Efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with secondary cytoreduction for platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, including fallopian tube and peritoneal origin, who underwent oxaliplatin-based HIPEC with secondary CRS, were enrolled. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included in the analysis. The mean PFS and OS were 20.4 months (95% CI 16.3-24.5 months) and 26.7 months (95% CI 23.7-29.7), respectively. Furthermore, the OS and PFS between platinum-sensitive and resistant recurrence showed no significant difference. Univariate and multivariate analysis of PFS identified a pre-operative peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score of ≥5 as a poor prognostic factor. Among them, the incidence of acute kidney injury was 9.0 % & none had grade ≧3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC with secondary CRS might provide a survival benefit for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with a decreased incidence of renal toxicity compared to cisplatin-based regimens. It might be effective and feasible in selected recurrent ovarian cancer patients, regardless of platinum-sensitive or resistant.

Past and present: a bibliometric study on the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a gynecological malignancy with a high mortality rate worldwide. The unfavorable prognosis of OC is mainly attributed to the recurrent propensity. Recently, mortality from OC has exhibited a downward trend. These favorable patterns are likely to be driven by advancements in novel therapeutic regimens. However, there is a lack of visualize analysis of the application of these new drugs on women with recurrent OC (ROC). Therefore, we aimed to provide a bibliometric analysis of the evolving paradigms in the ROC treatment. Methods: Documents on ROC treatment were systematically collected from the MEDLINE database and Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). The retrieved documents were exported in the plain text file format, and files were named and saved to the paths specified by the Java application. Microsoft Excel (version 2010), Citespace (6.2.R4) and VOSviewer (1.6.19) were used for data analysis, and included the following: 1) annual publication trend; 2) contributions of countries, institutions and authors; 3) co-citation of journals and references; and 4) co-occurrence of keywords. Results: A total of 914 documents published in the MEDLINE and 9,980 ones in WOSCC were retrieved. There has been an upward trend in the productivity of publications on ROC treatment on by years. The United States was the leading contributor in this field, and the University of Texas System stood out as the most productive institution. Giovanni Scambia and Maurie Markman were the research leaders in the field of ROC treatment. The journal Gynecologic Oncology had the highest citation frequency. The reference entitled with "Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer" got highest centrality of 0.14 in the co-citation network. Keyword analysis revealed that the focus of current ROC treatment was on platinum-based anticancer drugs, paclitaxel, angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). Conclusion: Scholars from a multitude of countries have been instrumental in the advancement of ROC treatment. The research hotspots and trend in the field of predominantly originated from leading international journals and specialized periodicals focused on gynecologic oncology. Maintenance therapy using AIs or (and) PARPis has emerged as a significant complement to platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with ROC.

TEDOVA: vaccine OSE2101 +/- pembrolizumab as maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of death from gynecological cancers worldwide. Platinum-based chemotherapy provides the cornerstone of the medical management. In first line and subsequent relapses, maintenance strategies are offered to prolong intervals between lines of chemotherapy. Current maintenance options involve bevacizumab and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, but these lines of therapy can only be used once in the disease course. Patients in first or second platinum sensitive relapse after poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors and bevacizumab represent an area of unmet medical need. This academic sponsored, international Phase II randomized trial is evaluating the combination of a therapeutic cancer vaccine (OSE2101) with anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) as maintenance therapy, in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrence regardless of number of prior lines and no progression after platinum-based chemotherapy.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04713514 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Ongoing Phase II study randomizing vaccine OSE2101 +/- Pembrolizumab vs supportive care as maintenance in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Efficacy and safety of VEGFR inhibitors for recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Aim: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRIs) have been common used for recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), but insufficient high-level evidence on verifying its efficacy and safety. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched under eight electronic databases. Stata 14.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were used for data analysis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE profiler. This systematic review (SR) was registered under INPLASY (INPLASY202120019). Conclusion: Totally 23 RCTs involving 2810 patients were included in this SR. Current evidence revealed that VEGFRIs had better efficacy, survival and quality of life in the treatment of ROC. Though VEGFRIs increase some drug-related adverse events (AEs), all the AEs could be manageable in the clinical practice.

The expression of VEGF/VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) in ovarian cancer (OC) tissue was found to be higher than in benign or normal ovarian tissue. Therefore angiogenesis inhibitors play an essential role in OC treatment. Many anti-angiogenic agents have been developed in recent years. The role of small-molecule inhibitors of VEGFRs for recurrent OC (ROC) has demonstrated significant antitumor efficacy. These drugs include Nintedanib, Axitinib, Pazopanib, Sorafenib, Vandetanib, Sunitinib, Cediranib, Ramucirumab and Apatinib, and more are in the way. However, insufficient high-level evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) focused on VEGFRIs for ROC. Therefore, we performed an SR to investigate the efficacy and safety of VEGFRIs for patients with ROC. This SR was registered under INPLASY (INPLASY202120019). Totally 23 RCTs involving 2810 patients were included in this SR. The results indicate that VEGFRIs have better efficacy and survival in the treatment of ROC. Though VEGFRIs increase some drug-related adverse events, all the adverse events could be manageable in clinical practice.

Combined aqupla, paclitaxel liposome, and docetaxel treatment: survival and biomarker outcomes in recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

As one lethal malignancy in women's reproductive systems, ovarian cancer (OC) is frequently detected at an advanced phase during diagnosis. when the disease has spread widely. The absence of obvious symptoms and powerful screening tools in the early stages makes treatment difficult and the prognosis poor. Despite the clinical remission that can be achieved in some patients after initial treatment, the recurrence rate is conspicuous, posing a considerable challenge in treating recurrent OC (ROC). In the retrospective analysis, we compared the effects of two treatment regimens, aqupla combined with paclitaxel liposome (NP group) versus aqupla combined with docetaxel (ND group), on survival and biomarkers in patients with ROC. The study included 121 OC patients, and clinical data were collected through an electronic medical record system, outpatient review records, and a follow-up record system. The results revealed a notably higher overall remission rate in the ND group than the NP group, but revealed no notable inter-group discrepancy in toxicities, implying that the aqupla combined with docetaxel regimen may be more effective in platinum-sensitive ROC patients. Additionally, post-treatment CA125 levels were lower in patients in the ND group, suggesting that the regimen may be more effective in reducing tumour load. Survival analysis further revealed that treatment regimen, FIGO stage, number of recurrent lesions, and pretreatment CA125 level were independent prognostic factors affecting patients' 5-year OS and PFS. Overall for ROC patients, especially platinum-sensitive patients, the aqupla in combination with docetaxel regimen provided an improved survival benefit with a comparable safety profile, highlighting the importance of individualised treatment strategies.

Exploring the Survival Determinants in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The Role of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) significantly challenges gynecological oncology due to its poor outcomes. This study assesses the impact of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on ROC survival rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conducted at the Medical University of Lublin from April 2011 to November 2022, this retrospective observational study involved 71 patients with histologically confirmed ROC who underwent CRS and subsequent HIPEC. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) was 41.1 months, with 3-year and 5-year survival rates post-treatment of 0.50 and 0.33, respectively. Patients undergoing radical surgery for primary ovarian cancer had a median OS of 61.9 months. The key survival-related factors included the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) score, AGO score, platinum sensitivity, and ECOG status. CONCLUSIONS: The key factors enhancing ROC patients' survival include radical surgery, optimal performance status, platinum sensitivity, a positive AGO score, and a lower PCI. This study highlights the predictive value of the platinum resistance and AGO score in patient outcomes, underlining their role in treatment planning. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these results and improve patient selection for this treatment approach.

Niraparib maintenance therapy using an individualised starting dose in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (NORA): final overall survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Niraparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC), regardless of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) status, in NORA. This analysis reports final data on overall survival (OS). Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial enrolled patients across 30 centres in China between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019 (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03705156). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, recurrent, (predominantly) high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma (no histological restrictions for those with gBRCAm) and had received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomised (2:1) to receive niraparib or placebo, with stratification by gBRCAm status, time to recurrence following penultimate platinum-based chemotherapy, and response to last platinum-based chemotherapy. Following a protocol amendment, the starting dose was individualised: 200 mg/day for patients with bodyweight <77 kg and/or platelet count <150 × 103/µL at baseline and 300 mg/day otherwise. OS was a secondary endpoint. Findings: Totally, 265 patients were randomised to receive niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88), and 249 (94.0%) received an individualised starting dose. As of 14 August 2023, median follow-up for OS was 57.9 months (IQR, 54.8-61.6). Median OS (95% CI) with niraparib versus placebo was 51.5 (41.4-58.9) versus 47.6 (33.3-not evaluable [NE]) months, with hazard ratio [HR] of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.60-1.23), in the overall population; 56.0 (36.1-NE) versus 47.6 (31.6-NE) months, with HR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.46-1.58), in patients with gBRCAm; and 46.5 (41.0-NE) versus 46.9 (31.8-NE) months, with HR of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.56-1.35), in those without. No new safety signals were identified, and myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia occurred in three (1.7%) niraparib-treated patients. Interpretation: Niraparib maintenance therapy with an individualised starting dose demonstrated a favourable OS trend versus placebo in PSROC patients, regardless of gBRCAm status. Funding: Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd; National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for "Significant New Drugs Development" in 2018, China [grant number 2018ZX09736019].

Efficacy and safety of niraparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Niraparib has been authorized for maintenance treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer after first-line treatment with platinum, in partial or complete response. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of maintenance niraparib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) patients in a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational unicentre study included women diagnosed with ovarian adenocarcinoma who received niraparib. Eligibility criteria encompassed women with PSROC, in response to platinum chemotherapy, and not previously treated with other PARPis. Data on demographics, comorbidities, BRCA mutation status, disease stage, treatment history and adverse events were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included, with a median age of 63.5 years. The majority of patients received niraparib at 200 mg/day based on Research on Adverse Drug Events and Report criteria. Median OS was 30 months (95% CI: 16.76-43.23), and median PFS was 8 months (95% CI: 2.48-13.52). Adverse effects were more frequent during the initial months of treatment, with most classified as CTCAE v5 grade 1-2. Dose reductions, interruption of treatment and discontinuations were observed due to haematologic toxicities primarily. CONCLUSION: This real-world study showed that maintenance niraparib in PSROC patients had effectiveness and safety profiles consistent with clinical trials and other observational studies. Median PFS and OS were comparable to previous reports, and most adverse events were manageable with dose modifications. The results support the use of niraparib as a maintenance therapy option in this patient population.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery and oncologic outcomes in the era of targeted maintenance therapy for recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncologic outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) before and after FDA approval of Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab maintenance therapies for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS-ROC). METHODS: Patients who underwent SCS for first recurrence of PS-ROC from 1/1/2013-1/1/2020 were identified. Exclusion criteria included prior chemotherapy for recurrence, bowel obstruction procedures, and palliative surgery. Data were dichotomized pre/post 1/2017, relative to FDA approval of PARPi and bevacizumab maintenance for ROC. Second progression-free survival (PFS2), the primary endpoint, was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 245 patients underwent SCS-131 (53%) pre- and 114 (47%) post-approval. Most patients had high-grade serous tumors (83% and 90%, respectively; p = 0.13). Deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 27% (32/120) and 28% (32/113) of tested patients, respectively (p = 0.88). Disease-free intervals pre- and post-approval were: 6-12 months, 16% and 18%; 12-30 months, 56% and 59%; and >30 months, 28% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.73). Overall, 85% and 86% of patients, respectively, achieved complete gross resection (CGR; p > 0.99). PARPi maintenance use increased from 3.8% to 27% (p < 0.001) following approval, and bevacizumab from 1.5% to 12% (p < 0.001). Median PFS2 was 19 and 20.1 months, respectively. In the post group, 1-year PFS2 rate was 84.5% (95% CI, 75.7-90.4%) for patients with CGR vs 56.2% (95% CI, 29.5-76.2%) for those with residual disease; 3-year PFS2 rates were 31.3% (95% CI, 21.6-41.4%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.1-32.8%), respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CGR during SCS is associated with improved PFS2 compared to suboptimal resection. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to elucidate the role of SCS as more therapeutics become available.

Pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A case series.

