Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 59(12): 3159-3169, 2024 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39282763

RESUMO

This systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of symptoms of post-COVID-19 condition (long COVID), in children hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched PUBMED and EMBASE on 15 March, 2023, using search strategy: "long COVID" OR "post-COVID-19" OR "postacute COVID-19" OR "long-term COVID" OR "COVID-19 sequelae" OR "persistent COVID-19" OR "chronic COVID-19". We included observational studies (case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, or case series) that investigated symptoms of post-COVID-19 condition (long COVID) in children (<18 years) admitted with COVID-19. We used the WHO case definition of post-COVID-19 condition. Long COVID was defined as persistence of otherwise unexplained symptoms for at least three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We used the command "metaprop" to perform random-effects meta-analysis. Eleven studies involving 2279 patients were included. In the period between ≥3 months and <12 months after acute COVID-19, the most frequent symptom was exercise intolerance with a pooled prevalence of 29% (95% CI: 7%-57%, I2 = 95%), followed by nonspecific respiratory symptoms (12%, 95% CI: 0%-48%, I2 = 0%), psychological disorders (10%, 95% CI: 1%-25%, I2 = 97%), and nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms (10%, 95% CI: 0%-37%, I2 = 99%). In the period ≥12 months after the initial infection, the pooled prevalence of post COVID symptoms was lower, with 6% (95% CI: 2%-10%, I2 = 83%) for exercise intolerance and 3% (95% CI: 0%-8%, I2 = 89%) for fatigue. In conclusion, symptoms of post-COVID condition (long COVID) in hospitalized children affect multiple organ systems, with higher prevalence in the period up to 12 months after the acute phase of COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Criança , Prevalência , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar
2.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 51: e20243761, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39045920

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TA) has attracted increased attention among surgical specialties, but its use in plastic surgery is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of topical administration of 3% TA solution in reconstructive surgery of the face and scalp after excision of skin cancers. METHODS: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in patients aged 18 years or older with malignant skin neoplasms in the face or scalp region (ICD-10 C44.9). The primary outcome was volume of blood loss in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included difficult-to-control intraoperative haemorrhage, hematoma, ecchymosis, and other adverse events. RESULTS: of the 54 included patients, 26 were randomised to TA group and 28 to placebo group. The mean blood loss was 11.42ml (SD 6.40, range 8.83-14.01) in the TA group, and 17.6ml (SD 6.22, range 15.19-20.01) in the placebo group, representing a mean decrease of 6.18ml (35.11%) (p=0.001). TA significantly reduced the risk of ecchymosis (RR = 0.046; 95% CI: 0.007-0.323). Only two patients in the placebo group experienced ischemia in the flaps, and one patient in the placebo group experienced tissue necrosis requiring surgical reintervention. There were no surgical wound infections, thromboembolic phenomena, or other adverse events related to TA. CONCLUSIONS: topical TA may reduce intraoperative and immediate postoperative bleeding, with a significantly decreased risk of ecchymosis. There is no evidence of ischemic damage of flaps, systemic thromboembolic complications, or other adverse events.


Assuntos
Administração Tópica , Antifibrinolíticos , Neoplasias Faciais , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Ácido Tranexâmico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Feminino , Antifibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Faciais/cirurgia , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 51: e20243761, 2024. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1565080

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Tranexamic acid (TA) has attracted increased attention among surgical specialties, but its use in plastic surgery is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of topical administration of 3% TA solution in reconstructive surgery of the face and scalp after excision of skin cancers. Methods: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in patients aged 18 years or older with malignant skin neoplasms in the face or scalp region (ICD-10 C44.9). The primary outcome was volume of blood loss in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included difficult-to-control intraoperative haemorrhage, hematoma, ecchymosis, and other adverse events. Results: of the 54 included patients, 26 were randomised to TA group and 28 to placebo group. The mean blood loss was 11.42ml (SD 6.40, range 8.83-14.01) in the TA group, and 17.6ml (SD 6.22, range 15.19-20.01) in the placebo group, representing a mean decrease of 6.18ml (35.11%) (p=0.001). TA significantly reduced the risk of ecchymosis (RR = 0.046; 95% CI: 0.007-0.323). Only two patients in the placebo group experienced ischemia in the flaps, and one patient in the placebo group experienced tissue necrosis requiring surgical reintervention. There were no surgical wound infections, thromboembolic phenomena, or other adverse events related to TA. Conclusions: topical TA may reduce intraoperative and immediate postoperative bleeding, with a significantly decreased risk of ecchymosis. There is no evidence of ischemic damage of flaps, systemic thromboembolic complications, or other adverse events.


