CD28 expression is not essential for positive and negative selection of thymocytes or peripheral T cell tolerance.

Thymocyte development requires positive selection of clones that can recognize Ag presented by MHC molecules and negative selection of clones that are self-reactive. However, the costimulatory signals required for negative selection and cell death, or positive selection and the transition to the peripheral lymphoid system, are not well understood. Many molecular interactions that are important for T cell activation have also been found to play a role in thymocyte development. The importance of the CD28/B7 interaction in the activation of mature T cells and recent observations that CD28 may play a role negative selection of developing CD4+CD8+ thymocytes suggest that CD28 may also be involved in development and maintenance of T cell tolerance. CD28-deficient mice were crossed to alpha beta and gamma delta TCR transgenic as well as H-2k Mlsc-bearing animals and were used to address the role of CD28 in positive and negative selection of developing T cells. The CD28-deficient animals demonstrated no obvious deficiency in either positive or negative selection of developing thymocytes. However, when mixed bone marrow chimeras were created with cells derived from both CD28-deficient and wild-type mice, the CD28+ T cells had a selective advantage over the CD28-deficient T cells. Therefore, it appears that CD28, although not essential for the selection of T cells during development, may allow for additional signals that increase the efficiency of selection and/or expansion of peripheral T cell populations.

Production of minor lymphocyte stimulatory-1a antigens from T cell subsets.

T cell subsets that produce minor lymphocyte stimulatory (Mls) antigens were analyzed using mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) in vitro or clonal elimination assay in vivo. When lymph node T cells from B10.BR(Mls-1b) mice were stimulated with various T cell subsets from AKR (Mls-1a) mice in the presence of B10.BR antigen presenting cells (APC), proportions of Mls-1a reactive T cell blasts (V beta 6+, V beta 8.1+) increased. The stimulatory potency of CD8+ T cells was higher than that of CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, among either CD8+ or CD4+ T cell subset, CD44+ T cells appeared to produce larger amounts of Mls-1a antigens than CD44- T cells. More marked difference was demonstrated, when stimulator AKR T cells were being activated by immobilized anti-T cell antigen receptor (TCR) antibody during MLR. Thus, AKR T cells appeared to produce large amounts of Mls-1a antigens on appropriate stimulations. These findings were confirmed by the semiquantitative analysis of mRNA levels of MTV-7 in the AKR T cell subsets. When CD8+CD44+ T cells from (AKR x B10.BR)F1 mice were injected intravenously into [B10.BR-->B10.BR] syngeneic bone marrow (BM) chimeras 1 week after BM reconstitution and proportions of V beta 6+ T cells were quantitated 7 weeks later, significant clonal elimination of V beta 6+ T cells was induced among both thymocyte population and lymph node T cell population in a dose-dependent manner of the inoculated F1 T cells. Inoculation of CD8+CD44-F1 T cells eliminated V beta 6+ T cells less efficiently from lymph node T cells and inoculation of CD4+F1 T cells induced no significant clonal elimination of the V beta 6+ T cells. The present findings demonstrate clearly that CD8+CD44+ T cells represent the cells producing large amounts of Mls-1a antigens and inducing clonal elimination of V beta 6+ T cells in vivo.

Production of minor lymphocyte stimulatory-1a antigen from activated CD4+ or CD8+ T cells.

Minor lymphocyte stimulatory (Mls) Ag are super Ag that stimulate a high proportion of T cells of a specific TCR V beta family. One of the super Ag, Mls-1a, which is recognized mainly by TCR V beta 6+ and V beta 8.1+ T cells, has recently been linked to the response to product of the open reading frame in 3'-long terminal repeat of endogenous mammary tumor virus, MTV-7. It is quite certain that B cells are able to produce and also to present the Mls-1a Ag. However, it remains to be determined whether other cell types, especially T cells, produce Mls-1a Ag. In this study using highly purified T cell subpopulations, capacity to produce Mls-1a Ag was analyzed by calculating the proportion of Mls-1a reactive V beta 6+ or V beta 8.1+ T cells in responding cell populations. We found that nonstimulated CD8+ T cells produced a low amount of Mls-1a Ag, and the capacity to do so was considerably increased by stimulation with immobilized anti-TCR mAb. By contrast, nonstimulated CD4+ T cells did not produce Mls-1a Ag at all. Even when CD4+ T cells were activated via TCR signaling with immobilized anti-TCR mAb, CD4+ T cells did not produce Mls-1a Ag. However, CD4+ T cells primed with conventional Ag in vivo produced Mls-1a Ag on restimulation with that specific Ag in vitro. These findings indicate that not only CD8+ T cells but also CD4+ T cells can produce Mls-1a Ag on appropriate stimulation, although different mechanisms for Mls-1a production may operate between the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Peripheral T cell activation and deletion induced by transfer of lymphocyte subsets expressing endogenous or exogenous mouse mammary tumor virus.

Murine T cell reactivity with products of the minor lymphocyte stimulatory (Mls) locus correlates with the expression of particular variable (V) domains of the T cell receptor (TCR) beta chain. It was recently demonstrated that Mls antigens are encoded by an open reading frame (ORF) in the 3' long terminal repeat of either endogenous or exogenous mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV). Immature thymocytes expressing reactive TCR-V beta domains are clonally deleted upon exposure to endogenous Mtv's. Mature T cells proliferate vigorously in response to Mls-1a (Mtv-7) in vivo, but induction of specific anergy and deletion after exposure to Mtv-7-expressing cells in the periphery has also been described. We show here that B cells and CD8+ (but not CD4+) T cells from Mtv-7+ mice efficiently induce peripheral deletion of reactive T cells upon transfer to Mtv-7- recipients, whereas only B cells stimulate specific T cell proliferation in vivo. In contrast to endogenous Mtv-7, transfer of B, CD4+, or CD8+ lymphocyte subsets from mice maternally infected with MMTV(SW), an infectious homologue of Mtv-7, results in specific T cell deletion in the absence of a detectable proliferative response. Finally, we show by secondary transfers of infected cells that exogenous MMTV(SW) is transmitted multidirectionally between lymphocyte subsets and ultimately to the mammary gland. Collectively our data demonstrate heterogeneity in the expression and/or presentation of endogenous and exogenous MMTV ORF by lymphocyte subsets and emphasize the low threshold required for induction of peripheral T cell deletion by these gene products.

In vivo presentation of Mls-1 antigen by T and B lymphocytes.

Previous studies of minor lymphocyte stimulatory (Mls) presenting lymphoid cells had shown that B cells rather than T cells present stimulatory Mls-1 antigen in vitro whereas B as well as T cells present Mls-1 antigen in vivo. Deletion of Mls-1 reactive T cells in the thymus of newborn mice is induced by T cells rather than by B cells. Applying a recently developed method for measuring the Mls-1 response in Mls-1- mice we assessed the Mls-1 stimulatory activity of T and B cells quantitatively. B cells are significantly more effective than T cells in this process. Both Mls-1+ T and B cells are also capable of inducing Mls-1 anergy in Mls-1- mice. Remarkably few lymphoid cells from Mls-1+ animals are needed for this effect: a few thousand B cells or 10(4) to 10(5) T cells per mouse induce substantial Mls-1 anergy in Mls-1- mice. These low cellular requirements for Mls-1 anergy production correspond well to the low T cell requirements described for the induction of Mls-1 tolerance in newborn mice. However, the high efficacy of B cells in inducing peripheral Mls-1 anergy contrasts with their failure to induce neonatal tolerance in newborn animals. We attribute this discrepancy to the previous notion that stimulatory Mls-1 antigen is not delivered to the thymus and that B cells and T cells present qualitatively different Mls-1 related signals to Mls-1 reactive T cells.