RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To study the efficacy of inside-out technique in completely eradicating the cholesteatoma from middle ear and mastoid, preservation of hearing & and quality of life post mastoidectomy with regards to recurrent discharge, wax, granulations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Non-randomized, prospective, observational study performed at the Department of ENT in our hospital. In the study we included 100 patients presenting with chronic suppurative otitis media with cholesteatoma, they underwent inside out mastoidectomy and were followed up till the end of the study to evaluate the efficacy of inside out mastoidectomy in eradicating the disease from the middle ear cleft. To assess preservation of hearing and to assess cavity problems. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 98 patients had a total clearance of disease by the inside out approach, and 2 patients, had doubtful clearance. All patients came for regular follow up and none of them had residual disease at the end of the study period. Thus, the overall success rate was 100% in our study. A significant improvement in the mean air conduction (pâ¯<â¯0.01) and the mean air bone gap (pâ¯<â¯0.01) was seen in all postoperatively at 3rd month PTA. Only one patient had conductive hearing loss one and a half years postoperatively after initial improvement. A dry self-cleansing cavity was achieved in 95% of the patients and only 5% required regular cleaning of wax the cavities. CONCLUSION: Inside out mastoidectomy is a better alternative in canal wall down procedures as it not only clears the disease from the middle ear cleft, but also leaves behind a small postoperative cavity, which will preserve the hearing, decrease the cavity problems and increase the quality of life of such patients.
Assuntos
Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/cirurgia , Mastoidectomia/métodos , Otite Média Supurativa/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/complicações , Colesteatoma da Orelha Média/patologia , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Audição , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Otite Média Supurativa/complicações , Otite Média Supurativa/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients with previous glaucoma filtering surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective review of all DSAEK surgeries performed at one center comparing complications of DSAEK in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering procedures (study eyes) with a time-matched group of all other DSAEK cases (control eyes). RESULTS: There were 28 study eyes, 19 with previous trabeculectomies and 9 with previous glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) and 431 control eyes. Study group intraoperative complications included 1 compromised bleb and 1 loss of donor tissue because of traumatic manipulation. One intraoperative complication, a perforation of the donor tissue, occurred in the control group. Venting stab incisions were used more often in study eyes (n = 5; 18%) than in control eyes (n = 12; 4.4%) (P = 0.002). GDD tubes were trimmed in 2 eyes (22%). No intraoperative manipulations were used to occlude the glaucoma filters or tubes. Postoperative complications in the study group included 1 dislocation (3.6%) and 1 decentered graft (3.6%) and 1 eye with loss of pressure control (3.6%), whereas in the control group, there were 10 dislocations (2.3%) and 1 decentered graft (0.2%) (P = 0.267 for dislocations and P = 0.118 for decentered grafts). One episode of pupillary block (0.2%) occurred in the control group, and none occurred in the study group. No primary graft failures occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK surgeries in eyes with previous glaucoma filtering procedures were performed without primary graft failure and with reasonably low dislocation (3.6%) and graft decentration (3.6%) rates. Although the intraoperative complication rate for the study group (7.1%) was higher than the rate for the control group (0.23%), excellent early postoperative outcomes can be achieved when DSAEK is performed in eyes with previous trabeculectomies and GDDs.
Assuntos
Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Trabeculectomia , Edema da Córnea/cirurgia , Distrofia Endotelial de Fuchs/cirurgia , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with intraocular lens (IOL) exchange compared with DSAEK alone. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: DSAEK was performed in 19 eyes in which the anterior chamber IOL was exchanged for a posterior chamber IOL (study group) and in 188 eyes in which the posterior chamber IOL was left in place (comparison group). The complications of graft dislocations, primary graft failure episodes, and pupillary block were recorded for all eyes. Six-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and mean central endothelial cell density were measured prospectively and then compared with preoperative values for all eyes. RESULTS: Dislocations occurred in 0 (0%) of 19 eyes in the study group and in 5 (3%) of 188 eyes in the comparison group (P = .47), with 0 primary graft failures and 0 pupillary block episodes in either group. Preoperative mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for those eyes without any underlying ocular comorbidities was 20/205 and 20/100 in the study and comparison groups, respectively (P = .18). Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months improved to 20/48 in the study group and to 20/34 in the comparison group, a statistically significant difference (P = .01). Mean donor cell loss at 6 months was 33% in the study group and 26% in the comparison group (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent IOL exchange with DSAEK surgery does not increase the dislocation, primary graft failure, or pupillary block rates in the immediate postoperative period. Donor endothelial cell loss in DSAEK was not increased significantly by IOL exchange. Visual acuity was slightly worse after combined surgery than after DSAEK alone.