RESUMO Introdução: o ácido tranexâmico (AT) ganhou reconhecimento em diversas especialidades cirúrgicas na prevenção sangramentos e complicações associadas, porém seu uso na cirurgia plástica ainda é limitado. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia e segurança do uso tópico do AT na cirurgia reparadora oncológica da face e escalpo. Metodologia: foi realizado um ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, em pacientes maiores de 18 anos, portadores de neoplasias malignas de pele na região da cabeça (CID-10 C44.9). Os desfechos avaliados foram volume de perda sanguínea no pós-operatório imediato, hemorragia transoperatória de difícil controle, hematomas, equimoses, isquemia, necrose de tecidos, infecção de ferida operatória, efeitos tromboembólicos e outras intercorrências. Resultados: foram incluídos 54 pacientes, 26 no grupo AT e 28 no grupo placebo. O sangramento médio foi de 11,42ml, DP 6,40 (8,83 a 14,01) no grupo AT e de 17,6ml, DP 6,22 (15,19 a 20,01) no grupo controle, representando uma diminuição média de 6,18ml (35,11%) nas perdas sanguíneas (p=0,001). O AT reduziu significativemente o risco de equimoses (grupo AT: 1/26, 3,9% vs. grupo placebo: 23/28, 82,1%; p=0,000), representando uma redução relativa de 95,4% (RR=0,046; IC de 95%: 0,007-0,323). Houve dois casos de isquemia cutânea e um caso de necrose no grupo placebo, sem outras complicações no grupo AT. Conclusão: o uso tópico do AT foi efetivo na redução do sangramento transoperatório e pós-operatório imediato, com importante diminuição no risco de equimoses, não sendo evidenciados sofrimento isquêmico de retalhos, complicações sistêmicas tromboembólicas ou outros eventos adversos.

5.
Estud. Psicol. (Campinas, Online) ; 41: e210198, 2024. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, Index Psicologia - Periódicos | ID: biblio-1557757

RESUMO

Objective To investigate the prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among hospital healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the extreme south of Brazil. Method Cross-sectional study was conducted with 264 healthcare workers, between August and December 2020. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Generalized Anxiety Scale. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed. Results The prevalence of depression and anxiety among healthcare workers was 32.4% and 26.2%, respectively. The profession of nursing technician, having a family member who had lost a job, being responsible for family income, being 50 or more years old, being divorced or widowed, having a test for COVID-19, having suffered a traumatic event in life and having received psychological counseling at work were associated with depression and anxiety. Conclusion In this study, receiving psychological counseling at work was a protective factor for anxiety and depression.


Objetivo Investigar a prevalência e os fatores associados à depressão e ansiedade entre profissionais de saúde durante a pandemia de COVID-19 no extremo sul do Brasil. Método Estudo transversal realizado com 264 profissionais de saúde, entre agosto e dezembro de 2020. Depressão e ansiedade foram avaliadas por meio do Questionário de Saúde do Paciente e da Escala de Ansiedade Generalizada. Foi realizada análise de regressão linear multivariável. Resultados A prevalência de depressão e ansiedade entre os profissionais de saúde foi de 32,4% e 26,2%, respectivamente. Ser técnico de enfermagem, ter familiar que tenha perdido o emprego, ser responsável pela renda familiar, ter 50 anos ou mais, ser divorciado/viúvo, ter feito exame para COVID-19, ter sofrido evento traumático na vida e ter recebido aconselhamento psicológico no trabalho esteve associado a depressão e ansiedade. Conclusão Neste estudo, receber aconselhamento psicológico no trabalho foi um fator de proteção para ansiedade e depressão.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Transtornos Mentais
6.
Arch Dis Child ; 108(11): 904-909, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37451832

