Why do employees actively work overtime? The motivation of employees' active overtime in China.

Introduction: Previous studies have defined "workaholic" effort as "bad effort" while work engagement is defined as "good effort." Active overtime is a mapping of work effort, but at this stage there is still relatively little exploration of the motivation behind "good effort" in the Chinese context. Methods: This study explores the reasons that promote employees' initiative to perform overtime work in Chinese enterprises based on the two-factor theory. The study mainly used data empirical research approaches, including exploratory factor analysis, validation factor analysis, and data modeling. The questionnaire scale was developed based on factors that have been proven to be of high reliability and validity. The data are mainly for employees who are currently employed in Chinese companies. Results and discussion: We received a total of 1741 valid questionnaires, which provided a good database for this study. The results of the study show that both motivational and hygiene factors can positively promote employees' motivation to intentionally work overtime to a certain extent. Among them, overtime culture, institutional agreement, good physical office environment, career growth, financial rewards, and work challenges can positively promote motivation to work overtime. Work stress can increase the frequency and intensity of overtime work, but negatively promote motivation to work overtime. The study helps to improve enterprise management, optimize work design, and enhance psychological satisfaction.

Psychological status of patients with amputation injury and effects of psychological interventions based on magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray characteristics.

BACKGROUND: To explore the psychological status of patients with amputation injury and to evaluate the effects of psychological interventions based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray characteristics. METHODS: Two hundred patients admitted from June 2016 to May 2019 were randomly assigned into control and observation groups (n=100). Routine care was performed for both groups, based on which observation group was given psychological interventions. Coping style, compliance to examinations, mental stress, degree of perceived control, degree of anxiety, degree of depression, incidence rate of adverse events, and satisfaction with nursing services were compared. RESULTS: After interventions, the score of positive coping, score of compliance to examinations and Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) score were significantly higher, whereas the score of negative coping, Chinese perceived stress scale (CPSS) score, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score were lower in observation group than those in control group. The score of positive coping, score of compliance to examinations and CAS-R score were significantly elevated, while the score of negative coping, CPSS score, SAS score and SDS score reduced in both groups (p<0.05). The satisfaction rate was significantly higher in observation group than that in control group (p<0.05). The incidence rate of these adverse events was significantly lower in observation group than that in control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Psychological interventions before MRI and X-ray examinations are conducive to adjustment of the mental state of patients receiving replantation of a severed limb, thus improving the compliance to examinations, completion rate and image quality.

Social Integration, Social Support, and All-Cause, Cardiovascular Disease and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Social relationships are associated with all-cause mortality. Substantial uncertainties remain, however, for the associations of social relationships with mortality from subtypes of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and major non-vascular diseases. This prospective cohort study estimated mortality risks according to social support and social integration utilizing a nationally representative sample of 29,179 adults ages 18 years and older. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed. Social integration, but not social support was associated with all-cause mortality risk. For CVD mortality, social integration predicted a 33% lower risk (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.53-0.86). The results were similar in magnitude for heart disease mortality. Participants with the highest social integration level had a 53%, 30%, and 47% decreased mortality risk of diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRD) than those with the lowest level. These social integration associations were linear and consistent across baseline age, sex and socioeconomic status. We did not observe an association of social integration with the risk of cancer mortality. Our findings support the linear association of social integration but not social support with mortality from a range of major chronic diseases in the US adult population, independent of socioeconomic status (SES), behavioral risk factors, and health status.