Examining the critical role of advanced practice providers on a multidisciplinary transplant team.

It is well documented that Physician Assistants (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs), collectively known as Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), have a beneficial role beyond the field of primary care. APPs broad spectrum of knowledge make them particularly well suited for specializing in complex fields such as transplant. Variations in practice across transplant centers lead to questions regarding optimal use of APPs. Using job descriptions from transplant centers currently employing APPs, we sought to examine the critical role of transplant APPs beyond clinical care alone. In this review, we explore not only the general training of APPs and current utilization of APPs in transplant, but also safety, cost effectiveness, and comparison of APPs to other transplant providers. We aimed to highlight the importance of recruitment and retention of transplant specific trained APPs to provide continuity in transplant programs. Additionally, APPs expansion into transplant research, quality improvement, leadership, and management must be considered. We challenge transplant centers utilizing APPs to consider these important aspects when seeking ways to expand and optimize the critical role APPs provide on the transplant team.

One Hundred Fifty Liver Transplants at a New Program in the Modern Era: The University of Mississippi Experience.

From 1991 to 2013, Mississippi was without liver transplant services. In 2013, a new liver transplant program was established at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Here, we describe our experience with the first 150 transplants over a 4.5-year period. This study is a review of 147 patients who underwent the first 150 liver transplants at the University of Mississippi Medical Center between March 5, 2013, and January 4, 2018. There were no exclusion criteria for this study. Donor, recipient, and outcome variables were analyzed. Recipients were 46% female and 74% white. Age at the time of transplant was 57 [IQR 49-63]. BMI at transplant was 30 [IQR 25-35]. Thirty per cent of transplants were for alcoholic cirrhosis, 25% non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 24% hepatitis C, and 12% cholestatic. Mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at the time of transplant was 20 [95% confidence interval 19-21] and MELD-Na was 22 [95% confidence interval 20-23]. One-year patient- and graft survival were 89% and 87%, respectively, which were as expected based on Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient reports after risk adjustment. The data published here verifies it is possible to establish a new liver transplant center in an underserved area previously lacking comprehensive liver care and to achieve results similar to other high-volume centers across the country.

Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Readmission after Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation.

Early hospital readmissions after kidney transplantation pose a significant financial burden and hardship for patients and health-care institutions alike. We sought to identify the risk factors associated with increased likelihood of readmission after transplantation, and examined to determine whether patient socioeconomic demographics impacted the likelihood of perioperative readmissions. We evaluated all deceased donor renal transplants performed at our institution between August 2011 and December 2015. In a cohort of 325 transplant operations that met our inclusion criteria, 117 (36%) were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days of discharge. In univariable analyses, length of stay and pretransplant disabled status were associated with increased likelihood of readmission within 90 days of transplant. When placed into multivariable models, there was a suggestion association with length of stay and disability status. Kidney donor profile index, estimated posttransplant survival, employment, race, age, and payor status were not associated with readmission. In conclusion, the factors associated with posttransplant readmission are not necessarily influenced by socioeconomic factors in our study population. The data collected in this single center study indicate that the factors associated with increased rates of readmission are likely clinical in nature.

A systematic approach to postoperative management of deceased donor kidney transplant patients with a clinical pathway.

CONTEXT: Clinical pathways have been used in many acute hospital settings. OBJECTIVES: To develop a systematic approach to postoperative care of adult recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pilot quality improvement project that uses implementation of a clinical pathway 24 hours after surgery for adult recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant for 7 months. Charts from the same 7 months of the preceding year were retrospectively reviewed for comparison. The project occurred on the transplant floor in an acute care hospital and did not include any patients admitted to the intensive care unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To demonstrate that clinical pathways can (1) promote a method for standardizing postoperative care, (2) decrease postoperative length of stay, and (3) contain costs by minimizing hospital charges related to laboratory and room fees and promote efficient medication use in adult recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant. RESULTS: All 24 patients in the clinical pathway group met daily goals of the implemented clinical pathway. The clinical pathway group had statistically significant decreases in postoperative length of stay, use of laboratory tests, and use of intravenous medications compared with the comparison group. The 2 groups were similar in race, sex, age, and body mass index. Surgical readmissions did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.