Assuntos
Ceratoplastia Endotelial com Remoção da Lâmina Limitante Posterior/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sobrevivência Celular , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify the degree and pattern of donor endothelial cell damage, which occurs with mechanical trephination of donor corneal tissue. METHOD: Twenty donor corneal-scleral tissues were used for these paired experiments. The tissues were randomized for trephination with 10 tissues trephinated by an 8.0-mm-diameter Barron trephine (Katena, Denville, NJ), and 10 tissues trephinated with an 8.0-mm-diameter UltraFit Coronet trephine (distributed by Angiotech, British Columbia, Canada) by the same investigator. Trephinated corneal buttons were then stained with vital dye stain, and the endothelial layer image captured with digital photography. The images were then analyzed by digital planimetry, and the pattern and quantity of endothelial damage was determined by an investigator who was masked to the specific trephine used for the individual tissue. RESULTS: Trephination created a pattern of circular damage at the edge of the donor button in every case with no break in continuity of the circle, but some portions of the circle were wider than others. Occasional, scattered, peripheral small areas also displayed damage, but no significant striae, stretch, or other central damage was noted in any donor. The mean percent damage in the series was 6.35% +/- 0.90% (range: 4.33%-7.78%). The UltraFit Coronet trephinations averaged damage of 5.64% +/- 0.85% (range: 4.33%-6.69%), and the Barron trephinations averaged damage of 6.50% +/- 0.95% (range: 4.92%-7.78%). Although 8 of 10 experimental pairs of trephinations demonstrated less peripheral endothelial damage with the UltraFit Coronet trephine, the mean damage between each group did not reach statistical significance in this small series. (P = 0.08) CONCLUSIONS: Donor mechanical trephination of full-thickness corneal tissue creates relatively consistent amounts of peripheral edge damage and likely no central endothelial damage. There may exist differences in edge damage between different mechanical trephination systems, and a direct comparison to laser-created trephination is needed.
Assuntos
Córnea/cirurgia , Endotélio Corneano/patologia , Bancos de Olhos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/instrumentação , Esclera/cirurgia , Humanos , Método Simples-CegoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report the immediate postoperative complications and the 6- and 12-month clinical results in a large series of cases undergoing the new triple-procedure Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and concurrent cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fifteen eyes of 233 patients with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy were evaluated for the complications of dislocation and iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF). Two hundred three eyes of 149 patients had 6-month postoperative data available for other outcome analysis. METHODS: A standardized technique of DSAEK with extensive use of cohesive viscoelastic was performed in all 315 eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy, and 225 of those eyes had cataract surgery concurrently. Of the 203 eyes with 6-month data, concurrent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens placement (triple procedure) was performed in 149 of those eyes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The complications of graft dislocation and IPGF were recorded for all eyes. Six- and 12-month postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive spherical equivalent (SE), and central donor endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured prospectively and then compared with preoperative values for the triple-procedure eyes. RESULTS: There were 4 dislocations (4%) among the 90 straight DSAEK cases and 4 dislocations (1.8%) among the 225 triple-procedure cases (P = 0.327). There was not a single case of IPGF in any of the 315 DSAEK cases. After the triple procedure, the BSCVA in eyes without comorbidity (n = 122) improved with 93% at 20/40 or better at 6 months and 97% at 20/40 or better at 12 months. Refractive SE at 6 months averaged 0.11+/-1.08 diopters (D), with 73% of eyes within 1 D of emmetropia and 95% within 2 D of emmetropia. The postoperative mean ECD was 1955 cells/mm(2) at 6 months (n = 125) and 1979 cells/mm(2) at 12 months (n = 89) and represented a 32% cell loss from that before surgery (P<0.001) for both postoperative time points. CONCLUSIONS: The new triple-procedure DSAEK combined with cataract surgery provides rapid visual recovery and allows selection of an appropriate intraocular lens. Dislocations are rare (1.8%) and primary graft failure did not occur.