Estimating the cost of university-based outbreaks of serogroup B meningococcal disease with different pre-matriculation vaccination policies in the United States.

Objective: We developed an Excel-based cost calculator to assess the economic burden of university-based Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) outbreaks. Participants: Hypothetical university with 6,354 students. Methods: Total societal costs of outbreak were estimated for three MenB pre-matriculation immunization policies-vaccination required, vaccination recommended, and no vaccine policy-under three different cost assumptions (low/mid-range/high cost). Results: Mid-range cost estimates of an outbreak under "no policy" were $2.60 and $2.70 million (of which 35% were incurred by the university) if targeting all undergraduates for mass vaccination with a two-/three-dose vaccine, respectively. The "required" and "recommended" policies lowered the burden to $2.17-$2.18 million and $2.34-$2.39 million, respectively. For a larger university with 40,000 students, costs were almost $9 million for a two-dose vaccine with "no policy" in place. Conclusions: The economic burden of a university MenB outbreak is substantial, but could be mitigated by a pre-matriculation MenB vaccination requirement or recommendation.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of triple-class treated patients with multiple myeloma in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Although multiple myeloma (MM) survival has improved following the introduction of proteosome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 therapies, patients become refractory to these agents. Real-world outcomes of triple-class exposed patients are limited and were investigated in this study. METHODS: The Integra Connect Database was used to assess the treatment patterns of triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) (January 2016-December 2019). RESULTS: During this period, patients (N = 501) reached triple exposure in a median of three lines of therapy (LOTs) over 995 days. A new LOT was started in a median of 18 (1-691) days after triple exposure; 71% of the patients started a new LOT within 30 days. Throughout the follow-up period, 8% of the patients had a therapy gap greater than 90 days. Following triple exposure, 103/501 patients (21%) received only triple-class agents in subsequent LOTs, while 24 (4.8%) patients received only non-triple-class agents. The median apparent survival from initiation of first therapy after triple exposure was 308 days. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that recycling of triple-class agents after previous exposure is widespread and prognosis in the RRMM population remains poor, highlighting the continuing unmet need for new agents with novel mechanisms to improve patient outcomes.

An Epidemiology Model for Estimating the Numbers of US Patients With Multiple Myeloma by Line of Therapy and Treatment Exposure.

OBJECTIVES: Estimates on the distribution of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) by line of therapy (LOT) are scarce and get outdated quickly as new treatments become available. The objective of this study was to estimate the number of patients with MM by LOT and the number of patients who have received at least 4 previous LOTs including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). METHODS: A compartmental model was developed to calculate the number of patients by LOT. Two pathways were considered based on stem cell transplant eligibility, and at each pathway, treatments were stratified in 2 types: anti-CD38 mAbs or other. The model population was stratified into 4 subgroups based on age and cytogenetic risk. Model inputs were informed from real-world evidence. RESULTS: The model estimated that, in 2020, 126 869 patients were living with MM in the United States. Of these, 105 701 received treatment in any LOT, with 56 959, 27 252, 11 258, and 5217 in lines 1 to 4, respectively, and 5015 in line 5 or beyond. The model estimated that 3497 patients received at least 4 previous LOTs including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti-CD38 mAbs. The model overall prevalence predictions aligned well with publicly available estimates. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a novel framework to estimate MM prevalence. It can assist clinicians to understand future trends in MM epidemiology, healthcare systems to plan for future resource use allocation, and payers to quantify the budget impact of new treatments.

Physician treatment preferences for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a discrete choice experiment.

Aim: This study aimed to assess physician preferences for later lines (third to fifth) of therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the USA. Materials & methods: Factors relevant to physicians' treatment preferences for RRMM were identified from a literature search and refined in a qualitative phase. Preferences were quantitatively assessed using a discrete choice experiment. Physicians (n = 227) made choices regarding treatment scenarios for RRMM. Results: Efficacy had the highest mean relative importance, with overall survival valued as most important when making treatment decisions for patients with RRMM. Reduced incidences of keratopathy and thrombocytopenia had similar relative importance in later-line treatment. Conclusion: Greater understanding of physicians' criteria for clinical decision-making may help inform wider adoption of new treatments.

