RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine an estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and to identify possible risk factors. DESIGN: Retrospective, case report study. SETTING: Hospitals in Limburg, the Netherlands. METHODS: Gynecologists in hospitals in Limburg were asked about uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS between 1999 and 2002. The charts of the reported perforations were studied. Data on the patient, doctor, insertion, diagnosis and removal were collected for every reported uterine perforation. RESULTS: In Limburg, the estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS is 2.6 per 1000 insertions. Insertion in lactating women, even beyond 6 weeks after delivery, was shown to be an important risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Complete registration of complications provides a greater insight into the actual incidence of LNG IUS-related uterine perforations and their possible consequences. This may eventually lead to a decrease in complications.
Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais Sintéticos/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efeitos adversos , Levanogestrel/efeitos adversos , Perfuração Uterina/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: An uncommon clinical presentation of metastatic tumor will often lead to additional diagnostic examinations. The patient of the present study was known to have endometrial cancer which was thought to be limited to the endometrium. Three months postoperatively, she developed ascites due to spread of the tumor, which is rarely seen in low-stage endometrial cancer. METHOD: Multiparameter flow cytometry using both cell phenotype information and DNA ploidy was performed. RESULTS: Retrospectively, the patient was diagnosed as having a DNA-diploid epithelial tumor of the endometrium as well as a DNA-aneuploid epithelial tumor in the left fallopian tube. It was shown that 3 months after primary surgery she developed ascites caused by metastatic tumor from the primary fallopian tube cancer. CONCLUSION: The complete diagnosis was made using multiparameter flow cytometry which, at present, is not routinely applied in gynecologic pathology.