Acquired gene alterations in patients treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone using baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA samples in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials.

BACKGROUND: A prior pooled analysis of the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials identified baseline markers predictive of sensitivity or resistance to ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET). We report the results of an analysis of paired baseline and end-of-treatment (EOT) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples across the MONALEESA trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paired baseline and EOT ctDNA samples from MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 were sequenced using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel. Genes with an EOT alteration prevalence of >5% were included. A McNemar test was performed on paired samples and adjusted for multiple testing to control the false discovery rate. A Bayesian mixed-effects model was used to adjust for ctDNA fraction at both time points and for study differences. RESULTS: The analysis included 523 paired samples. At EOT, 21 genes had a >5% alteration prevalence. A trend for higher ctDNA fraction at EOT vs baseline (P=0.08) was observed. Prevalence of alterations was higher at EOT vs baseline in RB1, SPEN, TPR, PCDH15, and FGFR2 in the ribociclib arm; PBRM1 in the placebo arm; and ESR1 in both arms. The mixed-effects model demonstrated that the same trends for increased prevalence of these alterations at EOT were observed after adjusting for ctDNA fraction and that the increased rate of RB1 and SPEN alterations at EOT were specific to ribociclib plus ET. Analysis of ESR1 indicated a similar increase at EOT in both arms. The most common acquired ESR1 mutations at EOT included Y537C/N/S/D, D538G, E380Q, and L536H/R/P/LC. The prevalence of PIK3CA hotspot mutations at baseline and EOT was similar. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identified acquired gene alterations in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus ET or placebo plus ET. These data may support further studies on acquired resistance mechanisms and inform future systemic interventions in the post-CDK4/6 inhibitor setting.

Breaking through therapeutic barriers: Insights into CDK4/6 inhibition resistance in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

The therapeutic landscape for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast carcinoma has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors, particularly in combination with endocrine therapy as the primary regimen. However, the evolution of resistance mechanisms in response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ metastatic breast cancer presents substantial challenges in managing the disease. This review explores the diverse genomic landscape underlying resistance, including disturbances in the cell cycle, deviations in oncogenic signaling pathways, deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms, and changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Additionally, it discusses potential strategies to surmount resistance, including advancements in endocrine therapy, targeted inhibition of cell cycle components, suppression of AKT/mTOR activation, exploration of the FGFR pathway, utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors, providing pathways for enhancing patient outcomes amidst treatment challenges.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the end of treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is an independent prognostic factor for ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical significance of peripheral blood biomarkers, including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), at the end of treatment (EOT) with CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib and palbociclib in patients with estrogen receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. METHODS: We included 67 patients treated with fulvestrant plus abemaciclib or palbociclib. Overall survival (OS) since the EOT with CDK/4/6 inhibitors was compared in relation to the levels of ALC and NLR. The cut-off values of ALC and NLR were set at 1000/µL and 3, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with a high ALC at EOT showed significantly longer OS than those with a low ALC (p = 0.0358). Moreover, patients with a low NLR at EOT showed significantly longer OS than those with a high NLR at EOT (p = 0.0044). Looking at the changes of ALC and NLR between baseline and the EOT, patients with a high ALC both at baseline and at the EOT showed significantly longer OS than others (p = 0.0201). Similarly, patients with a low NLR both at baseline and at the EOT showed significantly longer OS after EOT than others (p = 0.0136). Multivariable analysis revealed that the NLR at EOT (low vs. high) and changes in NLR (low at baseline to low at EOT vs. others) were significant and independent prognostic factors for OS after EOT (p = 0.0337, p = 0.0039, respectively). CONCLUSION: NLR at EOT with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a significant and independent prognostic marker for patients with ER-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Clinical benefit and safety profile of cross-line therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a retrospective study of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and have transformed the therapeutic landscape. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects. Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- ABC. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is (abemaciclib, palbociclib, ribociclib, and dalpiciclib) after progression with another CDK4/6i. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, objective response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, as promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. RESULTS: Eighty-two HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-9.2). Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS. Notably, patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months. The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i, then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation. Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs. No instances of fatal safety events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy.

Dalpiciclib in combination with letrozole/anastrozole or fulvestrant in HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study.

