Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Res ; 2021 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33408117

RESUMO

Both tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and PD-1+ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) are enriched for tumor-reactive clones recognizing known and unknown tumor antigens. However, the relationship between the T-cell receptor (TCR)-ß repertoires of the TIL and T cells expanded from paired PD-1+ PBL and whether T cells expanded from PD-1+ PBL can be used to treat patients with cancer as TIL substitutes remains unclear. Here we established a highly efficient protocol to prepare polyclonal T cells from PD-1+ PBL. A functional T-cell assay and tetramer staining revealed that cells from PD-1+ PBL were relatively enriched for tumor-reactive T cells. Furthermore, deep TCR-ß sequencing data revealed that an average of 11.29% (1.32%-29.06%, p=0.015, n=8) tumor-resident clonotypes were found in T cells expanded from paired PD-1+ PBL, and the mean accumulated frequency of TIL clones found in T cells expanded from PD-1+ PBL was 35.11% (7.23%-78.02%, p=0.017, n=8). Moreover, treatment of four patients, who failed multi-line therapy and developed acquired resistance to anti-PD-1, with autologous T cells expanded from PD-1+ PBL combined with anti-PD-1 antibody elicited objective responses from three of them. These results indicate that T cells expanded from PD-1+ PBL share more clones with paired TIL and could be used to treat patients with cancer as TIL substitutes.

2.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 1139, 2020 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228579

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The recommended cumulative doxorubicin dose in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment was based on cardiotoxicity data from retrospective studies of breast cancer patients. However, the treatment and prognosis of STS and breast cancer are quite different, and reference to breast cancer data alone may not reflect the efficacy of doxorubicin treatment in STS. This study, thus, aimed to review and analyze clinical data of STS patients treated with a high cumulative doxorubicin dose, to provide a reference for treatment selection and clinical trial design. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical data of patients with advanced STS who received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy from January 2016 to January 2020. The patients were divided into a standard-dose group (who received ≤6 cycles of doxorubicin after the initial diagnosis) and an over-dose group (who were re-administered doxorubicin [doxorubicin-rechallenge] after receiving 6 cycles of doxorubicin therapy discontinuously). Patient characteristics, cumulative doxorubicin dose, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), cardiotoxicity incidence, and treatment effectiveness were evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients with advanced STS were recruited (146 in the standard-dose group and 24 in the over-dose group). The average cumulative doxorubicin dose was 364.04 ± 63.81 mg/m2 in the standard-dose group and 714.38 ± 210.09 mg/m2 in the over-dose group. The ORR, DCR, and median PFS were 15.07, 58.9%, and 6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8-6.5) months in the standard-dose group and 16.67, 66.67%, and 4 (95%CI: 2.0-5.8) months in the over-dose group, respectively. Symptomatic heart failure occurred in five patients (3.42%) of the standard-dose group and in one patient (4.17%) of the over-dose group. In these patients with cardiotoxicity, doxorubicin was discontinued, and all of them died of uncontrolled tumor growth. No drug-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The continuation of or rechallenge with doxorubicin beyond the recommended cumulative dose could be a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of chemotherapy-sensitive advanced sarcomas. Further evaluation is necessary in prospective trials.

3.
Anticancer Drugs ; 2020 Nov 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105152

RESUMO

This study was performed to investigate pneumothorax characteristics and association with clinical outcomes in patients with osteosarcoma treated with apatinib. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of osteosarcoma patients treated with apatinib between January 2016 and April 2020 at three institutions. We evaluated the prevalence, healing time, recurrence, severity, clinical management, and prognosis of pneumothorax in these patients. A total of 54 osteosarcoma patients who received apatinib treatment were enrolled in this study. Among them, 14 patients had pneumothorax. There were significant differences between the patients with and without pneumothorax with regard to the cavitating rate of lung metastases (92.86 vs. 32.50%, respectively, P < 0.001), objective response rate (42.86 vs. 10.00%, P = 0.013), disease control rate (85.71 vs. 42.50%, P = 0.006), 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (57.10 vs. 20.00%, P < 0.001), and median PFS (5.65 vs. 2.90 months, P = 0.011). Compared with pneumothorax patients treated with chest tube drainage only [non-staphylococcal enterotoxin C (SEC) group], those treated with chest tube drainage and SEC thoracic perfusion in parallel (SEC group) had a shorter pneumothorax healing time (12.00 ± 4.50 days vs. 24.00 ± 14.63 days for SEC group and non-SEC group, respectively, P = 0.103), a lower recurrence rate of pneumothorax (25.00% vs. 66.67%, P = 0.277), and a longer median PFS (5.9 months vs. 4.75 months, P = 0.964). however, these numerical differences for the SEC/non-SEC data did not reach statistical significance. Pneumothorax and cavitation in lung metastases may be effective prognostic markers for patients with osteosarcoma treated with apatinib. SEC may be effective for treatment of such pneumothorax patients, warranting further study.

4.
Life Sci ; 262: 118544, 2020 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33035586

RESUMO

AIMS: Our previous study has demonstrated that high expression of ALDH1B1 promoted osteosarcoma tumor progression and was correlated with unfavorable prognosis in osteosarcoma patients. In the current study, we investigated the underlying mechanism and regulation of ALDH1B1 in osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: qRT-PCR assay was applied to detect miR-761 expression. CCK-8, colony formation and EdU assays were conducted to explore the functional role of miR-761/ALDH1B1 axis in osteosarcoma. Bioinformatics analysis and luciferase reporter assay was utilized to assess the regulation between miR-761 and ALDH1B1. Mechanism experiments were implemented to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of miR-761/ALDH1B1 axis. KEY FINDINGS: ALDH1B1 was negatively regulated by microRNA-761 (miR-761). Functionally, miR-761 suppressed cell growth, migration, and invasion in osteosarcoma via targeting ALDH1B1 in vitro. Xenograft tumor model demonstrated that miR-761 inhibited osteosarcoma tumor development in vivo through regulating ALDH1B1. Consistently, we showed that miR-761 expression was decreased in osteosarcoma patients and low expression of miR-761 was correlated with worse prognosis in osteosarcoma patients. Mechanistically, we revealed that high expression of ALDH1B1 was significantly associated with enhanced TGF-ß signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and cell adhesion. Furthermore, miR-761 regulated TGF-ß and EMT/cell adhesion in osteosarcoma via targeting ALDH1B1. SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together, our findings suggest that the oncogenic ALDH1B1 is regulated by miR-761 during osteosarcoma development and progression, which might provide a novel prognostic biomarker and therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma treatment.

5.
Front Oncol ; 10: 1642, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984034

RESUMO

Recent clinical trials have shown several multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to be effective in the treatment of osteosarcoma. However, these TKIs have a number of targets, and it is yet unclear which of these targets has a key role in osteosarcoma treatment. In this review, we first summarize the TKIs that were studied in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further, we compare and discuss the targets of these TKIs. We found that TKIs with promising therapeutic effect for osteosarcoma include apatinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and sorafenib. The key targets for osteosarcoma treatment may include VEGFRs and RET. The receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) MET, IGF-1R, AXL, PDGFRs, KIT, and FGFRs might be relevant but unimportant targets for osteosarcoma treatment. Inhibition of one type of RTK for the treatment of osteosarcoma is not effective. It is necessary to inhibit several relevant RTKs simultaneously to achieve a breakthrough in osteosarcoma treatment. This review provides comprehensive information on TKI targets relevant in osteosarcoma treatment, and it will be useful for further research in this field.

