Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mod Rheumatol ; 17(1): 1-9, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17278015

RESUMO

We conducted a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of iguratimod in 376 Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis to compare the efficacy and safety of the drug with those of placebo and salazosulfapyridine. In the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate, iguratimod was superior to placebo (53.8% versus 17.2%; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001) and was not inferior to salazosulfapyridine (63.1% versus 57.7%, 95% confidence interval for the rate difference, -7.9% to 18.7%). Iguratimod began exhibiting its therapeutic effect within 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment and was effective even in patients who had a poor response to previous treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No statistically significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse reactions between iguratimod and salazosulfapyridine. The study results suggest that iguratimod could become a new option for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/farmacologia , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Cromonas/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Sulfassalazina/uso terapêutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Cromonas/efeitos adversos , Cromonas/farmacologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sulfassalazina/efeitos adversos , Sulfassalazina/farmacologia , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/farmacologia
2.
Mod Rheumatol ; 17(1): 10-6, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17278016

RESUMO

We conducted a 52-week clinical study of iguratimod in 394 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis to evaluate the long-term safety of the drug. Iguratimod was administered orally at a daily dose of 25 mg for the first 4 weeks and 50 mg for the subsequent 48 weeks. Some of the patients continued the treatment for 100 weeks for their benefit. The cumulative incidence of adverse events for 100 weeks was 97.6%. The cumulative incidence of adverse reactions was 65.3%; unfavorable symptoms and signs (excluding abnormal laboratory data changes) accounted for 33.2% of the reactions, and abnormal laboratory data changes accounted for 50.4%. The continued treatment rate was 66.8% at week 28 and 53.6% at week 52. For reference, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate was calculated for the patients who had assessable disease activity, who did not violate the study protocol, and who continued the study treatment at weeks 28 and 52. The rate was 46.9% at week 28 and 41.0% at week 52. To use iguratimod safely for a long time, patients should be observed closely for adverse reactions such as increased hepatic enzymes.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/farmacologia , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Cromonas/efeitos adversos , Citocinas/antagonistas & inibidores , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Cromonas/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Rheumatol ; 31(2): 243-51, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14760792

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibiting resistance to disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, and to determine the optimal dosage. METHODS: A total of 212 patients with DMARD-resistant RA were enrolled in this double blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled study and allocated to 3 groups. Patients were administered tacrolimus at a dosage of 1.5 mg/day (68 patients) or 3 mg/day (70 patients), or placebo (74 patients), for 16 weeks. They were allowed to continue taking prednisolone (< or = 5 mg/day) and/or one nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) during the study. Clinical assessment was based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% criteria. RESULTS: ACR 20% response rates were higher in both tacrolimus groups (3 mg: 48.3%; 1.5 mg: 24.6%) than in the placebo group (14.1%), with the rate in the 3 mg group significantly higher. There were no significant differences between the tacrolimus groups and placebo group in the incidence of adverse events. The main adverse events in the tacrolimus groups, especially in the 3 mg group, were renal function abnormalities and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, no significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in the incidence of any adverse event except decrease in serum Mg level. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate excellent dose-dependent efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with DMARD-resistant RA and strongly suggest the usefulness of tacrolimus for treatment of RA. The optimal dosage appears to be 3 mg/day in terms of efficacy and safety.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA