Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (9): 77-84, 2021.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480459


OBJECTIVE: To compare early (resection quality, complication rate, surgery time) and long-term (recurrence rate) outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Rewiew Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: The study included 8 manuscripts including 6 retrospective trials, 1 case-control and only 1 prospective study. These studies comprised the results of endoscopic resection of 1989 colonic tumors (EMR - 748, ESD - 1241). ESD is associated with higher incidence of en-bloc resection (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.03 0.49; p=0.003) and R0 resection (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.05 1.02; p=0.05) compared to EMR. Local recurrence rate is 13 times higher after EMR compared to ESD (OR 13.94; 95% CI 6.3 30.8; p=0.00001). However, ESD is followed by 4 times higher risk of colon wall perforation (OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08 0.81; p=0.02). CONCLUSION: ESD is more advisable regarding resection quality compared to EMR. However, higher incidence of perforations, surgery time and technical features of ESD do not allow us to unambiguously interpret the results of our meta-analysis and determine the optimal surgical approach.

Neoplasias Colorretais , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
Colorectal Dis ; 2017 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28921903


AIM: To assess the rate and independent risk factors of postoperative ileus (POI) after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive patients underwent colorectal surgery for cancer at the State Scientific Centre of coloproctology, Moscow, Russia, between November 2015 and August 2016. POI was diagnosed as an absence of intestinal function for 72 hours or more after operation and confirmed by plain radiography. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression of the tumour-, patient- and treatment-related factors was performed. All patients had epidural catheters with multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (13%) had postoperative ileus. The variables associated with this condition in univariate analysis were age < 64 y.o. (p = 0.02), male gender (p = 0.02), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.02), moderate drinking (p = 0.02), heavier drinking (p < 0.0001), opioids (p = 0.02), history of abdominal operation (p = 0.003), firm, extensive adhesions as a result of previous surgery (p = 0.005), multivisceral resection (p = 0.009), blood loss ≥ 150 mL (p = 0.006), haemotransfusion (p = 0.01) and open approach (p = 0.006). In the multivariate logistic regression, BMI ≥ 26 kg/m2 (p = 0.008), opioids (p = 0.04) history of abdominal operation (p = 0.04) and adhesions (p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: Postoperative ileus is a common complication in colorectal surgery. The results of our study suggest at least two surgeon-dependent risk factors, i.e., open approach and opioids in the postoperative period. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.