Introduction: Treatment for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is clinically challenging as response rates to traditional chemotherapy are low, and recurrence rates are high. Immunotherapy has shown promise for this ovarian cancer (OC) subtype, and tumor molecular testing allows for the identification of a patient population that might benefit most from this treatment. We describe the clinical course and somatic genomic testing of 4 patients who received pembrolizumab for recurrent OCCC concurrent with a combination of bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. Methods: All patients with OCCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) within a single health system between 2018 and 2023 (excluding those on clinical trials) were identified via retrospective chart review. Results: Four patients were included. The average age at diagnosis was 56.5 years, and the number of prior treatments ranged from 1 to 6. All patients received pembrolizumab combined with either bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. All patients (n = 3) who received pembrolizumab and bevacizumab experienced a partial response. Responses were durable, ranging from 6 to 15 months. Somatic genomic testing results demonstrated microsatellite stability and low tumor mutational burden in all patient tumors, and 3 had AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A gene (ARID1A) mutations. Notably, two patients had treatment-limiting toxicities, one with presumed immune-mediated grade 2 myocarditis, and another with grade 5 hepatitis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab, combined with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, is a promising treatment option for patients with recurrent OCCC, though careful risk assessment and counseling regarding toxicities is necessary to maximize the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen. Prospective studies are needed for validation.

A Survival Analysis of Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Relapse Type: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in Armenia.

BACKGROUND: Annually, approximately 200 new ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in Armenia, which is considered an upper-middle-income country. This study aimed to summarize the survival outcomes of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer in Armenia based on the type of recurrence, risk factors, and choice of systemic treatment. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 228 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer from three different institutions. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 55. The median follow-up times from relapse and primary diagnosis were 21 and 48 months, respectively. The incidence of platinum-sensitive relapse was 81.6% (186), while platinum-resistant relapse was observed in only 18.4% (42) of patients. The median post-progression survival of the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group was 54 vs. 25 months (p < 0.001), respectively, while the median survival after relapse was 25 vs. 13 months, respectively; three- and five-year post-progression survival rates in these groups were 31.2% vs. 23.8%, and 15.1% vs. 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, despite new therapeutic approaches, ovarian cancer continues to be one of the deadly malignant diseases affecting women, especially in developing countries with a lack of resources, where chemotherapy remains the primary available systemic treatment for the majority of patients. Low survival rates demonstrate the urgent need for more research focused on this group of patients with poor outcomes.

Paclitaxel as HIPEC-Drug after Surgical Cytoreduction for Ovarian Peritoneal Metastases: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial (HIPECOVA).

Multidisciplinary strategies have transformed the management of advanced ovarian cancer. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of paclitaxel in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following surgical cytoreduction for ovarian peritoneal metastases in a randomized phase III trial conducted between August 2012 and December 2019. Seventy-six patients were randomized to either the HIPEC or no HIPEC group. Although median values for the primary endpoints (recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS)) revealed superior outcomes for the HIPEC (RFS: 23 months, OS: 48 months) over the control group (RFS: 19 months, OS: 46 months), these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and p = 0.579). Notably, the HIPEC group demonstrated significantly higher 5-year OS and 3-year RFS rates (47.2% and 47.5%) compared to patients without HIPEC (34.5% and 21.3%). Stratification according to Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) showed improved OS and RFS for patients with lower PSDSS (I-II) in the HIPEC-treated group (p = 0.033 and p = 0.042, respectively). The Clavien-Dindo classification of adverse event grades revealed no significant differences between HIPEC and controls (p = 0.482). While overall results were not statistically significant, our long-term follow-up emphasized the potential benefit of HIPEC-associated cytoreduction with paclitaxel, particularly in selected ovarian cancer patients with lower PSDSS indices.

Cost-effectiveness and drug wastage of bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy (CT) and drug wastage in treating platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) was assessed. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of patients with PRrOC from a Taiwan healthcare prospective, extrapolated to two years based on data obtained from the JGOG3023 clinical trial. The primary outcomes of the model were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, using vials of bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevbiol) plus chemotherapy, the ICER was (new Taiwan dollar) NT$ 4,555,878 per QALY gained. The incremental cost savings of an incremental 2.02 QALYs were NT$ 1,605,828 if weight-based Bevbiol plus chemotherapy were used, but the ICER remained high at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. If the cost of Bevbiol were reduced to 50% per vial, adding it to CT would be cost-effective at an acceptable WTP threshold of NTD 2,994,200, with an ICER of NT$ 2,975,484. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab biosimilars in mg/kg dosage form with chemotherapy are still not cost-effective in Taiwan, but using weight-based dosing will reduce drug waste and save treatment costs.

The Poor Prognosis of Acquired Secondary Platinum Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate response to treatment and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients with acquired secondary platinum resistance (SPR) compared to patients with primary platinum resistance (PPR). METHODS: Patients were categorized as PPR (patients with disease recurrence occurring during or <6 months after completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy) and SPR (patients with previously platinum-sensitive disease that developed platinum resistance on subsequent treatments). Clinico-pathological variables and treatment outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients included in this study, 60 had PPR and 58 developed SPR. The SPR women had a significantly higher rate of optimal debulking during their upfront and interval operations, significantly lower CA-125 levels during their primary treatment, and a significantly higher complete and partial response rate to primary chemotherapy. Once platinum resistance appeared, no significant difference in survival was observed between the two groups. The median PFS was 2 months in the PPR group and 0.83 months in the SPR group (p = 0.085). Also, no significant difference was found in post-platinum-resistant relapse survival, with a median of 17.63 months in the PPR and 20.26 months in the SPR group (p = 0.515). CONCLUSIONS: Platinum resistance is an important prognostic factor in women with EOC. Patients with SPR acquire the same poor treatment outcome as with PPR. There is a great need for future research efforts to discover novel strategies and biological treatments to reverse resistance and improve survival.

Successful avatrombopag combined with cyclosporine treatment for carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/bevacizumab-induced acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia in a patient with recurrent ovarian cancer: case report.

Carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/bevacizumab is an accepted standard anti-cancer treatment option for recurrent ovarian cancer. However, the occurrence of adverse events associated with this therapeutic regimen limits its continued clinical use. Among these adverse events, acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare but often potentially life-threatening adverse effect, and is intolerant to multiple treatment approaches. We report, for the first time, the successful treatment using avatrombopag combined with cyclosporine in one case of carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/bevacizumab-induced acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, which was refractory or intolerant to glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, recombinant human thrombopoietin, androgen, and even thrombopoietin receptor receptor agonist eltrombopag and herombopag. To date, this case manifests as normal platelet counts that are independent of transfusion. Our findings suggest that this combination is a potential and valuable alternative in acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia.

Maintenance Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer after Second-Line Chemotherapy.

(1) Background: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of maintenance chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer after second-line chemotherapy. (2) Methods: A total of 72 patients from a single institute who had been diagnosed with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer and had experienced either complete or partial response after six cycles of second-line chemotherapy were divided into a standard group (n = 31) with six cycles or a maintenance group (n = 41) with more than six cycles. We then compared patient characteristics and survival outcomes between these two groups. (3) Results: In all patients, after primary management for the first recurrence, the maintenance group showed worse survival outcomes. Patients who had not undergone either surgery or radiotherapy were divided into complete response and partial response groups after six cycles of chemotherapy. In patients with partial response, maintenance chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.007), but no significant change in in OS. The median cycle number of maintenance chemotherapy was four. (4) Conclusions: Maintenance chemotherapy may still play an important role in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly in selected patient groups.

Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with BRCA mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on BRCA mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints. RESULTS: In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable. CONCLUSION: All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women. REGISTRATION: CRD42021288932.

Results of a Phase Ib Study Investigating Durvalumab in Combination with Eribulin in Patients with HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The release of tumor-associated antigens with cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment may enhance the response to immune checkpoint blockade. Eribulin is a microtubule inhibitor with proven overall survival (OS) benefit in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which may also enhance intratumoral vascular remodeling. Durvalumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) receptor. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of eribulin in combination with durvalumab, as well as the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination in patients with previously treated HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC and recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 patients with HER2- MBC and ROC were treated in a modified 3+3 design. Eligible patients received escalating doses of eribulin (1.1 mg/m2 or 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and day 8) with durvalumab (1.12 g IV on day 1) in 21-day cycles until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), intolerable adverse events (AEs), disease progression, or other reasons for withdrawal. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: the rate of DLTs during cycles 1 and 2 of therapy. Secondary endpoints: AE rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. RESULTS: Nine patients with a median of 4 prior therapies for advanced disease were treated: 5 patients with HER2- MBC (1 with triple-negative disease and 4 with hormone-positive disease) and 4 patients with ROC. The RP2D of eribulin was 1.4 mg/m2 in combination with durvalumab. There were no DLTs experienced during the first two cycles of therapy. The most common treatment-related AEs (>50%) were fatigue, neutropenia, decreased white blood cell count, anemia, AST and alkaline phosphatase elevation, hyperglycemia, and nausea; most were grade 1 or 2. There was one immune-related AE of grade 3 (hepatitis) after 5 cycles of treatment, for which patient came off study. Two other patients discontinued study drug related to toxicity (neutropenia [n = 1], hepatic toxicity [n = 1]). ORR was 55%, and 4 additional patients experienced stable disease. All MBC patients exhibited a response to therapy. Median PFS was 6.2 months. Median OS was 15.0 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of eribulin at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 with standard dose durvalumab had a favorable AE profile in patients with previously treated HER2- MBC and ROC. The early antitumor activity observed in all MBC patients enrolled in the study suggests that further investigation of this combination is warranted.

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: 18 years of experience.

AIM: To identify the clinical and pathological factors associated with relapse in women who had undergone secondary cytoreductive surgery due to locally advanced recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Women with locally advanced recurrent ovarian cancer who had undergone cytoreduction between 2000 and 2018 were included in this study. Demographic, clinical and biochemical intraoperative findings were recorded for each woman. All factors were assessed in order to identify which correlated with the outcomes of interest (i.e. disease relapse, mortality and morbidity). RESULTS: In total, 181 women who had undergone secondary cytoreduction were analysed. The hospital mortality rate was 1.7 % (n = 3) and the morbidity rate was 32.1 % (n = 58). Recurrence was recorded in 101 (55.8 %) women. Infiltration of large bowel lymph nodes was a negative prognostic indicator of morbidity (p = 0.029). A prior surgical score of 1 (PSS-1) [odds ratio (OR) 0.465] and complete cytoreduction (OR 0.518) were found to be significant independent predictors for disease relapse. Median overall survival was greater for patients with PSS-1 (151.3 vs 59.4 vs 44.1 months; p = 0.049) and patients with complete cytoreduction (137.6 vs 36.2 vs 10.0 vs 27.4 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Complete cytoreduction and PSS-1 are associated with reduced disease relapse and increased overall survival. Infiltration of large bowel lymph nodes is associated with increased morbidity.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of apatinib combined with adriamycin for second-line treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apatinib combined with adriamycin in the second-line chemotherapy of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer （OC） from the perspective of the health system in China. METHODS A three-state partitioned survival model was constructed based on the APPROVE clinical trial and related literature data， with a model simulation time frame of 10 years and a 4-week cycle， and both cost and utility values were discounted using a 5% discount rate. Cost and quality-adjusted life years （QALYs） were used as a model output indicator and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio （ICER） was calculated to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apatinib combined with adriamycin versus adriamycin chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent OC. One-way sensitivity analysis， probability sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were used to verify the robustness of the base-case analysis results. RESULTS The results of base-case analysis indicated that compared with chemotherapy alone， ICER of patients receiving apatinib combined with adriamycin was 124 678.25 yuan/QALY， which was less than willingness-to-pay （WTP） threshold set in this study [3 times per capita gross domestic product （GDP） of China in 2022 （257 094 yuan）]. The results of scenario analysis showed that， with the extension of the simulation time limit， the ICER of apatinib combined with adriamycin was gradually reduced， and the decline was gradually reduced， but both were less than WTP threshold. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis showed that the factors that had the greatest impact on ICER were the utility value of progression， body surface area， discount rate，and the cost of best supportive treatment， etc. The results of probability sensitivity analysis showed that under WTP threshold set in this study， the economic probability of apatinib combined with adriamycin was about 99%. CONCLUSIONS From the perspective of China’s health system， using three times the per capita GDP in 2022 as the WTP threshold， the combination of apatinib and adriamycin is more cost-effective than adriamycin alone in second-line chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent OC.