A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting. METHODS: We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative). RESULTS: Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( - 16.7 vs - 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was - 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and - 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator's opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. METHODS: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). RESULTS: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)]. CONCLUSION: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Total Plasma Exchange in Neuromuscular Junction Disorders-A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy, Safety and Potential Diagnostic Properties in Doubtful Diagnosis.

Neuromuscular junction disorders (NJDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including myasthenia gravis (MG). In some cases, patients are present with myasthenic symptoms without evidence of autoimmune antibodies, making diagnosis challenging. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has proven efficacy in NJDs. The objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of TPE in NJD patients with questionable disease activity or uncertain diagnosis in order to assess the diagnostic potential of TPE. We report an observational, retrospective cohort study of clinical routine data. All the data were derived from the electronic medical records of the Department of Neurology at University Hospital Essen. We searched for patients with NJDs between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2021. Of the 303 patients who presented to the department with NJDs, 20 were treated with TPE; 9 patients did not show a measurable benefit from TPE (45%), 6 of whom were diagnosed with seronegative MG. Of these, 3 (50%) had long-standing ocular symptoms. There were decreases in the mean arterial pressure, hemoglobin, hematocrit and fibrinogen during treatment, which were not considered clinically relevant. In (seronegative) myasthenic patients, TPE may help to verify an uncertain diagnosis or to reveal possible muscle damage, allowing unnecessary therapy to be avoided.

Lymphoplasma Exchange Improves Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations: A Retrospective Study in a Chinese Center.

Background: Lymphoplasma exchange (LPE), a technique combining plasma exchange with leukapheresis, is emerging as promising treatment for autoimmune diseases. Data on the efficacy and safety of LPE in myasthenia gravis (MG) therapy are scarce. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively review the clinical efficacy, safety, and immunological characteristics of LPE therapy in MG patients. Study Design and Methods: A Chinese cohort of 276 generalized MG patients in state of exacerbation, including impeding crisis, myasthenia crisis, and preparation for thoracic exsection between January 2014 and December 2020, were evaluated in this study. Results: A total of 276 patients with a median age of 45.5 ± 16.7 years underwent a total of 635 LPE sessions. Clinical scales of Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores, Myasthenia Gravis Specific Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) scores, activities of daily living (ADL) scores, and quality of life (QOL) scores were improved during 4 weeks' follow-up. Adverse effects occurred in 20 out of 276 patients, with 14 patients having one adverse event each. Independent predictive factors for good response to LPE therapy were symptom onset before LPE therapy ≤3 days and age on LPE therapy <50 years of age. LPE decreased the serum levels of antibodies, immunoglobulins, and complements 4 weeks after the first replacement, with decreased levels of interleukin (IL)-17A and interferon (IFN)-γ and increased level of IL-10. Conclusion: LPE is an effective treatment for MG patients in state of exacerbation and preparation for thymectomy. Early use of LPE on early-onset MG may have good therapeutic effects. The potential mechanism for LPE is the polarization of cytokines from IL-17A, IFN-γ, into IL-10.

Association Between Clinical Factors and Result of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Myasthenia Gravis: A Single Center Experience and Systematic Review.

Background: Neurological immune-related adverse events (nirAEs) are rare toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). With the increase use of ICIs, incidence of nirAEs is growing, among which ICI related MG (irMG) is causing high fatality rate. Given the limited evidence, data from a large cohort of patients with irMG is needed to aid in recognition and management of this fatal complication. Objective: This study aimed to summarize clinical characteristics of irMG and explore predictors of irMG clinical outcome. Methods: We summarized our institution's patients who were diagnosed as irMG between Sep 2019 and Oct 2021. We systematically reviewed the literature through Oct 2021 to identify all similar reported patients who met inclusion criteria. As the control group, patients with idiopathic MG were used. We collected data on clinical features, management, and outcomes of both irMG and idioMG cases. Further statistical analysis was conducted. Results: Sixty three irMG patients and 380 idioMG patients were included in the final analysis. For irMG patients, six were from our institution while the rest 57 were from reported cases. The average age of irMG patients is 70.16 years old. Forty three were male. Average time from first ICI injection to symptom onset was 5.500 weeks. Eleven patients had a past history of MG. Higher MGFA classification and higher QMGS rates were observed in irMG patients compared to idioMG patients. For complication, more irMG patients had myositis or myocarditis overlapping compared to idioMG patients. The most commonly used treatment was corticosteroids for both idioMG and irMG. Twenty one patients (35%) with irMG had unfavorable disease outcome. Single variate and multivariate binary logistic regression proved that association with myocarditis, high MGFA classification or QMGS rates at first visit were negatively related to disease outcome in irMG patients. Conclusion: irMG is a life-threatening adverse event. irMG has unique clinical manifestations and clinical outcome compared to idioMG. When suspicious, early evaluation of MGFA classification, QMGS rates and myositis/myocarditis evaluation are recommended.