When deciding which treatment patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma should receive, physicians have to weigh the benefits of each treatment against the risk of side effects. This study required physicians to complete a survey on aspects involved in their treatment decisions and identified those of highest importance. Physicians chose patient survival as the most important factor and minimization of side effects as less important considerations. Reducing patients' risk of developing corneal conditions or low platelet (a type of blood cell) count were of equal importance to doctors. Understanding physicians' treatment preferences and the reasons behind them will help identify gaps in education about new therapies as they become available.

Meningococcal Vaccination Rates Among People With a New Diagnosis of HIV Infection in the US.

Importance: In the United States, individuals with HIV infection have been recommended to receive a 2-dose series of the meningococcal A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) vaccine since 2016 owing to their increased risk of meningococcal disease. Objective: To examine uptake and time to receipt of the MenACWY vaccine among people with a new diagnosis of HIV. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used health insurance data from the US Optum Research Database from January 1, 2016, through March 31, 2018, to retrospectively identify 1208 individuals aged 2 years or older with 1 or more inpatient claim or 2 or more outpatient claims evidencing a new diagnosis of HIV infection and with continuous insurance enrollment for 12 or more months before and 6 or more months after diagnosis. Follow-up was 6 to 33 months. Statistical analysis was conducted from March 7, 2019, to January 5, 2022. Exposure: Receipt of the MenACWY vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine after a new HIV diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included uptake and time to receipt of 2 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine. Vaccination uptake and receipt were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis; factors associated with receipt of 1 or more doses of the MenACWY vaccine were identified with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Of 1208 individuals eligible for vaccination (1024 male patients [84.8%]; mean [SD] age, 38.8 [12.5] years; 35 [2.9%] Asian; 273 [22.6%] Black; 204 [16.9%] Hispanic; 442 [36.6%] White), 16.3% were estimated to have received a first dose of the MenACWY vaccine in the 2 years after a new HIV diagnosis. Among individuals who received a first dose, at 1 year or more of enrollment after the first dose, 66.2% were estimated to have received a second dose within 1 year of the first dose. Factors statistically significantly associated with uptake of the MenACWY vaccine included receipt of a pneumococcal vaccine (hazard ratio [HR], 23.03; 95% CI, 13.93-38.09), attendance at a well-care visit (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.11-12.12), West or Midwest geographic region (West: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.44-3.47; Midwest: HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.16-2.71), and male sex (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.18-6.26), whereas age of 56 years or older was significantly associated with reduced uptake of the MenACWY vaccine (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that MenACWY vaccine uptake among people with a new diagnosis of HIV was low, highlighting the need to educate patients and clinicians about the recommendations for conditions such as HIV infection that increase the risk of meningococcal disease among high-risk populations.

The impact of community pharmacy utilization of immunization information systems on vaccination rates: Results of a clustered randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adult immunization rates in the United States remain low. More convenient access to immunization information systems (IIS) may improve vaccination rates. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this multilevel, clustered, randomized controlled study was to measure the impact of providing pharmacists with software and training to query IIS for patient vaccine history/recommendations on adult influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, and Td/Tdap vaccination rates. METHODS: California Rite Aid pharmacy districts were randomized into intervention/control groups using stratified randomization based on baseline influenza vaccination rates. Store demographic characteristics were collected at baseline (January 1-December 31, 2018). During follow-up (April 1, 2019-March 31, 2020), intervention group stores received access to ImmsLink, software that allows health care providers to review immunization records from IIS and identify a patient's recommended vaccinations. The difference-in-difference between intervention and control groups compared the changes in vaccination rates from baseline to follow-up by calculating adjusted ratios of risk ratios (RRRs). Analysis was performed at the store level. RESULTS: Thirty-six districts comprising 501 Rite Aid stores (intervention: n = 244 stores; control: n = 257) were included. We found no significant differences in vaccination rates between groups: influenza, 19-64 years (adjusted RRR 0.99 [95% CI 0.83-1.17]); influenza, ≥65 years (1.02 [0.86-1.22]); herpes zoster (1.07 [0.90-1.28]); pneumococcal (0.95, 0.80-1.14); and Td/Tdap (0.88, 0.73-1.05). Reasons that recommended vaccines were not given in the intervention group included patient being deferred to future visit, patient declining, patient having already received the vaccination, patient declining because of cost, or vaccine being unavailable. Overall, pharmacist engagement with ImmsLink was low. CONCLUSION: Providing pharmacists with software and training to query IIS did not improve vaccination rates compared with control pharmacies in this study. Factors such as an inconvenient interface or inadequate training or motivation may have caused low engagement with the software and should be considered in future interventions.