Background: Dalpiciclib is a novel cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor which showed tolerability and preliminary efficacy as monotherapy for pretreated advanced breast cancer (BC). Objectives: To further assess dalpiciclib with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC. Design: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib trial. Methods: Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic BC were enrolled in five cohorts. Patients without prior treatment for advanced disease (cohorts 1-2) were given dalpiciclib (125 or 150 mg) plus letrozole/anastrozole; patients who progressed after ET (cohorts 3-5) were given dalpiciclib (125, 150, or 175 mg) plus fulvestrant. Dalpiciclib was administered orally once daily in 3-weeks-on/1-week off schedule. The primary endpoint was safety. Results: A total of 58 patients received dalpiciclib with letrozole/anastrozole and 46 received dalpiciclib with fulvestrant. No maximum tolerated dose of dalpiciclib was reached with letrozole/anastrozole or fulvestrant. Across all cohorts, 86.7%-93.8% of patients had a grade ⩾3 adverse event, with the most common being neutropenia (grade 3, 40.0% for dalpiciclib 175 mg and 61.8%-87.5% for lower doses; grade 4, 46.7% and 4.2%-20.6%, respectively) and leukopenia (grade 3, 80.0% for 175 mg and 33.3%-54.2% for lower doses; grade 4, 0% for all doses). At tested dose levels, steady-state areas under the concentration curve and peak concentration of dalpiciclib increased with dose when combined with letrozole/anastrozole and fulvestrant. Dalpiciclib at 150 mg was associated with a numerically higher objective response rate in both patients untreated for advanced disease (67.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49.5-82.6) and patients progressing after ET (53.3%; 95% CI 26.6-78.7); as of July 30, 2022, the median progression-free survival with dalpiciclib 150 mg was 24.1 months (95% CI 16.9-46.0) with letrozole/anastrozole and 16.7 months (95% CI 1.9-24.1) with fulvestrant. Conclusion: Dalpiciclib plus letrozole/anastrozole or fulvestrant showed an acceptable safety profile. The recommended phase III dose of dalpiciclib was 150 mg. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03481998.

Prognosis in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer with HER2-low versus HER2-zero treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: a meta-analysis.

Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+), and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, the impact of HER2 status on the prognosis of patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET remains unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate different outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients in advanced HR+ breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and ET. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases for relevant published literature. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled by fixed or random effects models. Results: Overall, 12 studies with 3567 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled analysis suggested that no significant differences were observed in terms of ORR and OS between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent CDK4/6i and ET. Similarly, no significant difference in PFS was found between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent post-line CDK4/6i and ET or first-line Palbociclib and ET. However, in patients who received mixed-line (not a single treatment line) or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, the PFS was significantly shorter in the HER2-low subgroup than in the HER2-zero subgroup (mixed-line: HR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.11-1.65; P = 0.002; first-line: HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01-1.28; P = 0.04). A similar phenomenon was observed in patients who received mixed-line or post-line Palbociclib and ET (mixed-line: HR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.09-2.34; P = 0.02; post-line: HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.03-2.00; P = 0.03). Conclusion: These results indicated that HER2-low status did not have a significant association with ORR and OS, but it may have a worse impact on PFS in patients who received mixed-line or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, as well as mixed-line or post-line palbociclib plus ET.

Trends in HR+ metastatic breast cancer survival before and after CDK4/6 inhibitor introduction in the United States: a SEER registry analysis of patients with HER2- and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved patient survival in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in clinical trials and real-world studies. However, investigations of survival gains in broader HR+/HER2- mBC populations using epidemiological approaches are limited. METHODS: This retrospective study used SEER registry data to assess breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- de novo mBC from 2010 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare BCSS in patients diagnosed before (2010‒2013 with follow-up to 2014) and after (2015‒2018 with follow-up to 2019) the 2015 guideline recommendations for CDK4/6i use. A comparison was made to patients with HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) de novo mBC, for which no major guideline changes occurred during 2015-2018. RESULTS: Data from 11,467 women with HR+/HER2- mBC and 3260 women with HR+/HER2+ mBC were included. After baseline characteristic adjustment, patients with HR+/HER2- mBC diagnosed post-2015 (n = 6163), had an approximately 10% reduction in risk of BC-specific death compared with patients diagnosed pre-2015 (n = 5304; HR = 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant change was observed in HR+/HER2+ BCSS post-2015 (n = 1798) versus pre-2015 (n = 1462). Similar results were found in patients aged ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSION: Using one of the largest US population-based longitudinal cancer databases, significant improvements in BCSS were noted in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, potentially due to the introduction of CDK4/6i post-2015. No significant improvement in BCSS was observed in patients with HR+/HER2+ mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, likely due to the availability of HER2-directed therapies in both time periods.

CDK4/6 inhibition to resensitize BRAF/EGFR inhibitor in patient-derived BRAF/PTEN-mutant colon cancer cells.

Background: In v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC), encorafenib-cetuximab has been established as standard second-line therapy, but not all patients respond and the duration of response is relatively short. Overcoming intrinsic or acquired resistance to BRAF/EGFR inhibitors is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes in metastatic BRAF-mutated CRC. The aim of the study is to investigate the resistance mechanisms in BRAF-mutant CRC patient refractory to BRAF/EGFR targeted therapy. Methods: We established patient-derived cells (PDCs) from a patient with BRAF/PTEN-mutant metastatic colon cancer who progressed rapidly on encorafenib plus cetuximab. To explore potential treatment options for inherent resistance caused by simultaneous PTEN mutation in BRAF-mutated CRC, we conducted cell viability assays using PDCs treated with encorafenib-cetuximab in combination with a cyclin-dependent kinase-4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Results: The patient's tumor had concurrent PTEN loss-of-function alteration at diagnosis and PDCs were generated from ascites after resistance to the BRAF/EGFR inhibitor. The PDCs were resistant to the encorafenib-cetuximab combination even at a high concentration of cetuximab (up to 500 µg/mL). Adding the CDK4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, to encorafenib-cetuximab showed a synergistic effect in a proliferation assay. Ribociclib plus encorafenib-cetuximab represented a significantly lower expression of Ki-67 compared to the dual combination alone. An MTS assay showed that triplet therapy with ribociclib, encorafenib, and cetuximab suppressed cell viability more efficiently than the two-drug combinations. Investigating the combined effect of triplet therapy using the calculated combination index (CI) showed that ribociclib had a synergistic effect with encorafenib-cetuximab when applied to PDCs with a concurrent BRAF/PTEN mutation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that combining the CDK4/6 inhibitor with the BRAF/EGFR inhibitor might be a novel treatment strategy for concomitant BRAF and PTEN-mutant CRC.

Genomic alterations associated with resistance and circulating tumor DNA dynamics for early detection of progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor in advanced breast cancer.

Combined CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy significantly improves outcome for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer, but drug resistance and thus disease progression inevitably occur. Herein, we aimed to identify genomic alterations associated with combined CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy resistance, and follow the levels of specific mutations in longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for early detection of progression. From a cohort of 86 patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer we performed whole exome sequencing or targeted sequencing of paired tumor (N = 8) or blood samples (N = 5) obtained before initiation of combined CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy and at disease progression. Mutations in oncogenic genes at progression were rare, while amplifications of growth-regulating genes were more frequent. The most frequently acquired alterations observed were PIK3CA and TP53 mutations and PDK1 amplification. Longitudinal ctDNA dynamics of mutant PIK3CA or private mutations revealed increased mutation levels at progression in 8 of 10 patients (80%). Impressively, rising levels of PIK3CA-mutated ctDNA were detected 4-17 months before imaging. Our data add to the growing evidence supporting longitudinal ctDNA analysis for real-time monitoring of CDK4/6i response and early detection of progression in advanced breast cancer. Further, our analysis suggests that amplification of growth-related genes may contribute to combined CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy resistance.

Strategy of combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with other therapies and mechanisms of resistance.

