Evaluation of a Novel Equity-Focused Curriculum for Early-Stage Medical Students.

OBJECTIVES: Medical school curricula have increasingly incorporated topics and content related to health equity and affiliated social determinants of health. However, there is limited literature to guide how programs might measure the success of these initiatives. Previous studies assessed medical student attitudes and perceived knowledge, preparedness, and skills. Based on self-reported measures of these attributes, we compared within-group and between-group differences at the onset of a novel equity-focused curriculum implementation. METHODS: A multi-component approach to "thread" lectures, panel discussions, and other content dedicated to health equity concepts was assessed using adapted versions of two validated survey instruments of the measured constructs. Baseline data were collected prior to coursework and at follow-up early in students' second year assessed change attributable to the equity-focused curriculum thread, with additional comparison to a cohort of second-year students who had no exposure to the curriculum. Data were collected at the beginning of academic years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis of variance indicated significant change over time (p < 0.001) with the analyses of variance identifying students' perceived current skills and topic knowledge increasing over time. No significant differences were found between two separate groups of M2 students. CONCLUSIONS: Students' perceived skills at working with diverse patient populations and knowledge of topics focused on health equity increased across the study, despite a much smaller response rate for the same student cohort at follow-up. Students' perception that they are prepared to care for patients of diverse backgrounds was unaffected. Attitudinal assessment revealed a ceiling effect at baseline, which should be explored further with longitudinal assessment. For the ongoing effort to evaluate the success of equity-focused curricula and programs, this study contributes evidence of change on some but not all outcomes, and can help guide other programs in determining which outcomes best reflect areas of programmatic need and impact.

Into the Unknown: Experiences of Social Newcomers Entering Medical Education.

PURPOSE: Amid efforts to diversify the medical profession, research has yet to fully explore the role of early social ties to the field. This study examined diversity through the experiences of students without early ties to medicine through family members working in health care (i.e., "newcomers") in comparison with more-connected peers (i.e., "insiders"), examining how social newcomers to medicine negotiate challenges stemming from their outsider status. METHOD: The author conducted an exploratory qualitative study from 2018 to 2021 using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Following a voluntary preliminary survey of 2 cohorts of first-year medical students about their social connections in health care, the author conducted interviews over the next 2 years with students who had indicated their willingness to participate. Interviews addressed how social context shaped-and continued to influence-their journeys into medicine. Eighty second- and third-year students participated in 94 interviews, including some follow-up interviews for longitudinal insight into outsider status. Interviews from the second year (58 new, 14 follow-up) provided the foundation of the qualitative results. RESULTS: Students experienced outsider status primarily on the basis of being newcomers to medicine, often compounded by intersectional characteristics, including first-generation college status, rural or low-income background, race or ethnicity, and nontraditional status. For some, an early shortage of social capital became internalized, continuing to influence confidence and belonging well into training, in line with social reproduction theory. However, newcomers also experienced benefits associated with diverse backgrounds which helped them find a sense of belonging in medicine, as suggested by community cultural wealth and antideficit perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Newcomer status proved to be a central cause of outsiderness for students from all backgrounds and warrants greater attention from stakeholders, perhaps mirroring the undergraduate focus on first-generation college-goers. Findings suggest institutions that provide robust networking and community-building opportunities are best positioned to support newcomers.