Low Meningococcal Vaccination Rates Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Complement Component Deficiencies in the United States.

Meningococcal vaccination is recommended for patients with complement component deficiencies (CDs) in the United States. In this retrospective database study, only 4.6% and 2.2% of patients received MenACWY and MenB vaccination, respectively, within 3 years of CD diagnosis. Thus, meningococcal vaccination rates among patients with CDs need to be improved.

Budget Impact of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf) Adoption in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.

PURPOSE: Estimate the budget impact of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received ≥4 prior therapies, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, a proteasome inhibitor, and an immunomodulatory agent. METHODS: A budget impact analysis (BIA) was developed to estimate the cost difference between current (no belamaf) and projected (with belamaf) market scenarios over 3 years. Comparators were identified from a systematic literature review and included selinexor + dexamethasone or best supportive care. The number of treatment-eligible patients were estimated using an epidemiology model. Base-case analyses were conducted from a US commercial payer perspective (cost year: 2019). Model inputs included market share estimates, treatment duration, and costs of drug acquisition/administration, concomitant medications, adverse event (AE) management, treatment monitoring, and subsequent treatments based on published literature/cost databases. Budget impact, calculated as the difference in costs between current and projected scenarios over 3 years, was reported as cost per member per month (PMPM) and per member per year (PMPY). One-way sensitivity analysis assessed which key parameters most affected model outcomes. Alternative scenarios were tested (1- or 5-year time horizon; Medicare perspective; negligible cost of mental status change AE). RESULTS: In a hypothetical commercial payer health plan with 1 million members, 33 patients were identified as treatment-eligible over 3 years. Introducing belamaf for patients with RRMM resulted in an estimated budget-neutral PMPM cost of -$0.0003 and PMPY of -$0.004, based on n=9/33 patients receiving treatment. Sensitivity analyses showed that budget impact in the base case was most sensitive to changes in treatment duration and drug acquisition costs. Base-case results were consistent across all scenarios assessed. CONCLUSION: BIA indicates that adoption of belamaf in this patient population would be budget neutral for a US health plan.

Belantamab mafodotin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in heavily pretreated patients: a US cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) require several lines of therapy, with typically shorter remission duration with each additional line. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; DREAMM-2; NCT03525678) was compared with selinexor plus dexamethasone (SEL+DEX; STORM Part 2; NCT02336815) among patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior therapies. The base case used a US commercial payer's perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Efficacy data were based on parametric survival analysis of DREAMM-2 and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison between DREAMM-2 and STORM Part 2, which assessed relative treatment effects between belamaf and SEL+DEX. Cost inputs included drug treatment, concomitant medications, adverse event management, subsequent treatments, and disease management. RESULTS: Belamaf decreased total treatment costs per patient by $14,267 and increased patient life years by 0.74 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.49 versus SEL+DEX. Patients receiving belamaf accrued 0.12 fewer progression-free life years versus patients on SEL+DEX. CONCLUSIONS: From a US commercial payer's perspective, belamaf had lower costs, and increased QALYs and life-year gain, compared with SEL+DEX. Belamaf is therefore likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior lines of therapy.

