Contextos de saúde e trabalho de profissionais de enfermagem em tempos de pandemia de COVID-19 / Health and work contexts of nursing professionals during the pandemic of COVID-19 / Contextos de salud y trabajo de profesionales de enfermería en tiempos de pandemia por COVID-19

Introdução: Ao desempenhar e promover práticas que visam a melhoria da saúde, a equipe de enfermagem se assumiu como protagonista e linha de frente em tempos de pandemia de COVID-19. Logo, fica evidente a exposição pessoal-profissional-familiar; a carência de pessoal e a insegurança laboral-emocional, além das consequências que vão recair sobre os contextos de saúde e de trabalho destes profissionais. Objetivo: Analisar os contextos de saúde e trabalho de profissionais de enfermagem durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Metodologia: Estudo de método misto, combinando as abordagens por meio da estratégia de incorporação concomitante - QUAN(qual), realizado em Minas Gerais, Brasil, entre agosto e dezembro de 2020. Aplicou-se, via ligação telefônica, um roteiro de perguntas a 58 profissionais enfermeiros, técnicos e auxiliares de enfermagem. O roteiro continha perguntas abertas e fechadas ligadas a questões sociodemográficas e aos contextos e condições de saúde, trabalho e COVID-19. Realizou-se análise quantitativa descritiva e Análise de Conteúdo Temática. Resultados: A maioria mulheres (93,1%) técnicas de enfermagem (69%). 39,7% trabalhavam em plantão noturno; 58,6% relataram terem sofrido violências no trabalho e 48,3% relataram diagnósticos de transtorno mental. Os contextos de trabalho na pandemia evidenciaram necessidade de estímulos e valorização profissional e relações com fatores institucionais, a dinâmica e organização do trabalho, condições adequadas de trabalho e ao favorável relacionamento interpessoal, enquanto que contextos de saúde evidenciaram relação com interesses, oportunidades, rotina, normalidade, esperança e tenacidade que seriam trazidos pelo fim da COVID-19. Conclusão: A pandemia de COVID-19 fortaleceu um contexto de saúde e de trabalho crítico, amedrontado e inseguro da equipe de Enfermagem brasileira, exacerbando a necessidade de providências, ações e políticas que considerem a Saúde do Trabalhador como estruturantes para a organização dos serviços.

Introducción: Al realizar y promover prácticas que tienen como objetivo la mejora de la salud, el equipo de enfermería asumió el protagonismo en los tiempos de la pandemia por COVID-19. Por tanto, es evidente la exposición personal-profesional-familiar, la falta de personal y la inseguridad laboral-emocional, además de las consecuencias que recaerán sobre la salud y los contextos laborales de este grupo profesional. Objetivo: Analizar el contexto sanitario y laboral de profesionales de enfermería durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Metodología: Estudio de método mixto, combinando los abordajes a través de la estrategia de incorporación concomitante - QUAN(qual), realizado en Minas Gerais, Brasil, entre agosto y diciembre de 2020. Se aplicó un guion de preguntas, mediante llamada telefónica, a 58 profesionales, personal técnico y auxiliares de enfermería. El guion contenía preguntas abiertas y cerradas relacionadas con cuestiones sociodemográficas y los contextos y condiciones de salud, trabajo y COVID-19. Se realizó un análisis cuantitativo descriptivo y un análisis de contenido temático. Resultados: La mayor parte de la muestra estuvo compuesta por mujeres (93.1 %) y personal técnico de enfermería (69 %). El 39.7 % trabajaba en turno de noche, el 58.6 % declaró haber sufrido violencia en el trabajo y el 48.3 % informó de diagnósticos de trastorno mental. Los contextos de trabajo en la pandemia mostraron la necesidad de estímulo y valoración profesional y las relaciones con los factores institucionales, la dinámica y la organización del trabajo, las condiciones adecuadas de trabajo y la relación interpersonal favorable. Los contextos de salud, mientras tanto, mostraron una relación con los intereses, las oportunidades, la rutina, la normalidad, la esperanza y la tenacidad que se produciría al final de la COVID-19. Conclusión: La pandemia de la COVID-19 fortaleció un contexto de salud y trabajo crítico, atemorizado e inseguro del equipo de enfermería brasileño, exacerbando la necesidad de providencias, acciones y políticas que consideren la salud de la persona trabajadora como estructurante para la organización de los servicios.

Introduction: By performing and promoting practices that aim to improve health, the nursing team has assumed itself as a protagonist during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the personal, professional, and family exposure is evident; the lack of personnel and occupational security, in addition to the consequences on the health and work contexts of these professionals. Objective: To analyze the health and work contexts of nursing professionals during the pandemic of COVID-19. Methodology: This is a mixed-method study that combines approaches through the concurrent incorporation strategy - QUAN(qual), conducted in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between August and December 2020. A script of questions was applied over the phone to 58 professional nurses, nursing technicians, and nursing assistants. The script included open and closed questions related to sociodemographic issues and health, work, and COVID-19 contexts and conditions. A descriptive quantitative analysis and thematic content analysis were performed. Results: The majority were women (93.1%) nursing technicians (69%). The 39.7% of the participants worked the night shift; the 58.6% reported experiencing violence at work and the 48.3% was diagnosed with mental disorders. The work contexts during the pandemic showed that there was a need for encouragement and professional evaluation; they also portrayed the relationships with the institutional factors, the work dynamics and the organization, the appropriate working conditions and the favorable interpersonal relationships. On the other hand, health contexts showed the relationship between interests, opportunities, routine, normality, hope and tenacity that would occur at the end of COVID-19. Conclusion: The pandemic of COVID-19 strengthened a critical, fearful, and insecure health and work context of the Brazilian nursing team, exacerbating the need for provisions, actions and policies that consider worker's health crucial for the organization of services.

Connecting to (Re)connect: Video Calling as a Resource to Unite Families and Children in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit During the COVID-19 Era.

Video calling emerged as an important resource during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to reconnect child and family, bringing the possibility of communication even during isolation. The objective of this study was to understand the experiences of families who communicated with their children through video calls during isolation by COVID-19 in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This was a qualitative study employing the theory of symbolic interactionism and the research method of grounded theory, with 14 families of children in PICU who used video calling as a communication resource. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The analysis revealed the main category of "Connecting to (re)connect: Video calling as a resource to unite families and children in PICU in the COVID-19 era," from which a theoretical model explaining the experience was built. Video calling is an important resource to mitigate the effects of family-child separation during hospitalization, and its use is encouraged in other contexts.

[The impact of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis]. / El impacto de COVID-19 en una cohorte de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica.

Background: COVID-19 brought with it unknowns related to systemic sclerosis. Objective: To know the clinical evolution and prognosis of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: During the pandemic, we had digital contact with a cohort of 197 patients with SSc. If they had any condition that met the suspected definition of COVID-19, they underwent polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2; they were treated on an outpatient or hospital basis without interfering with their treatment. They followed their evolution every 24 hours until they became asymptomatic or died. Results: Thirteen patients (6.6%), nine diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc), and four limited cutaneous (lcSSc) developed COVID-19 during nine months of follow-up. The immunosuppressants used at the time of the disease were: mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and prednisone, in low doses. Seven patients had interstitial lung disease (ILD). The main symptoms were chest pain, cough, dyspnea, dysgeusia, and anosmia, 1 with mild symptoms without pneumonia, 11 with mild pneumonia, and one with severe pneumonia that required hospital management. Only one (7.7%) presented severe pneumonia, was hospitalized, and died. Conclusions: COVID-19 disease in patients with SSc can be overcome in most cases, even when they are ILD and were using immunosuppressants at the time of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Introducción: la COVID-19 trajo consigo incógnitas relacionadas con la esclerosis sistémica, enfermedad de baja prevalencia asociada a neumopatía intersticial difusa (NID). Objetivo: conocer la evolución clínica y el pronóstico de la COVID-19 en una cohorte de pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES). Métodos: se analizó una serie de 13 casos procedentes de una cohorte de 197 pacientes con ES en seguimiento vía digital. Cuando los pacientes cumplieron con la definición sospechosa de COVID-19 se solicitó prueba de reacción en cadena de polimerasa para SARS-CoV-2. Todos los pacientes recibieron seguimiento durante su atención ambulatoria u hospitalaria, sin interferir con su tratamiento cada 24 horas hasta quedar asintomáticos o fallecer. Resultados: de 197 pacientes, trece (6.6%) enfermaron de COVID-19 de edad 57 años (RIC: 52-63), cutáneos difusa (ESD) y 4 limitada (ESL) en lapso de 9 meses. Once presentaron neumonía leve (84%), una neumonía grave con fallecimiento intrahospitalario (7.7%). La oximetría media al ambiente se mantuvo en SO2 90% (88-92%). Casi todos usaban inmunosupresores (84%) al momento de enfermar: micofenolato de mofetilo, metotrexato, prednisona en dosis bajas. Siete (53%) tenían enfermedad pulmonar intersticial (EPI) previa. Principalmente manifestaron disnea (67.5%), dolor torácico, tos, disgeusia y anosmia. Conclusiones: es posible que al momento del contagio con el virus SARS-CoV-2 los inmunosupresores permitieran una menor respuesta inflamatoria sistémica, evitando un peor pronóstico, incluso en quienes tienen enfermedad intersticial previa.

Post-COVID-19 functional status scale: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version.

BACKGROUND: The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale was created to assess the functional status of patients after hospital discharge due to COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To perform cross-cultural adaptation of the PCFS Scale and Manual into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate its measurement properties in patients post-COVID-19. METHODS: For the cross-cultural adaptation, independent translations and back-translations were performed. This was followed by a pre-test, with analysis of the Content Validity Index (CVI), and preparation of the final version, after evaluating the measurement properties. Spearman's correlation between the PCFS and the WHO Disability Classification Scheme (WHODAS 2.0) was used for convergent validity. Weighted Kappa (wκ) was used for test-retest and interobserver reliability for PCFS scores and Kappa (κ) for PCFS items. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Only patients with post-discharge COVID-19 were evaluated through video-conferencing platforms. RESULTS: The CVI was 0.75-0.83 for comprehension and 0.83-0.84 for the language of the self-administered questionnaire and the structured interview version. For measurement properties, 63 patients were evaluated, 68% male, 51.50 (12.60) years, 12.28 (7.62) days of hospitalization. For the convergent validity, a strong correlation was found (r = 0.73; p<0.01). The test-retest (wκ=0.54) and interobserver (wκ=0.43) reliability was moderate and the item-by-item analyzes ranged from fair to substantial (κ=0.25-0.66) and weak to substantial (κ=0.07-0.79). Internal consistency was excellent (0.85). CONCLUSION: The final PCFS in Brazilian Portuguese showed adequate content validity, reliability, internal consistency, and convergent validity for the functional assessment of patients after hospital discharge due to COVID-19.

[Impact of hyperglycemia on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for severe pneumonia in COVID-19]. / Impacto de hiperglucemia en el pronóstico de hospitalizados por neumonía grave en COVID-19.

Background: Adequate glycemic control improves the prognosis of patients hospitalized for pneumonia associated with severe COVID-19. Objective: To evaluate the impact of hyperglycemia (HG) on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for severe pneumonia associated with COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study. We included patients hospitalized from August 2020 to February 2021, with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Data was collected from admission to discharge. We used descriptive and analytical statistics according to the data distribution. ROC curves were used to determine the cut-off points with the highest predictive performance for HG and mortality, with the IBM SPSS program, version 25. Results: We included 103 patients, 32% women, 68% men, age 57 ± 13 years; 58% were admitted with HG (191, IQR 152-300 mg/dL) and 42% with normoglycemia (NG < 126 mg/dL). Mortality was higher in HG at admission 34 (56.7%) than in NG 13 (30.2%) (p = 0.008). HG was associated with diabetes mellitus 2 and neutrophilia (p < 0.05). The risk of death increases 1.558 times (95% CI 1.118-2.172) if HG is at admission and 1.43 times (95% CI 1.14-1.79) during hospitalization. Maintaining NG throughout the hospitalization contributed independently to survival (RR = 0.083 [95% CI 0.012-0.571], p = 0.011). Conclusion: HG significantly impacts prognosis by increasing mortality more than 50% during hospitalization for COVID-19.

Introducción: el adecuado control glucémico mejora el pronóstico de pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía asociada a COVID-19 grave. Objetivo: evaluar el impacto de la hiperglucemia (HG) sobre el pronóstico de pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía grave asociada a COVID-19 en no vacunados. Material y métodos: estudio de cohorte prospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes hospitalizados de agosto de 2020 a febrero de 2021, con neumonía grave por COVID-19, no vacunados contra SARS-CoV-2. Los datos fueron recolectados desde el ingreso hasta el egreso. Se empleó estadística descriptiva y analítica de acuerdo con la distribución de datos. Se construyeron curvas ROC para determinar los puntos de corte de mayor rendimiento predictivo para HG y mortalidad, con el programa IBM SPSS, versión 25. Resultados: se incluyeron 103 pacientes, 32% mujeres, 68% hombres, edad 57 ± 13 años; 58% ingresaron con HG (191, IQR 152-300 mg/dL) y 42% en normoglucemia (NG < 126 mg/dL). La mortalidad fue mayor en HG al ingreso 34 (56.7%) que en NG 13 (30.2%) (p = 0.008). La HG se asoció con diabetes mellitus 2 y neutrofilia (p < 0.05). El riesgo de muerte se incrementó 1.558 veces (IC 95% 1.118-2.172) si la HG fue al ingreso y 1.43 veces (IC 95% 1.14-1.79) durante la hospitalización. Mantener NG durante todo el internamiento contribuyó de manera independiente a la sobrevida (RR 0.083 [IC 95% 0.012-0.571], p = 0.011). Conclusión: la HG impacta significativamente el pronóstico al incrementar en más de 50% la mortalidad durante la hospitalización por COVID-19.

IMPACT OF DISTANCE LEARNING AND THE FULL RETURN TO IN-PERSON CLASSES ON THE MENTAL HEALTH OF THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

In March 2020, the closure of schools in most countries and the implementation of virtual education were ordered as a control measure to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This, along with social distancing, represented a threat to the mental health of school children. In this context, access to information technologies was a determining factor in countering social isolation and allowing the continuity of the school's role in this population. In this sense, several studies reported that the suspension of in-person classes and the use of virtual education, adopted because of the pandemic, had both positive and negative effects on the mental health of the pediatric population; conditioned by individual, family, and socioeconomic factors. Thus, in terms of development and mental health, the reopening of educational institutions after a prolonged period of mobility restriction and social distancing constituted both an opportunity and a challenge for the pediatric population and the family. The objective of this article is to reflect on the differential impact that school closures and the implementation of virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic had on the development and mental health of the school-aged population, and on the potential effects of returning to in-person education. It is hoped that this reflection will be useful in guiding the implementation of educational and child mental health care actions in future pandemics.

Descriptive analysis of Cycle Threshold in patients with hematologic malignancies infected with SARS-COV-2.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 200 million documented infections, more than 4 million deaths, and unprecedented consequences worldwide. The cycle threshold (Ct), the number of amplification cycles required to obtain a product detectable through fluorescence during a quantitative RT-PCR test, is an indirect measurement of viral load. Patients with hematologic malignancies have an increased risk of death by the SARS-CoV-2. CASES PRESENTATION: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive analysis of the Ct obtained from patients with history of hematologic malignancies who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in our hospital, from March 3rd, 2020, to August 17th, 2021. We used the mean Ct at diagnosis. 15 adults, with previous diagnosis of lymphomas, acute leukemias and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, were included. 9 of the 15 patients (60 %) developed pneumonia, 6 of them required supplementary oxygen and 5 mechanical ventilation. 5 patients died between 7-86 days from symptom onset. Ct was lower among the group of patients who died (15.5 cycles; SD= 2.28, CI95%= 9.17-21.86) compared with those who survived (20.2 cycles; SD= 8.87, CI95%= 13.9-26.6). Ct was also lower in the pneumonia group (18.2 cycles; SD= 2.28, CI95%= 12.98-23.51) than in the no-pneumonia group (19.3 cycles; SD= 4.11; CI95%= 8.73-29.9). DISCUSSION: Ct was lowest in severe forms of CoViD-19. Further studies with larger populations of patients with hematologic malignancies could establish the validity of Ct as a quantitative laboratory determination as a course-prediction and infectivity tool.

Introducción: SARS-CoV-2 ha causado más de 200 millones de infecciones documentadas, más de 4 millones de muertes, y consecuencias sin precedentes globalmente. El umbral de ciclado (Ct), número de ciclos de amplificación requerido para obtener un producto detectable durante una prueba cuantitativa de RT-PCR, es una medida indirecta de la carga viral. Los pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas tienen mayor riesgo de muerte por SARS-CoV-2. Presentación de casos: Realizamos un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y descriptivo de los valores de Ct obtenidos de pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas que resultaron positivos para SARS-CoV-2 en nuestro hospital, desde el 3 de marzo de 2020, hasta el 17 de agosto de 2021. Empleamos el Ct promedio al diagnóstico. Fueron incluidos 15 adultos, con diagnóstico de linfomas, leucemias agudas y leucemia linfocítica crónica. 9 pacientes (60 %) desarrollaron neumonía, 6 requirieron oxígeno suplementario y 5 ventilación mecánica. 5 murieron a los 7-86 días desde el inicio de síntomas. Ct fue menor entre los pacientes que murieron (15.5 ciclos; DS= 2.28, IC95%= 9.17-21.86), comparado con los que sobrevivieron (20.2 ciclos; DS= 8.87, IC95%= 13.9-26.6). La misma tendencia se observó en el grupo de los que desarrollaron neumonía (18.2 ciclos; DS= 2.28, IC95%= 12.98-23.51), comparado con lo que no tuvieron neumonía (19.3 ciclos; DS= 4.11; IC95%= 8.73-29.9). Discusión: El valor de Ct fue más bajo en las formas más graves de CoViD-19. Estudios adicionales con poblaciones mayores de pacientes con enfermedades oncohematológicas podrían establecer la validez de Ct como determinación cuantitativa de laboratorio útil como predictora de evolución e infectividad.

Repercussions of COVID-19 on psychiatric inpatient care in Latin America and the Caribbean.

OBJETIVE: To characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalisations in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. METHODS: Descriptive study. 85 semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers involved with psychiatric hospitalisations in general hospitals (GHs) and specialised psychiatric hospitals (SHs) from 18 LAC countries. The interviews were done between 8 May and 30 June 2020. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: An initial decrease in the demand for hospitalisation is reported, attributed to the population's fear of approaching health services as well as restrictions on mobility. Stricter criteria for hospitalisation were reported with a double focus on the acute within the acute. The length of hospitalisations were mixed, with both increases and decreases in GHs and SHs. The therapeutic offer was drastically reduced, and interaction between hospitalised people and their support networks was restricted. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 context, hospitalisation seems to be not the last but the only alternative for psychiatric treatment. The decrease in the number of beds in SHs could be a positive aspect for the reform of psychiatric care, but it is questioned since this reduction also occurs in GHs.

Burden of COVID-19 in Córdoba, A Department of Colombia: Results of Disability-Adjusted Life-Years: Carga de COVID-19 en Córdoba, un Departamento de Colombia: Resultados de los Años de Vida Ajustados por Discapacidad.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate the burden of acute COVID-19 in Córdoba, one of the most affected departments (states) in Colombia, through the estimation of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). METHODS: DALYs were estimated based on the number of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection cases reported by official Colombian sources. A transition probability matrix among severity states was calculated using data obtained from a retrospective cohort that included 1736 COVID-19 confirmed subjects living in Córdoba. RESULTS: Córdoba had 120.23 deaths per 100 000 habitants during the study period (March 2020 to April 2021). Estimated total DALYs were 49 243 (2692 DALYs per 100 000 inhabitants), mostly attributed to fatal cases (99.7%). On average, 25 years of life were lost because of death by this infection. A relevant proportion of years of life lost because of COVID-19 (46.6%) was attributable to people < 60 years old and was greater in men. People ≥ 60 years old showed greater risk of progression to critical state than people between the age of 35 and 60 years (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 2.5-12.5) and younger than 35 years (9.1; 95% confidence interval 4.0-20.6). CONCLUSION: In Córdoba, premature mortality because of COVID-19 was substantially represented by people < 60 years old and was greater in males. Our data may be representative of Latin American populations with great infection spread during the first year of the pandemic and contribute to novel methodological aspects and parameter estimations that may be useful to measure COVID-19 burden in other countries of the region.

Repercusiones en pacientes crónicos de una Zona Básica de Salud de Toledo en la Pandemia COVID-19 / Impact on chronic patients in a Basic Health Zone of Toledo in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introducción: Las personas con enfermedades crónicas son población vulnerable a la interrupción de la atención y al estrés producido con la pandemia por COVID-19. Se necesita reevaluar su riesgo cardiovascular postconfinamiento. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto del confinamiento y modificaciones en sistema de atención sanitaria en la salud de personas con enfermedades crónicas de una Zona Básica de Salud de Toledo durante la pandemia COVID-19. Métodos: Estudio analítico, observacional, longitudinal, retrospectivo. Pacientes con patologías crónicas. Muestra aleatoria 420. Revisión historias clínicas para recogida parámetros clínicos/metabólicos antes y después confinamiento; N.º y tipo visitas enfermería e ingresos hospitalarios antes, durante y después confinamiento. Resultados: Se evaluaron 349 historias. Edad media 65,36 y el 52,7% fueron hombres. Se encontró que tras el confinamiento hubo una disminución significativa de peso (p=0,046) y aumento de presión arterial diastólica (p=0,018) en toda la muestra. La disminución de peso fue mayor en mujeres, mayores de 65, hipertensos y personas con hiperlipidemias. En cuanto a variables clínicas que incrementaron sus cifras postconfinamiento, se observó aumento colesterol LDL en mayores de 65 (p=0,005). Aumento presión arterial diastólica en mujeres (p=0,005), mayores de 65 (p=0,022) e hipertensos (p=0,038), y aumento de presión arterial sistólica en mujeres (p=0,041). Aumento ingresos postconfinamiento (p=0,001); 57,1% de ingresos estuvo relacionado con su patología crónica y una disminución visitas enfermería durante y postconfinamiento (p=0,000). Conclusiones: Los pacientes crónicos han empeorado sus condiciones relacionadas con su patología durante y después del confinamiento. La atención presencial disminuida durante este período podría ser un factor que ha contribuido a esta situación. (AU)

