70.9%) had a complete response, 37 (16.8%) had a partial response, and 27 (12.2%) had no improvement. An average of 2.73 treatments was needed. Forty-seven of the patients with more than one wart (21.3%) also noted at least partial resolution of untreated warts at distant sites. Twenty-seven of the 47 patients (57.4%) had complete resolution. All treated patients experienced some discomfort at the time of the injection, but no serious side effects were reported. DISCUSSION: We report our results using this approach in a large group of children. CONCLUSION: Intralesional injection of Candida antigen is an effective and safe therapy for children with multiple and recalcitrant cutaneous warts.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Fungos/administração & dosagem , Candida/imunologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Verrugas/terapia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intralesionais , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Verrugas/diagnósticoRESUMO
Se muestran cinco casos recibidos en el Hospital Pérez de León de Petare durante los años 1990-1996. Se hace énfasis en la reducción ortopédica incruenta y fijación con tres clavos de Knowless, así como los resultados postoperatorios y su seguimiento posterior