6.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 698, 2020 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723378

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evidence that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is safe and efficacious for the treatment of many types of malignant tumors is continuously increasing. However, the evidence and clinical data of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment are rare. METHODS: The clinical data of metastatic STS patients who received nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine chemotherapy between January 2019 and February 2020 were retrospectively analysed. All these patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine only after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy had failed. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in these patients. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients treated with nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine were enrolled in this study. One patient with angiosarcoma achieved complete response, 6 patients had partial response, 5 patients achieved stable disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. The average diameter change in target lesion from baseline was - 19.06 ± 45.74%. And median progression free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2-9 months). Grade 3 / 4 adverse events were not common, included neutropenia (17.6%), fatigue (11.8%), anemia (11.8%), leukopenia (11.8%), nausea (5.9%), peripheral neuropathy (5.9%), diarrhea (5.9%), and thrombocytopenia (5.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine combination chemotherapy is comparatively effective in the treatment of STS, demonstrates low toxicity, and is worthy of further study.

7.
Pathol Res Pract ; 216(6): 152983, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32327283

RESUMO

Cancers are deadly diseases. The general mystery of carcinogenesis, primary and acquired drug resistance and distant organ metastasis are still puzzles to be solved. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are receiving more and more attention in recent years since their roles in transcriptional regulation have been unveiled. Detailed functional annotations of lncRNAs have showed that their regulatory roles are largely determined by their binding partners. LncRNAs directly bind to DNA, RNA and proteins and regulate gene expression at transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational levels. Here we review the current understanding of molecular functions of lncRNAs, will emphasize on their binding partners and summarize their biological roles in cancer.

8.
Cancer Manag Res ; 12: 1339-1346, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32158266

RESUMO

Purpose: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are ineffective as monotherapy for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). However, increasing evidence shows that the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy is efficacious and safe for many types of malignancies, including STS. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of doxorubicin chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of metastatic STS. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients with metastatic STS who received doxorubicin chemotherapy plus a PD-1 inhibitor between November 2017 and October 2018. Results: The objective response rate was 47.6%, the disease control rate was 71.40%, and the median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 2-8 months). The average change in target lesion diameter from baseline was -25.15 ± 41.61. Majority of the patients experienced grade 1/2 adverse events (AEs), the grade 3/4 AEs were few. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were as follows: leukopenia (23.8%) and anemia (19.0%). Immune-related AEs were common and included hypothyroidism (14.3%) and pneumonitiss (9.5%). No drug related deaths occurred. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that the combination of doxorubicin chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor for advanced STS is safe and effective. We plan to conduct randomized clinical trials to confirm and characterize the activity of the chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations in the treatment of sarcomas.

9.
Invest New Drugs ; 38(5): 1559-1569, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32100146

RESUMO

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of apatinib and anlotinib for the treatment of sarcomas. However, more clinical data and evidence are needed to support clinical treatment selection and study design. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs for the treatment of sarcomas. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 110 patients with advanced osteosarcoma (n = 32) or soft tissue sarcoma (STS, n = 78) who received oral apatinib or anlotinib therapy during May 2016-February 2019 at two centers. Patients were divided into the apatinib and anlotinib groups. Results Among osteosarcoma patients, the objective response rates (ORRs) for the apatinib and anlotinib groups were 15.79% (3/19) and 7.69% (1/13), respectively. The disease control rates (DCRs) were 63.16% (12/19) and 30.77% (4/13), and the median progression-free survival (m-PFS) was 4.67 ± 3.01 and 2.67 ± 1.60 months, respectively. Among STS patients, ORRs for the apatinib and anlotinib groups were 12.24% (6/49) and 13.79% (4/29), respectively. The DCRs were 59.18% (29/49) and 55.17% (16/29), and m-PFS was 7.82 ± 6.90 and 6.03 ± 4.50 months, respectively. Regarding adverse events (AEs), apatinib was associated with a higher incidence of hair hypopigmentation and pneumothorax, while anlotinib was associated with a higher incidence of pharyngalgia or hoarseness. Conclusion Both apatinib and anlotinib were effective for the treatment of sarcomas. However, the effectiveness of the two drugs and associated AEs varied based on the histological type of sarcoma. These differences may be due to their different sensitivities to targets such as RET, warranting further study.

10.
Cancer Manag Res ; 11: 5293-5300, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31239779

RESUMO

Purpose: Apatinib has shown effectiveness in treating sarcoma. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib and doxorubicin combination therapy in metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and to compare the therapeutic effects of two treatments (apatinib after doxorubicin vs apatinib plus doxorubicin) on STS. Patients and methods: A total of 76 patients with metastatic STS who received apatinib and doxorubicin between May 2016 and June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into either the apatinib after doxorubicin group (in which apatinib was used after six cycles of doxorubicin chemotherapy) or the apatinib plus doxorubicin group (in which apatinib was used in combination with doxorubicin chemotherapy). Results: There were 55 patients in the apatinib after doxorubicin group and 21 patients in the apatinib plus doxorubicin group. There were significant differences between the apatinib plus doxorubicin group and the apatinib after doxorubicin group in the objective response rate (57.14% vs 25.45%, respectively, p=0.016) and average change from baseline in the target lesion size (-41.71±43.75% vs -1.89±51.61%, respectively, p=0.03). There were no significant differences in disease control rate (85.71% vs 63.64%, p=0.093) and median progression-free survival (8.8 months vs 10.3 months, p=1). Grade 3-4 adverse events were more common with apatinib plus doxorubicin than with apatinib after doxorubicin, and these included leukopenia (5.45% vs 38.1%, respectively, p=0.001), anemia (7.27% vs 28.57%, respectively, p=0.023), oral mucositis (3.64% vs 19.05%, respectively, p=0.046), transaminase increases (0% vs 14.29%, respectively, p=0.011). Conclusion: Our results do not support the use of apatinib plus doxorubicin for metastatic STS unless the specific objective is tumor shrinkage.

11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(19): e15650, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31083265

RESUMO

Recently, apatinib has been shown to be effective in treating sarcoma. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma after failed of standard multimodal therapy and to compare the therapeutic effects of apatinib on osteosarcoma between high-dose group and low-dose group.A total of 27 patients with osteosarcoma who received apatinib between January 2016 and August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 27 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 25.93% and 66.67%, respectively. The median of progression-free survival (m-PFS) was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-4.8 months), and the median of overall survival (m-OS) was 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-10.5 months). There was no statistically significant difference in ORR (36.36% vs 18.75%), DCR (63.64% vs 68.75%), m-PFS (4.3 months [95% CI, 1.8-7 months) vs 3.35 months (95% CI, 1.8-4 months]), and m-OS (9.5 months [95% CI, 7.8-10.5 months] vs 9.4 months [95% CI, 7.8-10.8 months]) (P > .05) between the high-dose group (the average dose was 659 mg/qd) and the low-dose group (the average dose was 516 mg/qd). Most of the adverse events (AEs) were in grade 1 or grade 2. The main AEs in grade 3 were hypertension, rash, weight loss, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea.Apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma. We recommend that the initial dose of apatinib should be 500 mg/qd in the treatment of osteosarcoma.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/terapia , Osteossarcoma/terapia , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Osteossarcoma/mortalidade , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Retratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
Oncotarget ; 9(2): 2502-2514, 2018 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416787

RESUMO

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in childhood and adolescence with poor prognosis. The mechanism underlying tumorigenesis and development of OS is largely unknown. ALDH1B1 has been reported to involve in many kinds of human cancers and functions as an oncogene, but the role of ALDH1B1 in OS has not been investigated comprehensively. In the present study, we aimed to examine clinical value and biological function of ALDH1B1 in OS. Firstly, we investigated the roles of ALDH1B1 on an OS tissue microarray (TMA) as well as two OS cohorts from GEO database. We found that ALDH1B1 was significantly up-regulated in OS tissues and was independently associated with poor prognosis. Moreover, ALDH1B1 silencing could suppress the proliferation, migration, invasion in vitro and inhibit the growth of xenograft tumor and of OS cells in vivo. Additional, ALDH1B1 knockdown increased the apoptosis rate and lead to cell cycle arrest in G1 stage of OS cell in vitro. More importantly, the inhibition of ALDH1B1 expression could increase the sensitivity of OS cells to chemotherapy, which suggested that ALDH1B1 might be served as a therapeutic target to reverse drug resistance in chemotherapy in OS patients. Taken together, our founding suggested that ALDH1B1 contributes to OS tumor progression and drug resistance, which may represent a novel prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target for OS patients.