Cell cycle-dependent protein kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) is a crucial kinase that regulates the cell cycle, essential for cell division and proliferation. Hence, combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with other anti-tumor drugs is a pivotal clinical strategy. This strategy can efficiently inhibit the growth and division of tumor cells, reduce the side effects, and improve the quality of life of patients by reducing the dosage of combined anticancer drugs. Furthermore, the combination therapy strategy of CDK4/6 inhibitors could ameliorate the drug resistance of combined drugs and overcome the CDK4/6 resistance caused by CDK4/6 inhibitors. Various tumor treatment strategies combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors have entered the clinical trial stage, demonstrating their substantial clinical potential. This study reviews the research progress of CDK4/6 inhibitors from 2018 to 2022, the related resistance mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and the strategy of combination medication.

Confirming the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of HR+ advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib) have been recommended in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer in China. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors by processing survival data using fractional polynomial modeling methods. Methods: Phase II or III randomized controlled trials in treatment-naive HR + patients with advanced breast cancer were systematically searched through the preset search strategy. The fractional polynomial (FP) model was used to relax the proportional hazard assumption and obtain time-varying hazard ratio (HR). Progression-free life years (PFLYs) and life years (LYs) were calculated from the area under curve (AUC) of the predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves to evaluate the long-term efficacy benefit. Odds ratio (OR) of grade≥3 adverse events were analyzed for safety outcomes. Results: 6 randomized controlled trials with 2,638 patients were included. The first-order FP model (p = -1) and the first-order FP model (p = 1) were used to calculate the time-varying HR of PFS and OS, respectively. Extrapolating to 240 months, abemaciclib obtained a PFS benefit of 3.059 PFLYs and 6.275 LYs by calculating the AUC of the PFS and OS curves. Palbociclib obtained 2.302 PFLYs and 6.351 LYs. Ribociclib obtained 2.636 PFLYs and 6.543 LYs. In terms of safety, the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors resulted in a higher risk of adverse events (OR = 9.84, 95% CI: 8.13-11.95), especially for palbociclib (OR = 14.04, 95% CI: 10.52-18.90). Conclusion: The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in treatment-naive patients with HR + advanced breast cancer significantly improves survival, but also increases the risk of adverse events. Abemaciclib and ribociclib may be the best options for prolonging PFS and OS in treatment-naïve patients, respectively.

Effect of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors on Circulating Cells in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard-of-care for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the impact of CDK4/6i on circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET (CDK4/6i+ET) remains poorly understood. This was a prospective cohort study including 44 patients with ER+/HER2- mBC treated with CDK4/6i+ET in either first or second line. Peripheral blood samples were collected before (baseline) and 3 months (t2) after therapy. Immune cell's subsets were quantified by flow cytometry, and microfluidic-captured CTCs were counted and classified according to the expression of cytokeratin and/or vimentin. Patients were categorized according to response as responders (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥ 6.0 months; 79.1%) and non-responders (PFS < 6.0 months; 20.9%). CDK4/6i+ET resulted in significant changes in the hematological parameters, including decreased hemoglobin levels and increased mean corpuscular volume, as well as reductions in neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil counts. Specific immune cell subsets, such as early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and Vδ2+ T cells expressing NKG2D, decreased 3 months after CDK4/6i+ET. Additionally, correlations between the presence of CTCs and immune cell populations were observed, highlighting the interplay between immune dysfunction and tumor dissemination. This study provides insights into the immunomodulatory effects of CDK4/6i+ET, underscoring the importance of considering immune dynamics in the management of ER+/HER2- mBC.

Radiosensitizing effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer mediated downregulation of DNA repair mechanism and NF-κB-signaling pathway.

CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy prolonged survival in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. We investigated whether CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance radiosensitivity and their underlying mechanisms of this subtype of breast cancer. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted using two HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and T-47D), CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib and palbociclib) and radiotherapy (RT) to assess the biological functions and mechanisms. The radiation-enhancing effect was assessed using clonogenic assays; γH2AX and 53BP1 levels were assessed by immunofluorescence to evaluate DNA damage. The levels of phospho (p)-ERK, c-Myc, and DNA-double strand break (DSB)-related molecules, p-DNA-PKcs, Rad51, and p-ATM, were assessed by western blotting. We used an NF-κB p65 transcription factor assay kit to evaluate NF-κB activity. We evaluated the antitumor effect of the combination of RT and ribociclib through the MCF-7 orthotopic xenograft model. The synergistic effects of combining RT with ribociclib and palbociclib pretreatment were demonstrated by clonogenic assay. CDK4/6 inhibitors synergistically increased the numbers of RT-induced γH2AX and 53BP1, downregulated the expression of p-DNA-PKcs, Rad51 and p-ATM activated by RT, and reduced RT-triggering p-ERK expression, NF-κB activation, and its down-streaming gene, c-Myc. Combined ribociclib and RT reduced the growth of MCF-7 cell xenograft tumors, and downregulated the immunohistochemical expression of p-ERK, p-NF-κB p65, and c-Myc compared to that in the control group. Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors enhanced radiosensitivity of HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer cells at least by reducing DNA-DSB repair and weakening the activation of ERK and NF-κB signaling by RT.

Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA's adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database. METHODS: The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs. RESULTS: This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease. CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

Infection associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are first-line treatments for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. With their increasing clinical use, infection-related adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors have been widely reported in recent years. This study aimed to analyze the occurrence of infections associated with the CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) based on the real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Data were extracted from the FAERS database between 2015Q1 and 2022Q3. The clinical characteristics of patients with primary suspected infection-related AEs were analyzed. A disproportionality analysis was performed to investigate the potential association between AEs and CDK4/6 inhibitors. The influencing factors were evaluated using Pearson's chi-square test. Results: Reports of infection-related AEs associated with ribociclib accounted for 8.58% of the total reports of AEs associated with ribociclib, followed by palbociclib (2.72%) and abemaciclib (1.24%). Ribociclib (67.65%) was associated with more serious outcome events than palbociclib (30%) or abemaciclib (48.08%). The sex and age were not associated with outcome severity. Disproportionality analysis showed that fourteen, sixteen and two infection-related preferred terms were detected for palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. Conclusion: Infection-related AEs were highly associated with three CDK4/6 inhibitors, especially palbociclib and ribociclib, based on the real-world data from the FAERS database. However, further causality assessment is required.

Is the percentage of hormone receptor positivity in HR+ HER2-metastatic breast cancer patients receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitor with endocrine therapy predictive and prognostic?

Purpose: There is no clear information in the literature about the relationship between the efficacy of CDK 4/6i combined with ET and HR positivity. However, we know that the longest overall survival was in the ER-strong positive/PR intermediate or strong positive groups. Therefore, we aimed to investigate CDK4/6i treatments that create positivity in HR. Methods: Patients with the diagnosis of HR+/HER2- MBC who were treated with CDK 4/6i and HR >10% were retrospectively evaluated. To analyze the role of HR positivity, ER was moderately positive (10-49%) and ER was strongly positive (50-100%); PR was grouped as moderately positive (10-49%) and PR strongly positive (50-100%). Results: Median follow-up of 150 patients included in the study was 15.2 months (95% CI, 2.1-40.9 months). The highest response in the whole group was obtained in the ER-strong positive/PR moderate or strong positive group, and the ER moderate positive/PR moderate or strong group. This was followed by the ER strong positive/PR negative group, and then the ER moderate positive/PR negative group. Although these advantages were not statistically significant, they were numerically higher (ORR: 83.8% vs. 83.3% vs. 77.4% vs. 62.5%, p=0.488, respectively). The highest survival in the whole group was achieved in the ER strong positive/PR moderate or strongly positive group, followed by the ER moderately positive/PR moderate or strongly positive group, the ER strongly positive/PR negative group followed by the ER moderate positive/PR negative group, respectively(p=0.410). However, these advantages were not statistically significant. Conclusion: As a result, HR+/HER2- MBC patients receiving CDK 4/6i combined with ET suggest that the percentage of HR positivity may have a predictive and prognostic role.

Palbociclib-Induced Vitiligo-Like Lesions: A Report of a Challenging Case.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, have emerged as essential in managing hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. While effective, these inhibitors can cause rare dermatologic side effects, including vitiligo-like depigmentation. We report a rare case of a 52-year-old female with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who developed vitiligo-like depigmentation following palbociclib treatment. The patient presented with asymptomatic depigmented lesions on the lower limbs and abdomen, appearing seven months after starting palbociclib. Examination and investigations confirmed the diagnosis after excluding other potential causes. Despite treatment with topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, there was no significant improvement, highlighting the need for more research into effective management strategies for drug-induced vitiligo. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing rare dermatologic side effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors like palbociclib. Ongoing vigilance, reporting, and research are necessary to improve understanding and management of these side effects, ultimately enhancing patient care in oncology.

What are the needs in oral antitumor therapy? An analysis of patients' and practitioners' preferences.

Background: Since the European approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors in 2016, the treatment of patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has changed significantly. Compared with chemotherapy, endocrine-based therapy has different treatment regimens and is associated with new side effects. Oral therapy aims for optimal drug efficacy and long treatment times while maintaining maximum independence and quality of life resulting in the conservation of medical staff resources. Methods: A monocentric analysis of therapy preferences of practitioners (25 nurses and physicians) and patients (11 on endocrine monotherapy, 17 on endocrine-based therapy, and 14 on intravenous chemotherapy) was performed using specific questionnaires. Preferences were assessed using a four-point Likert scale or bidirectional response options. Results: All patients were highly supportive of oral therapy (mean agreement score on the Likert scale 1.3, p < 0.001 vs. all other options) and a consultation interval of 4 weeks (2.0, p = 0.015 vs. 3 weeks). Practitioners also preferred oral therapy (1.4) and visits every 4 weeks (1.6). In general, patients on oral therapies reported higher compatibility of their therapy with daily life than patients on chemotherapy (1.6 and 1.7 vs. 2.6, p = 0.006). Outpatient oncology is the main source of information for all patients, mainly in case of side effects (2.0) and open questions (1.8). Regarding oral antitumor therapy regimens, patients do not show a significant preference for a specific regimen, while practitioners prefer a continuous regimen (1.6) over a 21/7 regimen (21 days on and 7 days off therapy, 2.5). Patients are likely to accept mild side effects (e.g., neutropenia, diarrhea, polyneuropathy, fatigue) and would still adhere to their initial choice of regimen (continuous or 21/7). Only when side effects occur with a severity of CTCAE grade 3 do patients prefer the regimen in which the side effects occur for a shorter period of time. Conclusion: Patients and practitioners prefer oral antitumor therapy-both continuous and 21/7 regimens-over other application forms. Patient education and proper therapy management, supported by additional tools, contribute to the specific management of side effects and high adherence. This allows quality of life to be maintained during long-term therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Exploring the Clinical Impact of RANK Pathway Inhibition in Advanced Breast Cancer: Insights From a Retrospective Study on CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Antiresorptive Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) remains a significant health concern, particularly in advanced stages where the prognosis is poor. The combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has improved outcomes for advanced BC (aBC) patients. However, resistance to CDK4/6i remains a challenge, with no validated biomarkers to predict response. The receptor activator of the nuclear factor-kB (RANK) pathway has emerged as a key player in aBC, particularly in luminal BC. RANK overexpression has been associated with aggressive phenotypes and resistance to therapy. In view of these findings, we proceeded to investigate the potential involvement of the RANK pathway in luminal BC resistance to CDK4/6i. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of denosumab in increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 158 BC patients with bone metastases were included. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative and hormone receptor-positive BC who received palbociclib or ribociclib in addition to antiresorptive medication were included. Patients received either denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) therapy. The primary endpoint was OS, with PFS as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Although the PFS and OS of denosumab were better than ZA in this study, it did not show a significant difference between the two drugs. Meanwhile, mOS was not achievable in patients in the denosumab group, while it was 34.1 months in patients in the ZA group. The hazard ratio (HR) showed a significant improvement for the denosumab group in patients under 60 of age (HR: 0.33, p<0.01), patients with a score of 1 HER2 overexpression (HR: 0.09, p=0.01), and patients with resistant endocrine (HR: 0.42, p=0.02) compared to ZA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential clinical relevance of the RANK pathway in BC treatment, and our findings suggest that denosumab may offer significant benefits in terms of PFS and OS for certain subgroups, particularly those with HER2 scores of 1, patients under 60, and those with endocrine-resistant BC. In conclusion, considering that RANK pathway status may be a predictive biomarker for CDK4/6i treatment and may cause treatment resistance, our results demonstrate the clinical relevance of the combination of CDK4/6i + ET with RANKL inhibition.