Dual activities of a silencing information regulator complex in yeast transcriptional regulation and DNA-damage response.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae silencing information regulator (SIR) complex contains up to four proteins, namely Sir1, Sir2, Sir3, and Sir4. While Sir2 encodes a NAD-dependent histone deacetylase, other SIR proteins mainly function as structural and scaffold components through physical interaction with various proteins. The SIR complex displays different conformation and composition, including Sir2 homotrimer, Sir1-4 heterotetramer, Sir2-4 heterotrimer, and their derivatives, which recycle and relocate to different chromosomal regions. Major activities of the SIR complex are transcriptional silencing through chromosomal remodeling and modulation of DNA double-strand-break repair pathways. These activities allow the SIR complex to be involved in mating-type maintenance and switching, telomere and subtelomere gene silencing, promotion of nonhomologous end joining, and inhibition of homologous recombination, as well as control of cell aging. This review explores the potential link between epigenetic regulation and DNA damage response conferred by the SIR complex under various conditions aiming at understanding its roles in balancing cell survival and genomic stability in response to internal and environmental stresses. As core activities of the SIR complex are highly conserved in eukaryotes from yeast to humans, knowledge obtained in the yeast may apply to mammalian Sirtuin homologs and related diseases.

Genetic Dissection of Budding Yeast PCNA Mutations Responsible for the Regulated Recruitment of Srs2 Helicase.

DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) is a mechanism by which eukaryotes bypass replication-blocking lesions to resume DNA synthesis and maintain cell viability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DDT is mediated by sequential ubiquitination and sumoylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, encoded by POL30) at the K164 residue. Deletion of RAD5 or RAD18, encoding two ubiquitin ligases required for PCNA ubiquitination, results in severe DNA-damage sensitivity, which can be rescued by inactivation of SRS2 encoding a DNA helicase that inhibits undesired homologous recombination. In this study, we isolated DNA-damage resistant mutants from rad5Δ cells and found that one of them contained a pol30-A171D mutation, which could rescue both rad5Δ and rad18Δ DNA-damage sensitivity in a srs2-dependent and PCNA sumoylation-independent manner. Pol30-A171D abolished physical interaction with Srs2 but not another PCNA-interacting protein Rad30; however, Pol30-A171 is not located in the PCNA-Srs2 interface. The PCNA-Srs2 structure was analyzed to design and create mutations in the complex interface, one of which, pol30-I128A, resulted in phenotypes reminiscent of pol30-A171D. This study allows us to conclude that, unlike other PCNA-binding proteins, Srs2 interacts with PCNA through a partially conserved motif, and the interaction can be strengthened by PCNA sumoylation, which turns Srs2 recruitment into a regulated process. IMPORTANCE It is known that budding yeast PCNA sumoylation serves as a ligand to recruit a DNA helicase Srs2 through its tandem receptor motifs that prevent unwanted homologous recombination (HR) at replication forks, a process known as salvage HR. This study reveals detailed molecular mechanisms, in which constitutive PCNA-PIP interaction has been adapted to a regulatory event. Since both PCNA and Srs2 are highly conserved in eukaryotes, from yeast to human, this study may shed light to investigation of similar regulatory mechanisms.

Acute Exposure of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to the Next-Generation Perfluoroalkyl Substance, Perfluoroethylcyclohexanesulfonate, Shows Similar Effects as Legacy Substances.

Perfluoroethylcyclohexanesulfonate (PFECHS) is an emerging perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) that has been considered a potential replacement for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). However, there is little information characterizing the toxic potency of PFECHS to zebrafish embryos and its potential for effects in aquatic environments. This study assessed toxic potency of PFECHS in vivo during both acute (96-hour postfertilization) and chronic (21-day posthatch) exposures and tested concentrations of PFECHS from 500 ng/L to 2 mg/L. PFECHS was less likely to cause mortalities than PFOS for both the acute and chronic experiments based on previously published values for PFOS exposure, but exposure resulted in a similar incidence of deformities. Exposure to PFECHS also resulted in significantly increased abundance of transcripts of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (pparα), cytochrome p450 1a1 (cyp1a1), and apolipoprotein IV (apoaIV) at concentrations nearing those of environmental relevance. Overall, these results provide further insight into the safety of an emerging PFAS alternative in the aquatic environment and raise awareness that previously considered "safer" alternatives may show similar effects as legacy PFASs.