Introduction: People with chronic diseases are vulnerable to disruption of care and stress with the COVID-19 pandemic. Their post-confinement cardiovascular risk needs to be reassessed. Objective: To assess the impact of confinement and modifications in health care system on the health of people with chronic diseases in a Basic Health Zone in Toledo during COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: Analytical, observational, longitudinal, retrospective study. Patients with chronic pathologies. Random sample 420. Review of clinical records to collect clinical/metabolic parameters before and after confinement. Number and type of nursing visits and hospital admissions before, during and after confinement. Results: 349 records were evaluated. Mean age 65.36 and 52.7% were men. It was found that after confinement there was a significant decrease in weight (p=0.046) and increase in diastolic blood pressure (p=0.018) in the whole sample. The decrease in weight was greater in women, patients aged >65 years, those with hypertension and those with hyperlipidemia. In terms of clinical variables that increased post-confinement figures, an increase in LDL cholesterol was observed in patients aged >65 (p=0.005). Increased diastolic blood pressure in women (p=0.005), patients aged >65 (p=0.022) and those with hypertension (p=0.038) and increased systolic blood pressure in women (p=0.041). Increased post-confinement admissions (p=0.001); 57.1% of admissions were related to their chronic pathology and a decrease in nursing visits during and post-confinement (p=0.000). Conclusions: Chronic patients have worsened conditions related to their pathology during and after confinement. Decreased face-to-face patient care during this period could be a contributing factor to this situation. (AU)

Relation between Orotracheal Intubation, Inflammatory Markers, Breathing and Voice in Post-COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19, an infectious disease with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and intensities in the human body, it can cause respiratory and vocal disorders, with fatigue. OBJECTIVE: To verify the relation between biological Inflammatory markers D-dimers and C-Reactive Protein, Forced Vital Capacity, Maximum Phonation Time, vocal performance and fatigue, length of hospitalization period and gender of people affected by COVID-19 who were hospitalized, but did not use orotracheal intubation and compare with a group of post-COVID-19 patients with orotracheal intubation. METHODS: Data on D-dimers and C-Reactive Protein, spirometry, Maximum Phonation Time, performance and vocal fatigue were collected. The study included 42 adult people affected by COVID-19 who were hospitalized, 22 (52.4%) female and 20 (47.6%) male; 23 (54.8%) critical cases composing the group with orotracheal intubation (average age 48.9 years old) and 19 (45.24%) severe cases in the group without orotracheal intubation (average age 49.9 years old). RESULTS: hospital length of stay was significantly longer for the group with orotracheal intubation; D-dimers were significantly altered in all groups; correlations between maximum phonation times were positive and significant; correlations between maximum phonation times, vocal performance and fatigue were both negative and significant. CONCLUSION: Patients with orotracheal intubation had longer hospital internment and increased D-dimers and were amazed that, whenever maximum phonation times decreased performance and vocal fatigue increased.

Choroidal thickness changes in post-COVID-19 cases / Mudanças de espessura da coroide após COVID19

ABSTRACT Purpose: The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Methods: This study evaluated the right eyes from 41 post-COVID-19 cases (Group 1) and 41 healthy subjects (Group 2). Choroidal thickness was measured using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Post-COVID-19 cases were evaluated within 1 month after a diagnosis of COVID-19. Two experienced ophthalmologists measured the choroidal thickness at the subfovea, temporal, and nasal quadrants at 500-μm intervals up to 1500 μm from the fovea at seven different points. Moreover, central macular thickness and ganglion cell layer thickness were measured via OCT, after which both two groups were compared. Results: Group 1 showed a significantly thicker choroid compared to Group 2 at the subfovea, 500 μm temporal to the fovea, 500 and 1000 μm nasal to the fovea (p=0.011, p=0.043, p=0.009, and p=0.019, respectively). Although other areas measured were also thicker in Group 1, the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Moreover, no significant difference in the central macular thickness and ganglion cell layer thickness were observed between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Choroidal thickness was increased in post-COVID-19 patients, which might be related to inflammation associated with the pathogenesis of COVID-19.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da doença por coronavírus de 2019 (COVID19) na espessura da coroide usando tomografia de coerência óptica com profundidade de imagem aprimorada. Métodos: Este estudo consistiu em 41 casos pós-COVID19 (Grupo 1) e 41 indivíduos saudáveis (Grupo 2). Apenas os olhos direitos dos participantes foram incluídos no estudo. A espessura da coroide foi medida usando tomografia de coerência óptica com profundidade de imagem aprimorada. Nos casos pós-COVID19, as medições foram realizadas dentro de 1 mês da doença. A espessura da coroide foi medida por dois oftalmologistas experientes nos quadrantes subfoveal, temporal e nasal, em sete pontos diferentes, a intervalos de 500 a 1500 μm da fóvea. Além disso, a espessura macular central e a espessura da camada de células ganglionares foram medidas com OCT e os dois Grupos foram comparados. Resultados: As espessuras coroidais foram estatisticamente mais espessas no Grupo 1 que no Grupo 2, com 500 μm no quadrante subfoveal, 500 Symbol (OTF)m no temporal e 1000 μm no nasal (p=0,011, p=0,043, p=0,009 e p=0,019, respectivamente). Embora outras medidas tenham se mostrado mais espessas no Grupo 1, elas não foram estatisticamente significativas (p>0,05). Também não houve diferenças significativas entre os Grupos quanto à espessura macular central e à espessura da camada de células ganglionares (p>0,05). Conclusão: A espessura da coroide mostrou-se aumentada em pacientes pós-COVID19. Isso pode estar relacionado à inflamação que faz parte da patogênese do COVID19.

Aging-related predictive factors for oxygenation improvement and mortality in COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients exposed to prone position: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are more susceptible to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) and are more likely to develop it in severe forms, (e.g., Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [ARDS]). Prone positioning is a treatment strategy for severe ARDS; however, its response in the elderly population remains poorly understood. The main objective was to evaluate the predictive response and mortality of elderly patients exposed to prone positioning due to ARDS-COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study involved 223 patients aged ≥ 65 years, who received prone position sessions for severe ARDS due to COVID-19, using invasive mechanical ventilation. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was used to assess the oxygenation response. The 20-point improvement in PaO2/FiO2 after the first prone session was considered for good response. Data were collected from electronic medical records, including demographic data, laboratory/image exams, complications, comorbidities, SAPS III and SOFA scores, use of anticoagulants and vasopressors, ventilator settings, and respiratory system mechanics. Mortality was defined as deaths that occurred until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Most patients were male, with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus as the most prevalent comorbidities. The non-responders group had higher SAPS III and SOFA scores, and a higher incidence of complications. There was no difference in mortality rate. A lower SAPS III score was a predictor of oxygenation response, and the male sex was a risk predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the oxygenation response to prone positioning in elderly patients with severe COVID-19-ARDS correlates with the SAPS III score. Furthermore, the male sex is a risk predictor of mortality.

Prevalence and prognosis of acute pancreatitis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic issue. In addition to the well-known respiratory and fever symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms have also been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognosis of patients with COVID-19 infection complicated with acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study, patients aged 18 years or older, admitted into the ICU in a single tertiary center from January 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022 were enrolled. Patients were identified by electronic medical records and reviewed manually. The primary outcome was the prevalence of acute pancreatitis among ICU patients with COVID-19. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4133 patients, admitted into the ICU, were screened. Among these patients, 389 were infected by COVID-19, and 86 were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. COVID-19 positive patients were more likely to present with acute pancreatitis than COVID-19 negative patients (odds ratio = 5.42, 95% confidence interval: 2.35-6.58, P < 0.01). However, the length of hospital stay, need for MV, need for CRRT, and in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between acute pancreatitis patients with and without COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Severe COVID-19 infections may cause acute pancreas damage in critically ill patients. However, the prognosis may not differ between acute pancreatitis patients with and without COVID-19 infection.

Effect of COVID-19 on Shoulder Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Care Medical Center in New York City.

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented pause in elective surgeries, including shoulder arthroplasty. We sought to determine whether clinical and/or demographic differences would be seen between patients who presented for shoulder arthroplasty during the pandemic compared with the previous year (2019). Methods Institutional records were queried for patients who underwent shoulder replacement between March 1 and July 1 of 2019 and 2020. Demographics, range of motion, surgical duration, hospitalization time, discharge disposition, and postoperative management were analyzed. Results The mean duration of surgery was 160 ± 50 minutes in 2020 and 179 ± 54 minutes in 2019 ( p = 0.13). The mean hospitalization time was 36 ± 13 hours in 2020 and 51 ± 40 hours in 2019 ( p = 0.04). In 2019, 96% of the patients participated in physical therapy, while 71% did it in 2020 ( p = 0.003). A total of 100% of the 2019 patients and 86% of the 2020 patients participated in an in-person postoperative follow-up ( p = 0.006). The 2019 patients reported for an office visit on average 14 ± 11 days after surgery; the 2020 patients waited 25 ± 25 days to return for a follow-up ( p = 0.10). Range of motion, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, and complication rates did not differ between the cohorts. Conclusion Patients presenting for surgery during the initial phase of the pandemic were demographically and clinically similar to 2019 patients. However, the length of stay was significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Postoperative follow-up and physical therapy were delayed in 2020, but this did not lead to differences in complication or readmission rates compared with those of the 2019 cohort. Level of Evidence III.

Impacto del confinamiento por COVID-19 en la prescripción de benzodiacepinas / Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the prescription of benzodiazepines

Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto del confinamiento por COVID-19 sobre la prescripción de benzodiacepinas según edad, sexo y zona básica de salud. Diseño: Estudio observacional longitudinal. Emplazamiento: Atención primaria. Área V de Salud del Principado de Asturias. Participantes: Mayores de 15 años a los que se prescribieron benzodiacepinas entre 2017 y 2020. Mediciones principales: Diferencia de las medias de dosis diaria definida por 1.000 habitantes (DHD) mensual de benzodiacepinas entre el periodo definido como preconfinamiento y el confinamiento. Además, se ajusta la diferencia por edad, sexo y zona básica de salud, así como por la interacción entre ellas. Resultados: La DHD media preconfinamiento fue 131,3 y 139,5 durante el confinamiento; en el análisis crudo, esta diferencia fue estadísticamente significativa (IC 95% 4,1 a 12,1). Se objetivó un aumento de DHD media en el grupo de 60-74 años (IC 95% 2,28 a 21,42) y en el de 90 años o más (IC 95% 21,31 a 40,63), así como en las mujeres (IC 95% 3,51 a 14,59). Finalmente, se observó una disminución de DHD media en las zonas básicas V11 (IC 95% -29 a -0,66) y V14 (IC 95% -54,28 a -25,04). Conclusiones: Determinados subgrupos muestran un cambio en la tendencia de dispensación de benzodiacepinas sin poder atribuirse completamente al confinamiento. Creemos que pueda existir una inercia terapéutica en la prescripción de psicofármacos, según las características biopsicosociales del paciente, que es importante detectar para evitar la medicalización de cuadros psicológicos.(AU)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 lockdown on the prescription of benzodiazepines by gender, age and district health departments. Design: Longitudinal observational study. Location: Primary care. Asturias (Spain) health district V. Participants: People over 15 years of age with filled benzodiazepine prescriptions in between 2017 and 2020. Main measurements: Benzodiazepine DHD (defined daily dose per 1000 habitants) mean difference between the period defined as pre-lockdown and lockdown. Additionally, the difference was adjusted for gender, sex and district health department and also with the interaction among them. Results: DHD mean pre-lockdown was 131.3 and 139.5 in the lockdown; this difference was significant in the global analysis (95% CI: 4.1–12.1). There was an increase in the DHD mean in the 60–74 age group (95% CI: 2.28–21.42), in the group over 90 years old (95% CI: 21.31–40.63) and in women (95% CI: 3.51–14.59). Finally, a decrease in the DHD mean of V11 (95% CI: -29 to -0.66) and V14 (95% CI: -54.28 to -25.04) district health departments was observed.Conclusions: Certain subgroups show a change in the pattern of benzodiazepine prescription without being able to relate this to the lockdown. We believe that there could be some inertia in the prescription of psychiatric medication according to the biopsychosocial characteristics of the patients; it is important to detect this in order to avoid the medicalization of psychological disorders.(AU)

Autonomía y supervisión operatorias del residente de cirugía: Una mirada en la pandemia por COVID-19 / Operative autonomy and supervision of the surgical resident: A look at the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción. Al declararse la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, se establecieron múltiples cambios en los sistemas de salud y en las instituciones hospitalarias, influyendo en la actividad quirúrgica global. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la pandemia en los niveles de autonomía y supervisión operatorias de los residentes de cirugía. Métodos. Estudio analítico cuasi-experimental, que incluyó los procedimientos quirúrgicos registrados por residentes de cirugía general de la Universidad de La Sabana, de febrero de 2019 a agosto de 2021. Se analizaron la autonomía y la supervisión mediante la escala Zwisch en los periodos prepandemia y pandemia. Resultados. Se recolectaron datos de 10.618 procedimientos en el periodo establecido, la mayoría realizados con abordaje abierto (57,4 %) y en rotaciones tronculares de cirugía general (65 %). Los procedimientos realizados más frecuentes fueron apendicectomía (18,6 %), colecistectomía (18,4 %) y herniorrafías (8,6 %). Se encontró una disminución estadísticamente significativa en los niveles globales de autonomía y supervisión entre los periodos analizados de 2, 4/4, 0 a 2, 2/4, 0 (p<0,001). Discusión. La disminución en la autonomía percibida por los residentes podría corresponder al impacto negativo en la motivación intrínseca de los individuos, en la disminución objetiva en el logro de las competencias esperadas en su proceso de formación quirúrgica y a la pérdida del relacionamiento colectivo propiciado por los aislamientos y limitaciones vividos. Conclusión. La pandemia por COVID-19 impactó negativamente en la autonomía y supervisión operatoria de los residentes de cirugía general de la Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.

Introduction. Changes in health systems and hospital institutions due to the coronavirus pandemic influenced global surgical activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the levels of autonomy and supervision in general surgery residents. Methods. Quasi-experimental analytical study. It included the surgical procedures recorded by general surgery residents of the University of La Sabana from February 2019 to August 2021. Autonomy and supervision were analyzed using the Zwisch scale in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Results. 10,618 procedures were collected in the established period. Most surgeries were performed with an open approach (57,4%), in rotations of general surgery (65%). The most frequent procedures performed were appendectomy (18,6%), and cholecystectomy (18,4%), and herniorrhaphy (8,6%). There was a decrease in levels of autonomy and supervision compared between the analyzed periods from 2, 4/4, 0 to 2, 2/4, 0 (p<0.001). Discussion. The decrease in the autonomy perceived by the residents could correspond to the negative impact on the intrinsic motivation of the individuals, a decrease in the achievement of the competencies expected in their surgical training process, and the loss of the collective relationship produced by the isolation and limitations experienced. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on autonomy and supervision in general surgery residents of the University of La Sabana, Chia, Colombia

Estudio de los desenlaces perioperatorios de la apendicitis aguda durante la pandemia por COVID-19: un estudio observacional analítico de cohorte / Study of perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analytical observational cohort study

Introducción. La condición de pandemia por COVID-19 impactó a la sociedad y los sistemas de salud a nivel mundial. Las adaptaciones institucionales procuraron mantener la calidad de la atención a pesar de un contexto organizacional desfavorable. La apendicitis aguda requirió ser manejada en un nuevo escenario institucional. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis durante la pandemia. Métodos. Estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, en el que se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía, antes y durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Se evaluaron las complicaciones, infección del sitio operatorio, reingresos y estancia hospitalaria. Adicionalmente, se analizaron los desenlaces en los 3 picos epidemiológicos de la pandemia. Se efectuaron estadísticas descriptivas y analíticas entre los grupos a comparar. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1521 pacientes con apendicitis, 48,3 % operados antes y 51,7 % durante la pandemia. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en complicaciones (p=0,352), infección del sitio operatorio (p=0,191), reingreso en los primeros 30 días (p=0,605) y estancia hospitalaria (p=0,514). El manejo de la apendicitis durante el tercer pico fue similar a las prácticas habituales. El tiempo de evolución fue mayor durante la pandemia (p=0,04) y los pacientes fueron llevados a cirugía más pronto que previo a la pandemia (p<0,001). Conclusiones. No se evidenció un incremento de complicaciones quirúrgicas, reingresos, estancia hospitalaria ni infección del sitio operatorio en los pacientes operados durante la pandemia. Hubo un efecto favorable para los pacientes como consecuencia de la adaptación institucional en la pandemia por COVID-19

Introduction. COVID-19 pandemic impacted society and health systems worldwide. The institutional adaptations sought to maintain the quality of care in an unfavorable organizational context. Acute appendicitis was required to be managed in a new institutional setting. The effectiveness of surgical treatment of appendicitis during the pandemic was evaluated. Methods. Retrospective analytical observational study, in patients with appendectomy, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Complications, surgical site infections, readmissions, and hospital stay were evaluated. Additionally, the outcomes in the 3 epidemiological peaks of the pandemic were analyzed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed between the groups to be compared. Results. A total of 1521 patients with appendicitis were included, 48.3% before and 51.7% during the pandemic. There were no differences in complications (p=0.352), operative site infection (p=0.191), readmission at 30 days (p=0.605), and hospital stay (p=0.514) between the groups. Management of appendicitis during the 3rd peak was like usual practices. There was a long evolution time during the pandemic (p=0.04) and the patients were taken to surgery sooner than before the pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusions. There was no evidence of an increase in surgical complications, readmissions, hospital stay, and surgical site infections during patients who underwent surgery. There was a favorable effect for patients because of institutional adaptation in the COVID-19 pandemic

Resultados en receptores de trasplante renal de donantes cadavéricos con infección por SARS-CoV-2: Una serie de casos en un centro de trasplante en Colombia / Results in kidney transplant recipients from cadaveric donors with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case series in a transplant center in Colombia

Introducción. La pandemia por COVID-19 ha causado la muerte de 6,5 millones de personas en el mundo y la donación de órganos se ha visto ampliamente afectada, reflejándose en una disminución importante en el número de trasplantes. Colombia no ha sido ajena a dicha problemática. Ante este desafío, el Instituto Nacional de Salud ha permitido tomar donantes cadavéricos con reacción en cadena de la polimerasa con transcripción reversa (RT-PCR) positiva para Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), sin enfermedad activa. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir una serie de pacientes trasplantados de riñón con donantes cadavéricos con RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivo y sus principales desenlaces clínicos. Métodos. Serie de casos de pacientes que fueron llevados a trasplante renal con donante cadavérico con SARS-CoV-2 positivo, sin enfermedad activa, entre mayo y agosto de 2022. Se recolectaron las variables demográficas y clínicas y se evaluó la infección y la mortalidad asociada a SARS-CoV-2 en un mes de seguimiento. Resultados. Un total de 5 receptores de trasplante renal con 5 donantes cadavéricos SARS-CoV-2 positivos fueron evaluados. No se presentó mortalidad ni pérdida del injerto renal. Se registraron dos casos de función retardada del injerto y un caso de rechazo agudo. Ninguno de los pacientes presentó RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positiva en el seguimiento posterior al trasplante. Conclusión. Con nuestra serie de casos mostramos que el trasplante de riñón proveniente de donante cadavérico con prueba positiva para RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2, sin evidencia de enfermedad COVID-19 activa, es un procedimiento seguro y una estrategia eficaz para aumentar el número de donantes en pandemia

Introduction. Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have caused the death of 6.5 million of people worldwide. The organ donation was extremely affected reflecting in the number of transplants. Colombia has not been immune to this problem. Facing this challenge, the National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud, INS) allowed to assign cadaveric donors with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive without COVID-19. We aim to describe a case series of kidney transplant patients with RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive cadaveric donors, and their main clinical outcomes. Methods. A case series of five patients who underwent kidney transplantation of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 during the study period from May to august of 2022. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected from the institutional medical records, and we evaluated the mortality and infection associated with SARS-CoV-2. Results. A total of five kidney transplant recipients and five cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 were described in the present study. There were not mortality reported and none of the patients had graft loss. Two cases of delayed graft function and one case of acute kidney rejection were documented. None of the patients had positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 in the follow-up. Conclusion. Our series demonstrated that the kidney transplant of cadaveric donors with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 without clinical evidence of active COVID-19 disease is a safe procedure and an efficient strategy to increase donors during a pandemic

COVID-19: Protocol and Checklist for Nursing Care Management at Urgent Care Units.

BACKGROUND: The 24 h urgent care units (24 h UCU) in Brazil are the main pre-admission hospital process of the public healthcare system and constitute an intermediate modality between primary care and hospital care. These units also provide care in cases of less severity that are not considered urgent. This study aimed to create and validate the content of a graphic protocol and checklist for the nursing care management of patients with a suspicion or confirmation of infection by COVID-19 at urgent care units. METHODS: A methodological study was carried out in three phases: construct of items and dimensions of the checklist; evaluation of the checklist by specialists for content validation; and construct and content validation of the graphic protocol. RESULTS: The checklist was evaluated by nine specialists. Eight items received suggestions for changes. Items with a content validity index ≥0.83 were maintained. With regard to content validity, despite the satisfactory level of agreement, the specialists suggested some changes in the writing of eight items. The graphic protocol was evaluated by six specialists and had an overall content validity of 0.97. CONCLUSION: The checklist with 44 items and three dimensions (Management, Biosafety and Care) and the protocol achieved a satisfactory standard of content validity for use at 24 h urgent care units. This protocol can contribute to the standardization and guidance of nursing actions in suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19 at urgent care units, ensuring safe care based on scientific evidence.