Comparative inhibitory activity of rofecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen on COX-2 versus COX-1 in healthy volunteers.

Steady-state inhibitory activity of rofecoxib (Vioxx) on COX-2 versus COX-1 was compared with that of commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in 76 healthy volunteers randomized to placebo, rofecoxib 12.5 mg qd, rofecoxib 25 mg qd, diclofenac 50 mg tid, ibuprofen 800 mg tid, sodium naproxen 550 mg bid, or meloxicam 15 mg qd. All of these doses include the high end of the approved clinical dose range. Ex vivo whole-blood assays were used to determine the effect on COX-2 and COX-1 activity, respectively. Urinary prostanoids were also measured. Mean inhibition of COX-2 (measured as the weighted average inhibition [WAI] of lipopolysaccharide [LPS]-induced PGE2 generation over 8 hours on day 6 vs. baseline) was -2.4%, 66.7%, 69.2%, 77.5%, 93.9%, 71.4%, and 71.5% for placebo, rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, meloxicam, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen, respectively. Corresponding values for mean inhibition of COX-1 (measured as TXB2 generation in clotting whole blood) were -5.15%, 7.98%, 6.65%, 53.3%, 49.5%, 88.7%, and 94.9%. Rofecoxib had no significant effect on urinary excretion of 11-dehydro TXB2, a COX-1-derived product. These data support the contention that rofecoxib is the only drug of the regimens tested that uniquely inhibits COX-2 without affecting COX-1.

Effect of multiple doses of montelukast, a CysLT1 receptor antagonist, on digoxin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

The effect of multiple oral doses of montelukast, a cysLT1 receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of oral digoxin was studied in healthy male volunteers in a randomized double-blind two-period crossover study. Subjects received 10 mg of montelukast or placebo daily for 11 days. On day 7, they received a single 0.5 mg oral dose of digoxin elixir. The pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin (AUC0-->24' AUC0-->infinity' Cmax' tmax' t1/2) and cumulative urinary excretion over 120 hours were not affected by the multiple doses of montelukast. The 90% confidence interval for each of these parameters fell within prespecified clinically acceptable bounds. Side effects were mild and transient. This suggests that concurrent administration of montelukast and digoxin was well tolerated. Concurrent treatment with montelukast has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Effect of montelukast on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

Montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, is being developed for the treatment of asthma and related diseases. This study was designed to evaluate whether montelukast at clinically used dosage levels would interfere with the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. In a two-period, double-blind, randomized crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin on the 7th day of a 12-day treatment with montelukast, 10 mg daily by mouth, or a placebo. Montelukast had no significant effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curves and peak plasma concentrations of either R- or S-warfarin. However, slight but statistically significant decreases in time to peak concentration of both warfarin enantiomers and in elimination half-life of the less potent R-warfarin were observed in the presence of montelukast. These changes were not considered as clinically relevant. Montelukast had no significant effect on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, as assessed by the international normalized ratio (INR) for prothrombin time (AUC0-144 and INR maximum). The results of this study suggest that a clinically important interaction between these drugs is unlikely to occur in patients requiring concomitant administration of both drugs.

Effect of clopidogrel on naproxen-induced gastrointestinal blood loss in healthy volunteers.

The effect of clopidogrel, a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation, on naproxen-induced faecal blood loss was investigated in 30 healthy volunteers in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two parallel treatment groups study. All subjects first received naproxen 250 mg b.i.d. during 7 days, after which they were randomly allocated to additionally receive either clopidogrel 75 mg once daily (n = 15) or matching placebo (n = 15) for 11 days. Faecal blood loss was measured by the 51Cr-labelled erythrocyte method during the last four days of each of the four study periods, i.e. baseline, treatment with naproxen alone, combined treatment and wash-out. Mean daily faecal blood loss was below 0.5 ml/day during the baseline period in both treatment groups and increased during treatment with naproxen alone to (mean +/- SD) 1.14 +/- 0.58 ml/day in the naproxen + placebo group and to 1.93 +/- 1.51 ml/day in the naproxen + clopidogrel group. Addition of clopidogrel to naproxen treatment was associated with an increase of the mean daily blood loss to 6.83 +/- 9.32 ml/day, which was statistically significantly higher than 1.75 +/- 1.40 ml/day observed during treatment with naproxen + placebo. During the wash-out period, mean daily blood loss decreased to 0.98 +/- 0.51 ml/day in the naproxen + placebo group and to 1.07 +/- 0.46 ml/day in the naproxen + clopidogrel group. Based on these results, it can be concluded that clopidogrel increases naproxen-induced gastrointestinal blood loss in healthy volunteers. Caution should therefore be called for when these drugs are coadministered.