Simulation as a Platform for Development of Entrustable Professional Activities: A Modular, Longitudinal Approach.

Background The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has recently identified a list of integrated activities to be expected of all medical school graduates entering residency: the core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). Direct observation and deliberate practice of individual EPA behaviors in the clinical setting has multiple challenges, and there is limited literature describing a comprehensive, longitudinal curriculum dedicated to formative EPA assessment.  Approach We present a model curriculum to develop and provide formative assessment of EPA skills longitudinally throughout the clinical years. Each EPA-focused training session includes a simulation case followed by several small group activities with content related to the clinical vignette in the initial simulation. We have designed this curriculum to be longitudinal and modular, and present the general framework here.  Outcomes Step-wise implementation began in 2013. Over 450 medical students have participated in the third year (MS3) clerkship sessions, 30 in the MS4 sub-internship sessions, and over 300 thus far in the fourth year (MS4) capstone course, including students from 10 different medical schools. MS3 sessions focused on EPAs 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, and MS4 sessions had an additional focus on EPA 8. The capstone course encompassed nearly all 13 EPAs in active simulation-based learning. Opportunities to provide formative assessment through on-the-spot feedback exist throughout the curriculum. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Next steps We found that simulations are an effective method of providing formative assessment of EPAs that are exceptionally well-received by medical students. We have demonstrated that these can be implemented for medical students from multiple educational backgrounds. We believe that deliberate practice and longitudinal formative assessment is of utmost importance in effectively developing core EPAs prior to final entrustment decisions.

Mayo Registry for Telemetry Efficacy in Arrest (MR TEA) study: An analysis of code status change following cardiopulmonary arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Code status discussions are important during a hospitalization, yet variation in its practice exists. No data have assessed the likelihood of patients to change code status following a cardiopulmonary arrest. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients that experienced a cardiopulmonary arrest between May 1, 2008 and June 30, 2014 at an academic medical center was performed. The proportion of code status modifications to do not resuscitate (DNR) from full code was assessed. Baseline clinical characteristics, resuscitation factors, and 24-h post-resuscitation, hospital, and overall survival rates were compared between the two subsets. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients survived the index event and were included. One hundred and fifteen (73.2%) patients did not have a change in code status following the index event, while 42 (26.8%) changed code status to DNR. Clinical characteristics were similar between subsets, although patients in the change to DNR subset were older (average age 67.7 years) compared to the full code subset (average age 59.2 years; p = 0.005). Patients in the DNR subset had longer overall resuscitation efforts with less attempts at defibrillation. Compared to the DNR subset, patients that remained full code demonstrated higher 24-h post-resuscitation (n = 108, 93.9% versus n = 32, 76.2%; p = 0.001) and hospital (n = 50, 43.5% versus n = 6, 14.3%; p = 0.001) survival rates. Patients in the DNR subset were more likely to have neurologic deficits on discharge and shorter overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patient code status wishes do tend to change during critical periods within a hospitalization, adding emphasis for continued code status evaluation.

Mayo registry for telemetry efficacy in arrest (MR TEA) study: An assessment of the effect of admission diagnosis on outcomes from in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Little data exists evaluating how different risk factors influence outcomes following in-hospital arrests. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients that suffered a cardiopulmonary arrest between 1 May 2008 and 30 June 2014 was performed. Patients were stratified into subsets based on cardiac versus non-cardiac reasons for admission. RESULTS: 199 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 138 (69.3%) had a non-cardiac reason for admission and 61 (30.7%) a cardiac etiology. No difference in demographics and non-cardiac comorbidities were present. Cardiac-related comorbidities were more prevalent in the cardiac etiology subset. Arrests with a shockable rhythm were more common in the cardiac group (P < 0.0001), yet return of spontaneous circulation from the index event was similar (P = 0.254). More patients in the cardiac group were alive at 24-h post resuscitation (n = 34, 55.7% versus n = 49, 35.5%; P = 0.0085), discharge (n = 21, 34.4% versus n = 19, 13.8%; P = 0.0018), and at last follow-up (n = 13, 21.3% versus n = 14, 10.1%; P = 0.0434). CONCLUSION: Although patients with cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies for admission have similar rates of return of spontaneous circulation, those with cardiac etiologies are more likely to survive to hospital discharge and outpatient follow-up.