Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.

INTRODUCTION: Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration. METHODS: SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268.

Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patient subgroups by baseline hemoglobin levels in the SIMPLIFY-1 trial.

A key hallmark of myelofibrosis is anemia, which ranges from mild to severe based on hemoglobin levels. To more clearly define outcomes with the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib by anemia severity, we performed a descriptive post hoc exploratory analysis of the double-blind, randomized, phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 study (NCT01969838; N = 432, JAK inhibitor naive, momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib); subgroups were defined by baseline hemoglobin: <10 (moderate/severe), ≥10 to <12 (mild), or ≥12 g/dL (nonanemic). Spleen and symptom results were generally consistent with those previously reported for the intent-to-treat population. In anemic subgroups, momelotinib was associated with higher rates of transfusion independence and reduced/stable transfusion intensity vs. ruxolitinib. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified. Overall, momelotinib provides spleen, symptom, and anemia benefits to JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis regardless of baseline hemoglobin level, and greater anemia-related benefits vs. ruxolitinib in patients with hemoglobin <12 g/dL.

Anemia-related response end points in myelofibrosis clinical trials: current trends and need for renewed consensus.

JAK inhibitors are the current standard of care in myelofibrosis, but many do not address and may worsen anemia; thus, anemia-related responses have traditionally been overlooked as efficacy end points in pivotal clinical trials, leading to a lack of consistency and analytic detail in their reporting. Here we apply our experiences in the phase III trials of momelotinib, a JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor and the first therapy indicated by the US FDA for myelofibrosis patients with anemia, to highlight how application of different criteria impacts the anemia-related benefits reported for any potential treatment in myelofibrosis. We advocate for a convention of a new expert consensus panel to bring consistency and transparency to the definition of anemia-related response in myelofibrosis.

What is this Perspective about? Anemia (too few healthy red blood cells) is common in patients with myelofibrosis. While it is becoming more common to measure the anemia benefits associated with potential treatments for myelofibrosis in clinical trials, different definitions of anemia benefit are available. This Perspective reviews these definitions, the differences between them, and why consistency and clarity in measuring anemia benefit matter. The definitions used in clinical trials of momelotinib, a treatment for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia, are also explained to show how the anemia benefit observed in these trials could have changed if different definitions were used. What does this Perspective show? Definitions of anemia benefit may include the number of red blood cell transfusions a patient receives, the amount of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) in their blood, or a combination thereof. Considerations such as timing, the types of patients included, and other factors are not consistent across definitions and not always clearly reported. Results when different definitions of anemia benefit were followed in the momelotinib clinical trials show that the amount of benefit observed with treatments changes depending on which definition is used. What conclusions can be drawn from this Perspective? More consistency and clarity in the definitions of anemia benefit in myelofibrosis clinical trials are needed, suggesting that a new panel of experts should come together to discuss this topic.

Transfusion Burden in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation over Time: Experience from a Single Institution.

INTRODUCTION: Transfusion plays a main role in supportive treatment for patients who receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, we compare the transfusion requirements of patients undergoing different modalities of HSCT according to different time periods. The objective is to assess the evolution of HSCT transfusion requirements over time, from a single institution. METHODS: The clinical charts and transfusion records of patients who underwent HSCT of different modalities at La Fe University Hospital during a twelve-year period were reviewed (2009-2020). For analysis, we divided the overall time into three periods: 1 from 2009 to 2012, 2 from 2013 to 2016 and 3 from 2017 to 2020. The study included 855 consecutive adult HSCT: 358 HLA-matched related donors (MRD), 134 HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD), 223 umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and 140 haploidentical transplants (Haplo-HSCT). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in RBC and PLT requirements or transfusion independence among the three time periods for MUD and Haplo-HSCT. However, the transfusion burden increased significantly for MRD HSCT during the 2017-2020 period. CONCLUSION: despite HSCT modalities having evolved and changed over time, overall transfusion requirements have not significantly decreased and continue to be a cornerstone of transplantation-supportive care.

Improved benefit of continuing luspatercept therapy: sub-analysis of patients with lower-risk MDS in the MEDALIST study.

Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) is an important goal in treating lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts. In the phase 3 MEDALIST study, RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks was achieved by significantly more luspatercept- versus placebo-treated patients in the first 24 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated RBC transfusion units and visits based on patients' baseline transfusion burden level and the clinical benefit of luspatercept treatment beyond week 25 in initial luspatercept nonresponders (patients who did not achieve RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks by week 25) but continued luspatercept up to 144 weeks. RBC transfusion burden, erythroid response, serum ferritin levels, and hemoglobin levels relative to baseline were evaluated. Through week 25, fewer RBC transfusion units and visits were observed in luspatercept-treated patients versus placebo, regardless of baseline transfusion burden. This continued through 144 weeks of luspatercept treatment, particularly in patients with low baseline transfusion burden. Sixty-eight patients were initial nonresponders at week 25 but continued treatment; most (81%) received the maximum dose of luspatercept (1.75 mg/kg). Sixteen percent achieved RBC-TI for ≥ 8 weeks during weeks 25-48, 26% had reduced RBC transfusion burden, 10% achieved an erythroid response, 44% had reduced serum ferritin, and hemoglobin levels increased an average of 1.3 g/dL from baseline. These data have implications for clinical practice, as transfusion units and visits are less in luspatercept-treated patients through week 25 regardless of baseline transfusion burden, and continuing luspatercept beyond week 25 can potentially provide additional clinical benefits for initial nonresponders. Trial registration: NCT02631070.

Transfusion Independence Achieved with Combination Fedratinib and Luspatercept in an Elderly Man with Heavily Pretreated Intermediate-2 Risk Primary Myelofibrosis.

Myelofibrosis (MF)-associated anemia and transfusion dependency are associated with inferior quality of life and poor prognosis. JAK2 inhibitors and TGF-ß superfamily ligand traps are being explored as treatment options for MF-associated anemia. Here, we present the case of a 66-year-old man with heavily pretreated intermediate-2 (INT-2) risk primary MF who had an exceptional response to combination fedratinib and luspatercept therapy. He achieved transfusion independence and experienced a reduction in spleen size from 20 cm to 12 cm, with remarkable improvement in performance status. Compared with other JAK inhibitors, the mechanism of action of fedratinib may explain its milder effect on anemia. It is possible that the addition of luspatercept may result in an additive or synergistic effect of one or both medications. Although the exact biological pathways have not yet been elucidated, combination fedratinib and luspatercept nevertheless is a promising therapy for anemia in patients with transfusion-dependent INT-2 risk MF.

Impact of Donor-to-Recipient ABO Mismatch on Outcomes of Antithymocyte Globulin-Based Peripheral Blood Stem Cell-Derived Myeloablative Conditioning Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation.

ABO incompatibility is common in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the impact of donor-recipient ABO compatibility on transplantation outcomes in different HSCT settings is controversial. Moreover, haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-derived grafts has not been well investigated. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of ABO incompatibility on post-transplantation outcomes, engraftment kinetics, blood product requirements, transfusion independence, and the incidence of poor graft function (PGF) in antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based haplo-SCT with PBSC grafts during long-term follow-up. We prospectively evaluated 510 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent haplo-SCT after myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were nonrelapse mortality (NRM), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, blood transfusion requirements, transfusion independence, and the incidence of PGF. There was no significant association between ABO matching and OS, disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, NRM, grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade III-IV acute GVHD, and moderate and severe chronic GVHD. There were also no significant differences in neutrophil and platelet engraftment, blood transfusion independence, and transfusion requirements at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days post-transplantation among patients with ABO matching and those with minor, major, or bidirectional ABO incompatibility. Donor-recipient ABO matching did not differ significantly according to graft function (good versus poor). ABO incompatibility status has no major impact on patient outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing ATG-based MAC haplo-SCT with PBSC-derived grafts.

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive treatment: a real-life multicenter experience.

The addition of venetoclax to hypomethylating agents (HMA-V) improved the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive treatment. The aim of our study was to confirm data reported in literature, in a real-life multicenter experience. We retrospectively evaluated 56 naïve AML patients who received HMA-V at 8 different collaborating Hematology Units in the North-East of Italy, from September 2018 to October 2020. Patients received azacitidine or decitabine at standard dose, adding venetoclax starting from cycle 1-3. The median time-to-response was 2 cycles and composite complete remission rate (CCR) was 67.9%. Thirteen out of 38 responders (34.2%) relapsed, with a median response duration of 13.7 months. Transfusion independence (TI) was obtained in 27 (87.0%) and 28 (90.3%) out of 31 patients for red blood cells and platelets, respectively. Median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-16.5), and median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-17.9). Cytogenetic risk was the only variable impacting on survival, while no differences were observed stratifying patients by age, bone marrow blasts, WHO classification or type of HMA. In conclusion, our real-life multicenter experience indicates that HMA-V treatment allows achieving good response rates in naïve AML patients, ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia.

The suite of marked anemia benefits that momelotinib has consistently conferred on myelofibrosis (MF) patients stem from its unique inhibitory activity on the BMP6/ACVR1/SMAD and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathways, resulting in decreased hepcidin (master iron regulator) expression, higher serum iron and hemoglobin levels, and restored erythropoiesis. Clinical data on momelotinib from the phase 2 and the two phase 3 SIMPLIFY trials consistently demonstrated high rates of sustained transfusion-independence. In a recent phase 2 translational study, 41% of the patients achieved transfusion independence for ≥ 12 weeks. In the phase 3 trials SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2, 17% more JAK inhibitor-naïve patients and two-fold more JAK inhibitor-treated patients achieved or maintained transfusion independence with momelotinib versus ruxolitinib and best available therapy (89% ruxolitinib), respectively. Anemia is present in approximately a third of MF patients at diagnosis, eventually developing in nearly all patients. The need for red blood cell transfusions is an independent adverse risk factor for both overall survival and leukemic transformation. Presently, FDA-approved medications to address anemia are lacking. Momelotinib is one of the prime candidates to durably address the critical unmet needs of MF patients with moderate/severe anemia. Importantly, momelotinib may have overall survival benefits in frontline and second-line MF patients. MOMENTUM is an international registration-track phase 3 trial further assessing momelotinib's unique constellation of anemia and other benefits in second-line MF patients; the results of the MOMENTUM trial are keenly awaited and may lead to regulatory approval of momelotinib.

Transfusion burden following reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Impact of donor type.

BACKGROUND: Transfusions are essential for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), yet they are influenced by graft, donor, and other factors. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed transfusions in 165 adult reduced intensity HCTs (2016-2019): HLA matched sibling donor (MSD) (n = 59), matched URD (n = 25), UCB (n = 33), and haploidentical (haplo, n = 48) detailing the cumulative incidence of platelet and RBC transfusion independence, total transfusions (day-10 to day+100) plus transfusion densities (per week) over 110 days. RESULTS: Platelet recovery to 20 × 109 /L by 6 months occurred in 39/48 (81.25%) haplo recipients (median 33 [range, 0-139]) days vs. 58/59 (98.3%) MSD (median 10 [0-37]), 21/25 (84%) matched URD (median 20 [0-153]), and 29/33 (87.87%) UCB (median 48 [29-166]) days, p < .01. Regression analysis demonstrated a lower likelihood of prompt platelet recovery in matched URD, UCB, or haplo HCTs vs. MSD. Recovery to platelet independence was quickest in MSD (median 8 days [range 0-94]), vs. URD (median 16 days [0-99]), UCB (median 57 [0-94]), or haplo (median 45 [12-97]) days, p < .01. Platelet needs were unaffected by age, conditioning, or acute GVHD. RBC transfusion independence was achieved in 78% of MSD, 64% URD, and 82% UCB, though less frequent (58%) and slowest in haplo recipients, p < .01. All haplo and UCB recipients required platelet transfusions vs. only 51% of MSD and 76% of URD. RBC needs were highest in UCB and haplo HCTs. DISCUSSION: The transplant donor influences the transfusion burden with greater platelet and RBC needs in haplo and UCB HCT which directly contributes to increased cost of care.

Effect of donor type on volume of blood transfusions required after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We reviewed blood product use in 729 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients at our center to assess the volume of red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets required after allo-HCT. The median number of bags required by day 30 was 4 for RBCs (range 0-22) and 9.5 for platelets (0-53). Multivariate analysis showed that related peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) required a significantly lower RBC transfusion volume by day 30 compared to unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UBMT). PBSCT from haplo-identical related donors and cord blood transplantation (CBT) required a significantly greater RBC transfusion volume. For platelet transfusion, related and unrelated PBSCT required a significantly lower volume than UBMT, and CBT a greater volume. Other factors independently associated with greater RBC transfusion volume were male sex, disease status other than complete remission, and major ABO mismatch. For platelet transfusion, these were male sex, disease status, and HCT-specific comorbidity index of 1. Although the burden of blood transfusions may not be the most important factor when choosing a donor type, our findings may provide a foundation for nationwide strategies to prepare blood products and inform aspects of national healthcare expenditures.

Thalidomide in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent E-Beta Thalassemia Refractory to Hydroxyurea: A Single-Center Experience.