DREAMM-2: Indirect Comparisons of Belantamab Mafodotin vs. Selinexor + Dexamethasone and Standard of Care Treatments in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Single-agent belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; BLENREP) demonstrated deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory agent, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 antibody (DREAMM-2; NCT03525678). METHODS: At the time of this study, STORM Part 2, NCT02336815 (selinexor plus low-dose dexamethasone; sel + dex) was systematically identified as the only feasible comparator to the DREAMM-2 cohort. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) evaluated efficacy and safety of belamaf (2.5 mg/kg; n = 97) versus sel + dex (80 mg + 20 mg, respectively; n = 123). Populations were weighted for clinically validated effect modifiers and prognostic factors. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), and safety. The relative efficacy of belamaf versus standard of care (SoC) on OS was estimated by a Bucher indirect treatment comparison using the MAIC-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for OS of belamaf (DREAMM-2) versus sel + dex (STORM Part 2) and a HR adjusted for refractoriness to carfilzomib and high-risk cytogenetics of sel + dex (STORM) versus SoC (MAMMOTH). RESULTS: Belamaf demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.34, 0.83; p = 0.005) and DoR (0.41; 0.21, 0.83; p = 0.013) versus sel + dex. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR, TTR, and PFS. Belamaf had a favorable safety profile for most evaluable hematologic (any-grade, Grade 3-4) and non-hematologic (any-grade) adverse events versus sel + dex. Significantly improved OS was observed with belamaf versus SoC (0.29; 0.16, 0.54; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Single-agent belamaf represents a new treatment option for triple-class refractory patients with RRMM.

Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against four preventable diseases in older adults: Impact of an aging population.

OBJECTIVE: This exploratory study estimates the economic value of the current vaccination program and increased coverage against four preventable diseases in older adults in the United States (US). METHODS: A population-based, age-structured economic model was used to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against influenza, pertussis, herpes zoster, and pneumococcal disease among US adults aged 50 years and older, accounting for aging of the population. The model used separate decision trees for each disease to project the discounted number of vaccinated individuals, number of disease cases, and direct medical and indirect costs (2018 US$) over a 30-year period. Benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) and net present values were calculated for two primary analyses comparing current vaccination coverage versus no vaccination and comparing increased coverage versus current coverage. Key parameter values were varied in deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Current adult vaccination coverage (vs. no vaccination) is estimated to result in nearly 65 million averted disease cases, $185 billion averted costs of cases, and $136 billion in incremental vaccination costs over a 30-year period from a societal perspective (BCR = 1.4). Increased vaccination coverage (vs. current coverage) is associated with over 33 million additional averted disease cases, $96 billion additional averted costs of cases, and nearly $83 billion in incremental vaccination costs, resulting in a societal BCR of 1.2 over 30 years. Deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that results were most sensitive to disease incidence, vaccine efficacy, and productivity costs for time required for vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Study results highlight the economic value of vaccination programs for older adults in the US and indicate that efforts to further increase vaccination coverage may be warranted and economically justifiable.

State-Level Variations and Factors Associated with Adult Vaccination Coverage: A Multilevel Modeling Approach.

BACKGROUND: Adult vaccination rates in the USA are generally low and fall short of public health goals. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of state-level characteristics on adult vaccination coverage in the USA. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of 2015-2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, conducted from March to October 2019 and including seasonal influenza; pneumococcal; tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); and herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines. Multilevel logistic regression models examined interstate vaccination coverage variability and assessed the impact of state-level characteristics, with model-adjusted coverage estimated. RESULTS: Model-adjusted vaccination coverage varied by state, with 35.1-48.1% coverage for influenza (2017), 68.2-80.8% for pneumococcal (2017), 21.9-46.5% for Tdap (2016), and 30.5-50.9% for HZ (2017). Characteristics associated with vaccination included state-level insurance coverage, pharmacists' vaccination authority, vaccination exemptions, and adult immunization information systems participation, as well as individual-level measures of income and education. After adjusting for these factors, substantial interstate heterogeneity remained. CONCLUSIONS: Model-adjusted coverage was generally low and varied by state. A small number of state-level characteristics partially explained interstate coverage variability. This and future research assessing additional state characteristics may help determine policies most likely to increase adult vaccination.

Adult vaccination rates in the USA are generally low and fall short of public health goals. Previous studies have indicated that adult vaccination rates vary between states and that individual characteristics affect vaccination coverage. We used modeling to evaluate the effects of both individual- and state-level factors on adult vaccination coverage. Health insurance coverage, the authority of pharmacists to vaccinate, existence of vaccination exemptions, and immunization information systems adult participation rates had a positive impact on vaccination coverage, although the impact varied by vaccine. These results provide policy decision makers at both state and federal levels with information to consider when expanding vaccination programs or preventive care efforts. However, additional data are needed to further explain the variations between states.

Meningococcal vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed asplenia in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Patients with asplenia are recommended to receive meningococcal ACWY (MenACWY) and B (MenB) vaccines in the United States (US). OBJECTIVES: To examine uptake and time to receipt of meningococcal vaccines in newly diagnosed asplenia patients, and identify factors associated with vaccination. METHODS: For this retrospective database analysis, patients were identified from 1/1/2010 (MenACWY) or 1/1/2015 (MenB) through 3/31/2018 from an administrative claims database including commercially insured US patients with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims with evidence of a new asplenia diagnosis (sickle cell disease was excluded); continuous enrollment for ≥12 months before and ≥6 months after the index date; and age ≥2 (MenACWY) or ≥10 (MenB) years. Co-primary outcomes were uptake and time to receipt of ≥1 dose, separately for MenACWY and MenB, by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with vaccination. RESULTS: Among 2,273 and 741 patients eligible for the MenACWY and MenB analyses, respectively, 28.1% and 9.7% received MenACWY and MenB in the first 3 years after a new asplenia diagnosis. Patients were more likely to receive meningococcal vaccines if they had received pneumococcal vaccines (MenACWY: hazard ratio [HR] 26.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.01-32.22; MenB: HR 3.89; 95% CI 2.07-7.29) or attended ≥1 well-care visit (MenACWY: HR 6.63; 95% CI 4.84-9.09; MenB: HR 11.17; 95% CI 3.02-41.26). CONCLUSIONS: Meningococcal vaccination rates among newly diagnosed asplenia patients were low, highlighting the need to educate providers about the recommendations for high-risk conditions and ensure healthcare access for vulnerable patients.

Estimate of multiple myeloma patients by line of therapy in the USA: population-level projections 2020-2025.

Aim: To report the results of a patient epidemiology model for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment by line of therapy (LOT) in the USA. Materials & methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry data and physician surveys were combined to project the incidence, prevalence and the number of MM patients treated with systemic therapy by LOT between 2020 and 2025. Results: Projected complete MM prevalence in the USA in 2020 was 144,922, increasing to 162,339 in 2025. Corresponding unique MM patients by LOT in 2020 were: 53,176 (1st; minimum-maximum: 47,304-59,212), 19,407 (2nd; 15,935-23,273), 6,481 (3rd; 5143-8877), 1649 (4th; 1146-2667) and 426 (5th; 217-876). Conclusion: MM incidence and prevalence by LOT is projected to continue to increase in the USA between 2020 and 2025.

Impact of population aging on the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases among older adults in the United States.

