Primary adrenal insufficiency due to bilateral adrenal hemorrhage-adrenal infarction in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: case presentation and review of the literature.

Primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) is a rare disease which represents the end stage of a destructive process involving the adrenal cortex. Occasionally it may be caused by bilateral adrenal hemorrhagic infarction in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We herein report the challenging case of a 30-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary APS who was admitted to the emergency department (ED) due to fever, lethargy, and syncopal episodes. Hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hyperpigmentation, shock, altered mental status, and clinical response to glucocorticoid administration were features highly suggestive of an acute adrenal crisis. The patient's clinical status required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), where steroid replacement, anticoagulation, and supportive therapy were provided, with a good outcome. Imaging demonstrated bilateral adrenal enlargement attributed to recent adrenal hemorrhage. This case highlights the fact that bilateral adrenal vein thrombosis and subsequent hemorrhage can be part of the thromboembolic complications seen in both primary and secondary APS and which, if misdiagnosed, may lead to a life-threatening adrenal crisis. High clinical suspicion is required for its prompt diagnosis and management. A literature search of past clinical cases with adrenal insufficiency (AI) in the setting of APS and SLE was conducted using major electronic databases. Our aim was to retrieve information about the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of similar conditions.

Modifications of the learning curve guidelines for breast cancer sentinel node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the learning period of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer do not address important details such as the false negative rate way of calculation and the number of patients with positive axilla that should be included among the cases of this period. The aim of this study was to identify refinement points which should be included in the guidelines. METHODS: We studied 138 breast cancer cases of the sentinel lymph node biopsy learning period of three surgeons. The sentinel node was identified using isosulfan blue or technetium sulfur colloid or both. All patients underwent complementary axillary dissection. RESULTS: All three surgeons (A, B, C) fulfilled the guidelines' false negative rate criteria of 5, 0 and 5%, respectively, after 20 cases. However, only six, 10 and 10 cases with positive axilla, respectively, were included and the false negative rates using only these cases were 17, 0 and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines may lead surgeons to inappropriate conclusions about their ability to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy with an acceptable false negative rate. The learning period should include as many cases with positive axilla as possible and the false negative rate should be calculated only on those patients.