13.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0127627, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121646

RESUMO

AIM: In recent years, several studies with large sample sizes and recent follow-up data have been published comparing outcomes between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. It is now timely to be re-evaluated and synthesized long-term efficacy and adverse events of both total and partial posterior fundoplication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic searches for RCTs comparing the outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication were performed in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials. The data of evaluation in positive and adverse results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication were extracted and compared using meta-analysis. RESULTS: 13 RCTs were ultimately identified involving 814 (52.05%) and 750 (47.95%) patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, respectively. The operative time, perioperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, recurrence, and the rates of medication adoption or re-operation due to recurrence were not significantly different between two groups. The two types of fundoplication both reinforced the anti-reflux barrier and elevated the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. However, rates of adverse results involving dysphasia, gas-bloat syndrome, inability to belch and re-operation due to severe dysphasia were significantly higher after LNF. In the subgroup analysis of wrap length≤2 cm, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia. However, in the subgroup wrap length>2 cm, the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication might be the better surgery approach for gastroesophageal reflux disease with a lower rate of postoperative adverse results and equal effectiveness as Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.


Assuntos
Fundoplicatura , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Transtornos de Deglutição/fisiopatologia , Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatologia , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Perioperatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Pressão , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci ; 32(4): 563-570, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22886971

RESUMO

A novel unsaturated polyphosphoester (UPPE) was devised in our previous research, which is a kind of promising scaffold for improving bone regeneration. However, the polymerization process of UPPE scaffolds was unfavorable, which may adversely affect the bioactivity of osteoinductive molecules added if necessary, such as recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP2). The purpose of this study was to build a kind of optimal scaffold named UPPE-PLGA-rhBMP2 (UPB) and to investigate the bioactivity of rhBMP2 in this scaffold. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of UPB scaffold was assessed in vitro. A W1/O/W2 method was used to fabricate PLGA-rhBMP2 microspheres, and then the microspheres were added to UPPE for synthesizing UPB scaffold. The morphological characters of PLGA-rhBMP2 microspheres and UPB scaffolds were observed under the scanning electron microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy. The cumulative release of UPB scaffolds was detected by using ELISA. The cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of UPB scaffolds were evaluated through examining the adsorption and apoptosis of bone marrow stromal cells (bMSCs) seeded on the surface of UPB scaffolds. The bioactivity of rhBMP2 in UPB scaffolds was assessed through measuring the alkaline phosphates (ALP) activity in bMSCs seeded. The results showed that UPB scaffolds sequentially exhibited burst and sustained release of rhBMP2. The cytotoxicity was greatly reduced when the scaffolds were immersed in buffer solution for 2 h. bMSCs attached and grew on the surface of soaked UPB scaffolds, exerting well biocompatibility. The ALP activity of bMSCs seeded was significantly enhanced, indicating that the bioactivity of rhBMP2 remained and still took effect after the unfavorable polymerization process of scaffolds. It was concluded that UPB scaffolds have low cytotoxicity, good biocompatibility and preserve bioactivity of rhBMP2. UPB scaffolds are promising in improving bone regeneration.


Assuntos
Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/química , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 2/farmacologia , Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ácido Láctico/química , Ácido Láctico/farmacologia , Fosfatos de Fosfatidilinositol/química , Fosfatos de Fosfatidilinositol/farmacologia , Ácido Poliglicólico/química , Ácido Poliglicólico/farmacologia , Humanos , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico e Ácido Poliglicólico , Tecidos Suporte
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA