Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 127(1): 88-97, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31544327

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term incidence of serious complications of surgery for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study using a surgical registry. SETTING: Thirteen public hospitals in France. POPULATION: A cohort of 1873 women undergoing surgery between February 2017 and August 2018. METHODS: Preliminary analysis of serious complications after a mean follow-up of 7 months (0-18 months), according to type of surgery. Surgeons reported procedures and complications, which were verified by the hospitals' information systems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serious complication requiring discontinuation of the procedure or subsequent surgical intervention, life-threatening complication requiring resuscitation, or death. RESULTS: Fifty-two women (2.8%, 95% CI 2.1-3.6%) experienced a serious complication either during surgery, requiring the discontinuation of the procedure, or during the first months of follow-up, necessitating a subsequent reoperation. One woman also required resuscitation; no women died. Of 811 midurethral slings (MUSs), 11 were removed in part or totally (1.4%, 0.7-2.3%), as were two of 391 transvaginal meshes (0.5%, 0.1-1.6%), and four of 611 laparoscopically placed mesh implants (0.7%, 0.2-1.5%). The incidence of serious complications 6 months after the surgical procedure was estimated to be around 3.5% (2.0-5.0%) after MUS alone, 7.0% (2.8-11.3%) after MUS with prolapse surgery, 1.7% (0.0-3.8%) after vaginal native tissue repair, 2.8% (0.9-4.6%) after transvaginal mesh, and 1.0% (0.1-1.9%) after laparoscopy with mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Early serious complications are relatively rare. Monitoring must be continued and expanded to assess the long-term risk associated with mesh use and to identify its risk factors. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Short-term serious complications are rare after surgery for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse, even with mesh.


Assuntos
Diafragma da Pelve/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Colposcopia/efeitos adversos , Colposcopia/mortalidade , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Slings Suburetrais/estatística & dados numéricos , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(3): 309-313, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29551299

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and functional urinary and digestive results of nerve sparing techniques in endometriosis surgery. METHODS: A research on the medline/pubmed database using specific keywords (nerve sparing, endometriosis, pelvic nerves) identified 7 publications among about 50 whose purpose was to describe the feasibility, the techniques and the functional results of nerve preservation in this indication. Among them there are: 2 uncontrolled retrospective studies, 3 prospective non-randomized studies, a meta-analysis and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Nerve preservation requires a perfect knowledge of the anatomy of the pelvic autonomic system. The laparoscopic approach is preferred by the different authors due to its anatomical advantage. The feasibility of this technique seems to be demonstrated despite certain limitations in the different studies and depending of the retroperitoneal extension of the lesions. When feasible, it is likely to significantly improve postoperative urinary function (urinary retention) compared to a conventional technique. It is observed no difference regarding digestive function. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve sparing in this indication is a technique the feasibility of which has been demonstrated and is subject to the topography and extent of the disease. In the absence of invasion or entrapment of pelvic autonomic nerves by endometriosis, this technique improves postoperative voiding function (NP3). During pelvic surgery for endometriosis, it is recommended to identify and preserve autonomic pelvic nerves whenever possible (GradeC).


Assuntos
Endometriose/cirurgia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Plexo Hipogástrico , Laparoscopia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Pelve/inervação , Transtornos Urinários/prevenção & controle
3.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(10): 1595-1597, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28293789

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of an ovine model for training in vaginal surgery. METHODS: Four senior urogynaecological surgeons and five residents attended five sessions of vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in five old multiparous female sheep. Urogynaecological examinations were performed and measurements similar to the POP-Q classification in humans were obtained. Standard POP surgical procedures with and without mesh were performed. A pelvic CT scan was done on one animal and the structures were compared with the pelvic structures in a woman. After the feasibility of vaginal surgery had been established in three cadavers, surgery was performed in two living animals under general anaesthesia and was followed by laparoscopy to explore the internal pelvic anatomy. RESULTS: We found anatomic similarities in the vaginal and pelvic structures between sheep and women. After caudal traction on the cervix, all five sheep had significant POP of stage 3 or 4. We proved the feasibility of all types of vaginal surgery in this animal model: traditional anterior and posterior repair, apex fixation and anterior wall repair with mesh. The video shows the internal pelvic anatomy and different vaginal procedures. CONCLUSION: This study showed that training in vaginal surgery for POP is feasible and useful in an animal model, the ewe, that has vaginal and pelvic structures very similar to those in women.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Modelos Animais , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Ovinos/cirurgia , Vagina/cirurgia , Animais , Feminino
7.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 42(4): 334-41, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23618743

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cystocele is a frequent and invalidating type of genital prolapse in woman. Sacropexy using synthetic mesh is considered the surgical gold standard, and the laparoscopic approach has supplanted the open abdominal route because it offers the same anatomical results with a lower morbidity. The use of mesh through the vaginal route may have many advantages: easiness to perform, shorter operative time and recovery, but may increase morbidity. In France, both laparoscopic sacropexy and vaginal mesh are commonly used to treat cystoceles. The French Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) has highlighted the lack of evaluation of safety assessment for vaginal meshes. METHOD/DESIGN: The main objective of the study is to compare the morbidity of laparoscopic sacropexy with vaginal mesh for cystocele repair. The primary endpoint will be the rate of surgical complications greater or equal to grade 2 of the Clavien-Dindo classification at 1-year follow-up. The secondary aims are to compare the functional results in the medium term (sexuality, urinary and bowel symptoms, pain), the impact on quality of life as well as anatomical results. PROSPERE is a randomized controlled trial conducted in 12 participating French hospitals. 262 patients, aged 45 to 75years old, with cystocele greater or equal to stage 2 of the POP-Q classification (isolated or not) will be included. Exclusion criterias are a previous surgical POP repair, and inability or contra-indication to one or the other technique. We have designed this study to answer the question of the choice between laparoscopic sacropexy and vaginal mesh for the treatment of cystocele. The PROSPERE trial aims to help better determine the indications for one or the other of these techniques, which are currently based on subjective choices or school attitudes. This is the reason why competent authorities have asked for such studies.


Assuntos
Cistocele/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Laparoscopia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Idoso , Cistocele/complicações , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/instrumentação , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próteses e Implantes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Reconstrutivos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Reconstrutivos/métodos , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/etiologia , Vagina/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA