Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Res ; 87(3): 432-433, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31896125
7.
Acad Med ; 93(6): 860-868, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29298182

RESUMO

Recent changes in health care delivery systems and in medical training have primed academia for a paradigm shift, with strengthened support for an expanded definition of scholarship. Physicians who consider advocacy to be relevant to their scholarly endeavors need a standardized format to display activities and measure the value of health outcomes to which their work can be attributed. Similar to the Educator Portfolio, the authors here propose the Advocacy Portfolio (AP) to document a scholarly approach to advocacy.Despite common challenges faced in the arguments for both education and advocacy to be viewed as scholarship, the authors highlight inherent differences between the two fields. On the basis of prior literature, the authors propose a broad yet comprehensive set of domains to categorize advocacy activities, including advocacy engagement, knowledge dissemination, community outreach, advocacy teaching/mentoring, and advocacy leadership/administration. Documenting quality, quantity, and a scholarly approach to advocacy within each domain is the first of many steps to establish congruence between advocacy and scholarship for physicians using the AP format.This standardized format can be applied in a variety of settings, from medical training to academic promotion. Such documentation will encourage institutional buy-in by aligning measured outcomes with institutional missions. The AP will also provide physician-advocates with a method to display the impact of advocacy projects on health outcomes for patients and populations. Future challenges to broad application include establishing institutional support and developing consensus regarding criteria by which to evaluate the contributions of advocacy activities to scholarship.


Assuntos
Defesa do Consumidor , Documentação/métodos , Docentes de Medicina/normas , Médicos/normas , Documentação/normas , Humanos
10.
Fam Syst Health ; 35(1): 21-24, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27935727

RESUMO

Although many health care professionals are interested in health policy, relatively few have training in how to utilize their clinical experience and scientific knowledge to impact policy. Developing a policy brief is one approach that health professionals may use to draw attention to important evidence that relates to policy. This article offers guidance on how to write a policy brief by outlining 4 steps: (a) define the problem, (b) state the policy, (c) make your case, and (d) discuss the impact. The steps and tips offer a starting point for health care professionals interested in health policy and translating research or clinical experience to impact policy. (PsycINFO Database Record


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/tendências , Formulação de Políticas , Redação , Humanos
12.
Fam Syst Health ; 33(2): 160-2, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26053576

RESUMO

Comments on the article "Please break the silence: Parents' views on communication between pediatric primary care and mental health providers" by Greene et al. (see record 2015-14521-001). The article highlights the need to improve communication between primary care and mental health care providers to better serve children and families. The report reaffirms that parents understand the value and necessity of collaborative care, as evidenced by the identification of gaps in consistency of bidirectional communication between providers in traditional and separate practice settings and the desire for improved care coordination.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Pais/psicologia , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Psicologia da Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
13.
Acad Med ; 85(1): 63-7, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20042825

RESUMO

Many medical authors and organizations have called for physician advocacy as a core component of medical professionalism. Despite widespread acceptance of advocacy as a professional obligation, the concept remains problematic within the profession of medicine because it remains undefined in concept, scope, and practice. If advocacy is to be a professional imperative, then medical schools and graduate education programs must deliberately train physicians as advocates. Accrediting bodies must clearly define advocacy competencies, and all physicians must meet them at some basic level. Sustaining and fostering physician advocacy will require modest changes to both undergraduate and graduate medical education. Developing advocacy training and practice opportunities for practicing physicians will also be necessary. In this article, as first steps toward building a model for competency-based physician advocacy training and delineating physician advocacy in common practice, the authors propose a definition and, using the biographies of actual physician advocates, describe the spectrum of physician advocacy.


Assuntos
Defesa do Consumidor , Papel do Médico , Política , Currículo , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Educação em Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Modelos Educacionais , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA