Interventions to reduce peripheral intravenous catheter failure: An international e-Delphi consensus on relevance and feasibility of implementation.

BACKGROUND: Around 1 billion peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) fail annually worldwide before prescribed intravenous therapy is completed, resulting in avoidable complications, dissatisfaction, and avoidable costs surging to ∼€4bn. We aimed to provide an international consensus on relevance and feasibility of clinical practice guideline recommendations to reduce PIVC failure. METHODS: e-Delphi study with three rounds through an online questionnaire from March-September 2020 recruiting a multispecialty panel formed by clinicians, managers, academic researchers, and experts in implementation from seven developed and three developing countries, reflecting on experience in PIVC care and implementation of evidence. Further, we included a panel of chronic patients with previous experience in the insert, maintenance, and management of PIVC and intravenous therapy from Ireland and Spain as public and patient involvement (PPI) panel. All experts and patients scored each item on a 4-point Likert scale to assess the relevance and feasibility. We considered consensus descriptor in which the median was 4 with less than or equal to 1,5 interquartile intervals. FINDINGS: Over 90% participants (16 experts) completed the questionnaire on all rounds and 100% PPI (5 patients) completed round 1 due to high consensus they achieved. Our Delphi approach included 49 descriptors, which resulted in an agreed 30 across six domains emerged from the related to (i) general asepsis and cutaneous antisepsis (n = 4), (ii) catheter adequacy and insertion (n = 3), (iii) catheter and catheter site care (n = 6), (iv) catheter removal and replacement strategies (n = 4), (v) general principles for catheter management (n = 10), and (vi) organisational environment (n = 3). CONCLUSION: We provide an international consensus of relevant recommendations for PIVC, deemed feasible to implement in clinical settings. In addition, this methodological approach included substantial representation from clinical experts, academic experts, patient and public expertise, mitigating uncertainty during the implementation process with high-value recommendations to prevent PIVC failure based contextual and individual features, and economic resources worldwide.

Analysis of palliative care needs in hospitalized patients.

AIM: To determine the prevalence of palliative care needs in patients in an acute care hospital and to analyze the profile of these patients. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study in an acute care hospital, in April 2018. The study population consisted of all patients over 18 years of age admitted to hospital wards and intensive care units. Variables were collected on a single day by six micro-teams using the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO© instrument. The descriptive analysis, on patient mortality and length of stay, was performed at a one-month follow-up. RESULTS: We assessed 153 patients, of whom 65 (42.5%) were female, with a mean age of 68.17±17.03 years. A total of 45 patients (29.4%) were found to be SQ+, of which 42 were NECPAL+ (27.5%), with a mean age of 76.64±12.70 years. According to the disease indicators, 33.35% had cancer, 28.6% had heart disease, and 19% had COPD, resulting in a ratio of 1:3 between patients with cancer and non-cancer disease. Half of the inpatients in need of palliative care were in the Internal Medicine Unit. CONCLUSIONS: Almost 28% of patients were identified as NECPAL+, most of them not identified as under palliative care in clinical records. Greater awareness and knowledge from healthcare professionals would facilitate the early identification of these patients and avoid overlooking palliative care needs.

Impact of advanced practice nurses in hospital units on compliance with clinical practice guidelines: a quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Incorporating the best available evidence into clinical practice is a determining challenge for healthcare professionals and organisations. The role of advanced practice nurses is viewed as a facilitator to adapt guideline recommendations to suit specific contexts and to overcome barriers to implementation. In this study, we evaluate the impact of advanced practice nurses on clinical indicators of hospitalised patients and on adherence to recommendations derived from two clinical practice guidelines (pressure ulcer prevention and treatment and vascular access device management). METHODS: Quasi-experimental study in five intervention (IU) and five control (CU) hospital units at three hospitals in Spain (period 2018-19). Five advanced practice nurses were incorporated into IU, with the intention that would produce attitudinal changes and enhance the skills and knowledge of the nursing team regarding 18 clinical practice recommendations. In this study, 41 indicators were evaluated through direct observation of all patients admitted, at monthly intervals for 1 year. Outcomes were assessed by means of a descriptive, multi-line regression and association analysis. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 3742 inpatients admitted for pressure ulcer assessment and 2631 fitted with vascular access devices. By the end of the study period, all variables had improved in the IU, where average compliance with recommendations was statistically significantly higher (pressure ulcer guidance 7.9 ± 1.9 vs 6.0 ± 1.7. OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.67-2.05; vascular access devices guidance 5.4 ± 1.4 vs 4.4 ± 1,6. OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.17). The prevalence of pressure lesions and catheter-related adverse events decreased statistically significantly in the IU compared to the CU. The prevalence of pressure ulcers decreases (5.7% in IU vs 8.7% in CU p < 0.005) as well as the prevalence of adverse events related to the catheter (14% In IU vs 21.6% in CU p < 0.005). The unnecessary catheters decressed in IU 10.9% VS CU 15.8% (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of an advanced practice nurse statistically significantly improves clinical indicators related to the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers and to the management of vascular access devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18259923 retrospectively registered on 11/02/2022.

What fuels suboptimal care of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infections in hospitals? A qualitative study of decision-making among Spanish nurses.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are commonly used in hospital worldwide. However, PIVC are not exempt from complications. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) increase morbidity and mortality rates, and costs for the healthcare organization. PIVC care is shaped by the complex mix of professional and organizational culture, such as knowledge gaps, low perception of impact of PIVCs on patient safety, or lack of hospital guidelines. AIM: To explore determinants of decision-making about the prevention of PIVC-BSI among nurses in Spanish hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured interviews in three public hospitals, the Balearic Islands Health Care Service in Spain. We considered hospital ward nurses working routinely with inpatients at any of the three hospitals for enrolment in the study. We approached relevant informants to identify suitable participants who recruited other participants through a 'snowball' technique. Fourteen inpatient nurses from the hospital took part in this study between September and November 2018. We employed several triangulation strategies to underpin the methodological rigour of our analysis and conducted the member checking, showing the information and codes applied in the recording of the interviews to identify the coherence and any discrepancies of the discourse by participants. We used the COREQ checklist for this study. FINDINGS: We identified four major themes in the analysis related to determinants of care: The fog of decision-making in PIVC; The taskification of PIVC care; PIVC care is accepted to be suboptimal, yet irrelevant; and chasms between perceived determinants of poor PIVC care and its solutions. CONCLUSION: The clinical management of PIVCs appear ambiguous, unclear, and fragmented, with no clear professional responsibility and no nurse leadership, causing a gap in preventing infections. Furthermore, the perception of low risk on PIVC care impact can cause a relevant lack of adherence to the best evidence and patient safety. Implementing facilitation strategies could improve the fidelity of the best available evidence regarding PIVC care and raise awareness among nurses of impact that excellence of care.

Classification of Pressure Injury Stages and Skin Damage Photographs by RNs and Nursing Students in Spain: An Observational Comparison Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and classify pressure injuries (PIs) and other skin lesions according to the judgment of hospital-based RNs and nursing students who recently trained in wound care using photographs and comparing findings to those of wound care experts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational survey. SUBJECT AND SETTING: RNs working at Manacor Hospital, Mallorca, Spain, and third-year nursing students from the University of the Balearic Islands. Data were collected in June 2017. METHODS: The survey instrument was accompanied by a set of 24 photographs in 7 categories of skin lesions, such as PIs or moisture-associated skin damage, which the respondents were asked to classify. Descriptive analysis of the classifications was carried out, and levels of agreement using the chi-square test were compared with evaluations/classifications of a panel of experts. RESULTS: In total, 314 surveys (199 RNs and 115 students) were included in the analyses. Findings showed a wide variability among participants with levels of agreement, with expert opinion ranging from 91.4% to 15.61%. The levels of agreement were substantially lower for unstageable PIs (47.92%), those caused by moisture (53.50%), and mixed etiology (38.37%) than for stages 1-4 PIs. Of note, 62.12% of RNs had not received PI training or continuing education during the previous 2 years. This lack of education was statistically significantly associated with the accuracy of the classification made by the RNs for some of the photographs evaluated such as moisture-associated skin damage. CONCLUSIONS: We found discrepancies in the classification of PIs and other wounds/lesions among experts, RNs, and students. The regular provision of up-to-date information in training and continuing education programs is imperative to maintain nurses' abilities to identify and classify PIs and other skin-related damage.

Multimodal intervention for preventing peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (PREBACP): a multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: 2 billion peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are inserted into inpatients worldwide each year. Almost one in two PIVCs fail before completion of intravenous therapy. We aimed to determine the efficacy and costs of a multimodal intervention to reduce PIVC failure among hospitalised patients. METHODS: PREBACP was a cluster-randomised, controlled trial done at seven public hospitals in Spain. Clusters (hospital wards) had at least 70% permanent staff and data were collected from patients aged 18 years and older with one or more PIVCs at the start of intravenous therapy. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1) to the multimodal intervention or control group using a centralised, web-based randomisation software, and stratified by type of setting. We concealed randomisation to allocation, without masking patients or professionals to the intervention. An intervention using a multimodal model and dissemination of protocols, education for health-care professionals and patients, and feedback on performance was implemented for 12 months in the intervention group. The control group received usual care. The primary outcome was all-cause PIVC failure at 12 months (phlebitis, extravasation, obstruction, or infections). Subsequently, through an amendment to the protocol approved on July 25, 2021, we included dislodgement as part of PIVC failure. Analysis was by modified intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned hospital wards for whom data on the primary endpoint were available. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN10438530. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2019, and March 1, 2020, we randomly assigned 22 eligible clusters to receive the multimodal intervention (n=11 clusters; 2196 patients, 2235 PIVCs, and 131 nurses) or usual practice in the control group (n=11 clusters; 2282 patients, 2330 PIVCs, and 138 nurses). At 12 months, the proportion of PIVC failures was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (37·10% [SD 1·32], HR 0·81 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·92] vs 46·49% [2·59], HR 1·23 [1·04 to 1·39]; mean difference -9·39% [95% CI -11·22 to -7·57]; p<0·0001). Per-protocol-prespecified analysis of the primary outcome excluding dislodgement also showed the intervention significantly reduced PIVC failure compared with the control group at 12 months (33·47% [SD 2·98], HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·75 to 0·96] vs 41·06% [4·62], HR 1·18 [1·04 to 1·33]; mean difference -7·59% [95% CI -11·05 to -4·13]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: A multimodal intervention reduced PIVC failure, thereby reducing potentially serious complications for hospitalised patients. The findings of PREBACP enabled a deeper understanding of decision making, knowledge mobilisation, and sense making in routine clinical practice. FUNDING: The College of Nurses of the Balearic Islands. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

¿Conocen los profesionales de cuidados intensivos el documento de voluntades anticipadas? Revisión crítica / Are palliative care proffesionals aware of the advanced care planning document? Critical review

JUSTIFICACIÓN: Las instrucciones previas o documento de voluntades anticipadas (IP/DVA) constituyen un conjunto de documentos en los que el paciente puede dejar constancia de cómo desea morir o ser tratado al final de su vida, con el fin de que su voluntad sea respetada. En 1998 surgió una nueva corriente, Advance Care Planning (Planificación Anticipada de las Decisiones). En ella, el DVA aparece como una herramienta, resultado final de un amplio proceso de comunicación que exige a los profesionales sanitarios una formación acorde para proporcionar una mejor atención sanitaria al final de la vida. A este respecto, son varios los estudios que muestran que una inadecuada formación en los cuidados al final de la vida, especialmente en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI), dificulta las habilidades y actitudes en la comunicación, los cuidados y el respeto del DVA con todas las medidas que contempla y, en definitiva, dificulta mantener la dignidad en el proceso de la muerte del paciente. OBJETIVO: Analizar la competencia (conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes) de médicos y enfermeras de las UCI de la Comunidad de Madrid sobre las IP o DVA. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal. LUGAR Y PERÍODO: Nueve hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid, entre octubre y diciembre de 2010. PARTICIPANTES: Se encuestó a una muestra de conveniencia cuyos criterios de inclusión fueron todos los médicos y enfermeras de las UCI de adultos de los nueve hospitales. INTERVENCIÓN: Cuestionario ad hoc estructurado, anónimo, autocumplimentado, con variables dicotómicas y escala de tipo Likert. RECOGIDA DE DATOS Y ANÁLISIS: Las variables estudiadas fueron: sociodemográficas, de conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes. Para la entrega de los cuestionarios se contactó con las supervisoras de las unidades y jefes de servicio, se hizo una charla informativa, se colgaron carteles informativos y se repartieron los cuestionarios a través de los investigadores y personas de enlace. Para la recogida de las encuestas se dispuso de urnas ubicadas en las unidades. La entrega de formularios se realizó mediante consentimiento informado previo y el estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética e Investigación Clínica del Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid. as variables cualitativas se describieron mediante frecuencias absolutas y relativas porcentuales de sus categorías, y se buscaron asociaciones con la prueba de ji cuadrado o el test exacto de Fisher. En las variables objeto de análisis se calculó su intervalo de confianza para un error a del 5 %, a través del programa estadístico SPSS V. 18.0. RESULTADOS: Se entregaron 649 encuestas en total y se recogieron 331 al terminar el periodo de recepción (3 meses). La tasa de respuesta fue del 51 %. De las características sociodemográficas destaca que el 73,4 % (243) de los profesionales eran mujeres y el 67,2 % (222) con más de 31 años; del total, el 20,5 % (68) eran médicos y el 79,5 % (263) profesionales de enfermería. Los resultados obtenidos con relación a los conocimientos muestran que el 64,4 % de los encuestados afirma no conocer los diferentes documentos que existen para expresar últimas voluntades. Con relación a las medidas concretas que contemplan las IP, como son la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, los cuidados paliativos, la donación de órganos, el rechazo a la obstinación terapéutica y la asignación de un representante legal, tan solo el 9,7 % de los profesionales las conocían todas. El 82,8 % opinaba que el DVA es un instrumento útil para los profesionales en la toma de decisiones. El 50,2 % opinaba que los DVA no se respetan. El 85,3 % de los médicos respetaría el DVA de un paciente en caso de urgencia vital, frente al 66,2 % de las enfermeras (p = 0,007). Solo el 19,1 % de los médicos y el 2,3 % de las enfermeras conocían si los pacientes que llevaban a su cargo poseían un DVA (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Aunque los profesionales sanitarios muestran conocimientos escasos sobre las IP, presentan una actitud favorable hacia su utilidad. Sin embargo, la mayoría no conocen si los pacientes que están a su cargo poseen un DVA e incluso algunos profesionales, a pesar de conocerlo, en caso de urgencia vital no lo respetarían. Se hace necesaria una mayor formación sobre las IP

Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most widely used invasive devices worldwide. Up to 42% of PIVCs are prematurely removed during intravenous therapy due to failure. To date, there have been few systematic attempts in European hospitals to measure adherence to recommendations to mitigate PIVC failures. AIM: To analyse the clinical outcomes from clinical practice guideline recommendations for PIVC care on different hospital types and environments. METHODS: We conducted an observational study in three hospitals in Spain from December 2017 to April 2018. The adherence to recommendations was monitored via visual inspection in situ evaluations of all PIVCs inserted in adults admitted. Context and clinical characteristics were collected by an evaluation tool, analysing data descriptively. RESULTS: 646 PIVCs inserted in 624 patients were monitored, which only 52.7% knew about their PIVC. Regarding PIVC insertion, 3.4% (22/646) patients had at least 2 PIVCs simultaneously. The majority of PIVCs were 20G (319/646; 49.4%) and were secured with transparent polyurethane dressing (605/646; 93.7%). Most PIVCs (357/646; 55.3%) had a free insertion site during the visual inspection at first sight. We identified 342/646 (53%) transparent dressings in optimal conditions (clean, dry, and intact dressing). PIVC dressings in medical wards were much more likely to be in intact conditions than those in surgical wards (234/399, 58.7% vs. 108/247, 43.7%). We identified 55/646 (8.5%) PIVCs without infusion in the last 24 hours and 58/646 (9.0%) PIVCs without infusion for more than 24 hours. Regarding PIVC failure, 74 (11.5%) adverse events were identified, all of them reflecting clinical manifestation of phlebitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the clinical outcome indicators from CPG for PIVC care were moderate, highlighting differences between hospital environments and types. Also, we observed that nearly 50% of patients did not know what a PIVC is.

Moving Evidence into Practice by Advanced Practice Nurses in Hospitalization Wards. Protocol for a Multicentre Quasi-Experimental Study in Three Hospitals in Spain.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) combined with quality of care improves patient outcomes. However, there are still difficulties for its implementation in daily clinical practice. This project aims to evaluate the impact of the incorporation of the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) role on the implementation of EBP at three levels: context, nurses' perceptions, and clinical outcomes. Mixed-methods study in two phases is proposed. Phase 1: a quasi-experimental design where five APNs are included in five hospitalization wards that are compared with another five similar wards without APNs. Variables from Practice-Environment-Scale-Nursing-Work-Index, Health-Science-Evidence-Based-Practice-Questionnaire, and Advanced-Practice-Nursing-Competency-Assessment-Instrument are used. Clinical outcomes are followed-up with monthly. A descriptive and exploratory analysis is performed. Phase 2: an exploratory qualitative design through focus groups at the intervention wards after one year of APNs implementation. Explicative data are gathered to explain the progression of change and how actors perceive and attribute triggers, barriers, and facilitators for change. An inductive thematic analysis is performed. The inclusion of APN in hospitalization context is insufficiently studied. It is hoped that these figures provide solutions to the multiple barriers in the development of EBP in these sceneries and contribute to resolve the gap between research results and healthcare practice.

Fiabilidad del uso de fotografías en la clasificación de heridas relacionadas con la dependencia / Reliability of the use of photographs for the classification of dependence-related lesions

Objetivo: Examinar la fiabilidad de la clasificación de lesiones relacionadas con la dependencia según su etiología mediante fotografías. Método: Se constituyó un panel de 5 expertas que evaluaron 24 fotografías de forma anónima, independiente y ciega, emitiendo un juicio para cada una de ellas. Las fotografías se enviaron por correo electrónico, junto con un cuestionario anónimo que se devolvió a un referente del grupo. Se propusieron 8 opciones de clasificación: úlceras por presión categorías I, II, III y IV, «sospecha de lesión de tejidos profundos», «lesión asociada a la humedad», etiología mixta presión-humedad y etiología multicausal. Se calculó el índice de acuerdo para cada fotografía y el coeficiente Kappa con técnica «jackknife» para cada imagen y cada categoría de clasificación, usando el paquete estadístico Epidat 4.2. Resultados: Los índices de acuerdo observado fueron variables, entre 0,4 y 1 dependiendo de la fotografía. En 6 ocasiones se obtuvo un 100% de acuerdo observado. El coeficiente Kappa global resultó moderado: 0,5202 (IC95%: 0,3850- 0,6542). El coeficiente de concordancia intraclase resultó moderado en 4 de las categorías y bajo en 3 de ellas, siendo alto solamente en úlceras por presión categoría II (Kappa 0,8924. IC 95%: 0,7388-1,0456). La concordancia entre observadoras resultó 0,6602 (IC 95%: 0,4969-0,8081). Conclusiones: La fiabilidad del uso de fotografías para la categorización de lesiones relacionadas con la dependencia resulta moderada, siendo mayor en úlceras por presión categoría II y baja en lesiones de mayor complejidad. Este método, debe ser usado con cautela en la categorización de lesiones crónicas, siendo necesario impulsar acciones formativas

Objective: To examine the reliability of the classification of dependence-related lesions using photography. Method: A panel of 5 experts carried out a blind, anonymous and independent assessment of 24 photographs. Images were sent by electronic mail, together with an anonymous questionnaire that was sent back to a referee of the research group. We suggested 8 options for classification: pressure ulcer (categories I, II, III, IV, or ‘suspect of deep-tissue damage’), moisture-associated damage, pressure-moisture combined aetiology and multifactorial lesion. Concordance index was calculated for every photography. Cohen‘s Kappa index with 'jackknife' technique were calculated for every photograph and category. We used the statistical programme Epidat 4.2. Results: Observed agreement was variable, between 4 and 1 depending on the photography. A consensus of 100% was observed in 6 images. Global Kappa resulted as moderate: 0.5202 (IC95%: 0.3850- 0.6542). Intra-group concordance resulted moderate in 4 categories, low in 3, and high only for pressure ulcer category II (Kappa 0.8924. IC 95%: 0.7388-1.0456). Inter-observer concordance was 0.6602 (IC 95%: 0.4969-0.8081). Conclusions: The reliability of the use of photographs for the categorization of dependence-related lesions is moderate, being higher for category II pressure ulcers and low for more complex wounds. This method must be used with care, and education on the subject is required

Risk Factors for Difficult Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation. The PIVV2 Multicentre Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation (DPIVC) is associated with serious complications related to vascular access. These complications might be avoided if the risk factors were identified previously, enabling the detection of potentially difficult situations at an early stage. The aim of this study is to consider these risk factors, to determine the influence of the hospital setting, to examine the association between DPIVC and the different techniques of catheter insertion and to analyse the importance of the clinician's experience in this context. METHODS: Case-control study following a previously published protocol, conducted in 48 units of eight public hospitals in Spain. Adult patients requiring a peripheral intravenous cannula were prospectively included in the study population during their hospital stay. Over a period of 11 months, for consecutive eligible patients, nurses in each participating unit recorded data on their assessment of the vascular access performed and the technique used. Variables related to these medical personnel were also recorded. One of the researchers reviewed the patients' clinical history to compile the relevant health variables and to characterise the healthcare process. The statistical analysis included association tests among the main study variables. The risk factors were analysed using bivariate logistic regression. The variables found to be statistically significant were included in a multivariate logistic regression model incorporating each of the healthcare environments identified. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 2662 patients, of whom 221 (8.3%) presented with DPIVC. A previous history of difficulty, the presence of non-palpable veins, acute upper limb alterations and punctures in the ante-cubital fossa were found to be independent risk factors for DPIVC. Differences were found in the frequency of occurrence of DPIVC and in some risk factors, according to the healthcare context. The variables related to the characteristics of the hospital personnel did not influence the study event. CONCLUSION: The present study identifies four independent risk factors for DPIVC that can be incorporated into algorithms aimed at preventing its occurrence and facilitating the referral of patients to vascular access specialist teams.

Defining risk factors associated with difficult peripheral venous Cannulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peripheral venous catheterization is a common technique in hospitals which is not always successful, resulting in multiple punctures and degradation of the vessels. This scenario, which we have termed 'difficult peripheral venous access', is associated to delays in care, obtention of samples or diagnosis, as well as a higher use of central catheters. This study intends to identify risk factors associated to the incidence of 'difficult peripheral venous access' in adults at hospital. We designed a systematic review of published studies (protocol PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018089160). We conducted structured electronic searches using key words and specific vocabulary, as well as directed searches in several databases. After validity analysis, we selected 7 studies with observational methodology. We found great variability in the definition of 'difficult peripheral venous access' and in the variables proposed as risk factors. Statistically significant factors through studies include demographic and anthropometric variables (gender, Body Mass Index), as well as medical and health conditions (diabetes, renal insufficiency, parenteral drug abuse, cancer chemotherapy), together with variables related to the vein or vascular access (vein visibility and palpability, vessel diameter, previous history of difficulty). Some studies have also considered variables related to the professional performing the technique. Meta-analyses were carried out for gender and obesity as potential risk factors. Only obesity appeared as a statistically significant risk factor with OR of 1.48; 95% CI (1.03 to 1.93; p = 0.016). Methodological heterogeneity prevented the development of further meta-analyses. It is essential to design future studies with diverse hospital populations, in which a wide selection of potential risk factors can be studied in a unique analysis. Our work identifies the most relevant variables that should be included in those studies.

Reliability of the use of photographs for the classification of dependence-related lesions. / Fiabilidad del uso de fotografías en la clasificación de heridas relacionadas con la dependencia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of the classification of dependence-related lesions using photography. METHOD: A panel of 5 experts carried out a blind, anonymous and independent assessment of 24 photographs. Images were sent by electronic mail, together with an anonymous questionnaire that was sent back to a referee of the research group. We suggested 8 options for classification: pressure ulcer (categories I, II, III, IV, or 'suspect of deep-tissue damage'), moisture-associated damage, pressure-moisture combined aetiology and multifactorial lesion. Concordance index was calculated for every photography. Cohen's Kappa index with 'jackknife' technique were calculated for every photograph and category. We used the statistical programme Epidat 4.2. RESULTS: Observed agreement was variable, between 4 and 1 depending on the photography. A consensus of 100% was observed in 6 images. Global Kappa resulted as moderate: 0.5202 (IC95%: 0.3850- 0.6542). Intra-group concordance resulted moderate in 4 categories, low in 3, and high only for pressure ulcer category II (Kappa 0.8924. IC 95%: 0.7388-1.0456). Inter-observer concordance was 0.6602 (IC 95%: 0.4969-0.8081). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of the use of photographs for the categorization of dependence-related lesions is moderate, being higher for category II pressure ulcers and low for more complex wounds. This method must be used with care, and education on the subject is required.

Evaluación cuantitativa de la atención recibida por los pacientes crónicos avanzados en un hospital comarcal / A quantitative assessment of the care received by advanced chronic patients in a regional hospital

OBJETIVO: Valorar la necesidad potencial de cuidados paliativos durante el último mes de vida de una muestra de pacientes fallecidos en un hospital comarcal de Mallorca, y cuantificar los procesos diagnósticos y terapéuticos que reciben durante su estancia hospitalaria, estimando también el coste económico. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre 119 pacientes fallecidos que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Un profesional experto en cuidados paliativos revisó la historia clínica cuantificando el uso de servicios y los procedimientos aplicados. Para la estimación de los costes se utilizaron los Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: El análisis de datos se realizó sobre 62 mujeres y 57 hombres, con una edad media de 78,15 ± 12,62 años. La prevalencia de pacientes fallecidos que cumplieron criterios de necesidad de atención paliativa fue del 88,81 %, con una identificación previa de pacientes paliativos del 6,7 %. El cáncer apareció como diagnóstico en 44 casos. La media de pruebas de imagen realizadas fue de 3,61 ± 2,70, analíticas de sangre de 7,46 ± 7,69 y tratamientos con antibióticos de 1,51 ± 1,60. El coste total medio de la atención prestada a la muestra fue de 5.662,44 €. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados evidencian la elevada prevalencia de pacientes con necesidad de atención paliativa entre el total de fallecidos y una baja identificación previa. Se observa una alta frecuentación de los servicios hospitalarios y una alta aplicación de procedimientos invasivos en el último mes de vida, con el elevado coste económico y potencial de sufrimiento que supone

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential need for palliative care during the last month of life in patients who passed away at a regional hospital in Mallorca, and to quantify the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures they underwent during their stay with an estimation of the costs incurred. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 119 deceased patients meeting the inclusion criteria. An expert in palliative care reviewed their medical records and quantified the services and procedures that were provided. Costs were estimated based on diagnosisrelated groups (DRGs). RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 62women and 57 men, with a mean age of 78.15 ± 12.62 years. The prevalence of deceased patients who met the criteria for palliative care need was 88.81 %, with prior identification of palliative patients at 6.7 %. Cancer was found to be the diagnosis in 44 cases. The mean number of imaging tests was 3.61 ± 2.70, that of blood tests was 7.46 ± 7.69, and that of antibiotic treatments was 1.51 ± 1.60. The average total cost of care was € 5,662.44. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal a high prevalence of patients with palliative care need among the total number of deceased subjects, and a low rate of prior identifications. Frequentation of hospital services was found to be high, as was the use of invasive procedures in the last month of life, which potentially entails high costs and patient suffering

Incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter failure among inpatients: variability between microbiological data and clinical signs and symptoms.

Background: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most widely used invasive devices among inpatients. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are serious yet preventable events for patients. Although the contribution of PIVCs towards these infections is gradually being recognised, its role in the Spanish setting is yet to be determined. We aimed to estimate the rate and incidence of PIVC failure at Manacor hospital (Spain) as baseline within a wider quality improvement initiative. Methods: Tips from all PIVC removed during December 2017 and January 2018 in hospital wards were cultured semiquantitatively. The study population included all PIVCs inserted in adult patients admitted to any of three medical and one surgical wards, emergency department, critical care unit and operating rooms. Clinical, microbiological and ward information was collected by clinical researchers for each PIVC from insertion to removal on the study sites. CRBSI was defined per international guidelines (i.e., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA). Data was analysed descriptively. Results: Seven hundred and eleven tips were cultured, with 41.8% (297/711) reported as PIVC failure. The PIVC failure rate density-adjusted incidence for hospital length of stay (HLOS) was 226.2 PIVC failure/1000 HLOS. 5.8% (41/711) tips yielded positive isolates, with most frequent microorganisms Staphylococcus spp (S. epidermidis 29/41, 70.7%, S. aureus 2/41, 4.9%, S. hominis 2/41, 4.9%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (1/41, 2.4%). One S. aureus isolate was methicillin-resistant. 53.6% (22/41) positive cultures were obtained from patients with local signs and symptoms compatible with catheter-related infection (CRI), 2.4% (1/41) were compatible with CRBSI type 2 and that clinical signs improve within 48 h of catheter removal (density-adjusted incidence for hospital stays of 16.7 PIVC-CRI/1000 hospital-stays and 0.76 PVC-BSI/1000 hospital-stays respectively) and no patients were diagnosed CRBSI type 3 with a bacterial growth concordant in tip and blood cultures. Most cases responded favourably to catheter removal and management. Conclusions: Our findings show that almost 42% PIVCs resulted in unplanned removal, amplifying the importance in terms of morbidity, mortality and patient safety. A high number of positive tip cultures without clinical signs and symptoms was observed. We underpin the importance to remove unnecessary PIVCs for the prevention of CRBSI.

Enfermeras de práctica avanzada y práctica basada en evidencias. Una oportunidad para el cambio / Advanced practice nurses and evidence-based practice. An opportunity for change

En un contexto de envejecimiento de la población, aumento en la prevalencia de enfermedades crónicas y creciente complejidad, se hace necesario definir nuevos roles profesionales que consigan dar respuesta a las necesidades de salud de la población. A ello se une la certeza de que la variabilidad en la práctica clínica, así como en la gestión sanitaria, hace necesaria la adopción de las mejores evidencias como base de la toma de decisiones. Pero la aplicación de la práctica clínica basada en evidencia en un determinado contexto implica un amplio dominio de la evidencia disponible, su aplicabilidad y limitaciones, así como una profunda comprensión de las características particulares del ámbito en que se pretende aplicar, desde el nivel «macro» (políticas de salud, normativa marco, líneas estratégicas, valores sociales, etc.) hasta el «micro» (cultura local, preferencias de los usuarios, etc.). El Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears, en colaboración con la Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia de la Universitat de les Illes Balears, propone el desarrollo de nuevos roles enfermeros de práctica avanzada que focalicen sus esfuerzos en la implementación planificada de evidencias en entornos clínicos. Las enfermeras de práctica avanzada han conseguido de manera natural, gracias a su desarrollo competencial, ejercer el papel de impulsoras de cambios organizacionales y actitudinales que facilitan la implementación de evidencia en organizaciones y entornos complejos

In a context of aging of the population, increased prevalence of chronic diseases and increasing complexity, it is necessary to define new professional roles that can meet the health needs of the population. Added to this is the certainty that variability in clinical practice, as well as in health management, makes it necessary to use best evidence as the basis for decision-making. But the application of clinical practice based on evidence in a specific context implies a broad mastery of the available evidence, its applicability and limitations, as well as a deep understanding of the particular characteristics of the area where it is to be applied, from the "macro" (health policies, framework regulations, strategic lines, social values, etc.) to the "micro" level (local culture, user preferences, etc.). The "Health Service of the Balearic Islands", in collaboration with the Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy from the University of the Balearic Islands, proposes the development of new advanced practice nursing roles that focus their efforts on the planned implementation of evidence in clinical settings. Advanced practice nurses have managed naturally, thanks to their competence development, to exercise the role of promoting organizational and attitudinal changes that facilitate the implementation of evidence in organizations and complex environments