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies to summarise the properties of sweat conductivity (SC) to rule in/out cystic fibrosis (CF). DATA SOURCE: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, SciELO and LILACS up to 13 March 2023. STUDY SELECTION: We selected prospective and retrospective diagnostic test accuracy studies which compared SC, measured through two well-established and commercially available devices, that is, Nanoduct or Sweat-Chek Analyser, to quantitative measurement of sweat chloride. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and negative likelihood ratio (-LR), and their corresponding 95% CIs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies guidelines were followed. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics model was used to estimate diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 8286 participants were included. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, +LR and -LR were 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98), 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99), 171 (95% CI 58 to 500) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.05), respectively. Sensitivity analyses did not reveal a substantial impact of study-level factors on the results, such as study quality, cut-off values for a positive test, study sample size and participant age group. The quality of evidence was considered moderate. CONCLUSION: SC demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. In addition, its accuracy parameters suggest its role as an alternative to the sweat test for CF diagnosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022284504.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Humanos , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Suor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 4: CD006458, 2023 04 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37014057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Airway oedema (swelling) and mucus plugging are the principal pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution (≥ 3%) may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction. This is an update of a review first published in 2008, and updated in 2010, 2013, and 2017. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of nebulised hypertonic (≥ 3%) saline solution in infants with acute bronchiolitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science on 13 January 2022. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 13 January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs using nebulised hypertonic saline alone or in conjunction with bronchodilators as an active intervention and nebulised 0.9% saline or standard treatment as a comparator in children under 24 months with acute bronchiolitis. The primary outcome for inpatient trials was length of hospital stay, and the primary outcome for outpatients or emergency department (ED) trials was rate of hospitalisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias in included studies. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We used mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) as effect size metrics. MAIN RESULTS: We included six new trials (N = 1010) in this update, bringing the total number of included trials to 34, involving 5205 infants with acute bronchiolitis, of whom 2727 infants received hypertonic saline. Eleven trials await classification due to insufficient data for eligibility assessment. All included trials were randomised, parallel-group, controlled trials, of which 30 were double-blinded. Twelve trials were conducted in Asia, five in North America, one in South America, seven in Europe, and nine in Mediterranean and Middle East regions. The concentration of hypertonic saline was defined as 3% in all but six trials, in which 5% to 7% saline was used. Nine trials had no funding, and five trials were funded by sources from government or academic agencies. The remaining 20 trials did not provide funding sources. Hospitalised infants treated with nebulised hypertonic saline may have a shorter mean length of hospital stay compared to those treated with nebulised normal (0.9%) saline or standard care (mean difference (MD) -0.40 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.69 to -0.11; 21 trials, 2479 infants; low-certainty evidence). Infants who received hypertonic saline may also have lower postinhalation clinical scores than infants who received normal saline in the first three days of treatment (day 1: MD -0.64, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.21; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 1 ED, 8 inpatient trials), 893 infants; day 2: MD -1.07, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.53; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 1 ED, 8 inpatient trials), 907 infants; day 3: MD -0.89, 95% CI -1.44 to -0.34; 10 trials (1 outpatient, 9 inpatient trials), 785 infants; low-certainty evidence). Nebulised hypertonic saline may reduce the risk of hospitalisation by 13% compared with nebulised normal saline amongst infants who were outpatients and those treated in the ED (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97; 8 trials, 1760 infants; low-certainty evidence). However, hypertonic saline may not reduce the risk of readmission to hospital up to 28 days after discharge (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.25; 6 trials, 1084 infants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether infants who received hypertonic saline have a lower number of days to resolution of wheezing compared to those who received normal saline (MD -1.16 days, 95% CI -1.43 to -0.89; 2 trials, 205 infants; very low-certainty evidence), cough (MD -0.87 days, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.44; 3 trials, 363 infants; very low-certainty evidence), and pulmonary moist crackles (MD -1.30 days, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.32; 2 trials, 205 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Twenty-seven trials presented safety data: 14 trials (1624 infants; 767 treated with hypertonic saline, of which 735 (96%) co-administered with bronchodilators) did not report any adverse events, and 13 trials (2792 infants; 1479 treated with hypertonic saline, of which 416 (28%) co-administered with bronchodilators and 1063 (72%) hypertonic saline alone) reported at least one adverse event such as worsening cough, agitation, bronchospasm, bradycardia, desaturation, vomiting and diarrhoea, most of which were mild and resolved spontaneously (low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Nebulised hypertonic saline may modestly reduce length of stay amongst infants hospitalised with acute bronchiolitis and may slightly improve clinical severity score. Treatment with nebulised hypertonic saline may also reduce the risk of hospitalisation amongst outpatients and ED patients. Nebulised hypertonic saline seems to be a safe treatment in infants with bronchiolitis with only minor and spontaneously resolved adverse events, especially when administered in conjunction with a bronchodilator. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low for all outcomes, mainly due to inconsistency and risk of bias.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite , Broncodilatadores , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Bronquiolite/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Tosse , Solução Salina/uso terapêutico , Solução Salina Hipertônica/uso terapêutico
9.
Arch Dis Child ; 108(7): 538-542, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36914231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of sweat conductivity among newborns and very young infants. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based, diagnostic test accuracy study. SETTING: Public Statewide Newborn Screening Programme where the incidence rate of cystic fibrosis (CF) is ≈1:11 000. PATIENTS: Newborns and very young infants with positive two-tiered immunoreactive trypsinogen. INTERVENTIONS: Sweat conductivity and sweat chloride were performed simultaneously, on the same day and facility by independent technicians, with the cut-off values of 80 mmol/L and 60 mmol/L, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), overall accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR, -LR) and post (sweat conductivity (SC)) test probability were calculated to assess SC performance. RESULTS: 1193 participants were included, 68 with and 1108 without CF, and 17 with intermediate values. The mean (SD) age was 48 (19.2) days, ranging from 15 to 90 days. SC yielded sensitivity of 98.5% (95% CI 95.7 to 100), specificity of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), PPV of 98.5% (95% CI 95.7 to 100) and NPV of 99.9% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), overall accuracy of 99.8% (95% CI 99.6 to 100), +LR of 1091.7 (95% CI 153.8 to 7744.9) and -LR of 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.10). After a positive and negative sweat conductivity result, the patient's probability of CF increases around 350 times and drops to virtually zero, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sweat conductivity had excellent accuracy in ruling in or ruling out CF after positive two-tiered immunoreactive trypsinogen among newborns and very young infants.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Lactente , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Fibrose Cística/diagnóstico , Triagem Neonatal , Estudos Prospectivos , Suor , Tripsinogênio , Cloretos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística
10.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(1): 218-225, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36076121

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For clinically low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, the decision on cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is disputed. The present study investigates the use of additional biomarkers of ploidy and stroma-ratio(PS) to stratify patients with low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, providing a basis for individualized treatment in the future. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled 198 patients with clinical-low-risk stage III colorectal cancer (T1-3N1M0) and analyzed the DNA ploidy and stroma ratio of FFPE tumor tissues. The patients were divided into PS-low-risk group (Diploidy or Low-stroma) and PS-high-risk group (Non-diploid and High-stroma). For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS: The results showed that the 5-year DFS of the PS-high-risk group was significantly lower than that in the PS-low-risk group (78.6 vs. 91.2%, HR = 2.606 [95% CI: 1.011-6.717], P = 0.039). Besides, in the PS-low-risk group, the 5 year OS (98.2 vs. 86.7%, P = 0.022; HR = 5.762 [95% CI: 1.281-25.920]) and DFS (95.6, vs 79.9%, P = 0.019; HR = 3.7 [95% CI: 1.24-11.04]) of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for > 3 months were significantly higher than those received adjuvant chemotherapy for < 3 months. We also found that the PS could stratify the prognosis of patients with dMMR tumors. The 5-year OS (96.3 vs 71.4%, P = 0.037) and DFS (92.6 vs 57.1%, P = 0.015) were higher in the PS-low-risk dMMR patients than those in the PS-high-risk dMMR patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that PS can predict the prognosis of patients with stage III low-risk CRC. Besides, it may guide the decision on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Ploidias , DNA/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante
11.
Environ Geochem Health ; 45(5): 2229-2240, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870077

RESUMO

Recife is recognized as the 16th most vulnerable city to climate change in the world. In addition, the city has levels of air pollutants above the new limits proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2021. In this sense, the present study had two main objectives: (1) To evaluate the health (and economic) benefits related to the reduction in mean annual concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 considering the new limits recommended by the WHO: 15 µg/m3 (PM10) and 5 µg/m3 (PM2.5) and (2) To simulate the behavior of these pollutants in scenarios with increased temperature (2 and 4 °C) using machine learning. The averages of PM2.5 and PM10 were above the limits recommended by the WHO. The scenario simulating the reduction in these pollutants below the new WHO limits would avoid more than 130 deaths and 84 hospital admissions for respiratory or cardiovascular problems. This represents a gain of 15.2 months in life expectancy and a cost of almost 160 million dollars. Regarding the simulated temperature increase, the most conservative (+ 2 °C) and most drastic (+ 4 °C) scenarios predict an increase of approximately 6.5 and 15%, respectively, in the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10, with a progressive increase in deaths attributed to air pollution. The study shows that the increase in temperature will have impacts on air particulate matter and health outcomes. Climate change mitigation and pollution control policies must be implemented for meeting new WHO air quality standards which may have health benefits.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , Poluentes Ambientais , Material Particulado/toxicidade , Material Particulado/análise , Mudança Climática , Brasil , Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/análise
13.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 28(31): 41843-41850, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33788092

RESUMO

Studies around the world have revealed reduced levels of atmospheric particulate matter in periods of greatest human mobility restriction to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study aimed to carry out a health impact assessment in Recife, Brazil, hypothesizing a scenario in which the levels of PM10 and PM2.5 remained, throughout the year, as in the most restrictive period of human mobility. Particular material data (PM10 and PM2.5) were measured during the pandemic and population and health (mortality, hospital admissions for heart and respiratory problems) data from 2018 were used. We observed a reduction in the concentration of PM2.5 in up to 43.7% and PM10 up to 29.5% during the period of social isolation in the city of Recife. The reduction in PM2.5 would avoid 106 annual deaths from non-external causes and 58 annual deaths from cardiovascular diseases. In this scenario, $ 294.88 million would be saved ($ 114.88 million from heart problems and $ 180 million from non-external causes). When considering hospitalizations avoided by the decrease in PM10, we observed 57 fewer hospitalizations for respiratory diseases, 42 for heart diseases and a reduction of 37 deaths due to non-external causes. The reduction in spending on respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations would exceed $ 330,000. Therefore, the reduction of particulate matter could prevent hospital admissions, deaths and consequently there would be a reduction in disease burden in developing countries where economic resources are scarce. In this sense, governments should seek to reduce levels of pollution in order to improve the life quality and health of the population.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , COVID-19 , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/análise , Brasil , Cidades , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Avaliação do Impacto na Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Material Particulado/análise , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(2): 537-545, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730135

RESUMO

There is a well-known inverse association between mortality rate from infectious diseases and improvements in socioeconomic status, even though longer time-series are required to demonstrate this relationship. This general rule seems to apply to mortality from pneumonia in children in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) era. Two recent published secular trend studies spanning from about 30 years among Brazilians under the age of five show either no effect of PCV - not even death rate decline from pneumococcal meningitis - or a modest one (8% reduction). Time-series mortality studies from pneumonia are needed for both, developed and developing countries, those who have implemented PCV or not. Results from these studies would provide critical input and feedback to public health policy makers.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas , Pneumonia Pneumocócica , Pneumonia , Infecções Respiratórias , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Conjugadas
15.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(8): 2115-2127, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519809

RESUMO

AIM: To summarize what we know so far about coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in children. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information from 1 January 2020 to 4 May 2020. We selected randomized trials, observational studies, case series or case reports, and research letters of children ages birth to 18 years with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to calculate the weighted mean prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) or the weighted average means and 95% CI. RESULT: Forty-six articles reporting 551 cases of COVID-19 in children (aged 1 day-17.5 years) were included. Eighty-seven percent (95% CI: 77%-95%) of patients had household exposure to COVID-19. The most common symptoms and signs were fever (53%, 95% CI: 45%-61%), cough (39%, 95% CI: 30%-47%), and sore throat/pharyngeal erythema (14%, 95% CI: 4%-28%); however, 18% (95% CI: 11%-27%) of cases were asymptomatic. The most common radiographic and computed tomography (CT) findings were patchy consolidations (33%, 95% CI: 23%-43%) and ground glass opacities (28%, 95% CI: 18%-39%), but 36% (95% CI: 28%-45%) of patients had normal CT images. Antiviral agents were given to 74% of patients (95% CI: 52%-92%). Six patients, all with major underlying medical conditions, needed invasive mechanical ventilation, and one of them died. CONCLUSION: Previously healthy children with COVID-19 have mild symptoms. The diagnosis is generally suspected from history of household exposure to COVID-19 case. Children with COVID-19 and major underlying condition are more likely to have severe/critical disease and poor prognosis, even death.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Assintomáticas , COVID-19 , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Tosse/etiologia , Eritema/etiologia , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Pandemias , Faringite , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
16.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(6): 1334-1339, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32119199

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess cardiac autonomic modulation, measured by short-term frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), in children with asthma. METHODS: We conducted an observational study at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The sample consisted of 119 children aged 7 to 15 years with asthma and 56 age-matched healthy controls. Frequency domain HRV measures included low-frequency (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz), high-frequency (HF; 0.15-0.4 Hz), and LF/HF ratio. The LF and HF components were expressed in both absolute values of power (ms2 ) and in normalized units (nu). RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, asthmatic children had significantly higher value of HF (nu) (mean ± standard deviation: 45.9 ± 14.6 vs 40.7 ± 13.6; P = .02), and lower values of LF (nu) (54.1 ± 14.6 vs 59.3 ± 13.6; P = .02) and LF/HF ratio (median, interquartile range: 1.12, 0.82-1.88 vs 1.59, 1.02-2.08; P = .03). We did not find significant differences between children with persistent and intermittent asthma, and between children with well-controlled and partially-controlled or uncontrolled asthma, in terms of HRV measures. CONCLUSIONS: Children with stable chronic asthma may have a cardiac autonomic imbalance with a possible enhanced parasympathetic modulation, as assessed by short-term frequency domain analysis of HRV. Neither asthma severity nor asthma control was significantly associated with HRV measures, but the study did not have enough power to draw a firm conclusion on this point.


Assuntos
Asma/fisiopatologia , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Adolescente , Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/fisiologia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
17.
Sleep Med ; 54: 28-34, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy would significantly impact hard clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of CPAP in survival and secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with OSA and cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, and SciElo databases (up to January 2018) were searched for randomized trials that compared CPAP with no active treatment in adults with OSA and CVD. The primary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and any major cardiovascular event. We used risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as the effect measures for dichotomous data, and weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI for continuous variables. We used the random-effects method for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine trials involving 3314 patients contributed data for meta-analysis of at least one outcome. The duration (median) of CPAP treatment varied from one month to 56.9 months. The pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.86 (0.60-1.23, I2 = 0.0%) for all-cause death, 0.58 (0.19-1.74, I2 = 47%) for cardiovascular death, 1.11 (0.76-1.62, I2 = 0.0%) for myocardial infarction, 0.77 (0.46-1.28, I2 = 16%) for stroke, and 0.93 (0.70-1.24, I2 = 49%) for any major cardiovascular event. The quality of evidence for these outcomes was low. CONCLUSIONS: Low-quality evidence suggests that CPAP therapy does not significantly improve survival or prevent major cardiovascular events in adults with OSA and cardiovascular disease.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Causas de Morte , Humanos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia
18.
J Pediatr (Rio J) ; 95 Suppl 1: 10-22, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30472355

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of asthma and its treatment (inhaled corticosteroids and other control medications) on growth. DATA SOURCES: The authors searched PubMed (up to August 24, 2018) and screened the reference lists of retrieved articles. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were selected. If there was no such article, the authors selected either randomized clinical trials or observational studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 37 articles were included in this review. The findings from 21 studies suggest that asthma per se, especially more severe and/or uncontrolled cases, can transitorily impair child's growth. Two Cochrane reviews of randomized clinical trials showed a small mean reduction in linear growth (-0.91cm/year for beclomethasone, -0.59cm/year for budesonide, and -0.39cm/year for fluticasone) in the first year of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in prepubertal children with persistent asthma. The effects were likely to be molecule- and dose-dependent. A recent review showed that most of "real-life" observational studies had not found significant effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children. Fifteen studies showed that the maintenance systemic corticosteroids could cause a dose-dependent growth suppression in children with severe asthma, but other controllers (cromones, montelukast, salmeterol, and theophylline) had no significant adverse effects no growth. CONCLUSIONS: Severe and/or uncontrolled asthma can transitorily impair child's growth. Regular use of inhaled corticosteroids may cause a small reduction in linear growth in children with asthma, but the well-established benefits of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling asthma outweigh the potential adverse effects on growth. Use of the minimally effective dose of inhaled corticosteroids and regular monitoring of child's height during inhaled corticosteroids therapy are recommended.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos do Crescimento/induzido quimicamente , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
19.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; J. pediatr. (Rio J.);95(supl.1): S10-S22, 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1002480