Despite vaccination recommendations, the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases remains high in older adults in the United States (US), contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and health care resource use and costs. To adequately plan for health care resource needs and to help inform vaccination policies, burden of disease projections that account for population aging over the coming decades are needed. As a first step, this exploratory study projects the burden of influenza, pertussis, herpes zoster, and pneumococcal disease in adults aged 50 y and older in the US, using a population-based modeling framework with separate decision trees for each vaccine-preventable disease. The model uses projected population estimates from the US Census Bureau to account for changes in the US population over time and then calculates expected numbers of cases and associated costs for each disease, keeping current estimates of age-specific disease incidence, vaccine coverage, and efficacy constant over time. This approach was used to focus the exploratory analysis on the burden of disease that may be expected due to population changes alone, assuming that all else remains unchanged. Due to population growth and the shifting age distribution over the next 30 y, the annual societal economic burden for the four vaccine-preventable diseases is projected to increase from approximately $35 billion to $49 billion, resulting in cumulative costs of approximately $1.3 trillion, as well as more than 1 million disease-related deaths. Given such notable burden, further efforts to increase vaccination coverage and effectiveness in older adults are needed.

Modelling the impact of 4CMenB and MenACWY meningococcal combined vaccination strategies including potential 4CMenB cross-protection: An application to England.

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), an uncommon but severe disease, affects mainly infants, young children and adolescents. Meningococcal B (4CMenB) and ACWY (MenACWY) vaccines targeting IMD-causing serogroups B and A, C, W and Y, respectively are available for these mostly-affected age-groups. The objective was to assess the impact of 4CMenB and/or MenACWY vaccination strategies on IMD in England, considering MenACWY carriage protection and potential cross-protection of 4CMenB against non-B serogroups. A novel dynamic transmission model was developed, accounting for vaccine characteristics, with separate variables for meningococcal carriage and IMD for three groups: B; ACWY; and 'Other' mostly non-pathogenic serogroups. A dynamic force of infection is assumed for each group. The model analysis uses data from England before 2015 (when 4CMenB and MenACWY were introduced), and accounts for existing MenC vaccination impact. Compared with no vaccination, the smallest decrease in IMD cases is observed for MenACWY strategies (toddler and/or adolescent). 4CMenB (infant or infant/adolescent), alone or with MenACWY, always results in the most rapid and steep decline in IMD cases. Combined strategies with adolescent 4CMenB result in the largest decrease in IMD cases, whereas adding MenACWY for toddlers has a minor impact. With potential 4CMenB cross-protection, 4CMenB infant strategy has a notable impact on reduction of MenW and MenY IMD cases in strategies where MenACWY toddler and/or adolescent vaccination is absent. This novel model allows for analysis of combined 4CMenB and MenACWY strategies including potential 4CMenB cross-protection. In settings comparable to England, a comprehensive meningococcal vaccination programme should include infant 4CMenB as essential building block. Decisions to include MenACWY toddler programmes should consider herd effects of MenACWY adolescent programmes and 4CMenB potential cross-protection effects. Extending 4CMenB infant and MenACWY adolescent programmes with a 4CMenB adolescent programme allows for the largest overall reduction in IMD cases.

The adult vaccination landscape in the United States during the Affordable Care Act era: Results from a large retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reduced financial barriers to preventive care, including routinely recommended vaccines; however, vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. This study examined characteristics of routine adult vaccinations and potential missed opportunities for vaccinations through the lens of healthcare resource utilization among adults in the ACA era. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of healthcare claims from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE), Medicare Supplemental (MS), and Multi-State Medicaid databases among adults aged 19 years or older. Influenza, Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis), herpes zoster (HZ), and pneumococcal vaccinations were identified between 2011 and 2016. Potential missed opportunities were defined as well-visits at which individuals were age-eligible for vaccination but did not receive it, assessed during recommended windows for each vaccine. Missed encounters were defined as having no well-visits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with vaccination and potential missed opportunities. RESULTS: Family/internal medicine and unknown/other providers administered most influenza, Tdap, and pneumococcal vaccinations, for the CCAE/MS and Medicaid cohorts, respectively. HZ vaccinations were primarily administered through pharmacies. The proportion of vaccination events increased in the pharmacy setting between 2011 and 2016. Having preventive care visits, non-well-visits, and receiving most care from a family/internal medicine practitioner were associated with increased odds of vaccination. Missed encounters were common in Medicaid enrollees. Potential missed opportunities were more prevalent in the CCAE/MS cohort than among Medicaid enrollees. Having non-well-visits was associated with a reduced likelihood of having a missed opportunity. CONCLUSION: Since the ACA implementation, preventive care among adults was sporadic. Many adults had limited opportunities for vaccination. The large prevalence of missed opportunities suggests vaccination uptake could be improved. Better support for vaccination or referrals for providers who may not traditionally vaccinate could improve vaccine uptake.

Determinants of Meningococcal ACWY vaccination in adolescents in the US: completion and compliance with the CDC recommendations.

Since 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines for routine MenACWY vaccination in the US include a primary dose before age 16 y, preferably at ages 11-12 y, with a booster dose at age 16 y. Data on rates and drivers of meningococcal vaccination completion (receipt of both doses) and compliance with recommendations (receipt of primary dose at ages 11-12 y followed by booster at 16 y) down to state-level are limited.This study evaluated rates and determinants of MenACWY vaccination completion and compliance in adolescents aged 17 y based on data from the annual National Immunization Survey-Teen between 2011 and 2016. Individual- and state-level determinants of completion and compliance were assessed using uni-level and multi-level multivariable regression models. Average national rates were 23.2% and 12.1% for completion and compliance, respectively, with large inter-state variation observed (completion: 8.7-39.7%; compliance: 3.1-26.2%). Beyond the state of residence, factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of both completion and compliance included being male, up-to-date on other routine vaccines, having private or hospital-based vaccine providers (vs. public) and having >1 child in the household. Factors specifically associated with completion included having >1 annual health-care visit and presence of a booster-dose vaccine mandate, while a history of asthma and high-risk health conditions had a positive association with compliance. State-level determinants of completion and compliance included pediatricians-to-children ratio and the proportion of Immunization Information System use among adolescents, respectively. Outcomes of this study may help guide clinical, policy and educational interventions to further increase MenACWY completion rates and reduce disparities in vaccination.

Meningococcal-group B (MenB) vaccine series completion and adherence to dosing schedule in the United States: A retrospective analysis by vaccine and payer type.

BACKGROUND: Two MenB vaccines with different dosing schedules are approved in the US: MenB-4C (2 doses) and MenB-FHbp (2-3 doses). Both vaccines were licensed on the basis of immunogenicity demonstrated after vaccine series completion. We evaluated vaccination completion and adherence to dosing schedules. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Commercial) January 1, 2015 - February 28, 2018 and Multi-State Medicaid Database (Medicaid) January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2017 to examine vaccine series completion and adherence to dosing schedule in individuals who initiated a MenB series at ages 16-23 years. Vaccine series completion and dose schedule adherence were assessed during a 15-month follow-up period after the first dose. Completion was defined as individual receipt of the recommended number of doses, with current recommendations applied retroactively to allow individuals who initiated the MenB-FHbp series to be complete with either the 2- or the 3-dose schedule. RESULTS: The study population comprised 65,205 commercially-insured individuals (36,118 initiated MenB-4C; 29,087 initiated MenB-FHbp) and 13,535 Medicaid-covered individuals (10,153 initiated MenB-4C; 3382 initiated MenB-FHbp). In Commercial, 63% of individuals who initiated MenB-4C and 52% of individuals who initiated MenB-FHbp completed vaccination within 15 months; dosing schedule adherence was 62% for MenB-4C initiators and 18% for MenB-FHbp initiators. In Medicaid, 15-month completion rates for MenB-4C and MenB-FHbp initiators were 49% and 31%, respectively, with corresponding dosing schedule adherence of 48% and 8%. Among individuals who completed the series, median time to completion was 68 days for MenB-4C versus 258 days for MenB-FHbp in Commercial and 88 days for MenB-4C versus 309 days for MenB-FHbp in Medicaid. CONCLUSION: During the study period, MenB vaccine series completion was suboptimal. However, completion was significantly higher for MenB-4C, with notably shorter time to completion. This may reflect the flexible dosing schedule of MenB-4C.