Role of metabolites in mediating the effect of triacylglycerol on aplastic anemia.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have found a link between lipid metabolism disorders and aplastic anemia (AA). However, due to confounding variables and reverse causation, it is difficult to conclude such a causal link. The precise mechanism and potential implications of lipid metabolism disorder in AA remain unclear, necessitating further studies in this area. METHOD: This study aimed to examine the causal relationship between 38 different subtypes of triacylglycerols and AA using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Additionally, two-step MR analyses were conducted to investigate the mediating effects of vitamin A to oleoyl-linoleoyl-glycerol (18:1-18:2) ratio. RESULTS: MR analysis showed that triacylglycerol (53:3) levels were positively associated with the risk of AA [inverse variance weighting (IVW): odds ratio (OR) = 1.131,95% confidence interval (CI):1.029-1.243, P = 0.011; Bayesian weighted MR (BWMR): OR = 1.137,95% CI:1.031-1.254, P = 0.010]. Triacylglycerol (53:3) level showed no inverse causality with AA (IVW:P = 0.834; BWMR:P = 0.349). Mediation analyses showed that increasing the vitamin A to oleoyl-linoleoyl-glycerol (18:1-18:2) ratio can decrease the risk of AA. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the association between vitamin A to oleoyl-linoleoyl-glycerol (18:1-18:2) ratio, triacylglycerol (53:3) levels and AA, and indicated that lowering triacylglycerol (53:3) levels can reduce the risk of AA.

Venetoclax combined chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) in combination with chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Method: To compare the efficacy and/or safety of VEN+chemo versus chemotherapy alone for AML, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to searching up to June 2023. Comparisons included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Result: A total of 9 articles were included, including 3124 patients. The baseline characteristics between two patient groups were similar. The combined analysis showed that compared with the group receiving chemo alone, the VEN+chemo group exhibited higher rates of CR, CRi, MLFS and ORR. Additionally, the VEN+chemo group had longer event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) durations. The incidence rates of AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were similar between the two groups, but the early 30-day mortality rate was lower in the VEN+chemo group than in the chemo alone group. Conclusion: The VEN+chemo therapy demonstrates significant efficacy and safety profile in AML patients. However, more prospective studies are needed in the future to provide more accurate and robust evidence for treatment selection in patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023439288, identifier CRD42023439288.

Effects of post-transplant maintenance therapy with decitabine prophylaxis on the relapse for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

In adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), post-transplant relapse is a major risk factor for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our study investigated the efficacy and safety of decitabine (dec) with ALL patients post-transplantation. We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess the efficacy of decitabine (dec) with post-transplant ALL at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2016 to September 2021. A total of 141 consecutive ALL patients were analyzed and divided into decitabine (dec, n = 65) and control (ctrl, n = 76) groups based on whether they were treated with decitabine after allo-HSCT. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rate in the dec group was lower than that in the ctrl group (19.6 vs. 36.1%, p = 0.031), with a hazard ratio of 0.491 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.257-0.936). Additionally, subgroup analyses revealed that the 3-year CIR rate of T-ALL and Ph-negative B-ALL patients in the dec and ctrl groups was 11.7 vs. 35.9% and 19.5 vs. 42.2% (p = 0.035, p = 0.068) respectively. In summary, ALL patients, especially those with T-ALL and Ph-negative B-ALL, may benefit from decitabine as maintenance therapy following allo-HSCT.