RefluxStop™ Therapy - a New Minimally Invasive Technology in Anti-reflux Surgery.

The symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are very common, but cannot be reliably controlled with medication, as more than 40% of patients suffer troublesome symptoms more than twice a week even when taking maximum doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Until recently, the only surgical option was anti-reflux surgery, usually performed as a hiatal hernia repair and some form of fundoplication. While this is still the gold standard, some centers note high recurrence rates and/or high rates of side effects such as dysphagia, bloating, and post-prandial discomfort. This paper describes a new surgical procedure that controls reflux symptoms through hiatal hernia repair in combination with the implantation of a silicone cube. The cube is implanted near the left side of the esophagus above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The details of the procedure, the indications for this new approach, the initial results, and the rate of side effects compared to Nissen fundoplication are described. Implantation of the CE-certified RefluxStop™ (Implantica, Zug, Switzerland) has been used for 3 years and the initial studies show encouraging success rates. In addition, side effects are significantly reduced. These results must be evaluated in further studies.

Clinical characteristics and comparison of the outcome in young versus older patients with upper gastrointestinal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical behaviour and outcome of young patients with gastroesophageal tumours (GET) is surmised to differ from older patients, yet data on the comparison of these two patient subgroups is scarce. This study focuses on the investigation of the clinical characteristics and survival outcome of younger-age people with GET, when compared to older patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with GET at the Medical University of Vienna between 2004 and 2016 were included in this study. Clinical parameters and the overall survival (OS) were compared between young (≤ 45 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) patients. RESULTS: Among 796 patients, who were eligible for this analysis, fifty-eight patients (7%) were ≤ 45 years at the initial onset of the disease. These 58 young patients were then matched to elderly patients based on the gender, tumour stage, histology and tumour location. The number of metastatic lesions was significantly higher among young patients (p < 0.05). In a non-metastatic setting younger patients showed a significant longer OS than older patients (median 1226 versus 801 days, p = 0.028). Furthermore, young patients with extensive metastatic disease (2 or more metastatic site) had a significantly poorer OS than elderly patients (median 450 versus 646 days, p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that young patients might be diagnosed very late, which might lead to the development of a more aggressive disease compared to older patients, but a relatively long OS when diagnosed and treated in a non-metastatic setting. Thus, screening methods for younger patients might be considerable to enhance the outcome of young patients with GET.

Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of symptoms at disease presentation of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterise these symptoms and correlate them with the outcome, so new prognostic markers can be defined. METHODS: We analysed clinical data including symptoms, therapies and survival of patients with stage IV gastro-oesophageal cancer treated between 2002 and 2018 at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. Initial symptoms as well as stenosis in endoscopy and HER2 positivity were evaluated in a cross-validation model to ascertain the impact of each variable on patient survival. RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were evaluated. Five factors (stenosis in endoscopy, weight loss, HER2 positivity, dyspepsia, ulcer or active bleeding) have proven to be statistically relevant prognostic factors and were given a count of +1 and -1, if applicable. The resulting score ranges between -3 and +2. The survival probability for 180 days with a score of -3/-2, -1, 0, +1 and +2 is 90%, 80%, 73%, 72% and 42%, whereas for 2 years, it is 30%, 30%, 8%, 7% and 3%, respectively. The median overall survival of a score of -3/-2, -1, 0, +1 and +2 was 579 (95% CI 274 to not measurable), 481 (95% CI 358 to 637), 297 (95% CI 240 to 346), 284 (95% CI 205 to 371), 146 (95% CI 120 to 229) days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data from this retrospective study indicate that the Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms score provides independent prognostic information that may support clinical decision making at diagnosis of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. Our findings should be evaluated in prospective studies.

Utilization and Efficacy of Palliative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastroesophageal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A standard treatment recommendation for advanced stage gastroesophageal cancer is still missing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer treated between 2001 and 2017 at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. RESULTS: Administration of systemic therapy was positively associated with overall survival (OS) (469 days vs. 185 days; p<0.001), while palliative gastrectomy or radiotherapy showed no correlation. OS was significantly longer in patients receiving capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) vs. leucovorin/5-FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (600 days vs. 327 days, p<0.05). Comparison of doublet vs. triplet chemotherapies showed no difference in OS, but triplet chemotherapy resulted in more adverse events. The anti-HER2-antibody trastuzumab doubled OS (836 days vs. 399 days, p=0.053). CONCLUSION: Capecitabine may be preferably used over infused 5-FU and doublet chemotherapy over triplet chemotherapy in the first-line palliative setting of advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

MK2 and ETV1 Are Prognostic Factors in Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.

Background. Esophageal cancer is ranked in the top ten of diagnosed tumors worldwide. Even though improvements in survival could be noticed over the last years, prognosis remains poor. ETS translocation variant 1 (ETV1) is a member of a family of transcription factors and is phosphorylated by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2). Aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of MK2 and ETV1 in esophageal cancer. Methods. Consecutive patients that underwent surgical resection at the department of surgery at the Medical University of Vienna between 1991 and 2012 were included into this study. After microscopic analysis, tissue micro arrays (TMAs) were created and immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies against MK2 and ETV1. Results. 323 patients were included in this study. Clinical data was achieved from a prospective patient data base. Nuclear overexpression of MK2 was observed in 143 (44.3%) cases for nuclear staining and in 142 (44.0%) cases a cytoplasmic overexpression of MK2 was observed. Nuclear and cytoplasmic ETV1 overexpression was detected in 20 cases (6.2%) and 30 cases (9.3%), respectively. In univariate survival analysis, cMK2 and nETV1 were found to be significantly associated with patients' overall survival. Whereas overexpression of cMK2 was associated with shorter, nETV1 was associated with longer overall survival. In multivariate survival analysis, both cMK2 and nETV1 were found to be independent prognostic factors for the subgroup of EAC as well. Discussion. Expression of MK2 and ETV1 are prognostic factors in patients, with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma - terra incognita: A demand for cross-national pooling of data.

To date, due to the rarity, tumor biology and carcinogenesis of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), the disease has been explored insufficiently and immunophenotyping and molecular characterization have not been finalized. This knowledge gap consecutively leads to an overt lack of diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. In the current study, we provide our experience with the treatment of SBA, and demand for cross-national data pooling to enable unlimited information transfer and higher powered study. A comprehensive database of all patients with SBA was established and consecutively reviewed for clinicopathohistological data, information concerning preoperative evaluation, surgical and chemotherapeutical treatment, as well as outcome parameters. Patients underwent curative intended surgery (42.4%; n=14), adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) following resection (36.4%; n=12) or palliative care (21.2%; n=7). The majority of patients were diagnosed at an advanced disease stage (pT3, 36.4%; pT4, 39.4%) and the duodenum was the most common tumor site (57.1%; n=20). Complete surgical resection was achieved in 88.5% of patients, while postoperative complications occurred in 19.4%. Within a mean follow-up period of 31.4 months, 17 patients succumbed to the disease following a median survival time of 11 months. Mean overall survival (OS) was 47.4, 25.3 and 9.8 months for surgically, surgically and chemotherapeutically and palliatively treated patients, respectively. Early surgical resection remains the mainstay in the treatment of localized SBA, since it is associated with a prolongation of OS. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant CTX has not yet been defined. Thus, since no consensus exists on the adequate treatment of these malignancies, we demand an international collaboration and cross-national data pooling to pave the way for the implementation of evidence-based standard care operating procedures.

Modern GERD treatment: feasibility of minimally invasive esophageal sphincter augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disease requiring adequate treatment since it represents one major cause of development of Barrett's esophagus and eventually carcinoma. Novel laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation for GERD was evaluated prospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 23 patients with GERD underwent minimally invasive implantation of LINX™ Reflux Management System. Primary outcome measures were overall feasibility, short-term procedure safety and efficacy. Secondary GERD-related quality of life was assessed. RESULTS: All implantations were performed without serious adverse events. A significant decrease in all major GERD complaints were found: heartburn: 96%-22% (p<0.001); bloating: 70%-30% (p=0.006); respiratory complaints: 57%-17% (p=0.039); sleep disturbance: 65%-4% (p<0.001). A four-week follow-up reduction of ≥50% of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dose was achieved in over 80% of patients. Self-limiting difficulty in swallowing was found in 70% within four weeks. One patient required for endoscopic dilation. GERD-related quality of life improved significantly. CONCLUSION: LINX™ implantation is a standardized, technically simple, safe and well-tolerated expeditious procedure.

Surgical treatment of GIST--an institutional experience of a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Discovery of the molecular pathogenesis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumors led to the development of targeted therapies, revolutionizing their treatment. However, surgery is still the mainstay of GIST therapy and the only chance for cure. AIM: Here we present a single institutional consecutive case series of 159 GIST-patients. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A total of 159 GIST-patients who underwent resection between 1994 and 2011 were reviewed for clinicopathohistological data, informations on surgical and medical therapy and further follow-up, outcome and survival data. RESULTS: Laparoscopic (25.2%) and open (71.1%) GIST surgery achieved complete resection rates of 97.5% and 85.2%, whereas 44.4% of incomplete and 6.6% of complete resected patients died from GIST. Compared to open surgery laparoscopy significantly reduced duration of operation (183.4 vs. 130.6 min), length of hospitalization (16.1 vs. 8.3 d) and morbidity (23% vs. 7.5%). Mean survival time was 3.7 ± 2.7 years (R0: 5.1 a and R1: 2.6 a) and the mean overall survival was 4.5 ± 3.8 years. CONCLUSION: Complete surgical resection is the primary goal and laparoscopy can be performed safely in a subset of GIST-patients with potential perioperative advantages. Although not proven by the present study the authors assume that multimodal GIST-treatment, as performed in reference-centers, is required for advanced or high risk disease. Our data suggest the potential for minimally invasive GIST resection to achieving comparable oncological outcomes as after open surgery while providing low morbidity rates.

The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy represents the gold standard in the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Despite significant improvements in perioperative care, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates remain high. Minimally-invasive surgical techniques introduced to the surgical treatment of esophageal malignancies have been shown to successfully diminish surgical trauma and postoperative morbidity. AIM: In the present report we present the stepwise implementation of minimally-invasive techniques in the treatment of esophageal cancer at a high-volume center and its influence on overall patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 consecutive patients with esophagectomy, in two 4-year periods, namely that before (period A) and that after (period B) the implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for cancer, were compared. Patients' characteristics, and perioperative, surgical, oncological and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In time period A, 73 patients were treated with open esophagectomy (OE), whereas in time period B 37 patients (40.2%) underwent an OE and 55 (59.8%) a minimally-invasive esophagectomy. Surgical and non-surgical complications did not differ significantly between groups (B: 44.6% vs. A: 54.8%; B: 38% vs. A: 35.6%; p>0.05). Duration of ventilation (B: 1.8 days vs. A: 6.7 days), ICU (B: 5.7 days vs. A: 12.2 days) and hospital stay (B: 20.5 days vs. A: 28.4 days) were significantly reduced in patients of time period B. The number of lymph nodes removed and complete resection rates were comparable (mean=18.1 ± 10.1 lymph nodes; B: 87% R0 vs. A: 93.2% R0). No significant differences between the groups were detectable regarding short-term disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy is feasible, safe and has the potential to reduce perioperative morbidity without compromising oncological outcome.