Fibrinolytic variables in patients with recurrent venous thrombosis: a prospective cohort study.

To determine whether fibrinolytic testing predicts recurrent venous thrombosis, we have performed a prospective cohort study in which 303 patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism underwent comprehensive fibrinolytic testing while receiving oral anticoagulants, and after anticoagulants had been discontinued. They were then followed for up to 3 years for recurrent venous thrombosis. No systematic differences in the levels or activity of type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or euglobulin clot lysis times were detected between patients who did, or did not, suffer recurrent thrombosis. There were also no differences in these variables when patients whose initial thrombosis was idiopathic were compared to patients whose thrombosis occurred in the setting of a known thrombotic risk factor. Based on these results, neither measuring fibrinolytic parameters in patients with venous thromboembolism, nor modification of treatment based on the results of such testing, are justified. Our study also confirms that patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism have a high risk of recurrence.

A comparison of elderly patients with aggressive histology lymphoma who were entered or not entered on to a randomized phase II trial.

The purpose of this study was to compare the baseline patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes of elderly patients with aggressive histology lymphoma who were entered or not entered onto a randomized phase II trial. We previously conducted a randomized phase II trial in patients > or = 65 years of age who had advanced stage intermediate grade lymphoma. A registry of all patients meeting the inclusion criteria for that trial was maintained. Many patients were not entered on to the randomized trial because of the presence of at least one exclusion criterion, or because of patient or physician choice. We have compared the baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival of the randomized and non-randomized patients. Results show that 68 consecutive patients met inclusion criteria for the randomized trial. Thirty-eight patients satisfied all eligibility criteria, consented, and were randomized; 30 patients (44%) were not entered. In comparison with randomized patients, non-randomized patients were older (mean 75.9 vs. 72.4 years; P=0.013), had a poorer performance status (P=0.0006), were less likely to be given treatment with curative intent (60% vs. 100%; P<0.001), and were less likely to complete 6 cycles of such treatment (27% vs. 89%; P<0.001). With a median follow-up of > 7 years, actuarial 5-year survival is superior in randomized patients (44.3% vs. 10%; P<0.00001). In conclusion, a substantial number of patients did not enter our randomized trial phase II trial and had different characteristics, received different therapy and had inferior outcomes in comparison with randomized patients. Randomized trials of therapy for elderly lymphoma patients may include special selection criteria and results may not be generalizable to a substantial proportion of other older patients.

The effects of radiation therapy on quality of life of women with breast carcinoma: results of a randomized trial. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of breast irradiation on quality of life, including cosmetic outcome, for patients enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1989, a randomized trial was conducted in Ontario, Canada, in which women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma who had undergone lumpectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were randomized to either breast irradiation or no further treatment. A modified version of the Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) was administered to women at baseline, 1 month (4 weeks), and 2 months (8 weeks) after randomization. Irritation of the skin of the breast, breast pain, and appearance of the breast to the patient were also assessed every 3 months for the first 2 years of the study. RESULTS: Of 837 patients, 416 were randomly allocated to radiation therapy and 421 to no further treatment. The mean change in quality of life from baseline to 2 months was -0.05 for the radiation group and +0.30 for the control group. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Longer term radiation therapy increased the proportion of patients who were troubled by irritation of the skin of the breast and breast pain. Radiation therapy did not increase the proportion of patients at 2 years who were troubled by the appearance of the treated breast; 4.8% in irradiated and nonirradiated patients (P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Breast irradiation therapy had an effect on quality of life during treatment. After treatment, irradiated patients reported increased breast symptoms compared with controls. However, no difference was detected between groups at 2 years in the rates of skin irritation, breast pain, and being upset by the appearance of the breast.

