Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 44: e98, 2020.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33088290

RESUMO

The Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) vocabulary establishes a unique and common language that allows the organization and facilitates the search and retrieval of technical and scientific literature on health available in the information sources of the Virtual Health Library. The DeCS, created by the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME), a specialized center of the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), is the translation and extension of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) vocabulary, maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine. BIREME, in coordination with experts from Latin America and the Caribbean, has included in the DeCS the topics of equity, gender, ethnicity and human rights-cross-cutting themes in the programmatic framework of PAHO/WHO technical cooperation-to ensure better retrieval and use of scientific information and evidence related to these topics. The objective of this article is to describe the methodology used during the terminology review of the DeCS and to report the results obtained and the impacts of the terminology expansion in the field of equity, which included the inclusion of 35 new descriptors.

2.
Artigo em Espanhol | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-52558

RESUMO

[RESUMEN]. El vocabulario Descriptores en Ciencias de la Salud (DeCS) establece un lenguaje único y común que permite la organización y facilita la búsqueda y recuperación de la literatura técnica y científica en salud disponible en las fuentes de información de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud. El DeCS, creado por el Centro Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (BIREME), un centro especializado de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud (OPS/OMS), es la traducción y la extensión del vocabulario Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), mantenido por la National Library of Medicine de los Estados Unidos. BIREME, en coordinación con expertos de América Latina y el Caribe, ha incluido en el DeCS los temas de equidad, género, etnicidad y derechos humanos —temas transversales en el marco programático de la cooperación técnica de la OPS/OMS— para garantizar una mejor recuperación y uso de la información y evidencia científica relacionadas a estos temas. El objetivo de este artículo es describir el método de revisión terminológica del DeCS e informar los resultados obtenidos y los impactos de la ampliación terminológica en el área de equidad, que comprendió la inclusión de 35 nuevos descriptores.


[ABSTRACT]. The Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) vocabulary establishes a unique and common language that allows the organization and facilitates the search and retrieval of technical and scientific literature on health available in the information sources of the Virtual Health Library. The DeCS, created by the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME), a specialized center of the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), is the translation and extension of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) vocabulary, maintained by the United States National Library of Medicine. BIREME, in coordination with experts from Latin America and the Caribbean, has included in the DeCS the topics of equity, gender, ethnicity and human rights—cross-cutting themes in the programmatic framework of PAHO/WHO technical cooperation—to ensure better retrieval and use of scientific information and evidence related to these topics. The objective of this article is to describe the methodology used during the terminology review of the DeCS and to report the results obtained and the impacts of the terminology expansion in the field of equity, which included the inclusion of 35 new descriptors.


Assuntos
Equidade , Sistemas de Informação , Medical Subject Headings , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Acesso à Informação , Equidade , Sistemas de Informação , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Acesso à Informação
3.
São Paulo; BIREME; 2019.
Não convencional em Inglês, Espanhol, Português | PIE | ID: biblio-1025068

RESUMO

Este mapa apresenta uma visão geral das evidências e lacunas existentes sobre os efeitos da Ozonioterapia Médica para diversas condições clinicas e de saúde das pessoas. A partir de uma ampla busca bibliográfica de estudos publicados e não publicados entre 2000 e meados de 2019, foram incluídas no mapa 14 revisões sistemáticas. Todos os estudos foram avaliados, caracterizados e categorizados pela Sociedade Brasileira de Ozonioterapia Médica (SOBOM) e contou com o apoio da World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT).


Este mapa presenta una visión general de la evidencia y las lagunas existentes sobre los efectos de la Ozonoterapia Médica para diversas condiciones clínicas y de salud de las personas. A partir de una amplia búsqueda bibliográfica de estudios publicados y no publicados entre 2000 y mediados de 2019, se incluyeron 14 revisiones sistemáticas en el mapa.Todos los estudios fueron evaluados, caracterizados y categorizados por la Sociedad Brasileña de Ozonioterapia Médica (SOBOM) y tuve el apoyo de la World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT).


This map provides an overview of the evidence and gaps that exist on the effects of Medical Ozone Therapy for various clinical and health conditions of people. From a broad bibliographic search of published and unpublished studies between 2000 and mid-2019, 14 systematic reviews were included in the map. All studies were evaluated, characterized and categorized by the Brazilian Society of Medical Ozone Therapy (SOBOM) with support from the World Federation of Ozone Therapy (WFOT).


Assuntos
Ozônio/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 36(4): 232-237, oct. 2014. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-733222

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el conocimiento que los editores de las revistas indizadas en la base de datos LILACS tienen acerca de las Guías para informar y publicar sobre investigaciones -promovidas por la Red EQUATOR (Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research)-, los requisitos de las revistas para su uso y el conocimiento de los editores sobre los motivos de la baja tasa de uso. MÉTODOS: Se encuestó por correo electrónico a editores de LILACS sobre las Guías y su disponibilidad en el sitio web de EQUATOR y los requerimientos y dificultades para su uso. RESULTADOS: De los 802 editores, 16,4% respondieron la encuesta, más de la mitad dijeron no conocer las Guías (en especial STROBE y PRISMA) y 30% tenían conocimiento sobre la Red EQUATOR. CONCLUSIONES: El primer estudio en América Latina y el Caribe sobre el conocimiento que tienen los editores de LILACS sobre las Guías revela que más de la mitad no conoce las Guías ni la Red EQUATOR.


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the familiarity of the editors of journals indexed in the LILACS database with the guidelines for reporting on and publishing research- promoted by the EQUATOR Network (Enhancing QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research)-, the journals' requirements for use of the guidelines, and the editors' opinions regarding the reasons for the low rate of use. METHODS: LILACS editors were surveyed by e-mail about the guidelines and their availability at the EQUATOR website, and about the requirements and difficulties in using them. RESULTS: Of 802 editors, 16.4% answered the survey. More than half said they were not aware of the guidelines (especially STROBE and PRISMA) and 30% were familiar with the EQUATOR Network. CONCLUSIONS: The first Latin American and Caribbean study on LILACS editors' familiarity with the guidelines revealed that more than half of them were not familiar either with the guidelines or the EQUATOR Network.


Assuntos
Políticas Editoriais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Editoração/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa/normas , Região do Caribe , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Guias como Assunto , América Latina , Viés de Publicação , Controle de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 36(4): 232-7, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25563148

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the familiarity of the editors of journals indexed in the LILACS database with the guidelines for reporting on and publishing research- promoted by the EQUATOR Network (Enhancing QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research)-, the journals' requirements for use of the guidelines, and the editors' opinions regarding the reasons for the low rate of use. METHODS: LILACS editors were surveyed by e-mail about the guidelines and their availability at the EQUATOR website, and about the requirements and difficulties in using them. RESULTS: Of 802 editors, 16.4% answered the survey. More than half said they were not aware of the guidelines (especially STROBE and PRISMA) and 30% were familiar with the EQUATOR Network. CONCLUSIONS: The first Latin American and Caribbean study on LILACS editors' familiarity with the guidelines revealed that more than half of them were not familiar either with the guidelines or the EQUATOR Network.


Assuntos
Políticas Editoriais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Editoração/normas , Relatório de Pesquisa/normas , Região do Caribe , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Guias como Assunto , América Latina , Viés de Publicação , Controle de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 28(4): 676-681, dic. 2011. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, LIPECS | ID: lil-611701

RESUMO

Los registros de ensayos clínicos (EC) constituyen una de las mayores fuentes de información de investigaciones en intervenciones en salud que se han o se están llevando a cabo en el mundo. La Organización Mundial de la Salud estableció un conjunto mínimo de datos que se deben registrar (20 ítems), consensuado a nivel internacional con las partes interesadas, y estableció una red de registros primarios y de registros asociados. Existen actualmente dos registros primarios en las Américas (Brasil y Cuba) avalados por la OMS, además del registro ClinicalTrial.Gov (de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica) que aportan datos a la plataforma internacional de registros de EC de la OMS (ICTRP). Adicionalmente, hay avances importantes en la región relacionados con las regulaciones, el desarrollo e implementación de registros nacionales y la adhesión de comités de ética y editores a la iniciativa.


Clinical trial registries are one of the main sources of information concerning health research interventions that have been or are being carried out throughout the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) established a minimum data set to be recorded (20 items), which was agreed upon internationally with the stakeholders, and established a network of primary and associated records. In addition to the register ClinicalTrial.Gov (of the United States of America), there are currently two primary registries in the Americas (from Brazil and Cuba) that meet WHO requirements and provide data to WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Furthermore, there are important advances in the region related to the regulations, development and implementation of national registries and to the support of the ethics committees and editors to this initiative.


Assuntos
Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Seleção de Pacientes , Região do Caribe , América Latina
8.
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica ; 28(4): 676-81, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22241267

RESUMO

Clinical trial registries are one of the main sources of information concerning health research interventions that have been or are being carried out throughout the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) established a minimum data set to be recorded (20 items), which was agreed upon internationally with the stakeholders, and established a network of primary and associated records. In addition to the register ClinicalTrial.Gov (of the United States of America), there are currently two primary registries in the Americas (from Brazil and Cuba) that meet WHO requirements and provide data to WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Furthermore, there are important advances in the region related to the regulations, development and implementation of national registries and to the support of the ethics committees and editors to this initiative.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Seleção de Pacientes , Região do Caribe , Humanos , América Latina
9.
Recurso educacional aberto em Português | CVSP - Brasil | ID: cfc-181315

RESUMO

Abordou a temática: 'Interoperabilidade da BVS com o CVSP', que será enquadrado como uma fonte de informação da BVS. A integração será efetuada por meio de uma limitação mínima de metadados comuns a serem compartilhados pelo CWIS. Esses metadados já estão definidos e acordados entre o CVSP e a BVS. Já existe o ambiente de teste que pode ser visto no sítio: http://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/cvsp. Os arquivos estão disponíveis para leitura e/ou download por meio dos ícones ao lado.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...