Transfusion-dependent E-Beta (EB) thalassemia is one of the major causes of hereditary hemoglobinopathies in India. Hydroxyurea has been tried for HbF induction and amelioration of the transfusion frequency in EB thalassemia. The primary objective of this retrospective study, conducted between January 2017 and December 2018, was to determine the efficacy of thalidomide in reducing transfusion frequency in patients with EB thalassemia who have failed a reasonable trial of hydroxyurea. Of the 21 patients studied, 15 (71.4%) attained transfusion independence (complete responders) and 1 (4.7%) attained partial response (50% decrease in transfusion requirement) while 5 (23.9%) were non-responders. 12 patients attained their response within 1 month, 2 patients achieved within 1-3 months, and 1 patient beyond 3 months. Median time to transfusion independence in complete responders was 1 month. The median time on thalidomide for the complete responders and partial responders was 16.48 months. No major grade 3/4 toxicities were documented. This approach needs larger randomised controlled studies. Thalidomide is a safe and effective strategy at reducing or abrogating transfusion requirement in patients with EB thalassemia. This approach requires further testing in systematic clinical trials.

Treatment patterns and comparative analysis of non-intensive regimens in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients-a real-world experience from India.

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia have a poor prognosis. Data from developing countries is sparse in the literature. In this retrospective study, 402 patients aged ≥ 60 years, diagnosed between Jan 2013 and Dec 2017, were analyzed for treatment patterns and survival. Median age of the whole cohort was 68 years (range 61-84). A total of 213 patients (53.3%) refused care; 188 patients (46.7%) received either BSC, LDAC, or HMA. Survival (in months) was 3.9, 6.4, and 1.2 with LDAC, HMA, and BSC, respectively. One-year survival was 17.2% and 6% with HMA and LDAC, respectively (P = 0.02). Overall response rate (ORR) did not differ between HMA and LDAC group (p = 0.12). HMA cohort had higher complete responses (20.6% vs 7.4%, p = 0.02), stable disease (32.7% vs 13.5%, p = 0.02), and transfusion independence (TI) (46.5% vs 22.2%, p = 0.01). Survival did not differ between the groups if the patients achieved ORR (12.3 vs 9.8 p = 0.2) or TI (11.6 vs 6.4 p = 0.2). Stable disease with HMA led to longer survival (8.1 vs 5.3 p = 0.01). HMAs were more effective than LDAC irrespective of cytogenetic risk category and blasts, of note HMAs improved survival of poor risk patients (5.6 vs 2.9 p = 0.004). HMA treatment (HR = 0.48; 95% 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004) and transfusion independence (HR = 0.2; 95% 0.1-0.3, p = 0.0001) predicted survival in multivariate analysis. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were frequent in HMA. Thrombocytopenia was the common adverse event with LDAC. Novel and cost-effective drugs are essential to improve the prognosis of these patients.

[Transfusion independence achieved with pomalidomide therapy in a patient with primary myelofibrosis].

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is commonly associated with anemia. IMiD® immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide and lenalidomide have been shown to be effective in improving anemia associated with PMF. However, because of adverse events, their use has been restricted. Herein we report the case of a 67-year-old male patient with transfusion-dependent PMF treated with the immunomodulatory drug pomalidomide in a clinical trial. Significant improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed with pomalidomide, and the patient recovered from transfusion dependence for 8 months. Although phase 3 trial failed to show the superiority of pomalidomide over placebo, pomalidomide may have some benefit in selected patients with transfusion-dependent PMF.

The Effect of Lenalidomide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Lower-Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results From the MDS-005 Study.

BACKGROUND: The phase III MDS-005 study compared lenalidomide versus placebo in red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) patients with lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), ineligible/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Lenalidomide-treated patients were more likely to achieve transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks (26.9% vs. 2.5%; P < .001) and hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL (19.4% vs. 2.5%) versus placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to oral lenalidomide 10 mg once daily or placebo once daily (both on 28-day cycles). Patients with creatinine clearance 40 to 60 mL/min were given lenalidomide 5 mg once daily. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a predefined secondary end point, was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 questionnaire at baseline, week 12, week 24, every 12 weeks thereafter, and at discontinuation. RESULTS: At week 24, lenalidomide was associated with benefit versus placebo across all 5 preselected questionnaire scales (fatigue, dyspnea, global quality of life, physical functioning, and emotional functioning). After adjustment for baseline scores, only emotional functioning achieved significance (P = .047). Further improvement versus baseline was observed for patients who continued lenalidomide after week 24. In post hoc analyses, achievement of TI ≥ 8 weeks was associated with significant improvements across all scales (P < .01); an increase in hemoglobin level correlated with significant improvements in all scales at week 24, except emotional functioning (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide did not adversely affect HRQoL in RBC-TD patients with lower-risk non-del(5q) MDS and response to lenalidomide was associated with significant improvements in HRQoL.

Patterns of treatment and costs associated with transfusion burden in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Transfusion dependence (TD) among myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients negatively impacts survival and health-related quality of life. We evaluated cost patterns of MDS care during TD and transfusion independence (TI). MDS patients were identified from a US claims database (2008-2013). TD was defined as ≥2 consecutive 8-week periods with ≥1 claim during each, and no interim 56-day period without transfusion; TI as 8 subsequent transfusion-free weeks; and transfusion frequency as the mean interval between transfusions during the TD period. 13,741 patients were included; 19% were TD and 70% had a mean interval between transfusions of ≤28 days. During a 2-year period, TD patients incurred a mean total cost of $17,815/patient-month; 53% higher for those with ≤28 days ($19,498) vs. >28 days ($12,717) between transfusions. Among patients who achieved TI, mean total cost was $7874/patient-month. For TD-MDS patients, cost increases are proportional to transfusion frequency and achieving TI yields economic benefits.

Lenalidomide in patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndrome and del(5q): a single-centre "real-world" experience.

"Real life" data are needed to complement published trials on the efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and del(5q) and on the risk of inducing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression. Here, we present results of lenalidomide treatment in a consecutive, population-based series of 21 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Of 18 evaluable patients (median follow-up: 22 months), 17 achieved an erythroid hematologic response (HI-E) and 16 an RBC transfusion independence. Cytogenetic response (CyR) rate was 80%, median overall survival was 48 months (range 3-164), and 5-year leukemia-free survival was 84%. Three patients progressed to AML; one, with baseline TP53 mutation, achieved HI-E, partial CyR, and did not progress to AML. Eighteen patients experienced hematological adverse events. Overall, lenalidomide was very effective and well tolerated even in unselected elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and did not appear to increase the risk of AML.

Transfusion-independent ß(0)-thalassemia after bone marrow transplantation failure: proposed involvement of high parental HbF and an epigenetic mechanism.

Currently, bone marrow transplantation is the only curative treatment for ß-thalassemia and sickle cell disease. In rare cases, sustained and full fetal hemoglobin production was observed in patients after failure of bone marrow transplantation. This rendered the patients transfusion-free, despite genetic disease and transplant rejection. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unexplored. We have studied a trio (father-mother-child) in which the affected child became transfusion-independent after rejection of an allogeneic bone marrow graft. Remarkably, we found that his non-thalassemic mother also expressed unusually high levels of γ-globin. High HbF in one of the parents may therefore be of prognostic value in these rare cases. Genotyping of the HBB locus and the HbF quantitative trait loci HBS1L-MYB, KLF1 and BCL11A, and protein expression analysis of KLF1 and BCL11A, failed to explain the increased HbF levels, indicating that an as yet unidentified HbF modifier locus may be involved. We hypothesize that epigenetic events brought about by the transplantation procedure allow therapeutic levels of HbF expression in the child. Potential implications of our observations for reactivation of γ-globin expression and interpretation of the French globin gene therapy case are discussed.

Outcomes in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with Low-/Intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion 5q treated with lenalidomide: a subset analysis from the MDS-004 study.

OBJECTIVE: A subset analysis of the randomised, phase 3, MDS-004 study to evaluate outcomes in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)-defined Low-/Intermediate (Int)-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with isolated del(5q). METHODS: Patients received lenalidomide 10 mg/d (days 1-21; n = 47) or 5 mg/d (days 1-28; n = 43) on 28-d cycles or placebo (n = 45). From the placebo and lenalidomide 5 mg groups, 84% and 58% of patients, respectively, crossed over to lenalidomide 5 or 10 mg at 16 wk, respectively. RESULTS: Rates of red blood cell-transfusion independence (RBC-TI) ≥182 d were higher in the lenalidomide 10 mg (57.4%; P < 0.0001) and 5 mg (37.2%; P = 0.0001) groups vs. placebo (2.2%). Cytogenetic response rates (major + minor responses) were 56.8% (P < 0.0001), 23.1% (P = 0.0299) and 0%, respectively. Two-year cumulative risk of acute myeloid leukaemia progression was 12.6%, 17.4% and 16.7% in the lenalidomide 10 mg, 5 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. In a 6-month landmark analysis, overall survival was longer in lenalidomide-treated patients with RBC-TI ≥182 d vs. non-responders (P = 0.0072). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the clinical benefits and acceptable safety profile of lenalidomide in transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS-defined Low-/Int-1-risk MDS with isolated del(5q).