Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(3): e0509322, 2023 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37219426

RESUMO

Colistin heteroresistance (HR) refers to a bacterial population comprised of several subpopulations with different levels of resistance to colistin. In this study, we discuss the classic form of HR, in which a resistant subpopulation exists within a predominantly susceptible population. We investigated the prevalence of colistin HR and its evolution into full resistance among 173 clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and examined the effect of HR on clinical outcomes. To determine HR, we performed population analysis profiling. Our results showed a high prevalence of HR (67.1%). To examine evolution of HR strains into full resistance, the HR strains were grown in colistin-containing broth, transferred onto colistin-containing plates, and colonies on these plates were transferred into colistin-free broth. Many of the HR strains (80.2%) evolved into full resistance, 17.2% reverted to HR, and 2.6% were borderline. We used logistic regression to compare 14-day clinical failure and 14-day mortality between patients infected by HR versus susceptible non-HR carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. In the subgroup of patients with bacteremia, HR was significantly associated with 14-day mortality. IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study to report on HR in Gram-negative bacteria. We described the prevalence of colistin HR in a large sample of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, the evolution of many colistin HR isolates to a resistant phenotype following colistin exposure and withdrawal, and the clinical consequences of colistin HR. We found a high prevalence of HR among clinical carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates; most evolved into a resistant phenotype following colistin exposure and withdrawal. In patients treated with colistin, evolution of HR A. baumannii into full resistance could lead to higher rates of treatment failure and contribute to the reservoir of colistin-resistant pathogens in health care settings.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Humanos , Colistina/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla
2.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 5(1): dlad005, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36726533

RESUMO

Recruitment of patients with critical priority antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria into drug approval randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been successful to date. Approaching from the viewpoint of clinician-investigators and learning from the experience of AMR-focused investigator-initiated trials, we present suggestions to improve feasibility and efficiency of RCTs evaluating patients with severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative or other AMR bacteria. Considerations address the trials' eligibility criteria, whether the focus of the trial is pathogen- or syndrome-targeted, trials' case report forms and monitoring, informed consent strategies for the recruitment of extremely ill patients, team dedication and incentives to run the trial and alternative trial designs. Evidence on the effects of new drugs against the AMR that these drugs target is weak and needs to be improved through better industry-academic collaboration, taking advantage of the different strengths of industry-led and investigator-initiated research.

3.
Gerontology ; 69(3): 312-320, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36273449

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Reports regarding the external validity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce. We aimed to assess the population external validity of an investigator-initiated RCT on the duration of antibiotics for the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia by comparing patients included in the RCT to patients that were not included in the trial. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacteremia were recruited into an RCT and randomized to receive 7 or 14 days of covering antibiotic therapy in Israel and Italy from 2013 to 2017. In a concomitant observational study, RCT participants were compared with patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria but were not included in the trial due to participation in other trials, discharge before approached by researchers, refusal to participate, or unwillingness of the treating physician to allow participants' recruitment. RESULTS: Six hundred and four RCT patients were compared with 613 nonincluded patients. Almost 50% of nonincluded patients (288/613) were dependent on others for activities of daily living at baseline compared to 37.7% of RCT participants (228/604). Dementia was nearly 2-fold more frequent in nonincluded patients than those included (5.9% [36/613] versus 3.6% [22/604], p = 0.07). Patients who were not included in the RCT were more likely to acquire their infection in the hospital (53.3% [327/613] versus 29.1% [176/604], p < 0.001). The primary composite outcome of mortality, clinical failure, readmissions, or extended hospitalization at 90 days occurred in 353 of 613 nonincluded patients (57.6%) compared to 299 of 604 RCT participants (49.6%), p = 0.005. However, on multivariate analysis noninclusion in the RCT was not an independent risk factor for clinical failure and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs, even with broad eligibility criteria, do not represent the whole spectrum of patients and leave out a population with more severe illness for whom the evidence is lacking.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Itália , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
Infect Dis Ther ; 11(4): 1505-1519, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35612693

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the impact of short antibiotic course. METHODS: We present a retrospective multicenter study including patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia during 2009-2015. We evaluated outcomes of patients treated with short (6-10 days) versus long (11-15 days) antibiotic courses. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality or bacteremia recurrence and/or persistence. Univariate and inverse probability treatment-weighted (IPTW) adjusted multivariate analysis for the primary outcome was performed. To avoid immortal time bias, the landmark method was used. RESULTS: We included 657 patients; 273 received a short antibiotic course and 384 a long course. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics of patients. The composite primary outcome occurred in 61/384 patients in the long-treatment group (16%) versus 32/273 in the short-treatment group (12%) (p = 0.131). Mortality accounted for 41/384 (11%) versus 25/273 (9%) of cases, respectively. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the short group [median 13 days, interquartile range (IQR) 9-21 days, versus median 15 days, IQR 11-26 days, p = 0.002]. Ten patients in the long group discontinued antibiotic therapy owing to adverse events, compared with none in the short group. On univariate and multivariate analyses, duration of therapy was not associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, 6-10 days of antibiotic course for P. aeruginosa bacteremia were as effective as longer courses in terms of survival and recurrence. Shorter therapy was associated with reduced length of stay and less drug discontinuation.

5.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259707, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34788325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for functional decline after hospitalization for Gram-negative bacteremia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial conducted between January 1, 2013 and August 31, 2017 in Israel and Italy. Hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacteremia who survived until day 90 and were not bedridden at baseline were included. The primary end point was functional decline at 90 days. RESULTS: Five hundred and nine patients were included. The median age of the cohort was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-80 years), 46.4% (236/509) were male and 352 of 509 (69%) patients were independent at baseline. Functional decline at 90 days occurred in 24.4% of patients (124/509). In multivariable analysis; older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; for an one-year increment, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), functional dependence in instrumental activities of daily living at baseline (OR, 4.64; 95% CI 2.5-8.6), low Norton score (OR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96) and underlying comorbidities: cancer (OR, 2.01; 95% CI 1.14-3.55) and chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 2.23 95% CI 1.12-4.42) and longer length of hospital stay (OR 1.09; for one-day increment, 95% CI 1.04-1.15) were associated with functional decline. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was associated with lower rates of functional decline within 90 days (OR, 0.4; 95% CI 0.21-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Patients surviving bloodstream infections have poor long term trajectories after clinical recovery and hospital discharge. This has vast implications for patients, their family members and health policy makers.


Assuntos
Bactérias Gram-Negativas/patogenicidade , Pneumopatias/sangue , Pneumopatias/microbiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Pneumopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
6.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(10): 1423-1428, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To describe the use of wall painting as part of an intervention to control an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). METHODS: An interrupted time-series analysis was performed analyzing an intervention in a neurosurgical intensive care unit (NSICU) and an inpatient hematology department in a tertiary level medical center in Israel. The intervention involved wall painting using a water based acrylic paint following patient discharge and terminal cleaning with sodium troclosene as part of an infection control bundle for an outbreak of CRAB in a NSICU and concurrent outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) colonization/infection in the same NSICU and the hematology department. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and December 2018, 122 patients hospitalized in the NSICU were identified with new CRAB colonization/infection. The median incidence in the periods prior to/post intervention were 2.24/1000 HD (interquartile range [IQR] 0.84-2.90/1000) vs. 0/1000 HD (IQR 0-0.49/1000), respectively. Poisson regression indicated a decrease of 92% in the CRAB incidence following the intervention onset (relative risk [RR] 0.080, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.037-0.174, p < 0.001). Forty-seven patients in the NSICU and 110 in the hematology department were colonized/infected with CRE in the same time period; a significant change was not observed following the start of the intervention in either department (for NSICU RR 1.236, 95% CI 0.370-4.125, p = 0.731; for hematology RR 0.658, 95% CI 0.314-1.378, p = 0.267). CONCLUSIONS: A. baumannii is able to survive on environmental surfaces despite decontamination efforts; wall-painting as part of a bundle may be a successful infection control measure.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Cloro , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Israel/epidemiologia
7.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(10): 1518.e1-1518.e3, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Israeli national policy for containing carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) includes a protocol allowing for discontinuation of carrier status following spontaneous decolonization. We examined the strategy's effectiveness based on carbapenemase type. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing individuals colonized with KPC- or NDM-producing Enterobacterales who underwent the process of isolation discontinuation. The primary outcome was reversion of carrier status, i.e. re-identification of the same CPE species following isolation discontinuation. We used survival analysis to estimate overall hazard ratio and performed competing-risks analysis using a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model and cause-specific hazard ratios. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2006 and 1 January 2019 we identified 1694 individuals who met inclusion criteria, including 1337 (78.9%) carriers of KPC-producing Enterobacterales, 305 (18.0%) carriers of NDM-producing Enterobacterales and 52 (3.1%) carriers of dual KPC-/NDM-producing Enterobacterales. A total of 134 individuals (7.9%) had reversion of carrier status: 9.1% (121/1337) and 4.3% (13/305) of individuals with KPC- and NDM-producing Enterobacterales, respectively. The subdistribution hazard ratio of status reversion was not increased among carriers of NDM producers compared with KPC producers (0.567, 95% CI 0.320-1.000], p 0.052). Cause-specific hazard ratios yielded similar results (0.522, 95% CI 0.291-0.937, p 0.029. CONCLUSIONS: Carriage of NDM-producing Enterobacterales was not associated with higher rates of reversion to carrier status following spontaneous decolonization than was carriage of KPC-producing Enterobacterales.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/classificação , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , beta-Lactamases/classificação , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Humanos , Israel , Políticas , Estudos Retrospectivos , beta-Lactamases/genética
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(8): 2172-2181, 2021 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia is a common and serious infection. No consensus exists regarding whether definitive combination therapy is superior to monotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of combination therapy on mortality. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study (nine countries, 25 centres), including 1277 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia during 2009-15. We evaluated the association between ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside or quinolone combination therapy versus ß-lactam monotherapy and mortality. The primary outcome was 30 day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted, introducing combination as a time-dependent variable. Propensity score was conducted to adjust for confounding for choosing combination therapy over monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 1119 patients included, 843 received definitive monotherapy and 276 received combination therapy (59% aminoglycoside and 41% quinolone). Mortality at 30 days was 16.9% (189/1119) and was similar between combination (45/276; 16.3%) and monotherapy (144/843; 17.1%) groups (P = 0.765). In multivariate Cox regression, combination therapy was not associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1.53). No advantage in terms of clinical failure, microbiological failure or recurrent/persistent bacteraemia was demonstrated using combination therapy. Likewise, adverse events and resistance development were similar for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, no mortality advantage was demonstrated using combination therapy over monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Combination therapy did not improve clinical or microbiological failure rates, nor affect adverse events or resistance development. Our finding of no benefit with combination therapy needs confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 309, 2021 Mar 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33789574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Population external validity is the extent to which an experimental study results can be generalized from a specific sample to a defined population. In order to apply the results of a study, we should be able to assess its population external validity. We performed an investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial (RCT) (AIDA study), which compared colistin-meropenem combination therapy to colistin monotherapy in the treatment of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to examine the study's population external validity and to substantiate the use of AIDA study results in clinical practice, we performed a concomitant observational trial. METHODS: The study was conducted between October 1st, 2013 and January 31st, 2017 (during the RCTs recruitment period) in Greece, Israel and Italy. Patients included in the observational arm of the study have fulfilled clinical and microbiological inclusion criteria but were excluded from the RCT due to receipt of colistin for > 96 h, refusal to participate, or prior inclusion in the RCT. Non-randomized cases were compared to randomized patients. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 14 days of infection onset. RESULTS: Analysis included 701 patients. Patients were infected mainly with Acinetobacter baumannii [78.2% (548/701)]. The most common reason for exclusion was refusal to participate [62% (183/295)]. Non-randomized and randomized patients were similar in most of the demographic and background parameters, though randomized patients showed minor differences towards a more severe infection. Combination therapy was less common in non-randomized patients [31.9% (53/166) vs. 51.2% (208/406), p = 0.000]. Randomized patients received longer treatment of colistin [13 days (IQR 10-16) vs. 8.5 days (IQR 0-15), p = 0.000]. Univariate analysis showed that non-randomized patients were more inclined to clinical failure on day 14 from infection onset [82% (242/295) vs. 75.5% (307/406), p = 0.042]. After adjusting for other variables, non-inclusion was not an independent risk factor for clinical failure at day 14. CONCLUSION: The similarity between the observational arm and RCT patients has strengthened our confidence in the population external validity of the AIDA trial. Adding an observational arm to intervention studies can help increase the population external validity and improve implementation of study results in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01732250 on November 22, 2012.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Israel , Itália , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(12): 1746-1753, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is the standard of care for treating bacterial infections. In randomized clinical trials of new antimicrobials, AST might not be performed or reported in real time. OBJECTIVES: To determine local, real-time laboratory AST performance, its usage in the trial flow, quality control (QC) of the local testing, central AST performance and the effect of using AST categorization on the trials' primary outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included registered randomized controlled trials published in journals between January 2015 and December 2019. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We included trials comparing different antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused predominantly by Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: Primary outcomes for different trial populations were extracted and differences between trial arms were compared for patients with infections caused by susceptible versus non-susceptible bacteria. Results are described narratively. RESULTS: Of 32 randomized trials, 25 trials reported that local AST was performed, 1312 reported the local laboratory AST methods, no trial reported QC, but post-hoc referral for AST at a reference laboratory was common. Patients' outcomes were superior when patients with infections due to susceptible and non-susceptible pathogens were compared post hoc (median difference 14%, interquartile range 8%-24%) in trials allowing this comparison (seven antimicrobials), except for colistin, where 14-day mortality was 9% higher when patients were treated with colistin for colistin-susceptible versus colistin-resistant carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. When excluding patients with pathogens that were non-susceptible to either antimicrobial in the trials, the difference in the primary outcome between the trial arms was reduced in five out of six trials. CONCLUSIONS: Trials should perform AST to guide patient inclusion or exclusion from the study and consider the impact of the central laboratory susceptibility results on the study outcomes when using post-hoc reference testing.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Acinetobacter baumannii , Colistina , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
11.
Euro Surveill ; 25(23)2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553060

RESUMO

BackgroundThe spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of worldwide concern. Public health policymakers and pharmaceutical companies pursuing antibiotic development require accurate predictions about the future spread of AMR.AimWe aimed to identify and model temporal and geographical patterns of AMR spread and to predict future trends based on a slow, intermediate or rapid rise in resistance.MethodsWe obtained data from five antibiotic resistance surveillance projects spanning the years 1997 to 2015. We aggregated the isolate-level or country-level data by country and year to produce country-bacterium-antibiotic class triads. We fitted both linear and sigmoid models to these triads and chose the one with the better fit. For triads that conformed to a sigmoid model, we classified AMR progression into one of three characterising paces: slow, intermediate or fast, based on the sigmoid slope. Within each pace category, average sigmoid models were calculated and validated.ResultsWe constructed a database with 51,670 country-year-bacterium-antibiotic observations, grouped into 7,440 country-bacterium-antibiotic triads. A total of 1,037 triads (14%) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 326 (31.4%) followed a sigmoid (logistic) pattern over time. Among 107 triads for which both sigmoid and linear models could be fit, the sigmoid model was a better fit in 84%. The sigmoid model deviated from observed data by a median of 6.5%; the degree of deviation was related to the pace of spread.ConclusionWe present a novel method of describing and predicting the spread of antibiotic-resistant organisms.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Modelos Teóricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(11): 2270-2280, 2020 05 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31323088

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal antibiotic regimen for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia is controversial. Although ß-lactam monotherapy is common, data to guide the choice between antibiotics are scarce. We aimed to compare ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive monotherapy. METHODS: A multinational retrospective study (9 countries, 25 centers) including 767 hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia treated with ß-lactam monotherapy during 2009-2015. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate, including propensity-adjusted, analyses were conducted introducing monotherapy type as an independent variable. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 37/213 (17.4%), 42/210 (20%), and 55/344 (16%) in the ceftazidime, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam groups, respectively. Type of monotherapy was not significantly associated with mortality in either univariate, multivariate, or propensity-adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-2.46, for ceftazidime; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.67-2.51, for piperacillin-tazobactam, with carbapenems as reference in propensity adjusted multivariate analysis; 542 patients). No significant difference between antibiotics was demonstrated for clinical failure, microbiological failure, or adverse events. Isolation of P. aeruginosa with new resistance to antipseudomonal drugs was significantly more frequent with carbapenems (36/206 [17.5%]) versus ceftazidime (25/201 [12.4%]) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28/332 [8.4%] (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in mortality, clinical, and microbiological outcomes or adverse events was demonstrated between ceftazidime, carbapenems, and piperacillin-tazobactam as definitive treatment of P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Higher rates of resistant P. aeruginosa after patients were treated with carbapenems, along with the general preference for carbapenem-sparing regimens, suggests using ceftazidime or piperacillin-tazobactam for treating susceptible infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
J Travel Med ; 27(2)2020 03 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31616947

RESUMO

Pregnant travellers and their offspring are vulnerable to severe outcomes following a wide range of infections. Vaccine-preventable diseases can have a particularly severe course in pregnant women, but little is known about the safety of travel vaccines in pregnant women. We performed a systematic review of all published literature concerning the safety of vaccines frequently given to travellers such as yellow fever, MMR (mumps, measles and rubella), influenza, Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis), meningococcus, hepatitis A and B, rabies, polio, typhoid fever, tick-borne encephalitis and Japanese encephalitis vaccines. We included case series, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). For the meta-analysis, we included only RCTs that compared the administration of a vaccine to placebo or to no vaccine. Outcome measures included severe systemic adverse events, maternal outcomes related to the course of pregnancy, neonatal outcomes and local adverse events. We calculated the risk ratio and its 95% confidence interval as the summary measure. The safety of influenza vaccine is supported by high-quality evidence. For Tdap vaccine, no evidence of any harm was found in the meta-analysis of RCTs. A slight increase in chorioamnionitis rate was reported in 3 out of 12 observational studies. However, this small possible risk is far outweighed by a much larger benefit in terms of infant morbidity and mortality. Meningococcal vaccines are probably safe during pregnancy, as supported by RCTs comparing meningococcal vaccines to other vaccines. Data from observational studies support the safety of hepatitis A, hepatitis B and rabies vaccines, as well as that of the live attenuated yellow fever vaccine. We found little or no data about the safety of polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, tick-borne encephalitis and MMR vaccines during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Medicina de Viagem , Vacinas , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Medicina de Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Relacionada a Viagens , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/normas
14.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(2): 105847, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770625

RESUMO

This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for 30-day mortality among hospitalised patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia, a highly fatal condition. A retrospective study was conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 October 2015 in 25 centres (9 countries) including 2396 patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses of risk factors were conducted for the entire cohort and for patients surviving ≥48 h. A propensity score for predictors of appropriate empirical therapy was introduced into the analysis. Of the 2396 patients, 636 (26.5%) died within 30 days. Significant predictors (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) of mortality in the multivariable analysis included patient-related factors: age (1.02, 1.01-1.03); female sex (1.34, 1.03-1.77); bedridden functional capacity (1.99, 1.24-3.21); recent hospitalisation (1.43, 1.07-1.92); concomitant corticosteroids (1.33, 1.02-1.73); and Charlson comorbidity index (1.05, 1.01-1.93). Infection-related factors were multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas (1.52, 1.15-2.1), non-urinary source (2.44, 1.54-3.85) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (1.27, 1.18-1.36). Inappropriate empirical therapy was not associated with increased mortality (0.81, 0.49-1.33). Among 2135 patients surviving ≥48 h, hospital-acquired infection (1.59, 1.21-2.09), baseline endotracheal tube (1.63, 1.13-2.36) and ICU admission (1.53, 1.02-2.28) were additional risk factors. Risk factors for mortality among patients with P. aeruginosa were mostly irreversible. Early appropriate empirical therapy was not associated with reduced mortality. Further research should be conducted to explore subgroups that may not benefit from broad-spectrum antipseudomonal empirical therapy. Efforts should focus on prevention of infection, mainly hospital-acquired infection and multidrug-resistant pseudomonal infection.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/mortalidade , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(10): 2599-2607, 2020 12 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31758195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether carbapenem-colistin combination therapy reduces the emergence of colistin resistance, compared to colistin monotherapy, when given to patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms. METHODS: This is a pre-planned analysis of a secondary outcome from a randomized, controlled trial comparing colistin monotherapy with colistin-meropenem combination for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant, colistin-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated rectal swabs taken on Day 7 or later for the presence of new colistin-resistant (ColR) isolates. We evaluated the emergence of any ColR isolate and the emergence of ColR Enterobacteriaceae (ColR-E). RESULTS: Data were available for 214 patients for the primary analysis; emergent ColR organisms were detected in 22 (10.3%). No difference was observed between patients randomized to treatment with colistin monotherapy (10/106, 9.4%) versus patients randomized to colistin-meropenem combination therapy (12/108, 11.1%; P = .669). ColR-E organisms were detected in 18/249 (7.2%) patients available for analysis. No difference was observed between the 2 treatment arms (colistin monotherapy 6/128 [4.7%] vs combination therapy 12/121 [9.9%]; P = .111). Enterobacteriaceae, as the index isolate, was found to be associated with development of ColR-E (hazard ratio, 3.875; 95% confidence interval, 1.475-10.184; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Carbapenem-colistin combination therapy did not reduce the incidence of colistin resistance emergence in patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant organisms. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the development of colistin resistance and methods for its prevention.


Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos , Colistina , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Meropeném , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
17.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(12): 2243-2251, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31399915

RESUMO

Little evidence exists addressing the clinical value of adding gentamicin to ampicillin for invasive listeriosis. A multicenter retrospective observational study of nonpregnant adult patients with invasive listeriosis (primary bacteremia, central nervous system (CNS) disease, and others) in 11 hospitals in Israel between the years 2008 and 2014 was conducted. We evaluated the effect of penicillin-based monotherapy compared with early combination therapy with gentamicin, defined as treatment started within 48 h of culture results and continued for a minimum of 7 days. Patients who died within 48 h of the index culture were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 190 patients with invasive listeriosis were included. Fifty-nine (30.6%) patients were treated with early combination therapy, 90 (46.6%) received monotherapy, and 44 (22.8%) received other treatments. Overall 30-day mortality was 20.5% (39/190). Factors associated with mortality included lower baseline functional status, congestive heart failure, and higher sequential organ failure assessment score. Source of infection, treatment type, and time from culture taken date to initiation of effective therapy were not associated with mortality. In multivariable analysis, monotherapy was not significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality compared with early combination therapy (OR 1.947, 95% CI 0.691-5.487). Results were similar in patients with CNS disease (OR 3.037, 95% CI 0.574-16.057) and primary bacteremia (OR 2.983, 95% CI 0.575-15.492). In our retrospective cohort, there was no statistically significant association between early combination therapy and 30-day mortality. A randomized controlled trial may be necessary to assess optimal treatment.


Assuntos
Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Listeriose/tratamento farmacológico , Listeriose/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Listeria/efeitos dos fármacos , Listeria/isolamento & purificação , Listeriose/diagnóstico , Listeriose/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos
18.
Euro Surveill ; 24(34)2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456558

RESUMO

BackgroundIn 2012, Israel's National Center for Infection Control initiated a national stewardship programme that included mandatory annual reporting of antimicrobial use. Here we present nationwide Israeli data for the period 2012 to 2017.AimThe goal of this study was to detect trends in antimicrobial use in Israel following the introduction of the stewardship programme, as part of an assessment of the programme's impact.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, data were collected from Israel's health maintenance organisations (HMOs), acute care hospitals and post-acute care hospitals (PACHs). Acute care hospital data were collected for general medical and surgical wards, and medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs). Data were converted into defined daily doses (DDD), with use rates presented as DDD per 1,000 insured/day in the community and DDD per 100 patient-days in hospitals and PACHs. Trends were analysed using linear regression.ResultsAntimicrobial use decreased across sectors between 2012 and 2017. In the community, the decrease was modest, from 22.8 to 21.8 DDD per 1,000 insured per day (4.4%, p = 0.004). In acute care hospitals, antibiotic DDDs per 100 patient-days decreased from 100.0 to 84.0 (16.0%, p = 0.002) in medical wards, from 112.8 to 94.2 (16.5%, p = 0.004) in surgical wards and from 154.4 to 137.2 (11.1%, p = 0.04) in ICUs. Antimicrobial use decreased most markedly in PACHs, from 29.1 to 18.1 DDD per 100 patient-days (37.8%, p = 0.005).ConclusionBetween 2012 and 2017, antimicrobial use decreased significantly in all types of healthcare institutions in Israel, following the introduction of the nationwide antimicrobial stewardship programme.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/tendências , Carbapenêmicos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Israel , Notificação de Abuso , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31171967

RESUMO

We analyzed Israeli national data on antimicrobial susceptibility from bloodstream isolates collected between 2014 and 2017 and compared resistance proportions with those of Europe. The incidence of bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by most antibiotic-resistant organisms remained unchanged or decreased. An exception was increased incidence of BSI caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli. Overall, resistance proportions were similar to those observed in southern Europe, with the exception of a lower proportion of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Israel.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(5): 769-776, 2019 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30462182

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between mortality and colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infections and the interaction with antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of patients with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections treated with colistin or colistin-meropenem combination. We evaluated patients with infection caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) identified as colistin susceptible (CoS) at the time of treatment and compared patients in which the isolate was confirmed as CoS with those whose isolates were retrospectively identified as colistin resistant (CoR) when tested by broth microdilution (BMD). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Data were available for 266 patients (214 CoS and 52 CoR isolates). Patients with CoR isolates had higher baseline functional capacity and lower rates of mechanical ventilation than patients with CoS isolates. All-cause 28-day mortality was 42.3% (22/52) among patients with CoR strains and 52.8% (113/214) among patients with CoS isolates (P = .174). After adjusting for variables associated with mortality, the mortality rate was lower among patients with CoR isolates (odds ratio [OR], 0.285 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .118-.686]). This difference was associated with treatment arm: Mortality rates among patients with CoR isolates were higher in those randomized to colistin-meropenem combination therapy compared to colistin monotherapy (OR, 3.065 [95% CI, 1.021-9.202]). CONCLUSIONS: Colistin resistance determined by BMD was associated with lower mortality among patients with severe CRAB infections. Among patients with CoR isolates, colistin monotherapy was associated with a better outcome compared to colistin-meropenem combination therapy. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01732250.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...