Telemedicine for the Underserved Racial and Ethnic Minorities During COVID-19 and Beyond.

Objective: To demonstrate that a culturally and linguistically appropriate telehealth protocol can be implemented to improve the glycemic control of patients as an extension of regular clinical services and provide continuity of care. Methods: A telehealth platform was established during COVID-19 pandemic and from numerous telehealth encounters we sampled 498 patients who received telehealth intervention over a 12-month period for specific services: Rx refill, consultation for laboratory results, wellness evaluation and education, and acute or sick visits with appropriate referrals. This telehealth platform was integrated with a remote patient monitoring system utilizing a Bluetooth-enabled glucometer for patients with diabetes compared to their abnormal baseline hemoglobin A1C (HgA1C). The Blood sugar values were recorded at predefined intervals to monitor controls for diabetes. The ethnic diversity and level of education of patients required addressing the digital divide, language interpretation, and navigation at each monitoring step. Results: This method demonstrated that a culturally and linguistically appropriate telehealth protocol can be implemented to improve the glycemic control of patients in an intervention group compared with a control group. Validation of the glycemic control was based on 70 patients identified as eligible for participation based on the inclusion criteria: a HgA1C level of 7% or higher obtained within the last 10 months. Informed consent was obtained for 42 participants based on patient participation constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: We conclude that telemedicine procedures utilized for patients with little or no prior knowledge of remote self-monitoring methods can support their treatment of chronic diseases, such as diabetes. The outcomes from the implementation of telemedicine services were observed in a well-defined group of underserved racial and ethnic minority patients at our clinic. We now have a protocol to expand this to other chronic diseases and used as a regular clinical procedure.

Community-level screening for type 2 diabetes risk in Mexicans living in Colorado

Introduction: Many Mexican immigrants to the US are medically underserved and have a higher risk for type 2 diabetes; early identifica-tion of risk factors can prompt referrals to lifestyle changes and primary care in this population. We used a cross-sectional study design to assess diabetes risk using an existing community partnership, a public health professional, and a lay health promoter model to identify individuals at high risk for diabetes without imposing tests that are difficult to perform or sustain in a community setting. Materials and Methods: Between January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2019, a community-based approach for type 2 diabetes-risk screening was conducted by lay health workers using a standard protocol including an educational component, the FINDRISC questionnaire, and capillary plasma glucose criteria. Basic descriptive statistics were obtained for demographic, lifestyle, and diabetes risk factors. Results:Our team screened 783 adult individuals (444 females and 339 males) for type 2 diabetes risk. 29% of participants (35.6% of females and 20.6% of males) were at high risk of type 2 diabetes because they had FINDRISC scores of 14 or higher. We also identified other risk factors, 79% of females and 86% of males were overweight or obese, and 39% had high blood pressure; consequently, we referred 427 patients to their PCP or a new medical home. Conclusions: The use of a community-based intervention using the FINDRISC type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool is a suitable, easy to perform intervention that can be applied in community settings by community lay health promoters.

Introducción: un gran número de mexicanos que viven en los Estados Unidos están medicamente desatendidos y tienen alto riesgo de desarrollar diabetes. La identificación oportuna de factores de riesgo puede iniciar el proceso de referencia a programas de mejora de estilo de vida y a primer nivel de atención. Presentamos un estudio transversal diseñado para evaluar el riesgo de diabetes utilizando alianzas comunitarias pre-existentes, un profesional en salud pública y un modelo de promotores comunitarios de salud para identificar personas con alto riesgo de diabetes sin usar estudios de laboratorio complejos. Material y métodos: entre enero de 2018 y diciembre de 2019 se aplicó un programa comunitario para detector riesgo de diabetes por miembros de la comunidad utilizando un protocolo estandarizado que incluyo un componente educativo, el cuestionario FINDRISC y criterios de glucosa capilar. Se hicieron estudios esta-disticos basicos en demografia, estilos de vida y factores de riesgo de diabetes. Resultados: 783 personas (444 mujeres y 339 hombres) fueron evaluados para determinar su riesgo de diabetes. 29% de los participantes (35.6% de las mujeres y 20,6% de los hombres) tuvieron un resultado mayor o igual a 14 en la escala FINDRISC lo que indica alto riesgo de desarrollar diabetes. Se identificaron otros factores de riesgo, 79% de las mujeres y 86% de los hombres tenían sobrepeso u obesidad. Se detectó hipertensión en 39% de la muestra. Como consecuencia de esta intervención se refirieron 427 personas a primer nivel de atención. Conclusiones: La detección de individuos de alto riesgo de diabetes a nivel comunitario utilizando la escala FINDRISC por miembros de la comunidad es factible y de fácil aplicación.

Relationships hold the key to trustworthy and productive translational science: recommendations for expanding community engagement in biomedical research.

Good relationships between research institutions and communities are an essential, but often neglected, part of the infrastructure of translational science. In an effort to create greater interest among translational science researchers in cultivating relationships with community members, we report the results of a workshop we convened to learn how relationships vital to research are best created and sustained. We highlight common barriers and challenges that hinder relationships. We also provide recommendations that individual research institutions and teams can use to expand and strengthen their relationships with community members. The improved relationships between universities and communities that could result from their implementation should build greater public trust in biomedical research, lead to a stronger commitment to see it succeed, and engender shared values and commitments that will give rise to new rewards, recognition and admonishment to sustain those values and commitments over time, all of which would facilitate translational science.