Evaluation of outcome measures for myasthenia gravis subgroups.

INTRODUCTION: Disease evaluation and long-term follow-up of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients rely on disease-specific measures. We evaluated four widely used MG-specific assessments, and compared the response to disease change in different MG subgroups. METHODS: We used the Cronbach's α coefficient to test reliability, Pearson correlation coefficients to test construct validity, as well as one-way ANOVA and independent-sample t-tests to access discriminant validity. Analyses of similar items between QMG and MG-ADL included paired-sample t-tests and mean score comparisons. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to describe the correlation between changes of QMG, MG-ADL, MG-QOL15r and MGC. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was performed to compare the outcomes. RESULTS: 872 MG patients were enrolled. QMG, MG-ADL, MG-QOL15r, and MGC all exhibited high reliability. All four scales displayed good discriminant validity according to the MGFA classification and MGC score. MG-ADL showed significant differences between patients grouped by age and gender, and MG-QOL15r showed significant differences between patients grouped by age. Analyses of similar items showed that MG-ADL achieved higher scores in bulbar items, whereas QMG produced higher scores in limb items. For patients in remission or minimal manifestation status, QMG exhibited significantly greater improvement than MG-QOL15r. In patients of MGFA I, II, III, and IV, QMG showed significantly greater improvement than MG-ADL. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported scale is an important supplement for a given period. MG-ADL has a better response to severe disease, and MG-QOL15r is more comprehensive for patients in remission or minimal manifestation status.

Correlation of Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living scales in the MGTX study.

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scales were compared using the data from the Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone Therapy (MGTX) study. METHODS: Correlation between QMG and MG-ADL raw and change-from-baseline scores was calculated every 3 months for 60 months based on treatment groups and minimal manifestation status (MMS). RESULTS: QMG and MG-ADL change-from-baseline scores correlated significantly, with increasing strength of correlation over time, in both treatment groups. QMG and MG-ADL raw scores correlated significantly in both treatment groups, with increasing correlation only in the prednisone-alone group. Correlation between raw scores was weaker in patients who were in MMS, demonstrating a "floor effect" on the MG-ADL scale. Raw QMG scores could be modeled assuming a normal distribution, whereas raw MG-ADL scores could not be modeled this way. DISCUSSION: The floor effect and skewed distribution of the MG-ADL measure should be taken into account in the design of myasthenia gravis clinical trials.

Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index: Sensitivity for Change in Generalized Muscle Weakness.

INTRODUCTION: The recently developed Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) is a promising measure as it has less floor effects and a higher relative efficiency in its responsiveness to treatment effect compared to other MG measures. This study aimed at validating the MGII in a Dutch cohort of MG patients and analyzing the sensitivity of MGII compared to MG-ADL for changes in generalized weakness. METHODS: We analyzed (generalized items of; -gen) MGII, quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), EQ-5D visual analog, Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) and ACTIVLIM (an ADL questionnaire focusing on generalized weakness) scores in a prospective cohort of 99 MG patients. We investigated correlations between MGII and other outcome measures. We used a generalized linear model to assess whether MGIIgen had an additional sensitivity on top of MG-ADLgen for changes (Δ) in QMGgen in individual patients. RESULTS: MGII had a lower floor effect (4%) compared to QMG (6%), MG-ADL (11%) and MGC (16%). MGII correlated well with QMG (r = 0.68), MG-ADL (r = 0.83) and MGC (r = 0.74). As expected, the correlations with EQ visual analog and ACTIVLIM were lower (r = - 0.57 and - 0.48). ΔMGIIgen had an additional value on top of ΔMG-ADLgen in the prediction of ΔQMGgen (B = 0.54, p = 0.01). DISCUSSION: The MGII score was cross-culturally validated in a Dutch cohort of MG patients. MGII had a higher sensitivity for generalized weakness than MG-ADL.

Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION: Eculizumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG; REGAIN; NCT01997229). We report an interim analysis of an open-label extension of REGAIN, evaluating eculizumab's long-term safety and efficacy. METHODS: Eculizumab (1,200 mg every 2 weeks for 22.7 months [median]) was administered to 117 patients. RESULTS: The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with REGAIN; no cases of meningococcal infection were reported during the interim analysis period. Myasthenia gravis exacerbation rate was reduced by 75% from the year before REGAIN (P < 0.0001). Improvements with eculizumab in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life in REGAIN were maintained through 3 years; 56% of patients achieved minimal manifestations or pharmacological remission. Patients who had received placebo during REGAIN experienced rapid and sustained improvements during open-label eculizumab (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: These findings provide evidence for the long-term safety and sustained efficacy of eculizumab for refractory gMG. Muscle Nerve 2019.

Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody Titers and Clinical Course after Influenza Vaccination in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (ProPATIent-Trial).

BACKGROUND: It is a continuous matter of discussion whether immune activation by vaccination in general and Influenza vaccination in particular increases the risk for clinical deterioration of autoimmune diseases. This prospective study investigated the serological and clinical course of autoimmune Myasthenia gravis (MG) after a seasonal influenza vaccination. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study enrolled MG patients with antibodies against acetylcholine-receptors (AChR-ab). They were allocated to receive seasonal influenza vaccine or placebo. The primary endpoint was the relative change of AChR-ab-titer over 12weeks. A relative increase of 20% was set as non-inferiority margin. Secondary endpoints were clinical changes in the modified Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMG), increase of anti-influenza-ELISA-antibodies, and changes of treatment. The study is registered with Clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT number 2006-004374-27. FINDINGS: 62 patients were included. Mean±standard deviation (median) in the vaccine and placebo group were AChR-ab-titer changes of -6.0%±23.3% (-4.0%) and -2.8%±22.0% (-0.5%) and QMG score changes of -0.08±0.27 (0.17) and 0.11±0.31 (0.00), respectively. The difference between groups (Hodges-Lehmann estimate with 95% CI) was - for the AChR-ab-titer change 4·0% [-13.3%, 4.5%] (p=0.28 for testing a difference, p<0.0001 for testing non-inferiority) and for the QMG change 0·00 [-0.17, 0.00] (p=0.79 for testing a difference). The occurrence of 74 adverse events (AE) was comparable between groups. The most common AE was flu-like symptoms. One serious AE (hospitalisation following gastrointestinal haemorrhage) in the verum group was not related to the vaccine. INTERPRETATION: Influenza vaccination in MG is safe. Uprating the potential risk of a severe course of MG exacerbation during influenza infection compared to the 95% CI differences for the endpoints, vaccination is principally indicated in this patient population.

[Clinical significance of serum resistin in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis].

Objective: To detect the serum resistin levels in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG) and evaluate the clinical values of resistin. Methods: We detected the serum resistin levels in 58 patients with GMG and 58 healthy controls (HC) from January 2013 to December 2015 in Tianjin medical university general hospital.Then we analyzed the correlation of the serum resistin levels with the clinical features. Results: The serum resistin levels in patients with GMG, (8.26±4.27) ng/ml, was significantly higher than in HC, (4.12±1.36) ng/ml, (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference of the serum resistin levels between female or male patients with GMG (P=0.589). The serum resistin levels in patients with GMG was positively correlated with the quantitative MG score for disease severity (QMG) (r=0.446, P<0.001), but not correlated with age (r=0.168, P=0.206). The patients with higher resistin levels took higher risk of combining with thymoma (P=0.002), 56.5%, and these patients had higher QMG, 11(5) (P=0.001); and the ratio and QMG in the patients with lower resistin levels were 17.1%, 7(5), respectively.The GMG patients with thymoma (TGMG+ ) had remarkably higher serum resistin levels, (10.7±5.3) ng/ml (P=0.010) and the QMG score, 11(5) (P<0.001) than the GMG patients without thymoma (TGMG-) with (7.0±3.1) ng/ml and 8(5). Conclusion: Resistin is probably associated with the severity of the disease of MG, and maybe a potential biomarker of MG combined with thymoma.

Leflunomide treatment in corticosteroid-dependent myasthenia gravis: an open-label pilot study.

Leflunomide is an effective drug used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Here we report the findings of an open-label pilot study, which found that leflunomide is also an effective treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). This study recruited 15 corticosteroid-dependent MG patients. For 6 months, leflunomide 20 mg was given to these patients daily along with prednisone. The quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) scores and MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) profiles were measured in these MG patients. After 6 months of treatment, 9 of the 15 patients enrolled in this study showed improvements in both QMG and MG-ADL. The mean QMG scores (13.4 to 8.5) and MG-ADL profiles (5.8 to 2.8) were significantly decreased (P = 0.01, 0.006 respectively). Furthermore, we found that the mean corticosteroid doses were reduced after treatment with leflunomide (24.3 to 12.3 mg per day). Leflunomide is a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment for corticosteroid-dependent MG, which may also enable lower doses of corticosteroids to be administered.

Two-year outcome of thymectomy with or without immunosuppressive treatment in nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis and its effect on regulatory T cells.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the autoimmune disorder in which the thymus is considered the pathogenic organ. Thymectomy (TE) is a therapeutic option for MG and often ameliorates clinical symptoms. METHODS: We evaluated clinical features and outcomes after TE in patients without thymoma and the influence of TE with or without concomitant immunotherapy on the CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cell subpopulation of lymphocytes in peripheral blood in defined followed groups of nonthymomatous MG patients. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with generalized MG who underwent transsternal TE were identified. Neurologic outcomes after TE were favorable for the majority of patients mainly from the group treated with corticosteroids or combined immunosuppressive treatment. TEs with immunosuppressive treatment in MG patients were associated with increased percentages of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells (p<0.001). No significant change in the postoperative levels of CD4(+)CD25(+) cells was observed in thymectomized patients who preoperatively only received pyridostigmine. Also their clinical response to TE after 2 years of follow-up was worst of all followed groups. CONCLUSIONS: The exact mechanism by which TE ameliorates symptoms of MG is yet not clear. These observations indicate that increased percentages of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in MG may be related to disease stability and that TE and synergistic effect with concomitant, continuing immunotherapy augmented the proportion of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. On the basis of our observations TE alone is not enough to increase the number of circulating CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells and to establish complete stable remission.

Does change in acetylcholine receptor antibody level correlate with clinical change in myasthenia gravis?

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to determine if change in acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-ab) levels reflects change in clinical severity in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS: We reviewed results from a prospective trial in MG and from all 85 patients in an MG Clinic who had AChR-ab determinations performed at least twice by the same commercial laboratory. RESULTS: Change in AChR-ab levels correlated only weakly with change in clinical severity. AChR-ab levels fell in 92% of patients who improved and in 63% who did not. A fall in AChR-ab level had a positive predictive value for clinical improvement of 83% and a negative predictive value of only 59%. CONCLUSIONS: AChR-ab levels fell in almost all patients who improved, but also in most patients who did not. Thus, we do not recommend commercially available AChR-ab levels as a biomarker of improvement in MG. However, antibody levels might be useful as a marker for inadequate immunotherapy.

Salbutamol therapy in congenital myasthenic syndrome due to DOK7 mutation.

INTRODUCTION: Salbutamol is a selective B2-adrenergic agonist, which has previously been described to be associated with partial improvement of myasthenia gravis and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS). In this study, we analyzed the effect of salbutamol in five patients with Dok-7 CMS. METHODS: We studied 5 patients (2 male and 3 female), with a mean age of 27±11.06 years, who harbored c.1124_1127dupTGCC, p.G64R and/or p.S45L mutations in DOK7 gene. Salbutamol was given at a dose of 2mg three times daily (6 mg/day) to all patients. The response was assessed by QMG score at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months; ADL-MG score and 6 minute walk test at baseline and after 12 months during follow-up clinic visits. Side effect profile of salbutamol was also evaluated. RESULTS: We noted an increasingly positive response as measured by the QMG score after 3 months of salbutamol treatment. Improvement in specific subcomponents of the QMG score such as leg outstretched in 45° supine was most marked. In ADL-MG scores and 6 minute walk test, comparison between baseline and after 12 months revealed a clear beneficial response. Salbutamol was well tolerated in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Salbutamol is an effective treatment in Dok-7 CMS. This study provides class IV evidence that salbutamol given at a dose 6 mg/day improves function as measured by the QMG score, ADL-MG score and 6 minute walk test.