Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 45: 1-6, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639293

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Febrile neutropenic immunocompromised children are at a high risk of Serious Bacterial Infections (SBI). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis report the prevalence of SBI in healthy children with febrile neutropenia. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from their inception to August 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Patients with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1000 cells/mm3 up to 18 years of age presenting to the ED with a chief complaint of fever (temperature > 38°C) and who had a workup for SBI as defined by each study. DATA ABSTRACTION: Data from individual studies was abstracted by a subset of the authors and checked independently by the senior author. Any discrepancies were adjudicated by the joint agreement of all the authors. We calculated the prevalence of SBI by using the number of SBI's as the numerator and the total number of febrile events in patients as the denominator. Bias in our studies was quantified by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: We identified 2066 citations of which five studies (1693 patients) our inclusion criteria. None of our reviewed studies consistently tested every included patient for SBI. Spectrum bias in every study resulted in a wide range of the SBI prevalence of 1.9% (<0.01% - 11%) similar to non-neutropenic children. LIMITATIONS: All of our studies were retrospective and many did not consistently screen all subjects for SBI. CONCLUSION: If the clinical suspicion is low, the risk for SBI is similar between febrile healthy neutropenic and non-neutropenic children.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Febre/microbiologia , Neutropenia/microbiologia , Criança , Humanos , Prevalência
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 2020 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118837

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Head trauma is a common reason for evaluation in the emergency department. The evaluation for traumatic brain injury involves computed tomography, exposing children to ionizing radiation. Skull fractures are associated with intracranial bleed. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can diagnose skull fractures. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to determine operating characteristics of POCUS skull studies in the diagnosis of fractures in pediatric head trauma patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of emergency department pediatric head trauma patients. Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to evaluate risk of bias. Point-of-care ultrasound skull study operating characteristics were calculated and pooled using Meta-DiSc. RESULTS: Six studies of 393 patients were selected with a weighted prevalence of 30.84%. Most studies were at low risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity (91%) and specificity (96%) resulted in pooled positive likelihood ratio (14.4) and negative likelihood ratio (0.14). Using the weighted prevalence of skull fractures across the studies as a pretest probability (31%), a positive skull ultrasound would increase the probability to 87%, whereas a negative test would decrease the probability of a skull fracture to 6%. To achieve a posttest probability of a skull fracture of ~2% would require a negative skull ultrasound in a patient with only a pretest probability of ~15%. CONCLUSIONS: A POCUS skull study significantly increases the probability of skull fracture, whereas a negative study markedly decreases the probability if the pretest probability is very low.

4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(6): 1184-1190, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31000315

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Partial thickness burns are the most common form of thermal burns. Traditionally, dressing for these burns is simple gauze with silver sulfadiazine (SSD) changed on a daily basis. Foam dressings have been proposed to offer the advantage of requiring less frequent dressing change and better absorption of exudates. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of silver-containing foam dressing to traditional SSD with gauze dressing on wound healing of partial thickness burns. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library database and Google Scholar for trials comparing traditional SSD dressings to that of silver-containing foam dressing on wound healing in partial thickness burns <25% of the body surface area. We excluded studies that enrolled burns involving head, face, and genitals; burns older than or equal to 36 h, non-thermal burns, and immunocompromised patients. Quality of trials was assessed using the GRADE criteria. The main outcome, complete wound healing, is reported as percentages of wound with complete epithelialization after the follow up period. Relative risks of complete healing are also reported with respective 95% CI. Time to healing and pain score before, during, and after dressing change at each follow up visit are compared between the groups (means with standard deviation or medians with quartiles). RESULTS: We identified a total of 877 references, of which three randomized controlled trials (2 combined pediatric and adult trials and 1 adult trial) with a total of 346 patients met our inclusion criteria. All three trials compared silver-containing foam dressing to SSD and gauze on partial thickness burns. Moderate quality evidence indicated no significant difference in wound re-epithelialization between the groups across all three trials as confidence intervals for the relative risks all crossed 1. Although pain scores favored foam dressing at the first dressing change (7 days), there was no significant difference between the groups at the end of the treatment period at 28 days. Time to wound healing was also similar across the three trials with no statistical difference. Infection rates favored the foam-dressing group, but data were inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Moderate quality evidence indicates that there is no significant difference in wound healing between silver-containing foam dressing and SSD dressing. However, foam has the added benefit of reduced pain during the early treatment phase and potentially decreased infection rates.


Assuntos
Bandagens/classificação , Bandagens/normas , Queimaduras/terapia , Cicatrização , Administração Tópica , Queimaduras/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Manejo da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sulfadiazina de Prata/administração & dosagem
5.
Acad Emerg Med ; 26(7): 826-828, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30632653
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...