The occurrence of subsequent malignancy in patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis: results from a historical cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that patients who present with idiopathic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have an increased risk of subsequently developing cancer. A clinical trial had previously been conducted examining the optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy following initial heparin treatment in patients with proximal DVT. METHODS: A historical cohort study was performed on patients enrolled in the duration of anticoagulant trial. Patients known to have cancer at the time of entry into the trial were excluded. The qualifying DVTs were classified as idiopathic (no known associated risk factors) or secondary without knowledge of subsequent recurrent venous thrombosis or cancer. The patients were then followed for the development of cancer. RESULTS: Thirteen (8.6%) of the 152 patients in the idiopathic cohort subsequently developed cancer compared to eight (7.1%) of 112 patients in the secondary cohort, P = 0.86. Two (5.4%) of 37 patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism and 19 (8.4%) of 227 patients without recurrent thromboembolism developed cancer, P = 0.7. CONCLUSION: Our study did not detect an increased risk of subsequent cancer in patients presenting with idiopathic DVT compared to secondary DVT; nor did we detect an increased incidence of cancer in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism. Further studies are required prior to pursuing a policy of aggressive screening for cancer in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of surgery in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a single cerebral metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral metastasis is a common oncologic problem that occurs in 15-30% of cancer patients; approximately half such metastases are single. Previous retrospective studies and two randomized trials reported that the addition of surgical extirpation prior to radiation therapy increased survival, neurologic function, and quality of life compared with radiation alone in patients with a single brain metastasis. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with a single brain metastasis were allocated to undergo radiation alone or surgery plus radiation. Radiation consisted of 3000 centigray to the whole brain in 10 fractions. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received radiation alone and 41 patients surgery plus radiation. All but two of the study patients died. No difference in survival was detected between the groups; the median survival for the radiation group was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3-11.4) compared with 5.6 months for the surgery plus radiation group (95% confidence interval, 3.9-7.2) (P = 0.24). Most patients died within the first year (69.8% in the radiation arm vs. 87.8% in the surgery plus radiation arm). There were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality, morbidity, or causes of death. Extracranial metastases was an important predictor of mortality (relative risk, 2.3). The mean proportion of days that the Karnofsky performance status was > or = 70% did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to demonstrate that the addition of surgery to radiation therapy improved outcome of patients with a single brain metastasis. Thus, the efficacy of surgery plus radiation compared with radiation alone needs to be addressed by further clinical trials and/or a meta-analysis.

Ardeparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) vs graduated compression stockings for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. A randomized trial in patients undergoing knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis is common in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Static graduated compression stockings effectively prevent venous thrombosis in general surgery. Because of the demonstrated prophylactic efficacy of pneumatic compression in knee surgery, the similar efficacy of static graduated compression and pneumatic compression in neurosurgery, and the easier use of static graduated compression in knee surgery, graduated static compression stockings were used as the control arm in our clinical trial. Although low-molecular-weight heparin had been shown to be effective in general surgery and hip replacement, its efficacy was unproved in knee surgery. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized trial compared the combination of low-molecular-weight heparin and graduated compression stockings with graduated compression stockings alone in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Patients received either ardeparin (Normiflo) (low-molecular-weight heparin), 0.005 mL/kg (50 anti-Xa U/Kg), or placebo. Both were administered subcutaneously twice daily commencing 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge, if sooner. Both study groups wore graduated compression stockings. Bilateral venography was performed on day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were allocated to receive ardeparin and 124 received placebo. Ninety-six patients in the ardeparin group and 103 in the placebo group had evaluable venograms. Deep vein thrombosis was detected in 28 patients in the ardeparin group and in 60 in the placebo group. Proximal deep vein thrombosis was detected in two patients who received ardeparin and 16 who received placebo. One patient in each group, both of whom did not have venography, experienced pulmonary embolism. Thus, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was detected in 29 (29.9%) of the 97 patients in the ardeparin group and in 61 (58.7%) of the 104 patients in the placebo group, a relative risk reduction of 49% (P < 00.1). The rate of major bleeding in the ardeparin group was 2.5%, compared with 2.4% in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Ardeparin administered postoperatively twice daily is effective and safe for the prevention of venous thrombosis in patients undergoing major knee surgery. Whereas graduated compression stockings have been shown to be effective prophylactic agents in general surgery and neurosurgery, they have little effect in knee surgery.

The Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire: a morbidity/quality-of-life instrument for clinical trials of radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument for clinical trials to measure radiation-related acute morbidity and quality of life from the perspective of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: The Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire (HNRQ) was developed by a panel of health care workers and patients, was pretested in a pilot study of HNC patients, and was validated in a randomized double-blind trial of concomitant fluorouracil (FUra) infusional therapy (1.2 g/m2 per 24 hours) or saline placebo administered for 72 hours in the first and third weeks of a 6 1/2-week course of radiation therapy. The HNRQ was validated against existing toxicity and performance status indices, all of which were measured weekly for the 6 1/2 weeks of treatment and for 4 weeks posttreatment. RESULTS: There were three a priori constructs: (1) that the HNRQ scores would conform to a shallow U-shaped pattern to reflect declining quality of life (increasing morbidity) during radiation and recovery posttreatment; (2) that the HNRQ would correlate with existing toxicity indices (World Health Organization [WHO] stomatitis, Byfield stomatitis, WHO skin toxicity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] and Karnofsky performance status); and (3) that the HNRQ would discriminate between FUra and placebo groups. The HNRQ and its domain scores all showed a change from baseline reflecting increased morbidity during radiation (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P < .00001). The HNRQ correlated well with all other indices (r > or = .60), and domain scores correlated best with other indices that assess the same symptom complex (eg, HNRQ skin domain and WHO skin toxicity index, r = .77). There was a significant difference in HNRQ scores between the FUra and placebo groups during radiation (ANOVA, P = .0007), and all HNRQ domains also discriminated between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The HNRQ is a valid measure of acute morbidity due to radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced HNC, and may be useful as an outcome measure for future clinical trials of radiation treatment strategies.

Influence of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of radiation therapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a risk factor for several cancers and may also limit the efficacy of treatment. In this study, we evaluated the influence of cigarette smoking during radiation therapy on the efficacy of treatment in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Using a questionnaire, we obtained information on smoking behavior at base line and weekly during therapy in 115 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated with radiation therapy with or without fluorouracil. The side effects of therapy were evaluated weekly, and response was assessed 13 weeks after treatment was completed. The main outcomes measured were treatment response and survival. RESULTS: The prognostic variables were similar among the patients who smoked and those who did not smoke during treatment. The 53 patients who continued to smoke during radiation therapy had a lower rate of complete response (45 percent vs. 74 percent, P = 0.008) and poorer two-year survival (39 percent vs. 66 percent, P = 0.005) than the 62 patients who did not smoke or who had quit before treatment. Among the nonsmoking patients, mortality was influenced by the length of time between quitting and treatment, with a risk reduction (relative to that for patients who continued to smoke) of 40 percent for patients who had quit less than 12 weeks before diagnosis and of 70 percent for patients who had quit more than 1 year before diagnosis. After adjustment for other variables with proportional-hazards regression analysis, smoking remained an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), with a relative risk of 2.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.4) favoring the patients who abstained from smoking. The results could not be explained by the type of chemotherapy received, the presence of coexisting morbid conditions, differences in the side effects of radiation, or the number of interruptions of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck cancer who continue to smoke during radiation therapy have lower rates of response and survival than patients who do not smoke during radiation therapy.

The effect of the synthetic retinoid etretinate on sputum cytology: results from a randomised trial.

Laboratory studies, and one previous uncontrolled trial, have suggested that retinoids may reverse bronchial atypia, a putatively premalignant condition. Sputum sampling is a simple, non-invasive method of assessing atypia. Smokers with at least a 15 pack-year history were screened for sputum atypia. One hundred and fifty subjects' were randomised to receive the synthetic retinoid etretinate 25 mg orally or identical placebo daily for 6 months. Compliance was measured by performing pill counts and serum sampling every 2 months for etretinate levels. The outcomes assessed were, improvements in sputum atypia and toxicity. At baseline there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to gender, smoking history or extent of atypia. Four of 75 subjects on etretinate and six of 75 on placebo dropped out before 6 months. Compliance as measured by pill counts and etretinate levels was high. Eighty-six per cent of subjects on etretinate took 90% or more of their prescribed medication and etretinate was detected in 245 of 264 samples. By contrast etretinate was detected in only six of 266 samples in the control group and probably did not represent true contamination. After 6 months on etretinate there was no difference in the degree of atypia between the two treatment arms. Toxicity was mild in both groups with considerable placebo effect noted. Etretinate, at the dose used in this study, had no impact on sputum atypia as detected by sputum sampling.

Chemotherapy induced amenorrhoea in a randomised trial of adjuvant chemotherapy duration in breast cancer.

We have previously reported the results of a clinical trial in patients with stage II breast cancer which compared a 12 week chemohormonal regimen with a 36 week chemotherapy regimen. Both pre and post menopausal women were entered. The 12 week regimen was inferior both in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival. The effect of chemotherapy on menstrual function was prospectively documented in 95 of 114 premenopausal women at 3 of the 4 participating centres. 67 of the 95 women (70.5%) developed permanent amenorrhoea. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of induced amenorrhea between the 12 week and the 36 week groups; 23/42 vs. 44/53, respectively (P = 0.003). Recurrence and mortality rates were lower in the patients who became amenorrheic; 38% vs. 57% (P = 0.03) and 18% vs. 32% (P = 0.17), respectively. Similar trends were observed within treatment groups. The effect of induced amenorrhoea on outcome was seen predominantly in patients under 40 years old. These results suggest that the induction of ovarian failure is a potential mechanism for the observed effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients. The difference in the ovarian failure rates between groups may be a possible explanation for the inferiority of the 12 week regimen.

Chemoprevention for lung cancer--evidence for a high degree of compliance.

Studies of treatment efficacy are important for the development of cancer chemoprevention strategies. Recruitment aims for motivated, compliant subjects. The Concerned Smoker Study targets smokers with at least a 15-pack-year history and bronchial atypia on sputum sampling. Subjects receive etretinate 25 mg daily or identical placebo and are followed for 6 months. Compliance was monitored by assessing timely return for follow-up visits, return of monthly sputum samples, pill counts, and serum etretinate levels. Contamination, in the control group, was assessed by measuring etretinate levels. With half of the subjects having completed the study, this report assesses compliance: 88% follow-up visits occurred on schedule with only 9 missed visits of a possible total of 380; 443 (97.1%) of 456 possible sputum samples were returned. Pill counts indicated a high degree of compliance which was supported by the serum etretinate levels. Contamination was insignificant. The results suggest a very high degree of compliance. Only minor protocol changes will be required.

Recruitment for an efficacy study in chemoprevention--the Concerned Smoker Study.

Efficacy studies are important for the development of long-term cancer prevention strategies. Recruitment aims for a highly motivated group of participants. The Concerned Smoker Study is aimed at smokers with at least a 15 pack-year history and bronchial atypia on sputum sampling Recruitment has been primarily through use of the media. During the first year of randomization 905 potential participants expressed interest. Of these, 80 were eventually randomized. With over 60 participants having completed the study only one has defaulted and compliance with the study protocol has been high. Participants became aware of the study through the following sources: daily newspaper 36.6%, weekly newspaper 16.2%, television 14.9%, radio 13.8%, community television 1.3%, other sources 13.3%. Over 90% of potential participants who initially express interest in such a chemoprevention project may not ultimately be suitable. The population chosen for such studies may not be very representative of the more general population; however, a high degree of compliance can be obtained which will provide valuable information on treatment efficacy.

Etretinate blood levels in monitoring of compliance and contamination in a chemoprevention trial.

We measured serum etretinate to monitor compliance in an ongoing chemoprevention trial in which heavy smokers are randomized to either etretinate or placebo orally for 6 months. Blood is collected for determination of etretinate levels before treatment and then at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks after randomization. The monitoring strategy was assessed by interim evaluation. There were 276 posttreatment samples available from 75 randomized subjects of whom 36 received etretinate and 39 placebo. The mean coefficient of variation for the internal standard retinyl acetate in serum was 4.16% for the high-pressure liquid chromatography method used. Among positive samples, the mean etretinate concentration was 25.7 ng/mL (SD, 23.4). Of the 131 samples obtained from subjects randomized to etretinate, 120 or 91.6% had detectable levels compared with 4 of 145 or 2.8% placebo samples. Among the 36 subjects given etretinate, at least one positive test occurred. In 27 of these 36 participants, etretinate was detected in every sample obtained. In the other nine, the absence of drug could be explained by pill counts or a history of discontinuation of treatment for six. Among the 39 subjects given placebo, the four positive samples were from four individuals, all of whom were negative on three other occasions. These data confirm the usefulness of the monitoring system we used and indicate that compliance and/or contamination will not be major problems in this trial.