RESUMO

Abstract Objectives: To assess the impact of asthma and its treatment (inhaled corticosteroids and other control medications) on growth. Data sources: The authors searched PubMed (up to August 24, 2018) and screened the reference lists of retrieved articles. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were selected. If there was no such article, the authors selected either randomized clinical trials or observational studies. Data synthesis: A total of 37 articles were included in this review. The findings from 21 studies suggest that asthma per se, especially more severe and/or uncontrolled cases, can transitorily impair child's growth. Two Cochrane reviews of randomized clinical trials showed a small mean reduction in linear growth (-0.91 cm/year for beclomethasone, -0.59 cm/year for budesonide, and -0.39 cm/year for fluticasone) in the first year of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in prepubertal children with persistent asthma. The effects were likely to be molecule- and dose-dependent. A recent review showed that most of "real-life" observational studies had not found significant effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children. Fifteen studies showed that the maintenance systemic corticosteroids could cause a dose-dependent growth suppression in children with severe asthma, but other controllers (cromones, montelukast, salmeterol, and theophylline) had no significant adverse effects no growth. Conclusions: Severe and/or uncontrolled asthma can transitorily impair child's growth. Regular use of inhaled corticosteroids may cause a small reduction in linear growth in children with asthma, but the well-established benefits of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling asthma outweigh the potential adverse effects on growth. Use of the minimally effective dose of inhaled corticosteroids and regular monitoring of child's height during inhaled corticosteroids therapy are recommended.


Resumo Objetivos: Avaliar o impacto da asma e seu tratamento (corticosteroides inalados e outros medicamentos de controle) no crescimento. Fontes de dados: Uma busca foi feita no PubMed (até 24 de agosto de 2018) e foram triadas as listas de referência dos artigos recuperados. Revisões sistemáticas e metanálises foram selecionadas. Se não houvesse tal artigo, ensaios clínicos randomizados ou estudos observacionais eram selecionados. Síntese dos dados: Trinta e sete artigos foram incluídos nesta revisão. Os achados de 21 estudos sugerem que a asma por si só, especialmente os casos mais graves e/ou descontrolados, podem prejudicar o crescimento da criança. Duas revisões Cochrane de ensaios clínicos randomizados mostraram uma pequena redução média no crescimento linear (−0,91 cm/ano para beclometasona, −0,59 cm/ano para budesonida e −0,39 cm/ano para fluticasona) no primeiro ano de tratamento com corticosteroides inalados em crianças pré-púberes com asma persistente. Os efeitos pareciam ter efeito dose- e molécula-dependente. Uma revisão recente mostrou que a maioria dos estudos observacionais da "vida real" não encontrou efeitos significativos dos corticosteroides inalados no crescimento de crianças asmáticas. Quinze estudos mostraram que a manutenção de corticosteroides sistêmicos poderia causar uma supressão do crescimento dose-dependente em crianças com asma grave, mas outros controladores (cromonas, montelucaste, salmeterol e teofilina) não tiveram efeitos adversos significativos no crescimento. Conclusões: A asma grave e/ou descontrolada pode prejudicar o crescimento da criança. O uso regular de corticosteroides inalados pode causar uma pequena redução no crescimento linear em crianças com asma, mas os benefícios bem estabelecidos dos corticosteroides inalados no controle da asma superam os potenciais efeitos adversos no crescimento. Recomenda-se o uso de doses minimamente eficazes de corticosteroides inalados e o monitoramento regular da altura da criança durante a terapia com corticosteroides inalados.


Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos do Crescimento/induzido quimicamente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências
20.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 53(8): 1089-1095, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29893029

RESUMO

AIM: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) on the rate of hospitalization in infants with acute bronchiolitis in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Virtual Health Library-BVS and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 31, 2018. We selected randomized trials that compared nebulized HS with normal saline (NS) or standard care in children up to 24 months of age with acute bronchiolitis in the ED setting. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 293 records were screened and 8 trials involving 1708 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed a 16% reduction in the risk of hospitalization among patients treated with HS compared to NS (risk ratio [RR]: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.98, P = 0.03). A significant effect of HS in reducing the risk of hospitalization was found only in the subgroup analyses of trials in which HS was mixed with bronchodilators, multiple doses (≥3) were given, and risk of bias was low. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized hypertonic saline may potentially reduce the risk of hospitalization in infants with acute bronchiolitis in the ED setting. Quality of evidence is moderate due to substantial clinical heterogeneity between studies and large multicenter trials are still warranted.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite/terapia , Hospitalização , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Solução Salina Hipertônica/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Lactente
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA